Are nighttime respiratory symptoms assessed by asthma control test affected by comorbidities?

OBJECTIVE: Nocturnal symptoms are common in the asthmatic population, reflecting an exaggerated airway narrowing overnight due to several factors; it is questioned to what extent the awakenings documented in the clinical assessment of asthma control are due to the disease itself or to comorbidities. To answer this question, we aimed to evaluate to what proportion rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux and the likelihood of being affected by OSAS were related to poor asthma control, by means of ACT evaluation. METHODS: Asthmatics attending the outpatient clinic were enrolled and administered the following questionnaires: ACT, Total 5 Symptom Score, GERD Impact Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire. RESULTS: One-hundred consecutive patients (M/F: 42/58, mean age 52 ± 15 years) were recruited. According to the ACT findings, 14 asthmatics resulted as fully controlled (FC, ACT equal to 25), 55 partially controlled (PC, 25 < ACT >19) and 31 as uncontrolled (UC, ACT <19). GERD was not associated with the ACT score neither did rhinitic symptomatology. On the other hand, the PSQI scores appeared to significantly increase with the lack of symptom control: FC, 2.0 (1-4); PC, 3.5 (2-5); UC, 6.6 (4-8) (p = 0.002). The SA-SDQ questionnaire results significantly increased with the loss of asthma control: FC, 11.0 (9-12); PC, 12.5 (10-14); UC, 15.1 (14-16) (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm and extend previous findings showing that there is a higher likelihood that underlying unknown sleep disturbances worsen asthma control, suggesting that a more comprehensive assessment is necessary to clarify the cause of nocturnal symptoms in asthma.

Sustained remission induced by 2 years of treatment with benralizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and nasal polyposis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that benralizumab is characterized by a good profile of efficacy and safety, thereby being potentially able to elicit clinical remission on-treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). The main goal of this multicentre observational study was to verify the effectiveness of benralizumab in inducing a sustained remission on-treatment of SEA in patients with or without comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). METHODS: Throughout 2 years of treatment with benralizumab, a four-component evaluation of sustained remission of SEA was performed, including the assessment of SEA exacerbations, use of oral corticosteroids (OCSs), symptom control and lung function. RESULTS: The present study recruited 164 patients suffering from SEA. After 24 months of add-on biological therapy with benralizumab, 69 (42.1%) achieved the important target of sustained remission on-treatment (exacerbation rate = 0, OCS dose = 0, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥80% pred., ACT score ≥ 20). During the same period, a persistent improvement of CRSwNP (SNOT-22 < 30, NP recurrence = 0) was observed in 33 (40.2%) out of 82 subjects with concomitant NP. The latter comorbidity and post-bronchodilator reversibility of airflow limitation were two independent predictors of sustained remission on-treatment (OR = 2.32, p < 0.05 and OR = 5.59, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Taken together, the results of this real-life clinical investigation indicate that benralizumab can induce a sustained remission on-treatment of SEA, especially in those patients with comorbid CRSwNP and reversible airflow limitation.

Effectiveness of benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma: Distinct sub-phenotypes of response identified by cluster analysis.

BACKGROUND: Benralizumab is effective in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), but suboptimal responses are observed in some patients. Although several factors have been associated with benralizumab response, no cluster analysis has yet been undertaken to identify different responsiveness sub-phenotypes. OBJECTIVE: To identify SEA sub-phenotypes with differential responsiveness to benralizumab. METHODS: One hundred and five patients diagnosed with SEA who had completed 6 months of benralizumab treatment were included in a hierarchical cluster analysis based on a set of clinical variables that can be easily collected in routine practice (age, age at disease onset, disease length, allergen sensitization status, blood eosinophil count, IgE levels, FEV1 % predicted, nasal polyposis, bronchiectasis). RESULTS: Four clusters were identified: Clusters 2 and 3 included patients with high levels of both IgE and eosinophils (type-2 biomarkers high), whereas Clusters 1 and 4 included patients with only one type-2 biomarker at a high level: IgE in Cluster 1 and eosinophils in Cluster 4. Clusters 2 and 3 (both type-2 biomarkers high) showed the highest response rate to benralizumab in terms of elimination of exacerbations (79% and 80% respectively) compared to Clusters 1 and 4 (52% and 60% respectively). When super-response (the absence of exacerbation without oral corticosteroid use) was assessed, Cluster 2, including patients with more preserved lung function than the other clusters, but comparable exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroid use and symptom severity, was the most responsive cluster (87.5% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Our cluster analysis identified benralizumab differential response sub-phenotypes in SEA, with the potential of improving disease treatment and precision management.

