A phase I and pharmacologic trial of two schedules of the proteasome inhibitor, PS-341 (bortezomib, velcade), in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the toxicities, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of the proteasome inhibitor, PS-341 (bortezomib), in patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (14 male and 14 female) received PS-341 twice weekly for 4 of 6 weeks (schedule I). Because toxicity necessitated dose omissions on this schedule, 16 additional patients (12 male and 4 female) received PS-341 twice weekly for 2 of every 3 weeks (schedule II). A total of 73 courses of treatment was given (median, 2; range, 1-4). Inhibition of 20S proteasome activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and accumulation of proteasome-targeted polypeptides in tumor tissue were evaluated as pharmacodynamic markers of PS-341 activity. RESULTS: The most common toxicity was thrombocytopenia, which was dose limiting at 1.7 mg/m2 (schedule I) and 1.6 mg/m2 (schedule II), respectively. Sensory neuropathy was dose-limiting in a patient in schedule I. Grade > or =3 toxicities for schedule I were constipation, fatigue, myalgia, and sensory neuropathy. Grade > or =3 toxicities for schedule II were dehydration resulting from diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, hypoglycemia, and hypotension. The maximum tolerated dose was 1.5 mg/m2 for both schedules. Reversible dose-dependent decreases in 20S proteasome activity in PBMCs were observed, with 36% inhibition at 0.5 mg/m2, 52% at 0.9 mg/m2, and 75% at 1.25 mg/m2. Accumulation of proteasome-targeted polypeptides was detected in tumor samples after treatment with PS-341. A patient with multiple myeloma had a partial response. CONCLUSION: PS-341 given 1.5 mg/m2 twice weekly for 2 of every 3 weeks is well tolerated and should be further studied.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of NSC 655649, a rebeccamycin analogue, given in both single-dose and multiple-dose formats.

PURPOSE: NSC 655649 was given in both single- and multiple-dose formats, to characterize maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and pharmacokinetic profile. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of NSC 655649 in either a single-dose format (step 1) or a multiple-dose format (step 2). In step 1, NSC 655649 was given as a 30-60 min infusion. In step 2, the NSC 655649 dose was divided into three consecutive daily doses. Plasma and urine were sampled to assess the pharmacokinetic and excretory characteristics of NSC 655649. A total of 12 patients were enrolled at the MTD for the purpose of gender equity. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were treated with NSC 655649 for a total of 108 cycles in step 1, and 26 patients were treated for a total of 41 cycles in step 2. The MTD for both steps 1 and 2 was determined to be 572 mg/m(2). Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity. Local venous irritation was generally grade 1-2 in severity but could only be adequately prevented by administration of study drug through central i.v. access. One patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary experienced a partial response on step 1. Four patients experienced stable disease of >100 days duration. CONCLUSIONS: NSC 655649 may be safely given at an MTD of 572 mg/m(2) in both single-dose and multiple-dose formats. Optimally, this drug should be administered through central i.v. access.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a micronized formulation of carboxyamidotriazole, a calcium signal transduction inhibitor: toxicity, bioavailability and the effect of food.

PURPOSE: This Phase I study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity profile and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of an oral micronized formulation of the signal transduction inhibitor carboxyamidotriazole (CAI). Bioavailability of the micronized formulation relative to a gelatin capsule (gelcap) formulation was assessed. The effects of food intake and timing on CAI steady-state plasma concentrations (C(ss)) were also investigated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received continuous daily CAI (28-day cycles). Starting dose was 150 mg/m(2) daily and escalations were by 50 mg/m(2) increments. The first three patients enrolled were given test doses of the original gelcap formulation and two different micronized formulations to determine relative bioavailability. Toxicity and pharmacokinetic assessments were performed weekly. Additional cohorts were added after MTD determination to assess the effect of food intake and duration of fast on CAI C(ss). RESULTS: The micronized formulation was absorbed more slowly than the gelcap formulation. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation portion of the study. After dose escalation to 300 mg/m(2), dose-limiting neurotoxicities occurred including reversible vision loss in two patients. Other toxicities were mild. The final MTD was 150 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetics appeared linear with significant inter- and intrapatient variability. Patients with C(ss) of > or = 4.0 mg/liter were more likely to have neurotoxicity. Nine patients with renal cell cancer and one with hepatocellular cancer had prolonged stable disease. CAI plasma concentrations were higher when taken with food. CONCLUSIONS: Micronized CAI was well tolerated at the MTD of 150 mg/m(2). Higher doses were limited by significant neurotoxicity. The variability in CAI pharmacokinetics may be partially attributable to concomitant food intake and timing of the dose.

