In vitro activity of manogepix and comparators against infrequently encountered yeast and mold isolates from the SENTRY Surveillance Program (2017-2022).

Manogepix is a potent new antifungal agent targeting the fungal Gwt1 enzyme. Manogepix has previously demonstrated potent in vitro activity against clinical isolates of both Candida (except Candida krusei) and Aspergillus species. This study determined the in vitro activity of manogepix and comparators against a large collection of infrequently encountered yeast and molds. Manogepix demonstrated potent in vitro activity against infrequently encountered yeasts exhibiting elevated MIC values to other drug classes, including Candida spp. (MIC50/90, 0.008/0.12 mg/L), Saprochaete clavata (Magnusiomyces clavatus) (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/L), Magnusiomyces capitatus (MICrange, 0.016-0.06 mg/L), Rhodotorula minuta (MIC, 0.016 mg/L), and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.12 mg/L). Similarly, manogepix was active against infrequently encountered mold isolates and strains exhibiting elevated MIC/MEC values to echinocandins, azoles, and amphotericin B, including Coprinopsis cinerea (MEC, 0.004 mg/L), Fusarium spp. (MEC50/90, 0.016/0.06 mg/L), Fusarium (Gibberella) fujikuroi species complex (MEC50/90, 0.016/0.03 mg/L), Lomentospora prolificans (MEC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/L), Microascus cirrosus (MEC, 0.008 mg/L), Paecilomyces spp. (MEC50/90, ≤0.008/0.016 mg/L), Pleurostomophora richardsiae (MEC, 0.06 mg/L), Sarocladium kiliense (MEC range, 0.016-0.12 mg/L), and Scedosporium spp. (MEC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/L). Manogepix demonstrated potent activity against a majority of the infrequently encountered yeast and mold isolates tested including strains with elevated MIC/MEC values to other drug classes. Additional clinical development of manogepix (fosmanogepix) in difficult-to-treat, resistant fungal infections is warranted.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Antifungal, Fosmanogepix, in Patients with Candidemia Caused by Candida auris: Results from a Phase 2 Trial.

Fosmanogepix (FMGX), a novel antifungal available in intravenous (IV) and oral formulations, has broad-spectrum activity against pathogenic yeasts and molds, including fungi resistant to standard of care antifungals. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study evaluated FMGX safety and efficacy for treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis caused by Candida auris. Eligible participants were ≥18 years, with established candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis caused by C. auris, (cultured within 120 h [for candidemia] or 168 h [for invasive candidiasis without candidemia] with accompanying clinical signs) and limited treatment options. Participants were treated with FMGX (≤42 days; loading dose: 1000 mg IV twice daily [Day 1], followed by 600 mg IV once daily [QD]). Switching to oral FMGX 800 mg QD was permitted from Day 4. Primary endpoint was treatment success (survival and clearance of C. auris from blood/tissue cultures without additional antifungals) at the end of the study treatment (EOST), assessed by an independent data review committee (DRC). Day 30 survival was a secondary endpoint. In vitro susceptibility of Candida isolates was assessed. Nine participants with candidemia (male:6, female:3; 21 to 76 years) in intensive care units in South Africa were enrolled; all received IV FMGX only. DRC-assessed treatment success at EOST and Day 30 survival were 89% (8/9). No treatment related adverse events or study drug discontinuations were reported. FMGX demonstrated potent in vitro activity against all C. auris isolates (MIC range: 0.008 to 0.015 µg/mL [CLSI]; 0.004-0.03 µg/mL [EUCAST]), with the lowest MICs compared to other antifungals tested. Thus, the results showed that FMGX was safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in participants with candidemia caused by C. auris.