Management of severe asthma during the first lockdown phase of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Tips for facing the second wave.

SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has contributed to implement telemedicine, allowing clinicians to follow the patient remotely, therefore minimizing the risk of any exposure to positive COVID-19 patients. We summarize the approaches adopted to treat and monitor severe asthmatic patients during the lockdown phase of the pandemic. Our experience supports the strategy that every effort should be made to minimize patient contact with the health-care system, planning a pathway that allows patients to receive appropriate medical care and continue the biological therapies, thus preventing the loss of disease control and acute severe exacerbations.

Does the frequency of switching inhalers represent a predictive factor of exacerbation in asthma?

OBJECTIVE: Management of asthma includes monitoring of inhaler technique and level of adherence to treatment. Both factors could be influenced by high frequency of switching inhaler devices. We explored whether switching inhalers is an independent predictive factor of exacerbations. METHODS: Data were collected from 2015 to 2017 from the outpatient clinic of asthma at the University of Palermo, Italy. This observational study consisted of two phases: Phase 1 included subjects of at least three visits in the previous year who reported the frequency of inhalers switched; Phase 2 included subjects of at least two visits during the second year, and the rate of switches and exacerbations was recorded. We included adult (24-84 years old) mild/moderate asthmatics under regular inhaled treatment; uncontrolled asthma was defined as poor symptom control, exacerbations (≥2/year) requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS), or serious exacerbations (≥1/year) requiring hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 109 records were retrieved for the analysis. A significant correlation between the rate of switches in Phase 1 and exacerbations in Phase 2 was found (p = 0.001). Age and the rates of exacerbations in Phase 1 were also independently associated with a higher number of exacerbations in Phase 2 (p < 0.0001). The multivariate regression model showed that the numbers of switches, as well as exacerbations in Phase 1, were independently correlated to the number of exacerbations in Phase 2 (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of switching inhalers independently affects the risk of exacerbations in asthma. These results imply that changing inhaler requires careful management in clinical practice.

Severe asthma and COVID-19: lessons from the first wave.

OBJECTIVE: Severe asthma is considered a risk factor for SARS-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection but scientific evidences are lacking. METHODS: we performed a literature search and review based on PubMed database national, international recommendations as well as papers on severe asthmatic patients and their management during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. RESULTS: the majority of international recommendations, expert panels and editorials provide indications about management of severe asthmatic patients. No published studies evaluated the effects of biologic agents on severe asthmatic patients during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and asthma is variable worldwide and severe asthmatic patients were seldom reported in published cohorts. International recommendations suggest maintaining asthma under control to limit exacerbations occurrence, by using all available treatment. The minimum steroid dosage effective to control symptoms should be maintained to avoid exacerbations; biologic agents administration should be regularly scheduled encouraging patient support programmes.

Applicability of the MASK-Air® App to Severe Asthma Treated with Biologic Molecules: A Pilot Study.

