Association of Arterial Stiffness with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Significant kidney function may be lost before CKD is diagnosed. Arterial stiffness may be a risk factor for CKD and the relationship may be bi-directional. A systematic review of cohort studies was undertaken to ascertain the temporal relationship of arterial stiffness and CKD. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were searched to 4 October 2023 to identify studies that investigated whether arterial stiffness, as estimated by pulse wave velocity, was predictive of the development or progression of CKD, rapid decline in kidney function, and vice versa. The characteristics and outcomes of the included studies were set out in a qualitative summary. The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019129563). RESULTS: Forty-two studies were included, all of which were high quality with respect to bias. Thirteen of seventeen studies that investigated arterial stiffness as a predictor of incident CKD found a positive association (p < 0.05). Of the 10 studies that controlled for CKD risk factors, 6 found a positive association. Eight of seventeen studies that investigated arterial stiffness as a predictor of progression of CKD, and five out of eight studies, which investigated rapid kidney decline, found a positive association. One study of six found kidney function was able to predict future elevated arterial stiffness. CONCLUSION: Arterial stiffness may predict incident CKD and a rapid decline in CKD. It is uncertain if arterial stiffness is associated with CKD progression or whether reduced kidney function is predictive of increased arterial stiffness. Further longitudinal research is required.

Arterial Stiffness and Incident Glaucoma: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether arterial stiffness, assessed oscillometrically, is associated with incident glaucoma in the Vitamin D Assessment (ViDA) Study cohort, aged 50 to 84 years. DESIGN: Prospective, population-based cohort study. METHODS: Arterial stiffness was assessed in 4,713 participants without known glaucoma (mean ± SD age = 66 ± 8 years) from 5 April 2011 to 6 November 2012 by way of aortic PWV (aPWV), estimated carotid-femoral PWV (ePWV) and aortic PP (aPP). Incident glaucoma was identified through linkage to national prescription and hospital discharge registers. Relative risks of glaucoma for each arterial stiffness measure were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression, over the continuum of values and by quartiles. RESULTS: During a mean ± SD follow-up of 10.5±0.4 years, 301 participants developed glaucoma. Arterial stiffness, as measured by aPWV (Hazard ratio (HR) per SD increase, 1.36, 95% CI 1.14-1.62) and ePWV (HR per SD increase, 1.40, 95% CI 1.14-1.71) but not aPP (HR per SD increase, 1.06, 95% CI 0.92-1.23) was associated with incident glaucoma. When arterial stiffness was analyzed as a categorical variable, the highest quartiles of aPWV (HR, 2.62, 95% CI 1.52-4.52; Ptrend = .007), ePWV (HR, 2.42, 95%CI 1.37-4.27; Ptrend = .03), and aPP (HR, 1.68, 95%CI 1.10-2.5; Ptrend = .02) were associated with the development of glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial stiffness measured with a simple oscillometric device predicted the development of glaucoma and could potentially be used in clinical practice to help identify people at risk of this condition. It may also present a new therapeutic research avenue, including in respect of systemic antihypertensives.