Osteogenic Sarcoma of the Head and Neck: Is Chemotherapy Needed?

OPINION STATEMENT: Head and neck osteosarcoma (HNOS) is a rare subtype of sarcoma that most commonly arises in the mandible or maxilla. Treatment for HNOS typically involves a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach depending on the size, grade, and histological subtype. Surgery by sarcoma-experienced head and neck surgeons and orthopedic oncologists remains a crucial component of treatment in all subtypes of HNOS, particularly for those with low-grade histology, which can be treated definitively with surgical resection if negative margins are obtained. Negative surgical margins are of utmost prognostic importance, and neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation should be considered in patients with positive (or anticipated positive) margins/residual postoperative disease. Current data favors the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade HNOS to improve overall survival but must be individualized to weigh benefits and risks of the short- and long-term effects of treatment. Our center uses a multidisciplinary treatment plan and notes anecdotal improvement in treatment outcomes with a combined surgical and ifosfamide-containing chemotherapeutic approach with radiotherapy for local control if positive margins. Large volume cohorts and adequate randomized control trials assessing the efficacy of chemotherapy in HNOS are scant and additional research and multi-institutional collaboration are needed to study polychemotherapeutic and radiation treatment regimens and outcomes more adequately.

Metastatic Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma to the Optic Nerve Sheath Mimicking Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis.

Lung carcinoma is the second most common malignancy in both men and women, and may metastasize to the orbit relatively early in the disease course. Metastasis to the optic nerve or its sheath is an exceedingly rare occurrence, and diagnosis may be complicated by nonspecific clinical and radiographic features. The authors present a case of squamous cell lung cancer metastatic to the optic nerve sheath, initially diagnosed as optic neuritis based on its equivocal clinical and radiographic features. This is the first histopathologically confirmed case of squamous cell lung cancer metastatic to the optic nerve sheath in the literature.

Imaging-Based Disease Assessment and Management Recommendations: Impact of Multidisciplinary Sarcoma Tumor Board.

Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) facilitate decision-making among subspecialists in the care of oncology patients, but the mechanisms by which they enhance outcomes remain incompletely understood. Our aim was to measure the agreement between sarcoma MTBs and radiology reports' disease assessment and management recommendations. This single-center IRB-approved retrospective study evaluated cases presented at a weekly sarcoma MTB from 1 August 2020 to 31 July 2021. Cases without clinical notes, imaging studies, or radiology reports were excluded. The data collected included the patient's clinical status at the time of the MTB, the treatment response assessment by the MTB and radiologists (stable disease; partial response; complete response; progressive disease/recurrence), and the recommendations of the radiology reports and of the MTB. The agreement between the initial radiologist review and MTB on disease assessment and recommendations was analyzed using kappa statistics. In total, 283 cases met the inclusion criteria. Radiology reports provided recommendations in 34.3% of cases, which were adhered to by the ordering providers in 73.2% of cases. The agreement between MTBs and radiology reports was moderate in disease assessment (86.2% agreement; κ = 0.78; p < 0.0001) and negligible in recommendations (36% agreement; κ = 0.18; p < 0.0001). Radiologists were more likely to assign progressive disease/recurrence than MTBs (54.4% vs. 44.4%; p < 0.001) and to recommend short-term imaging follow-up more commonly than MTBs (46.4% vs. 21.7%; p < 0.001). At a tertiary care center, radiologists' isolated interpretations of imaging findings and management recommendations frequently differ from the MTB's consensus, reflecting the value of multidisciplinary discussions incorporating the patient's clinical status and the available treatment options into the final radiographic assessment.