A phase I trial of perifosine (NSC 639966) on a loading dose/maintenance dose schedule in patients with advanced cancer.

Perifosine (NSC 639966) is a synthetic, substituted heterocyclic alkylphosphocholine that acts primarily at the cell membrane targeting signal transduction pathways. Early clinical trials were limited because of dose-limiting gastrointestinal toxicity, and parenteral dosing of this class of agents is not possible because of their hemolytic properties; therefore, related compounds with an improved therapeutic index were developed. Toxicity was minimized and efficacy improved by using a loading dose/maintenance dose schedule, and therefore, this schedule was carried into clinical trials. This phase I trial enrolled 42 patients with incurable solid malignancies. The starting doses were 100 mg p.o. x four doses (every 6 hours) load followed by a 50 mg p.o. once daily maintenance dose with escalation of either component in successive dose levels. No treatment related deaths occurred. The maximum-tolerated dose was determined to be 150 mg p.o. x four doses load and 100 mg p.o. once daily maintenance. Dose-limiting toxicities such as nausea, diarrhea, dehydration, and fatigue were seen early during the loading phase and were surmountable with the use of prophylactic 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, dexamethasone, and loperamide. Toxicities during the chronic phase were difficult to manage and, given that pharmacokinetic data showed biologically active serum concentrations (based on preclinical data), raised the question of less frequent maintenance dosing. Pharmacokinetic data confirmed the maintenance of stable drug levels with chronic dosing and the long half-life. One partial response was seen, as were multiple patients with stable disease beyond course 2. These results suggest perifosine activity in sarcoma and perhaps renal cell carcinoma (stable disease in two patients who continued for 6 and 14 courses), thus justifying additional investigation of this agent in a phase II sarcoma trial.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of prinomastat, a matrix metalloprotease inhibitor.

PURPOSE: Prinomastat is a matrix metalloprotease (MMP) inhibitor with selectivity for MMPs 2, 3, 9, 13, and 14. Inhibition of these MMPs has been postulated to block tumor invasion and metastasis. This Phase I, dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the acute and chronic toxicities of various doses of prinomastat and to determine prinomastat pharmacokinetics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Seventy-five patients with advanced cancer were given 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg prinomastat orally twice daily until tumor progression or development of significant toxicities. Prinomastat pharmacokinetics were measured on day 29 of therapy. RESULTS: The primary toxicities identified were joint and muscle-related pain, which were generally reversible with treatment rest and/or dose reduction. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted within the first 4 weeks of treatment, but grade 2-3 arthralgias and myalgias were noted 2-3 months after initiation of therapy in >25% of patients at doses >25 mg twice a day. The frequency and severity of symptoms were dose related. Plasma prinomastat concentrations greater than the K(i) for MMPs 2 and 9 were achieved at all of the dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 5-10 mg bid were recommended for additional trials, because this dose range was well tolerated for a treatment duration of at least 3 months and achieves trough plasma concentrations 10-100-fold greater than the K(i) (in vitro inhibition constant) for the targeted MMPs (2 and 9).

