Connexin-36-positive gap junctions in ventral tegmental area GABA neurons sustain opiate dependence.

Drug dependence is characterized by a switch in motivation wherein a positively reinforcing substance can become negatively reinforcing. Put differently, drug use can transform from a form of pleasure-seeking to a form of relief-seeking. Ventral tegmental area (VTA) GABA neurons form an anatomical point of divergence between two double dissociable pathways that have been shown to be functionally implicated and necessary for these respective motivations to seek drugs. The tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus (TPP) is necessary for opiate conditioned place preferences (CPP) in previously drug-naïve rats and mice, whereas dopaminergic (DA) transmission in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is necessary for opiate CPP in opiate-dependent and withdrawn (ODW) rats and mice. Here, we show that this switch in functional anatomy is contingent upon the gap junction-forming protein, connexin-36 (Cx36), in VTA GABA neurons. Intra-VTA infusions of the Cx36 blocker, mefloquine, in ODW rats resulted in a reversion to a drug-naïve-like state wherein the TPP was necessary for opiate CPP and where opiate withdrawal aversions were lost. Consistent with these data, conditional knockout mice lacking Cx36 in GABA neurons (GAD65-Cre;Cx36 fl(CFP)/fl(CFP)) exhibited a perpetual drug-naïve-like state wherein opiate CPP was always DA independent, and opiate withdrawal aversions were absent even in mice subjected to an opiate dependence and withdrawal induction protocol. Further, viral-mediated rescue of Cx36 in VTA GABA neurons was sufficient to restore their susceptibility to an ODW state wherein opiate CPP was DA dependent. Our findings reveal a functional role for VTA gap junctions that has eluded prevailing circuit models of addiction.

On-admission anemia predicts mortality in COVID-19 patients: A single center, retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the impact of anemia based on admission hemoglobin (Hb) level as a prognostic risk factor for severe outcomes in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from a random sample of 733 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) obtained from a total of 4356 laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases who presented to the Emergency Department of Montefiore Medical Center between March-June 2020. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of in-hospital severe outcomes of COVID-19. A secondary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among the 733 patients included in our final analysis, 438 patients (59.8%) presented with anemia. 105 patients (14.3%) had mild, and 333 patients (45.5%) had moderate-severe anemia. Overall, 437 patients (59.6%) had a composite endpoint of severe outcomes. On-admission anemia was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, (Odds Ratio 1.52, 95% CI [1.01-2.30], p = 0.046) but not for composite severe outcomes. However, moderate-severe anemia (Hb < 11 g/dL) on admission was independently associated with both severe outcomes (OR1.53, 95% CI [1.05-2.23], p = 0.028) and mortality (OR 1.67, 95% CI [1.09-2.56], p = 0.019) during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Anemia on admission was independently associated with increased odds of all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Furthermore, moderate-severe anemia (Hb <11 g/dL) was an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19 outcomes. Moving forward, COVID-19 patient management and risk stratification may benefit from addressing anemia on admission.

Segregation of caffeine reward and aversion in the rat nucleus accumbens shell versus core.

Caffeine, the most commonly consumed psychoactive drug in the world, is readily available in dietary sources, including soft drinks, chocolate, tea and coffee. However, little is known about the neural substrates that underlie caffeine's rewarding and aversive properties and what ultimately leads us to seek or avoid caffeine consumption. Using male Wistar rats in a place conditioning procedure, we show that systemic caffeine at a low intraperitoneal dose of 2 mg/kg (or 100 µM injected directly into the rostral, but not caudal, portion of the ventral tegmental area) produced conditioned place preferences. By contrast, high doses of systemic caffeine at 10 and 30 mg/kg produced conditioned place aversions. These aversions were not recapitulated by a caffeine analog restricted to the periphery. Both caffeine reward and aversion were blocked by systemic D1-like receptor antagonism using SCH23390, while systemic D2-like receptor antagonism with eticlopride had smaller effects on caffeine motivation. Most important, we demonstrated that pharmacological blockade of dopamine receptors using α-flupenthixol injected into the nucleus accumbens shell, but not core, blocked caffeine-conditioned place preferences. Conversely, α-flupenthixol injected into the nucleus accumbens core, but not shell, blocked caffeine-conditioned place aversions. Thus, our findings reveal two dopamine-dependent and functionally dissociable mechanisms for processing caffeine motivation, which are segregated between nucleus accumbens subregions. These data provide novel evidence for the roles of the nucleus accumbens subregions in mediating approach and avoidance behaviours for caffeine.

