Centre-based comparison of double versus single prevention strategy on transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus in at-risk haemopoietic stem cell transplant patients and a state survey on cytomegalovirus-seronegative ordering practises.

BACKGROUND: Universal leucocyte depletion reduces the risk of transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus; however, many clinicians still prescribe cytomegalovirus seronegative units. AIM: Our retrospective study aims to confirm the low risk of transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus with leucocyte depletion alone and demonstrate the ongoing variability in cytomegalovirus seronegative transfusion prescribing. METHODS: Over a 9-year period (July 2009-July 2018), occurrences of transfusion transmitted cytomegalovirus in cytomegalovirus seronegative donor/recipient haemopoietic stem cell transplant pairs were compared at one allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplant centre providing cytomegalovirus seronegative blood products and leucocyte depletion (double prevention) versus another providing leucocyte depletion only (single prevention). Retrospective chart audit identified patient demographics, blood product exposure and cytomegalovirus infection by polymerase chain reaction. A separate audit examined cytomegalovirus seronegative blood product ordering in a broader range of hospital types. RESULTS: We identified 122 and 66 cytomegalovirus-negative donor/recipient haemopoietic stem cell transplant pairs using double and single transfusion prevention strategy respectively. Transfusion exposure to red cells and pooled platelets was similar, although more apheresis platelets were used in the double prevention group. The cytomegalovirus infection rate was 3 (2.4%) and zero in the double and single prevention groups respectively. Cytomegalovirus seronegative unit ordering was not limited to hospitals with obstetric or neonatal populations, suggesting ongoing reliance of cytomegalovirus seronegative units outside this population. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis suggests a double prevention strategy does not provide additional protection against transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus. There is ongoing variability in the acceptance of leucocyte depletion alone despite the low risk of cytomegalovirus infection.

Cancer health professionals need funding, time, research knowledge and skills to be involved in health services research.

Inadequate knowledge about research processes within cancer health services has the potential to limit the development of evidence-based care. A survey was emailed to 201 health professionals working in cancer services in a major city to identify perceived levels of research knowledge and barriers to conducting research. Eighty-five people (42%) responded. Barriers to conducting research included time-constraints (84%), workload (72%), limited research funding (74%) and limited knowledge (34%). Gaps in research knowledge included performing quantitative analyses (79%), gaining funds (71%), using qualitative and quantitative research methods (62 and 67%) and formulating a research proposal (54%). More nurses reported having gaps in research knowledge than other professions. Two thirds (66%) of participants reported an interest in further education. There is a need for research training for practising health professionals and a focus on research as the basis for providing evidence-based care in undergraduate courses. Research, translation of research into practice and evidence-based care need to be incorporated into health professional roles throughout their careers.

Validation of a modified pre-lysis sample preparation technique for flow cytometric minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and B-non Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment of hematopoietic neoplasia below 10-4 requires more leukocytes than is usually attainable by post-lysis preparation. However, not all laboratories are resourced for consensus Euroflow pre-lysis methodology. Our study aim was to validate a modified pre-lysis protocol against our standard post-lysis method for MRD detection of multiple myeloma (MM), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and B-non Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), to meet demand for deeper MRD assessment by flow cytometry. METHOD: Clinical samples for MRD assessment of MM, CLL, and B-NHL (50, 30, and 30 cases, respectively) were prepared in parallel by pre and post-lysis methods for the initial validation. Total leukocytes, MRD, and median fluorescence intensity of antigen expression were compared as measures of sensitivity and antigen stability. Lymphocyte and granulocyte composition were compared, assessing relative sample processing stability. Sensitivity of the pre-lysis assay was monitored post validation for a further 18 months. RESULTS: Pre-lysis achieved at least 10-4 sensitivity in 85% MM, 81% CLL, and 90% B-NHL samples versus 24%, 48%, and 26% by post-lysis, respectively, with stable antigen expression and leukocyte composition. Post validation over 18 months with technical expertise improving, pre-lysis permitted 10-5 MRD assessment in 69%, 86%, and 82% of the respective patient groups. CONCLUSION: This modified pre-lysis procedure provides a sensitive, robust, time efficient, and relatively cost-effective alternative for MRD testing by MFC at 10-5 , facilitating clinically meaningful deeper response assessment for MM, CLL, and B-NHL. This method adaptation may facilitate more widespread adoption of highly sensitive flow cytometry-based MRD assessment.

Novel agents versus chemotherapy as frontline treatment of CLL.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a neoplastic disorder of mature B lymphocytes. While traditionally treated with combinations of chemoimmunotherapy, the therapeutic options for CLL have expanded in recent years with the emergence of novel oral agents, such as the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, that are well tolerated and highly efficacious. The role of novel agents in the first-line setting is now being investigated in head-to-head clinical trials. In this discussion paper, we consider the role of novel agents in the up-front setting, using three case studies of treatment-naive patients to highlight how choice of therapy may be individualized depending on the characteristics of the patient and the disease, as well as patient preferences.