A zero-exchange approach for left atrial access in pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an innovative technique for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Typically, a transeptal puncture (TSP) with a standard sheath precedes a switch to the larger diameter sheath in the left atrium. This study aimed to describe the safety and feasibility of direct TSP using the large diameter Faradrive sheath before performing PVI with PFA. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 166 consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI with PFA at our institution. TSP was performed in all cases with transesophageal echocardiography guidance, using the Faradrive sheath and a 98 cm matched Brockenbrough needle. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of pericardial tamponade during or within the first 48 h after the procedure. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of any major complication. RESULTS: All 166 patients were included into the final analysis (44% female): 64% of patients had paroxysmal AF and 36% persistent AF (68 ± 11 years old, median CHA2DS2Vasc Score 3, median left atrial volume index 31). The median duration of the procedure was 60 min, median time to TSP was 15 min, and the median fluoroscopy dose was 595 cGy × cm2. The primary endpoint occurred in one patient: a non-TSP related pericardial tamponade, which was managed with pericardial puncture. CONCLUSION: Direct TSP with skipping sheath exchange using the large diameter Faradrive sheath for PVI with PFA was safe, feasible, and reduced costs in all patients. Large scale studies and registries are needed to verify this workflow.

Case report: "A healthy woman with exertional dyspnea: Indication of a pacemaker or not?"

The selection of patients with chronotropic incompetence (CI) for cardiac pacing therapy remains challenging. Here, we present a case of a 40-year-old woman with severe exertional dyspnea. The exercise test revealed a blunted increase in the heart rate (HR) (maximum of 110 bpm). Her exercise capacity significantly improved under atrial stimulation at 170 bpm using a temporary pacing lead. Therefore, we implanted a rate-adaptive dual-chamber pacemaker with a blended sensor. During follow-up exercise capacity normalized, and she had no residual exertional dyspnea at 6 months. This case highlights the potential value for individual assessments of CI to identify clear indications for pacemaker implantation.

One-Year Course of Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results of a German Nationwide Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Periprocedural oral anticoagulation (OAC) strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures are changing rapidly. OBJECTIVE: To assess the management and course of periprocedural OAC for AF ablation procedures in experienced electrophysiology (EP) centers in Germany over the last 12 months. METHODS: The data are based on an electronic questionnaire, which was sent to 35 experienced EP centers in September 2018 and then exactly 1 year later. Participants provided information on their periprocedural OAC management, the handling with dual therapy (OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy), the availability of specific antidotes, the transseptal puncture approach, and noteworthy complications. RESULTS: Responses were received from all 35 centers and represent 10,010 AF ablation procedures annually. In 2018, the administration of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) was continued throughout the procedure at all centers (100%). In contrast, the majority of centers used minimally interrupted periprocedural non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) (54.3%), 13 centers (37.2%) completely interrupted NOAC, and only 3 centers (8.5%) continued NOAC throughout the procedure. At the 1-year follow-up survey, 32 centers were found to have continued their previous strategy of periprocedural OAC and 3 changed from a minimally interrupted to a continued NOAC strategy. Of note, 30 centers (85.7%) performed transseptal puncture fluoroscopically without additional cardiac imaging. In the setting of uninterrupted periprocedural OAC management, no relevant complications were noted. CONCLUSION: Our survey shows marked heterogeneous periprocedural OAC management at experienced EP centers in Germany. Whereas continuation of VKA has already been integrated into clinical practice, the majority of centers still use a minimally interrupted NOAC strategy.