Deletion of α5 nicotine receptor subunits abolishes nicotinic aversive motivational effects in a manner that phenocopies dopamine receptor antagonism.

Nicotine addiction is a worldwide epidemic that claims millions of lives each year. Genetic deletion of α5 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits has been associated with increased nicotine intake, however, it remains unclear whether acute nicotine is less aversive or more rewarding, and whether mice lacking the α5 nAChR subunit can experience withdrawal from chronic nicotine. We used place conditioning and conditioned taste avoidance paradigms to examine the effect of α5 subunit-containing nAChR deletion (α5 -/-) on conditioned approach and avoidance behaviour in nondependent and nicotine-dependent and -withdrawn mice, and compared these motivational effects with those elicited after dopamine receptor antagonism. We show that nondependent α5 -/- mice find low, non-motivational doses of nicotine rewarding, and do not show an aversive conditioned response or taste avoidance to higher aversive doses of nicotine. Furthermore, nicotine-dependent α5 -/- mice do not show a conditioned aversive motivational response to withdrawal from chronic nicotine, although they continue to exhibit a somatic withdrawal syndrome. These effects phenocopy those observed after dopamine receptor antagonism, but are not additive, suggesting that α5 nAChR subunits act in the same pathway as dopamine and are critical for the experience of nicotine's aversive, but not rewarding motivational effects in both a nondependent and nicotine-dependent and -withdrawn motivational state. Genetic deletion of α5 nAChR subunits leads to a behavioural phenotype that exactly matches that observed after antagonizing dopamine receptors, thus we suggest that modulation of nicotinic receptors containing α5 subunits may modify dopaminergic signalling, suggesting novel therapeutic treatments for smoking cessation.

NCX 667, a Novel Nitric Oxide Donor, Lowers Intraocular Pressure in Rabbits, Dogs, and Non-Human Primates and Enhances TGFß2-Induced Outflow in HTM/HSC Constructs.

Purpose: NCX 667, a novel nitric oxide (NO) donor with an isomannide core, was characterized for its IOP-lowering ability in animal models of ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Bioengineered human trabecular meshwork/Schlemm's canal (HTM/HSC) constructs were used to explore the mode of action. Methods: Ocular normotensive New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits (ONT-rabbits), spontaneously ocular hypertensive pigmented Dutch-belted rabbits (sOHT-rabbits), hypertonic saline (5%)-induced transient ocular hypertensive NZW rabbits (tOHT-rabbits), ocular normotensive Beagle dogs (ONT-dogs), and laser-induced ocular hypertensive cynomolgus monkeys (OHT-monkeys) were used. NCX 667 or vehicle (30 µL) was instilled in a crossover, masked fashion and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured before dosing (baseline) and for several hours thereafter. The ONT-rabbits were used for cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) determination in ocular tissues after ocular dosing with NCX 667. Transforming growth factor-beta2 (TGFß2) (2.5 ng/mL, six days)-treated HTM/HSC constructs were used to address changes in outflow facility. Results: NCX 667 resulted in robust and dose-dependent IOP decrease in all models used. Maximal IOP-lowering efficacy at 1% was -4.1 ± 0.6, -12.2 ± 2.7, -10.5 ± 2.0, -5.3 ± 0.8, and -6.6 ± 1.9 mmHg, respectively, in ONT-dogs, sOHT-rabbits, tOHT-rabbits, ONT-rabbits, and OHT-monkeys. In ONT-rabbits NCX 667 (1%) increased cGMP in aqueous humor (AH) but not in retina and iris/ciliary body. NCX 667 concentration-dependently increased outflow facility in TGFß2-treated HTM/HSC constructs (outflow facility, 0.10 ± 0.06 and 0.30 ± 0.10 µL/min/mmHg/mm2, respectively, in vehicle- and NCX 667-treated constructs). Conclusions: NCX 667 leads to robust IOP lowering in several animal models. Evidence in HTM/HSC constructs indicate that the IOP reduction likely results from NO-mediated increase of the conventional outflow pathway. Other mechanisms including changes in AH production and episcleral vein pressure may not be excluded at this time.

