Bone conductivity and spine fluoroscopy, Hand-Eye-Ear dialogue, during pedicle screw positioning: a new human cognitive system for precision and radiation-decrease; better than artificial intelligence and machine learning system?

PURPOSE: There is an increasing need for pedicle screw positioning while decreasing radiation exposure. This study compares intra-operative radiation dose using posterior internal fixation using impedancemetry-guided pedicle positioning by the Pediguard system versus standard free-hand sighting when surgery was performed with a trainee or expert surgeon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the electrical properties of bone, the Pediguard detects iatrogenic penetration of the pedicle wall and gives auditory feedback to the surgeon. A single centre, two surgeons (one experienced and the other novice) conducted a continuous prospective randomized study for one year. Twenty patients were randomized into one group (free-hand control group) receiving pedicle instrumentation without the use of the Pediguard and the second group receiving pedicle instrumentation with the use of the Pediguard. The total screw placement times and fluoroscopic times for each screw was recorded and pedicle screw position was analyzed on post-operative CT scan. RESULTS: Among the 104 screwed pedicles, 22 unrecognized perforations were detected by CT scan, while no perforation signal was observed intra-operatively. Only one perforation was greater than 2 mm. The overall screwing time was 4.33 ± 1.2 minutes per screw for experienced surgeon and 5.84 ± 2.5 minutes per screw for the novice. Pediguard did not increased significantly the time (0.3 mn per screw) for the experienced surgeon, but the time with Pediguard was longer (2 mn more per screw) for the novice surgeon, particularly at the thoracic level. The overall fluoroscopic average time per screw for the experienced surgeon is 5.8 ± 2.3 s and 10.4 ± 4.5 s for the novice surgeon. For the novice surgeon, radiation time reduced from 12 (without Pediguard) to 6 s (with Pediguard). There was no significant difference for the experienced surgeon in terms of improvement in radiation time with the use of Pediguard. CONCLUSION: The overall time was longer for the novice surgeon with the Pediguard system, but allowed to decrease by 50% the fluoroscopy time.

Hip fractures re-operation compared with death at two year in elderly patients: lowest risk of revision with dual mobility total hip arthroplasty than with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation of Garden I and II.

PURPOSE: This study determined at two year follow-up the lifetime risk of re-operation for elderly patients with hip fractures undergoing internal fixation, dual mobility total hip arthroplasty, or bipolar hemiarthroplasty, using death of the patient as a competing risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the hypothesis that arthroplasties may have less complications without increasing mortality even for Garden I and Garden II fractures, we retrospectively reviewed 317 hips with femoral neck fractures operated between January 2015 and August 2019. The mean age at time of surgical intervention was 82.4 years (range 65 to 105). Sixty patients presented a nondisplaced hip fracture (Garden I or II) treated by internal fixtion (I-F), and 257 were treated by hip arthroplasty: 118 dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) and 139 with a bipolar hemiarthroplaty (B-H). Demographics, surgical and complications data, and mortality were collected and compared for each group. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 22.4% at two years, and similar (p = 0.98) in all groups, respectively 22%, 22%, and 23% for DM-THA, B-H, and I-F groups. With dual mobility THA, the cumulative incidence of re-operations for any reason was (lower (9%) than with internal fixation (22%) or bipolar hemiarthroplasties (19%). CONCLUSION: Using a double mobility total prosthesis does not increase the post-operative mortality of the patients, nor does it increase their survival. But, reducing the risk of complications certainly improves their quality of life during the little time they have left .

Vitamin C prevention of complex regional pain syndrome after foot and ankle surgery: a prospective randomized study of three hundred and twenty nine patients.

PURPOSE: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) after foot and ankle surgery has a significant impact on the ability to walk. As the symptomatic treatment of this disaster complication is poor and has low efficacy, a preventive treatment would be beneficial. Vitamin C has been reported to be efficient in preventing CRPS in elective scheduled surgery. Few authors explored this efficiency in foot and ankle surgery. We, therefore, evaluated the efficacy of vitamin C in preventing this complication after foot and ankle surgeries for both trauma and elective surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, 329 patients were included in the study. We conducted a prospective randomized study on the efficiency of vitamin C (one group with and one without vitamin C) to prevent CRPS risk in patients operated in our institution on foot or ankle surgery. The incidence of CRPS after foot and ankle surgery was evaluated in both groups; the diagnostic of CRPS was made using the Budapest criteria associated with three-phase bone scintigraphy. RESULTS: Among the 329 patients included in the study (232 women and 97 men), 121 patients were included in the vitamin C group and 208 in the control group (without vitamin C). Vitamin C was statistically linked with a decreased risk of CRPS (OR 0.19; CI 95% from 0.05 to 0.8; p = 0.021). Alcoholism and cast immobilization were increased risks factors of CRPS (respectively p = 0.001 and p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Taking 1 g per day of vitamin C during 40 days after a foot or ankle surgery reduces the risk of CRPS.