MASK-air®, a good practice of the DG Santé, has been fully validated in allergic rhinitis, but little is known about its applicability to asthmatics. We explored whether the MASK-air® application is applicable to patients with severe asthma. Severe asthmatics were proposed to use the MASK-air® application for 6 months, along with best practice treatment. Treatment of the patients was not changed based on the application results. The evolution of the visual analogue scales (VAS) for asthma, shortness of breath, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, work, and sleep was monitored using MASK-air®. Adherence to MASK-air® and to the asthma treatment was also checked. Thirteen patients reported on 1229 days of MASK-air® use. The average application adherence was 51.8% (range: 19.7-98.9%). There was no correlation between application and medication adherence. Highly variably trends were found for the VAS for asthma. Five patients had over 90% well-controlled days, four had well- or moderately controlled asthma (with up to 20% uncontrolled days), one patient had moderately controlled asthma with approximately 20% uncontrolled days, and one patient had 80% uncontrolled days. Highly significant correlations were found for the VAS for asthma, and other patients reported VASs for work, dyspnea, sleep, and rhinitis. MASK-air® can be used in patients with severe asthma. VAS asthma appears to be an interesting patient-reported outcome highly correlated with dyspnea and impacts on work. Adherence to the application was better than that for rhinitis, but it needs to be improved.

The impact of SARS-COV2 pandemic on the management oF IPF patients: Our narrative experience.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has changed the health-care systems around the world in a remarkable way. We describe the strategies adopted to cope with the limitations imposed by the pandemic to the access to health care by patients diagnosed with idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis including IPF patients under antifibrotic drugs (nintedanib and pirfenidone) that accessed to the Outpatient clinic of the University of Palermo, Italy. Patients received a phone number and an email address in case of any urgency and a virtual meeting was settled up monthly. RESULTS: 40 patients (M/F: 30/10) were followed up, 33 under nintedanib treatment, 7 under pirfenidone. Among patients under nintedanib, 1 patient reported high fever (T max 39 °C) and purulent sputum with no sign of infections, 1 had hemoptysis that was spontaneously resolved. 2 patients accessed to the emergency department for the worsening of dyspnea; 5 patients had diarrhea that resolved with symptomatic drugs in few days. 3 patients had an increase of alkaline phosphatase levels, leading to the withdrawal of the antifibrotic drug for 15 days, and subsequent normalization of the plasmatic levels. Among patients under pirfenidone, one subject had an increase of ferritin serum levels with no symptoms. The remaining subjects were in stable clinical conditions. None of the patients reported hospitalization or exacerbations, and did not experience antifibrotic withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to demonstrate that by implementing alternative ways to monitor the disease, patients did not incur in increased rates of acute exacerbations or higher frequency of side effects and antifibrotic treatment withdrawal.

Management of suspected COVID-19 patients in a low prevalence region.

The spread of the SARS-CoV-2 infection among population has imposed a re-organization of healthcare services, aiming at stratifying patients and dedicating specific areas where patients with suspected COVID-related respiratory disease could receive the necessary health care assistance while waiting for the confirmation of the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. In this scenario, the pathway defined as a "grey zone" is strongly advocated. We describe the application of rules and pathways in a regional context with low diffusion of the infection among the general population in the attempt to provide the best care to respiratory patients with suspected COVID-19. To date, this process has avoided the worst-case scenario of intra-hospital epidemic outbreak.