NCX 1741, a Novel Nitric Oxide-Donating Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor, Exerts Rapid and Long-Lasting Intraocular Pressure-Lowering in Cynomolgus Monkeys.

Purpose: We studied the IOP-lowering effects of NCX 1741, a novel nitric oxide (NO)-donating derivative of the phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, avanafil, in Cynomolgus monkey with laser-induced ocular hypertension (OHT-monkeys). NCX 1193 (NO-donating moiety), NCX 1744 (NCX 1741 without ester nitrate moiety), and travoprost (PGF2α analogue) were used for comparison. Ocular exposure after NCX 1741 dosing also was addressed. Methods: Vehicle (phosphate buffer pH 6.0, Kolliphor® 5%, DMSO 0.3%, benzalkonium chloride 0.02%), NCX 1741, NCX 1193, NCX 1744, or travoprost were instilled (30 µL; single dose) masked and conscious IOPs were measured by pneumatonometry. LC-MS/MS-based methods were employed to monitor ocular exposure of NCX 1741 and main metabolites after ocular dosing in New Zealand White rabbits. Results: NCX 1741 (2.2%, 0.8 µmol/eye) lowered IOP with an Emax (ΔΔIOP, IOP change vs. pre-dose and vehicle) between 5 and 8 h post-dosing (ΔΔIOP5h, -5.3 ± 2.0 mmHg and ΔΔIOP8h, -6.0 ± 2.1 mmHg). Conversely, equimolar (0.47%, 0.8 µmol/eye) NCX 1193 IOP-lowering effects were maximal 3 h post-dosing (ΔΔIOP3h, -4.7 ± 1.6 mmHg) and declined thereafter (ΔΔIOP5h, -1.6 ± 1.1 mmHg). In a follow-up study, NCX 1741 (1.5%, 0.5 µmol/eye) was more effective than NCX 1744 despite a similar duration. Further, NCX 1741 was as effective as travoprost (0.1%, 0.06 µmol/eye) at 5 and 8 h post-dosing (travoprost, ΔΔIOP5h, -3.4 ± 2.2 mmHg and ΔΔIOP8h, -4.9 ± 1.3 mmHg) but had shorter duration (NCX 1741, ΔΔIOP24h, -1.5 ± 1.1 mmHg; travoprost, ΔΔIOP24h, -7.1 ± 2.8 mmHg). NCX 1741 resulted in significant aqueous humor exposure, as determined by the levels of the main metabolite, avanafil. Conclusions: NCX 1741 rapidly and effectively lowers IOP in OHT-monkeys for several hours post-dosing. How these effects translate in humans is still to be defined.

Prostaglandin analogues and nitric oxide contribution in the treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

In patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma, all treatments aim to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) by modulating aqueous humour (AH) production and/or uveoscleral and trabecular meshwork/Schlemm's canal AH drainage. PG analogues are considered to be the 'gold standard' treatment and are the most frequently used IOP-lowering agents. Recent data support an important role for NO in regulating IOP. Thus, novel PG analogues carrying a NO-donating moiety were recently advanced. Latanoprostene bunod (LBN) and NCX 470, NO-donating derivatives of latanoprost and bimatoprost, respectively, are examples of such compounds. LBN ophthalmic solution, 0.024% (Vyzulta™), showed greater IOP-lowering efficacy compared with that of Xalatan® (latanoprost ophthalmic solution, 0.005%) or 0.5% timolol maleate in clinical settings. NCX 470 was found to be more effective than bimatoprost in animal models of ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Selective EP2 receptor agonists (i.e. taprenepag isopropyl, omidenepag isopropyl and aganepag isopropyl) and non-selective prostanoid receptor agonists (i.e. ONO-9054, sepetaprost isopropyl) that concomitantly stimulate FP and EP3 receptors have also been shown to hold promise as effective IOP-lowering agents. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Eicosanoids 35 years from the 1982 Nobel: where are we now? To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.8/issuetoc.

Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination compared with brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5%.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination with brinzolamide 1% or timolol 0.5% alone in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, parallel group, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-three patients were randomized to the study treatments. METHODS: Patients with OAG or OHT were recruited to the study. Qualifying eyes had IOPs of 24 to 36 mmHg at 8 am and 21 to 36 mmHg at 10 am on 2 eligibility visits after an appropriate washout period from previous treatment. Patients were assigned randomly to either brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5%, brinzolamide 1% (Azopt; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX), or timolol 0.5%, dosed twice daily and were followed up while receiving therapy for 6 months. At selected sites, additional IOP measurements were performed at 12 pm, 4 pm, and 8 pm during the 2 eligibility visits, at month 3, and at month 6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean IOP. RESULTS: Brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% produced statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions from baseline ranging from 8.0 to 8.7 mmHg, which were statistically and clinically superior to that of either brinzolamide 1% (5.1-5.6 mmHg) or timolol 0.5% (5.7-6.9 mmHg). No safety concerns were identified based on an assessment of ocular and cardiovascular parameters and a review of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Brinzolamide 1%/timolol 05% is superior in IOP-lowering efficacy to either brinzolamide 1% or timolol 0.5%.

Effects of travoprost on aqueous humor dynamics in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: To determine the mechanism by which travoprost 0.004% reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open angle glaucoma. DESIGN: This is a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, single center study of 26 patients scheduled for 3 visits (baseline, day 15, and days 17 to 18) following screening. METHODS: After appropriate washout of all ocular medications, baseline IOPs were taken and travoprost 0.004% was administered once-daily in the evening for 17 consecutive doses to 1 eye and its vehicle to the fellow eye in a randomized, masked fashion. On day 15, beginning 12 hours after the 14th consecutive dose, IOP was measured by pneumatonometry, aqueous flow and outflow facility by fluorophotometry, and episcleral venous pressure by venomanometry. Uveoscleral outflow was determined by mathematical calculation. Two days later, the last drop of drug/vehicle was given at 2000 hours. Fluorophotometry and tonometry measurements were repeated between 2200 and 0600 hours. Treated eyes were compared with contralateral control eyes or baseline measurements, and daytime measurements were compared with nighttime measurements using paired t tests. RESULTS: Travoprost-treated eyes showed a significant (P<0.001) decrease in daytime IOP compared with baseline (26%) or to vehicle-treated eyes (22%), and an increase in daytime outflow facility (P=0.001; 64%). The increase in uveoscleral outflow was not statistically significant. At night, the IOPs of travoprost-treated eyes remained 21% to 24% below baseline daytime values. Seated and supine IOPs in control eyes were significantly (P<0.04) lower at 2200 hours than 1700 hours (P<0.04). Supine IOPs were higher than seated IOPs in both control and treated eyes (P<0.001). Aqueous flow was significantly (P<0.001) reduced at night in both travoprost (30%) and vehicle-treated (25%) eyes when compared with daytime values. No other comparisons were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost seems to lower IOP by increasing trabecular outflow facility. An effect on uveoscleral outflow cannot be ruled out.