Clinical safety and efficacy of novel antifungal, fosmanogepix, for the treatment of candidaemia: results from a Phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Fosmanogepix is a first-in-class antifungal targeting the fungal enzyme Gwt1, with broad-spectrum activity against yeasts and moulds, including multidrug-resistant fungi, formulated for intravenous (IV) and oral administration. METHODS: This global, multicenter, non-comparative study evaluated the safety and efficacy of fosmanogepix for first-line treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic adults. Participants with candidaemia, defined as a positive blood culture for Candida spp. within 96 h prior to study entry, with ≤2 days of prior systemic antifungals, were eligible. Participants received fosmanogepix for 14 days: 1000 mg IV twice daily on Day 1, followed by maintenance 600 mg IV once daily, and optional switch to 700 mg orally once daily from Day 4. Eligible participants who received at least one dose of fosmanogepix and had confirmed diagnosis of candidaemia (<96 h of treatment start) composed the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Primary efficacy endpoint was treatment success at the end of study treatment (EOST) as determined by the Data Review Committee. Success was defined as clearance of Candida from blood cultures with no additional antifungal treatment and survival at the EOST. RESULTS: Treatment success was 80% (16/20, mITT; EOST) and Day 30 survival was 85% (17/20; 3 deaths unrelated to fosmanogepix). Ten of 21 (48%) were switched to oral fosmanogepix. Fosmanogepix was well tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events/discontinuations. Fosmanogepix had potent in vitro activity against baseline isolates of Candida spp. (MICrange: CLSI, 0.002-0.03 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this single-arm Phase 2 trial suggest that fosmanogepix may be a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious treatment for non-neutropenic patients with candidaemia, including those with renal impairment.

Use of linezolid susceptibility test results as a surrogate for the susceptibility of Gram-positive pathogens to tedizolid, a novel oxazolidinone.

BACKGROUND: Tedizolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial with potent activity against a wide range of Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Although tedizolid is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, commercial susceptibility testing products for tedizolid are not currently available. This study evaluated the usefulness of applying linezolid susceptibility test results as a surrogate for predicting susceptibility to tedizolid in clinically significant Gram-positive pathogens. METHODS: Gram-positive isolates (N = 10,702) were obtained from annual surveillance programs conducted between 2009 and 2012, from 3 tedizolid clinical trials, and from a preclinical study of the antibacterial activity of tedizolid. Susceptibility testing of linezolid and tedizolid was performed using the reference broth microdilution method in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methods. RESULTS: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution for tedizolid and linezolid against this set of isolates was consistent with that of previous reports. Scatter plot analysis of relevant subsets of organisms was performed and showed high categorical agreement between linezolid and tedizolid MIC results (>99% for staphylococci and streptococci; >98% for enterococci). Very major error rates (ie, tedizolid false-susceptible errors) were very low and within acceptable limits for a surrogate agent: S. aureus and other staphylococcal species, 0%; Enterococcus spp, 0.2%; and Streptococcus spp, 0%. CONCLUSIONS: High categorical agreement between MIC values for tedizolid and linezolid and low very major error rates were shown for all organism groups tested, supporting the use of linezolid as a reliable surrogate for tedizolid susceptibility testing.

In vitro activity and microbiological efficacy of tedizolid (TR-700) against Gram-positive clinical isolates from a phase 2 study of oral tedizolid phosphate (TR-701) in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Tedizolid (TR-700, formerly torezolid) is the active moiety of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate (TR-701), a next-generation oxazolidinone, with high potency against Gram-positive species, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). A recently completed randomized, double-blind phase 2 trial evaluated 200, 300, or 400 mg of oral tedizolid phosphate once daily for 5 to 7 days in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. This report examines the in vitro activity of tedizolid and Zyvox (linezolid) against Gram-positive pathogens isolated at baseline and describes the microbiological and clinical efficacy of tedizolid. Of 196 isolates tested, 81.6% were S. aureus, and of these, 76% were MRSA. The MIC(50) and MIC(90) of tedizolid against both methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA were 0.25 µg/ml, compared with a MIC(50) of 1 µg/ml and MIC(90) of 2 µg/ml for linezolid. For coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 7), viridans group streptococci (n = 15), and beta-hemolytic streptococci (n = 3), the MICs ranged from 0.03 to 0.25 µg/ml for tedizolid and from 0.12 to 1 µg/ml for linezolid. The microbiological eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit (7 to 14 days posttreatment) in the microbiologically evaluable population (n = 133) were similar in all treatment groups, with overall eradication rates of 97.7% for all pathogens, 97.9% for MRSA, and 95.7% for MSSA. The clinical cure rates for MRSA and MSSA infections were 96.9% and 95.7%, respectively, across all dose groups. This study confirms the potent in vitro activity of tedizolid against pathogenic Gram-positive cocci, including MRSA, and its 4-fold-greater potency in comparison with linezolid. All dosages of tedizolid phosphate showed excellent microbiological and clinical efficacy against MRSA and MSSA.