Serum lipoproteins are not associated with the severity of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the bronchi with a complicated and largely unknown pathogenesis. In this context, an emerging role is attributed to the apolipoproteins which serve as structural components of plasma lipoproteins. Low density lipoproteins (LDL) may be involved in the inflammatory pathways of the asthmatic airways; in particular, small dense LDL (sdLDL) particles were associated with increased oxidative susceptibility compared to medium and large sized LDL. In our previous study, we found a positive correlation between forced expiratory volume 1 s (FEV1) % predicted and larger LDL particles (LDL-1), and an inverse correlation between FEV1% predicted and sdLDL (LDL-3) in mild, untreated asthmatics. Although LDL appear to be important modulators of inflammation, data on their clinical implications are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to investigate whether LDL subclasses correlate with the severity of asthma, assuming that the atherogenic and most pro-inflammatory LDL contribute to ignite and perpetuate the airway inflammatory processes. METHODS: The study was conducted in one visit, and included clinical and lung functional assessments, as well as measurements of serum concentrations of the LDL subclasses. Non-denaturing, linear polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to separate and measure LDL subclasses, with the LipoPrint© System (Quantimetrix Corporation, Redondo Beach, CA, USA). LDL subclasses were distributed as seven bands (LDL-1 to LDL-7), LDL-1 and -2 being defined as large LDL (least pro-inflammatory), and LDL-3 to 7 defined as sdLDL (most pro-inflammatory). RESULTS: 70 asthmatics under inhaled treatment (M/F: 35/35) were enrolled; 10 healthy subjects (M/F: 3/7) served as controls. In the asthmatic group, FEV1% predicted was 81 ±â€¯22% (mean ±â€¯SD), vital capacity (VC) % predicted was 97 ±â€¯18%, and FEV1/FVC was 0.68 ±â€¯0.1. The mean asthma control test (ACT) score was 18 ±â€¯5. LDL-1 were significantly lower in asthmatics as compared to controls (18 ±â€¯4% vs. 22 ±â€¯4%, p = 0.008). On the contrary, LDL-2 (12 ±â€¯4% vs. 12 ±â€¯5%) and LDL-3 (3 ±â€¯3% vs. 2 ±â€¯2%) were not statistically different between the two groups; smaller subclasses were undetectable. To comply with the design of the study, subjects were classified according to their degree of severity into the 5 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps: Step 1 (M/F: 4/3, 44 ±â€¯12 yrs), Step 2 (M/F: 1/2, 37 ±â€¯11 yrs), Step 3 (M/F: 12/7, 47 ±â€¯12 yrs), Step 4 (M/F: 8/15, 54 ±â€¯12 yrs), and Step 5 (M/F: 7/9, 56 ±â€¯9 yrs). None of the LDL subclasses showed significant differences between classes of severity: LDL-1 were 16.1 ±â€¯5.6% in Step 1, 18 ±â€¯2.8% in Step 2, 16.7 ±â€¯3.7% in Step 3, 18 ±â€¯3.3% in Step 4, and 19.5 ±â€¯3.2% in Step 5 (p = NS); LDL2 were 14 ±â€¯3.6%, 15 ±â€¯3.4%, 12.4 ±â€¯5.3%, 12.7 ±â€¯4.4% and 11.3 ±â€¯4.2%, respectively (p = NS); LDL3 were 5 ±â€¯5.2%, 4.4 ±â€¯2.6%, 3.3 ±â€¯3.6%, 3.2 ±â€¯2.6% and 2.4 ±â€¯1.8%, p = NS. Finally, no relationship was detected between LDL subclasses and lung function parameters as well as the ACT scores. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings confirm a role of LDL as a potential biomarker in the diagnostic process for asthma, and suggest that LDL cannot be used as marker of severity of the disease.

Sleep Disturbances in COPD are Associated with Heterogeneity of Airway Obstruction.

Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) experience sleep disturbances due to the impact of respiratory symptoms on sleep quality. We explored whether sleep disturbances in COPD are linked to heterogeneity of airway constriction. The impact of breathing problems on sleep quality was measured in consecutive COPD outpatients with the COPD and Asthma Sleep Impact Scale (CASIS) questionnaire. Impulse oscillometry technique (IOS) was employed to assess heterogeneity of airway constriction. Subjects with a previous or concomitant diagnosis of asthma or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were excluded. Fifty COPD subjects (M/F 40/10; age: 71 ± 8 yrs, Body Mass Index (BMI): 26.2 ± 4.7 kg/m2, Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1): 65 ± 25% predicted; mean ± SD) were enrolled. The mean CASIS score was 36 ± 3.3, and the R5-R20 value was 0.2 ± 0.15 kPa s L-1. The CASIS score was significantly higher in subjects with increased R5-R20 (>0.07 kPa s L-1) (39 ± 24; p = 0.02) compared to normal R5-R20 (21 ± 17). When subjects were categorized on the basis of lung function in severely versus non severely obstructed (FEV1 ≤ or >50% predicted) or air trappers versus non air trappers (Residual Volume, RV ≥ or <120% predicted) the CASIS score remained unchanged (for FEV1: 37 ± 23 versus 33 ± 25, respectively, p = 0.61; for RV: 30 ± 20 versus 40 ± 23, p = 0.16). Sleep disturbances due to COPD symptoms are associated with heterogeneity of airway constriction, possibly reflecting peripheral airway dysfunction.