Travoprost 0.004% with and without benzalkonium chloride: a comparison of safety and efficacy.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004% without benzalkonium chloride (BAC) to that of the marketed formulation of travoprost 0.004% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: The study was a double-masked, randomized, parallel group, multicenter, noninferiority design. Adult patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with qualifying intraocular pressure (IOP) on 2 eligibility visits received either travoprost 0.004% with BAC (n=346), or travoprost 0.004% without BAC (n=344) dosed once-daily each evening. Patients were followed for a period of 3 months. IOP measurements at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM were taken at study visits on week 2, week 6, and month 3. RESULTS: Mean IOP reductions, across all 9 study visits and times ranged from 7.3 to 8.5 mm Hg for travoprost 0.004% without BAC and from 7.4 to 8.4 mm Hg for travoprost 0.004% with BAC. Statistical equivalence was also demonstrated for the comparison of mean IOP changes; 95% confidence limits were within +/-0.8 mm Hg at 9 of 9 study visits and times in both the per protocol and intent-to-treat data sets. Adverse events and the number of patients discontinued owing to adverse events were similar for both treatment groups. Adverse events due to hyperemia occurred in 6.4% and 9.0% of patients treated with travoprost 0.004% without BAC and travoprost 0.004% with BAC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Travoprost 0.004% without BAC is equivalent to travoprost 0.004% with BAC in both safety and efficacy.

TFOS DEWS II Clinical Trial Design Report.

The development of novel therapies for Dry Eye Disease (DED) is formidable, and relatively few treatments evaluated have been approved for marketing. In this report, the Subcommittee reviewed challenges in designing and conducting quality trials, with special reference to issues in trials in patients with DED and present the regulatory perspective on DED therapies. The Subcommittee reviewed the literature and while there are some observations about the possible reasons why so many trials have failed, there is no obvious single reason other than the lack of correlation between signs and symptoms in DED. Therefore the report advocates for conducting good quality studies, as described, going forward. A key recommendation for future studies is conduct consistent with Good Clinical Practice (GCP), including use of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) quality clinical trial material. The report also recommends that the design, treatments, and sample size be consistent with the investigational treatment, the objectives of the study, and the phase of development. Other recommendations for pivotal studies are a priori selection of the outcome measure, and an appropriate sample size.

The safety and intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of brimonidine tartrate 0.15% preserved with polyquaternium-1.

PURPOSE: The safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of brimonidine tartrate 0.15% preserved with polyquaternium-1 were evaluated and compared with brimonidine tartrate 0.15% preserved with chlorine dioxide in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, parallel group, multicenter equivalence study. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred forty-two patients randomized to the study treatments. METHODS: Patients with OAG or OHT and with qualifying IOP (22-36 mmHg at 8 am on 2 eligibility visits after an appropriate washout period from previous treatment) were assigned randomly to either brimonidine tartrate 0.15% preserved with polyquaternium-1 (brimonidine PQ) or brimonidine tartrate 0.15% preserved with chlorine dioxide (brimonidine P) dosed 3 times daily and were followed up for 6 months. Approximately one half of the study sites continued to follow up their patients for an additional 6 months to obtain longer-term safety data. RESULTS: Brimonidine PQ produced statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions from baseline ranging from 4.3 to 6.5 mmHg, which were statistically and clinically equivalent to brimonidine P at all 18 visit days and times. No safety concerns were identified based on an assessment of ocular and cardiovascular parameters. Patient discontinuations resulting from adverse events were similar for both groups and most of these were a result of signs or symptoms of ocular allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Brimonidine PQ is equivalent in IOP-lowering efficacy and safety to brimonidine P.