Antimicrobial activity of manogepix, a first-in-class antifungal, and comparator agents tested against contemporary invasive fungal isolates from an international surveillance programme (2018-2019).

OBJECTIVES: Manogepix, the active moiety of the prodrug fosmanogepix, is a novel antifungal with activity against major fungal pathogens including Candida (except Candida krusei), Aspergillus and difficult-to-treat/rare moulds. We tested manogepix and comparators against 2669 contemporary (2018-2019) fungal isolates collected from 82 medical centres in North America (42.3%), Europe (37.9%), Asia-Pacific (12.3%) and Latin America (7.6%). Of these, 70.7% were Candida spp., 3.6% were non-Candida yeasts including 49 Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii, 21.7% were Aspergillus spp. and 4.1% were other moulds. METHODS: Isolates were tested for antifungal susceptibility by the CLSI reference broth microdilution method. RESULTS: Manogepix (MIC50/90, 0.008/0.06 mg/L) was the most active agent tested against Candida spp. isolates; corresponding anidulafungin, micafungin and fluconazole MIC90 values were 16- to 64-fold higher. Similarly, manogepix (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L) was ≥4-fold more active than anidulafungin, micafungin and fluconazole against C. neoformans var. grubii. Against Aspergillus spp., manogepix (MEC50/90, 0.015/0.03 mg/L) had comparable activity to anidulafungin and micafungin. Low manogepix concentrations inhibited uncommon species of Candida, non-Candida yeasts, and rare moulds including Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora (Scedosporium) prolificans. CONCLUSION: Manogepix exhibited potent activity against contemporary fungal isolates, including echinocandin- and azole-resistant strains of Candida and Aspergillus spp., respectively. Although rare, Candida strains that were non-wild type for manogepix demonstrated resistance to fluconazole. However, the clinical relevance of this finding is unknown. The extended spectrum of manogepix is noteworthy for its activity against many less-common yet antifungal-resistant strains. Clinical studies are underway to evaluate the utility of fosmanogepix against difficult-to-treat resistant fungal infections.

Results of the surveillance of Tedizolid activity and resistance program: in vitro susceptibility of gram-positive pathogens collected in 2011 and 2012 from the United States and Europe.

The in vitro activity and spectrum of tedizolid and comparators were analyzed against 6884 Gram-positive clinical isolates collected from multiple US and European sites as part of the Surveillance of Tedizolid Activity and Resistance Program in 2011 and 2012. Organisms included 4499 Staphylococcus aureus, 537 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 873 enterococci, and 975 ß-hemolytic streptococci. The MIC values that inhibited 90% of the isolates within each group (MIC90) were 0.25 µg/mL for Staphylococcus epidermidis and ß-hemolytic streptococci and 0.5 µg/mL for S. aureus, other CoNS, and enterococci. Of 16 isolates with elevated tedizolid or linezolid MIC values (intermediate or resistant isolates), 10 had mutations in the genes encoding 23S rRNA (primarily G2576T), 5 had mutations in the genes encoding ribosomal proteins L3 or L4, and 5 carried the cfr multidrug resistance gene. Overall, tedizolid showed excellent activity against Gram-positive bacteria and was at least 4-fold more potent than linezolid against wild-type and linezolid-resistant isolates. Given the low overall frequency of isolates that would be resistant to tedizolid at the proposed break point of 0.5 µg/mL (0.19%) and potent activity against contemporary US and European isolates, tedizolid has the potential to serve as a valuable therapeutic option in the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens.