Inhalation therapy in the next decade: Determinants of adherence to treatment in asthma and COPD.

Proceedings of the European Seminars in Respiratory Medicine course, Inhalation therapy in the next decade: Determinants of adherence to treatment in asthma and COPD, held in Taormina, Italy, on 3-4 March, 2017.

How to unveil chronic respiratory diseases in clinical practice? A model of alliance between general practitioners and pulmonologists.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma and COPD are under-diagnosed and undertreated in adult populations, mainly due to the discrepancy between guideline recommendations and clinicians' practices. One of the reasons of this discrepancy is the difficulty encountered in real life in sharing the management of chronic respiratory diseases between general practitioners (GPs) and respiratory physicians. METHODS: An explorative, population-based investigation was performed to test whether, and to what extent, an active collaboration between GPs and pulmonologists increases the diagnosis and proper treatment of chronic obstructive airway diseases. The "COPD action" involved an in-house intervention by pulmonologists who trained GPs on how to diagnose the disease and interpret the spirometry, yielding a final agreed diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 210 subjects (M/F: 156/54; age: 62.5 ± 13.8, mean ± SD) were consecutively invited by 20 GPs and classified in a) healthy, b) symptomatic with no airway obstruction, and 3) affected by chronic respiratory diseases. 11% of previously defined "healthy" subjects were diagnosed with COPD, and symptomatic subjects were diagnosed with asthma (20%) or COPD (23%). In addition, in those who already carried a diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases as judged by GPs, the diagnosis of COPD decreased significantly after respiratory specialist intervention (p = 0.001), in favor of asthma and chronic bronchitis. Furthermore, following the clinical and lung function assessments performed by the respiratory physicians, changes in inhaled treatments were statistically significant for each therapeutic category (test-retest reliability: r = 0.42; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the collaboration between GPs and pulmonologists based on a pro-active approach to the individuals attending the primary care offices followed by an in-house intervention by specialists may largely improve the diagnosis and management of chronic respiratory diseases.

Asthma management in a specialist setting: Results of an Italian Respiratory Society survey.

BACKGROUND: Asthma considerably impairs patients' quality of life and increases healthcare costs. Severity, morbidity, and degree of disease control are the major drivers of its clinical and economic impact. National scientific societies are required to monitor the application of international guidelines and to adopt strategies to improve disease control and better allocate resources. AIM: to provide a detailed picture of the characteristics of asthma patients and modalities of asthma management by specialists in Italy and to develop recommendations for the daily management of asthma in a specialist setting. METHOD: A quantitative research program was implemented. Data were collected using an ad hoc questionnaire developed by a group of specialists selected by the Italian Pneumology Society/Italian Respiratory Society. RESULTS: The records of 557 patients were analyzed. In the next few years, specialists are expected to focus their activity patients with more severe disease and will be responsible for selection of patients for personalized biological therapy; however, only 20% of patients attending Italian specialist surgery can be considered severe. In 84.4% of cases, the visit was a follow-up visit requested in 82.2% of cases by the specialist him/herself. The Asthma Control Test is used only in 65% of patients. When available, a significant association has been observed between the test score and asthma control as judged by the physician, although concordance was only moderate (κ = 0.68). Asthma was considered uncontrolled by the specialist managing the case in 29.1% of patients; nevertheless, treatment was not stepped up in uncontrolled or partly controlled patients (modified in only 37.2% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey support re-evaluation of asthma management by Italian specialists. More resources should be made available for the initial visit and for more severely ill patients. In addition, more extensive use should be made of validated tools, and available drugs should be used more appropriately.