Patients' and physicians' perceptions of the travoprost dosing aid: an open-label, multicenter study of adherence with prostaglandin analogue therapy for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes patients' and physicians' perceptions of issues related to dosing adherence with topical therapies for lowering intraocular pressure before and after use of the travoprost dosing aid (Travatan Dosing Aid, Alcon Research Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas). METHODS: The study had an open-label, multicenter, single-treatment-arm design that included sequential patients with open-angle glaucoma (with or without pigment dispersion or pseudoexfoliation component) or ocular hypertension who were taking any prostaglandin analogue monotherapy. Ten participating physicians were chosen on the basis of factors such as their experience, qualifications, and previous clinical study participation. The study consisted of 2 visits: screening and week 4. Patients were asked to complete a survey about their medication adherence before study entry at the screening visit and at study exit during the week-4 visit. In addition, each physician was asked to complete an entry and exit survey on each patient as well as a survey to provide feedback on the travoprost dosing aid. RESULTS: Of the 87 enrolled patients, 6 did not complete the exit survey; therefore, 81 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Mean (SD) age at enrollment was 65.4 (11.6) years; 61.7% (50/81) of the patients were women and 60.5% (49/81) were white. Most patients (96.3% [78/81]) had open-angle glaucoma. Participating physicians perceived that problems involving dosing and adherence were reduced after patients used the dosing aid. Physicians indicated that they would recommend continued use of the travoprost dosing aid for 91.3% (73/80) of patients. All 10 participating physicians said that they would recommend the dosing aid to patients in the future. Of the 81 patients, the majority (68.8% [55/80]) indicated that they would like to continue using the travoprost dosing aid. For 67.5% (54/80) of patients, dosing adherence as recorded by the travoprost dosing aid was >70%. The dosing lever (39.7% [31/78]) and the visual alarm (29.5% [23/78]) were the 2 most favored features of the dosing aid reported by all evaluable patients. The majority of patients (58.8% [47/80]) indicated that they were "relieved" or "very relieved" that the doctor was able to monitor when they dosed their medication; few (7.5% [6/80]) were "concerned" or "very concerned" that the doctor was able to monitor their dosing. CONCLUSIONS: The travoprost dosing aid was perceived to be effective in reminding this group of patients to take their medication as prescribed. In this study, the device was well accepted by both patients and physicians.

The safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution (Trav/Tim) to its components travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution, TRAVATAN, (Trav) and timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Tim) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. DESIGN: Randomized multicenter, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel group study. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-three patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to receive Trav/Tim once daily AM (and vehicle PM), Trav once daily PM (and vehicle AM), or Tim twice daily (AM and PM). Efficacy and safety were compared across treatment groups over 3 months. RESULTS: Trav/Tim produced a mean IOP decrease from baseline of 1.9 mm Hg to 3.3 mm Hg more than Tim, with a significant decrease in mean IOP at each of the nine study visits (P < or = .003). Trav/Tim decreased mean IOP by 0.9 mm Hg to 2.4 mm Hg more than Trav, with a significant decrease in mean IOP at seven of the nine study visits (P < or = .05). The adverse event profile for Trav/Tim was comparable to Trav or Tim alone. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 3 months of treatment, Trav/Tim produced clinically relevant IOP reductions in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension that were greater than those produced by either Trav or Tim alone. The clinical results that Trav/Tim was safe and well tolerated with an incidence of adverse events was comparable to the results of Trav or Tim alone. Trav/Tim provides both more effective IOP reduction than its components and the benefits of once-daily dosing.

Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution once daily for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a fixed combination of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% every day in the morning with a concomitant regimen of timolol 0.5% every day in the morning, plus travoprost 0.004% every day in the evening; and timolol 0.5% twice daily on the intraocular pressure (IOP) of subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension over 3 months. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, active-controlled, multicenter trial. METHODS: Patients comprised adult subjects (n = 403) of either gender with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in at least one eye. To qualify, the IOP had to be between 22 to 36 mm Hg in the same eye at two consecutive eligibility visits. The primary outcome variable was IOP measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. RESULTS: Mean IOP ranged from 16.2 to 17.4 mm Hg with the combination travoprost/timolol compared with 15.4 to 16.8 mm Hg in the concomitant travoprost + timolol group, from baselines of 23.1 to 25.6 mm Hg and 22.9 to 25.0 mm Hg, respectively. The fixed combination of travoprost/timolol significantly lowered IOP by 7 to 9 mm, similar to the IOP reductions observed with concomitant therapy. The most frequent ocular adverse event was hyperemia that occurred in 14.3% and 23.4% of subjects treated with travoprost/timolol combination and concomitant travoprost + timolol, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost/timolol combination produces greater IOP reductions than the positive control, timolol 0.5%, and reductions that were similar to concomitant travoprost + timolol. This study demonstrates that the fixed combination of travoprost/timolol produces significant and clinically relevant reductions of IOP in a once-daily dosing regimen.