Continuous 28-day iododeoxyuridine infusion and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy for malignant glioma: a phase I clinical study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the maximal tolerated dose of a continuous 28-day iododeoxyuridine (IUdr) infusion combined with hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART); to analyze the percentage of IUdr-thymidine replacement in peripheral granulocytes as a surrogate marker for IUdr incorporation into tumor cells; to measure the steady-state serum IUdr levels; and to assess the feasibility of continuous IUdr infusion and HART in the management of malignant glioma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were required to have biopsy-proven malignant glioma. Patients received 100 (n = 4), 200 (n = 3), 300 (n = 3), 400 (n = 6), 500 (n = 4), 625 (n = 5), or 781 (n = 6) mg/m(2)/d of IUdr by continuous infusion for 28 days. HART was started 7 days after IUdr initiation. The total dose was 70 Gy (1.2 Gy b.i.d. for 25 days with a 10-Gy boost [2.0 Gy for 5 Saturdays]). Weekly assays were performed to determine the percentage of IUdr-DNA replacement in granulocytes and serum IUdr levels using standard high performance liquid chromatography methods. Standard Phase I toxicity methods were used. RESULTS: Between June 1994 and August 1999, 31 patients were enrolled. No patient had Grade 3 or worse HART toxicity. Grade 3 or greater IUdr toxicity predominantly included neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 3), and elevated liver function studies (n = 3). The maximal tolerated dose was 625 mg/m(2)/d. Thymidine replacement in the peripheral granulocytes peaked at 3 weeks and increased with the dose (maximal thymidine replacement 4.9%). The steady-state plasma IUdr level increased with the dose (maximum, 1.5 microM). CONCLUSION: In our study, continuous long-term IUdr i.v. infusion had a maximal tolerated dose of 625 mg/m(2)/d. Granulocyte incorporation data verified the concept that prolonged IUdr infusion results in IUdr-DNA replacement that corresponds to a high degree of cell labeling. IUdr steady-state plasma levels increased with increasing dose and attained levels needed for clinical radiosensitization. Continuous IUdr infusion and HART were both feasible and well tolerated.

Phase I study of docetaxel and topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and topotecan are drugs with different mechanisms of action and significant activity against various tumour types. Topotecan may influence docetaxel metabolism by inhibiting the CYP3A4 enzyme. We designed a phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose of this combination and to assess the impact of pharmacokinetic interactions of the two drugs on toxicity. METHODS: Docetaxel and topotecan were administered intravenously on day 1, and days 1 - 5 respectively, using a phase I dose escalation design. Plasma samples were analysed to determine docetaxel and topotecan concentration by HPLC with subsequent pharmacokinetic analysis using NONMEM. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients enrolled in the trial, 11 had grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and 1 had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhaematological toxicities were less frequent. The maximum tolerated dose for docetaxel and topotecan were 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1 - 5, respectively. One patient had stable disease. Subjects with grade >or= 3 haematologic toxicity had higher plasma docetaxel or topotecan area under the curve (AUC) (docetaxel 1.03 +/- 0.11 mg-hr/L versus 0.73 +/- 0.13 mg-hr/L; topotecan 65.8 +/- 14.6 mcg-hr/L versus 41.6 +/- 13.9 mcg-hr/L). There was no additive effect of the AUC of the two drugs on the likelihood of grade >or= 3 haematologic toxicity by multiple logistic regression. CONCLUSION: The dose-limiting toxicity seen with the combination of docetaxel and topotecan was myelosuppression. Future trials will require growth factor support if this combination is pursued.

Phase I study of eniluracil, oral 5-fluororacil and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancy.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this trial were to assess the maximal tolerated dose and toxicity of the combination of oral eniluracil and 5-fluorouracil and intravenous gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed, incurable malignancy (solid tumor or lymphoma) refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy exists were enrolled. The treatment plan consisted of weekly gemcitabine for three weeks with twice daily dosing of 5-FU and eniluracil for 21 days beginning on day one of gemcitabine. Cycles repeated on an every four week schedule. The initial cohort received gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, oral 5-FU 0.6 mg/m2 and eniluracil 6.0 mg/m2. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Eight patients received less than 2 cycles of therapy. Hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity predominated, with 48% of courses resulted in grade one or two neutropenia. Hematologic toxicity was dose limiting. One treatment related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine offers an oral alternative for 5-FU administration. The recommended phase II dose is gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, 5FU 1.2 mg/m2 and eniluracil 12 mg/m2.