Which factors affect the choice of the inhaler in chronic obstructive respiratory diseases?

Inhalation is the preferred route of drug administration in chronic respiratory diseases because it optimises delivery of the active compounds to the targeted site and minimises side effects from systemic distribution. The choice of a device should be made after careful evaluation of the patient's clinical condition (degree of airway obstruction, comorbidities), as well as their ability to coordinate the inhalation manoeuvre and to generate sufficient inspiratory flow. These patient factors must be aligned with the specific advantages and limitations of each inhaler when making this important choice. Finally, adherence to treatment is not the responsibility of the patient alone, but should be shared also by clinicians. Clinicians have access to a wide selection of pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) that can be used effectively when matched to the needs of individual patients; this should be perceived as an opportunity rather than a limitation.

Patients with bronchiectasis have a lower combined risk of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular comorbidity compared to patients with COPD.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic respiratory diseases are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD); however, it is unknown whether some respiratory diseases are at higher risk than others. In this perspective, head-to-head studies comparing bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are encouraged. We explored whether the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia) and cardiovascular comorbidity (systemic hypertension, ischemic heart diseases, cardiac arrhythmia, stroke) are different in these two diseases. METHODS: The present retrospective case-control study aimed to compare patients with bronchiectasis with age and sex-matched individuals with COPD. A total of 63 patients with bronchiectasis and 63 with COPD were retained for analysis. RESULTS: Patients with bronchiectasis had a lower risk of systemic hypertension (OR 0.42 (C.I. 0.20 to 0.87)) and diabetes mellitus (OR 0.28 (C.I. 0.09 to 0.81)). In contrast, ischemic heart diseases, cardiac arrhythmia, stroke, and hyperlipidemia did not differ between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, male sex, and COPD remain independent risk factors for having at least one condition of a composite index including the above-mentioned CVD and CV risk factors. In detail, a patient with COPD has a risk of 4.648 times (C.I. 1.48 to 15.78) for having at least one CVD compared with a patient with bronchiectasis. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that subjects with bronchiectasis may experience lower cardiovascular risk than those with COPD. Larger studies are needed to confirm this preliminary observation and its clinical implications.

Relevance of individual bronchial symptoms for asthma diagnosis and control in patients with rhinitis: A MASK-air study.

RATIONALE: It is unclear how each individual asthma symptom is associated with asthma diagnosis or control. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of individual asthma symptoms in the identification of patients with asthma and their association with asthma control. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed real-world data using the MASK-air® app. We compared the frequency of occurrence of five asthma symptoms (dyspnea, wheezing, chest tightness, fatigue and night symptoms, as assessed by the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test [CARAT] questionnaire) in patients with probable, possible or no current asthma. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of each symptom, and assessed the association between each symptom and asthma control (measured using the e-DASTHMA score). Results were validated in a sample of patients with a physician-established diagnosis of asthma. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 951 patients (2153 CARAT assessments), with 468 having probable asthma, 166 possible asthma and 317 no evidence of asthma. Wheezing displayed the highest specificity (90.5%) and positive predictive value (90.8%). In patients with probable asthma, dyspnea and chest tightness were more strongly associated with asthma control than other symptoms. Dyspnea was the symptom with the highest sensitivity (76.1%) and the one consistently associated with the control of asthma as assessed by e-DASTHMA. Consistent results were observed when assessing patients with a physician-made diagnosis of asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Wheezing and chest tightness were the asthma symptoms with the highest specificity for asthma diagnosis, while dyspnea displayed the highest sensitivity and strongest association with asthma control.