A three-month, multicenter, double-masked study of the safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution compared to travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution and timolol 0.5% dosed concomitantly in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination to the concomitant administration of travoprost 0.004% (TRAVATAN) and timolol 0.5% in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel group study. Three hundred sixteen patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomly assigned to travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution fixed combination once daily in the morning or concomitant administration of timolol 0.5% once daily in the morning and travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution once daily in the evening. The efficacy and safety of the fixed combination were compared with concomitant therapy over three months. The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean intraocular pressure. RESULTS: Both travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination and the concomitant administration of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.5% produced statistically significant reductions from baseline in IOP, with mean IOP ranging from 15.2 to 16.5 mm Hg in the patients using travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination compared with 14.7 to 16.1 mm Hg in the concomitant group. The upper 95.1% confidence limit for the differences in mean IOP (fixed combination minus concomitant) was < or =1.5 mm Hg at 7 of 9 visits, including all three 8 AM time points, 24-hours post-dose. Mean IOP reductions from baseline ranged from 7.4 to 9.4 mm Hg in the fixed combination group compared with 8.4 to 9.4 mm Hg with concomitant therapy. Safety analysis demonstrated equivalent safety between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed combination of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.5% produced clinically relevant IOP reductions in patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension that were comparable to concomitant therapy with its components. Safety and tolerability of the fixed combination were also equivalent to concomitant therapy. Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination offers IOP reduction equivalent to concomitant therapy, with potential benefits that include convenience (fewer bottles and drops per day), improved compliance, cost savings (based on fewer co-payments), and elimination of potential washout effects.

Identification and characterization of the ocular hypotensive efficacy of travoprost, a potent and selective FP prostaglandin receptor agonist, and AL-6598, a DP prostaglandin receptor agonist.

The structure-activity studies that led to the identification of travoprost, a highly selective and potent FP prostaglandin analog, and AL-6598, a DP prostaglandin analog, are detailed. In both series, the 1-alcohol analogs are very effective and are thought to be acting as prodrugs for the biologically active carboxylic acids. The efficacy of amide prodrugs depends on the degree of substitution and the size of the substituents. Selected compounds are profiled in vitro and in vivo preclinically. Clinical studies show that travoprost 0.004% (isopropyl ester) provided intraocular pressure control superior to timolol 0.5% when used as monotherapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In clinical studies, AL-6598 0.01% provided a sustained intraocular pressure reduction with q.d. application; b.i.d. provided greater intraocular pressure control. The acute and, apparently, conjunctival hyperemia associated with topical ocular AL-6598 can be attenuated while maintaining intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy by formulating with brimonidine.