Comparison of digital planimetry and ruler technique to measure ABSSSI lesion sizes in the ESTABLISH-1 study.

BACKGROUND: In August 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued draft guidelines for developing antibiotics for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), with the outcome measure of such treatment relying primarily on the cessation of spread or on the decrease in size of skin lesions at 48-72 h after the initiation of such treatment. In 2012, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health proposed an interim outcome measure defined as a reduction in lesion size by ≥20% at a 48-72 h examination. These recent changes make it necessary to identify reliable methods for measuring the lesions in acute infections of the skin. METHODS: In the first study of the Efficacy and Safety of 6-day Oral Tedizolid in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections vs. 10-day Oral Linezolid Therapy (ESTABLISH-1), the sizes of ABSSSI lesions were evaluated with the two methodologies of: (1) Digital planimetry (DP) of photographed lesions, and (2) a ruler technique (RT) with measurement of the longest head-to-toe length and greatest perpendicular width of lesions, to compare the respective response rates of lesions to the two antimicrobial regimens in the study. RESULTS: The RT method and DP showed similar percentages of subjects in which treatment stopped the spread of ABSSSI lesions (93.2% vs. 94.2%, respectively) but showed less agreement for a reduction in lesion size, of ≥20% (87.7% vs. 62.0%, respectively) across all categories of lesions (cellulitis/erysipelas, major cutaneous abscess, and acute wound infection) at 48-72 h after the initiation of treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of the ESTABLISH-1 study show that both the RT method and DP are consistent and reliable techniques for measuring the sizes of ABSSSI lesions. Ultimately, changes in lesion size, rather than the absolute value of lesion size, will be used to assess the outcomes of treatment for ABSSSI in clinical research.

Pharmacokinetics of tedizolid following oral administration: single and multiple dose, effect of food, and comparison of two solid forms of the prodrug.

OBJECTIVES: The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of tedizolid were examined after oral administration of tedizolid phosphate disodium (TPD), including the effect of food on PK. The relative bioavailability of TPD to the free acid tedizolid phosphate was determined to bridge the results of these and other studies to the solid form of the prodrug selected for further development. DESIGN: Randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind single- and multiple-ascending dose studies and randomized open-label, crossover food effect and relative bioavailability studies. SETTING: Clinical Research Units. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy subjects. INTERVENTION: Study TR701-101 enrolled 40 subjects in single-ascending dose (200-1200 mg TPD or placebo) and 40 subjects in 21-day multiple-ascending dose (200, 300, or 400 mg TPD once/day; 600 mg linezolid twice/day; or placebo) arms. Study TR701-103 was a food-effect study in 12 subjects administered 600 mg TPD. Study TR701-108 was a relative bioavailability study in 12 subjects administered 150-mg tedizolid equivalents as TPD or tedizolid phosphate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate, its active moiety tedizolid, and/or linezolid were collected. After administration of 200 to 600 mg TPD, tedizolid values increased approximately dose proportionally in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ). Tedizolid half-life values were approximately 2-fold greater compared with linezolid. TPD administration with food delayed tedizolid absorption and reduced Cmax relative to the fasted state but did not alter AUC. Minimal accumulation was predicted and observed for tedizolid, whereas observed accumulation of linezolid exceeded predictions based on single-dose PK. Comparable PK of tedizolid was observed following oral administration of either TPD or tedizolid phosphate. In the multiple-ascending dose study, 3 of 24 tedizolid subjects were withdrawn under prespecified stopping rules (one each of elevated alanine aminotransferase, low reticulocyte count, or low white blood cell count), as was 1 of 8 linezolid subjects (low reticulocyte count). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, tedizolid has a favorable PK profile, a half-life that supports once daily administration, and no nonlinearities at steady state. Tedizolid phosphate can be administered without regard to food.