Exhaled nitric oxide is associated with cyclic changes in sexual hormones.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that changes in the levels of sexual hormones during the menstrual cycle influence the concentration of nitric oxide in the exhaled air (FeNO) and alveolar exhaled nitric oxide (CANO). METHODS: Twelve healthy, non allergic women in their reproductive age (age range 25-37 years) were recruited. Subjects were studied, on alternate days, over the course of their menstrual cycle. At each visit, measurements of FeNO and CANO were performed. Progesterone and 17-ß-estradiol concentrations were measured in salivary samples. RESULTS: Eight subjects completed the study. The levels of FeNO and CANO were 13 ± 4.7 pbb and 3.5 ± 1.9 pbb, respectively (mean ± SD). The mean salivary concentration of progesterone was 65.1 ± 16.2 pg/ml (mean ± SD), with a range of 32.4-107.7 pg/ml, and the concentration of 17 ß-estradiol was 6.0 ± 1.6 pg/ml, with a range of 3.1-12.9 pg/ml. The Generalized Estimating Equations procedure demonstrated that levels of progesterone influenced both FeNO and CANO (Wald χ2 = 11.60, p = 0.001; and Wald χ2 = 87.55, p = 0.001, respectively). On the contrary, the salivary levels of 17 ß-estradiol were not significantly associated with FeNO (Wald χ2 = 0.087, p = 0.768) or CANO (Wald χ2 = 0.58, p = 0.448). CONCLUSION: In healthy women, the menstrual cycle-associated hormonal fluctuations selectively influence the levels of bronchial and alveolar NO. The current findings may have important clinical implications for the interpretation of eNO levels, by identifying a patient-related factor that influences the eNO measurements.

Airway distensibility by HRCT in asthmatics and COPD with comparable airway obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Decreased airway distensibility (AD) in response to deep inspirations, as assessed by HRCT, has been associated with the severity of asthma and COPD. AIMS: The current study was designed to compare the magnitude of AD by HRCT in individuals with asthma and COPD with comparable degrees of bronchial obstruction, and to explore factors that may influence it. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 12 asthmatics (M/F:7/5) and 8 COPD (7/1) with comparable degree of bronchial obstruction (FEV1% predicted mean ± SEM: 69.1 ± 5.2% and 61.2 ± 5.0%, respectively; p = 0.31). Each subject underwent chest HRCT at FRC and at TLC. A total of 701 airways (range 20 to 38 airway per subject; 2.0 to 23.1 mm in diameter) were analyzed. AD did not differ between asthmatics and COPD (mean ± SEM: 14 ± 3.5% and 17 ± 4.3%, respectively; p = 0.58). In asthmatics, AD was significantly associated with FEV1% predicted (r(2) = 0.45, p = 0.018). We found a significant correlation between the change in lung volume and the change in AD by HRCT (r(2) = 0.64, p = 0.002). In COPD, we found significant correlations between AD and the RV% predicted (r(2) = 0.51, p = 0.046) and the RV/TLC (r(2) = 0.68, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: AD was primarily affected by the dynamic ability to change lung volumes in asthmatics, and by static lung volumes in COPD.

Coronavirus disease 2019 and severe asthma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the most severe forms of asthma has been an object of discussion. Indeed, it is not clear whether asthma is among the risk factors for the occurrence of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, or rather it plays a protective role against the worsening of the respiratory involvement in the SARS-CoV-2 infection. On the other hand, the extent to which coronavirus infection may trigger asthma attacks is still partly unknown. The current investigation aims at reviewing the available literature on the topic to address factors influencing this relationship. RECENT FINDINGS: Based on recent observations, it is likely that type 2 inflammation plays a protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease. In particular, asthmatics show different expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme2 (ACE2) and Transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2) that are responsible for a reduced risk of infection as well as lower risk of hospitalization. Interestingly, studies showed a safe profile of inhaled corticosteroids and biological drugs in SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, inhaled corticosteroid could play a protective role against worsening of asthma. SUMMARY: The current findings suggest that current treatment for asthma should be maintained to avoid severe exacerbations. Severe asthmatics under biological treatment should continue their medications, and be encouraged to receive COVID-19 vaccines.