Comparison of the diurnal ocular hypotensive efficacy of travoprost and latanoprost over a 44-hour period in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin analogues are effective ocular hypotensive agents and are being used increasingly in the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). These agents are typically dosed once daily. OBJECTIVES: A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the duration of travoprost's IOP-lowering efficacy up to 84 hours after the final dose in patients with open-angle glaucoma. A follow-up study was conducted to compare diurnal IOP control with travoprost and latanoprost over a 44-hour period. METHODS: In the open label pilot study, patients received 0.004% travoprost in both eyes at 8 pm daily for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, IOP was measured before administration of the last daily dose, every 4 hours thereafter for 36 hours, and 60 and 84 hours after the last dose, with no additional ocular hypotensive medication given. In the controlled, double-masked, parallel-group, follow-up study, patients were randomized to self-administer 1 drop of the marketed doses of 0.004% travoprost or 0.005% latanoprost in both eyes at 8 pm daily for 2 weeks. At the end of this period, patients returned to the facility at approximately 8 pm for IOP measurement and administration of the final dose of study medication. IOP was then measured at 4-hour intervals for 44 hours after the last dose, with no additional ocular hypotensive medication given. RESULTS: The pilot study included 21 patients (67% female, 33% male; age range, 35-81 years) with open-angle glaucoma. IOP values were significantly below baseline at all time points up to 84 hours after the final dose of travoprost ( P<0.001). The follow-up study enrolled 35 patients, 1 of whom was excluded for missing data; thus, the intent-to-treat analysis included 34 patients (68% female, 32% male; age range, 36-72 years). At the unmedicated eligibility visit, mean IOP over 24 hours ranged from 21 to 26 mm Hg in each treatment group. After 2 weeks of treatment and 24 hours after the last dose, mean (SD) IOP was 13.1 (2.1) mm Hg (change from eligibility visit, -10.4 [2.7] mm Hg) in the travoprost group and 16.0 (3.1) mm Hg (change from eligibility visit, -7.1 [2.4] mm Hg) in the latanoprost group. The difference in change from baseline was statistically significant between treatment groups (P=0.006). Travoprost lowered IOP significantly at all time points throughout the 44-hour period after the last dose (mean IOP,

Clinical efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% compared with placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-masked environmental study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% administered once daily is effective for up to 24 hours after instillation and is well tolerated in adults and children aged > or =3 years. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of olopatadine 0.2% compared with placebo in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: This was a 10-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked environmental study conducted during the spring allergy season (April-August) of 2003. Patients assessed their ocular signs and symptoms in terms of frequency (whole-unit scale from 0 to 5) and severity (half-unit scale from 0 to 4), and grass pollen counts were obtained daily for each investigative site. Responder analyses were conducted by pollen level (frequency based) and pollen period (severity based) to evaluate the clinical significance of differences in ocular itching and redness between treatment groups. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty patients (137 females, 123 males) were enrolled in the study, including 28 children aged between 11 and 17 years; the overall population was 74% white, 11% black, 4% Hispanic, and 11% other. The frequency-based responder analyses of ocular itching and redness showed that when grass pollen counts were high (>20 gr/m(3) air), a respective 21% and 14% of patients in the olopatadine 0.2% group assessed the frequency of ocular itching and redness as >2, compared with 47% and 31% of patients in the placebo group (P < 0.001 for ocular itching; P < 0.003 for redness). The results of the severity-based responder analyses by peak pollen period were consistent with those of the frequency-based analyses. Compared with placebo, olopatadine 0.2% was associated with significant reductions in calculated mean scores for ocular itching and redness by pollen level and by pollen period. No patient was discontinued from the study because of a treatment-related adverse event, and no patient experienced a treatment-related serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: In the patients studied, olopatadine 0.2% appeared to be effective and well tolerated when administered once daily for the treatment of the ocular signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis.

Response to travoprost in black and nonblack patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Two prospective, controlled, multicenter, double-masked studies--one lasting 6 months (n=594) and the other, 12 months (n=787)--examined the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of travoprost in 1381 black and nonblack patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Investigated regimens were travoprost 0.004% once daily, latanoprost 0.005% once daily, and timolol 0:5% twice daily. In both studies, mean IOP was significantly lower in blacks treated with travoprost. The IOP reduction was also significantly greater in blacks after adjustments for age, sex, iris color, diagnosis, and corneal thickness. Timolol lowered mean IOP to a greater extent in nonblack patients. The significantly larger IOP reduction with travoprost compared with timolol in both racial groups was more pronounced in blacks. Travoprost also was superior to latanoprost in blacks. Mean changes from baseline generally were greater for black than for nonblack patients, although the differences did not achieve statistical significance. The response rate to travoprost was higher in blacks. The most common adverse effect was hyperemia.