A novel biodegradable stent applicable for use in congenital heart disease: bench testing and feasibility results in a rabbit model.

OBJECTIVES: A novel double opposed helical (DH) biodegradable stent was designed and fabricated for CHD applications. The primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of DH stent delivery and deployment in rabbit external iliac arteries (EIA). Secondary objectives were to assess stent patency, thrombosis and inflammation at 1-week and 1-month follow-up. BACKGROUND: Biodegradable stents have largely been designed for adult cardiovascular indications, to avoid long term complications of permanent implants. A growing child with congenital heart disease (CHD) would especially derive substantial benefit from this technology. METHODS: DH stents were manufactured to 3, 4, 5, and 6-mm diameter with poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) fibers. Bench test analysis was performed. Six DH stents were implanted in rabbit EIA. Vessel patency was assessed at 1-week and 1-month follow-up with repeat angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Histopathological evaluation was performed. RESULTS: The elastic recoil and collapse pressure of DH stents were comparable to conventional metal stents. All DH stents were successfully delivered and implanted with good apposition to the vessel wall and no collapse of the proximal, mid or distal ends. All stented vessels remained patent. No acute or early stent thrombosis was noted. Histopathology showed minimal inflammatory response and mild neointimal proliferation at 1 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro results of DH PLLA biodegradable stents are comparable to conventional metal stents. The pilot animal study confirms the delivery and deployment of the DH stents to the desired location. The DH design can be used to fabricate larger diameter stents needed for CHD.

Relationship of pulmonary artery wedge pressure to left atrial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance in preoperative Fontan patients.

Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWp) as a surrogate for left atrial pressure (LAp) has been validated in patients with fully pulsatile two-ventricle circulations. This study was to validate PAWp as an accurate estimate of LAp for calculating pulmonary vascular resistance in single-ventricle patients after the bidirectional Glenn operation. A prospective study measuring direct branch pulmonary artery pressures, ipsilateral PAWp, and direct LAp to calculate pulmonary and systemic blood flows was conducted. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated for each patient using the PAWp and compared to the PVR calculated by direct LAp measurements. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled; 27 were eligible for study inclusion. Ages ranged from 21 to 60 months and weights ranged from 9.5 to 20.8 kg. Underlying congenital heart defect diagnoses varied, with all patients either functionally or anatomically univentricular. Left mPAWp measured 4.4 ± 2.6, statistically different from simultaneous direct mLAp of 2.5 ± 2.4 mmHg (P < 0.001. Right mPAWp measured 4.3 ± 3.2 mmHg, statistically different from simultaneous direct mLAp of 2.8 ± 2.6 mmHg (P < 0.001. The PVR calculated using mPAWp was 1.2 ± 0.7 W.U., statistically different to 1.8 ± 0.95 W.U. using mLAp (P < 0.001). The average PVR measurement calculated using mPAWp underestimated the PVR calculated using mLAp by 0.6 W.U. It can be extrapolated that a PVR of 2.3 W.U. calculated using wedge measurements would estimate a PVR of 3 W.U. calculated using direct LA measurements. In this study, the PVR calculated using PAWp as a surrogate for LAp either equaled or underestimated the true PVR, up to 33% different. This difference is important in patients with univentricular physiology who rely on low PVR for cardiac output. Thus, based on this study, a PVR measurement of greater than 2.3 W.U. by the mPAWp method should prompt a direct LA pressure measurement, in order to more appropriately determine true surgical risk.