The role of the specialist nurse in comprehensive care for bleeding disorders in Europe: An integrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Managing bleeding disorders (BDs) is complex, requiring a comprehensive approach coordinated by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Haemophilia nurses (HNs) play a central role in the MDT, frequently coordinating care. As novel treatments bring change to the treatment landscape, ongoing education and development is key. However, understanding of the roles and tasks of HNs is lacking. AIM: The EAHAD Nurses Committee sought to identify and describe the roles and tasks of the European HN. METHODS: A five-step integrative review was undertaken, including problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data synthesis and presentation. Relevant literature published from 2000 to 2022 was identified through database, hand and ancestry searching. Data were captured using extraction forms and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Seven hundred and seventy-seven articles were identified; 43 were included. Five main roles were identified, with varied and overlapping associated tasks: Educator, Coordinator, Supporter, Treater and Researcher. Tasks related to education, coordination and support were most frequently described. Patient education was often 'nurse-led', though education and coordination roles concerned both patients and health care practitioners (HCPs), within and beyond the MDT. The HN coordinates care and facilitates communication. Long-term patient care relationships place HNs in a unique position to provide support. Guidelines for HN core competencies have been developed in some countries, but autonomy and practice vary. CONCLUSION: As the treatment landscape changes, all five main HN roles will be impacted. Despite national variations, this review provides a baseline to anticipate educational needs to enable HNs to continue to fulfil their role.

Infrastructural considerations of implementing gene therapy for hemophilia in the Nordic context.

Background: Despite improvements in hemophilia care, challenges remain, including treatment burden and impaired quality of life. Gene therapy may overcome these. However, its introduction presents a challenge. Objectives: To outline a function-based gene therapy working model describing critical milestones associated with gene therapy handling, administration, and follow-up to facilitate and implement an effective infrastructure for gene therapy introduction. Design: Literature review and consensus discussion among Hemophilia Comprehensive Care centers (HCCCs) in the Nordic region. Methods: Representatives from six HCCCs sought to pinpoint milestones and key stakeholders for site readiness at the pre-, peri-, and post-infusion stages, including authority and genetically modified organism (GMO) product requirements, awareness, medical eligibility, logistics and product handling for infusion, laboratory monitoring, and follow-up. Results: A gene therapy transit map was developed with key stakeholders identified. The approach to prepare the vector will differ between the Nordic centers, but the contracted pharmacy unit will be a key stakeholder. Therefore, a pharmacy checklist for the implementation of gene therapy was developed. For the future, Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product centers will also be implemented. Patients' expectations, commitments, and concerns need to be addressed repeatedly and education of patients and the expanded health-care professionals team will be the key to successful and optimal clinical management. Eligibility testing according to the product's summary of product characteristics and frequent follow-up and monitoring post-infusion according to the World Federation of Hemophilia chart will be crucial. Conclusion: The approach to deliver gene therapy in the Nordic region will differ partly between the hemophilia centers, but the defined road map with checklists for the implementation of this advanced therapy will be applicable to all. The map may also serve as a platform for the use of future GMO product options both within and outside the area of hemophilia.

Implementing gene therapy for hemophilia in the Nordic context Why was this study done? • Despite improvements in hemophilia care, challenges remain including treatment burden and impaired quality of life. • Gene therapy may overcome these challenges. • The introduction of gene therapy presents a challenge in many ways. What did the researchers do? • We, as representatives from six Hemophilia Comprehensive Care Centers in the Nordic region, sought to pinpoint milestones and key stakeholders for site readiness at the pre-, peri- and post-infusion stages, including authority and genetically modified organism (GMO) product requirements, awareness, medical eligibility, logistics and product handling for infusion, laboratory monitoring, plus follow-up. What did the researchers find? • We developed a gene therapy transit map and identified key stakeholders. • The approach to prepare the vector will differ between the Nordic centers, but the pharmacy unit will be a key stakeholder. We therefore developed a pharmacy checklist for the implementation of gene therapy. • For the future, Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product centers will be implemented. • Patients' expectations, commitments and concerns need to be addressed repeatedly. • Education of patients and the expanded health care professionals team will be the key to successful and optimal clinical management. • Eligibility testing according to the product's summary of product characteristics and close follow-up and monitoring post-infusion according to the World Federation of Hemophilia chart will be crucial. • Access to both chromogenic and one-stage factor activity assay results from a specialized coagulation laboratory with a short turn-around time is important. What do the findings mean? • The approach to delivering gene therapy in the Nordic region will differ partly between the hemophilia centers, but the defined road map with checklists for the implementation will be applicable to all. • The map may also serve as a platform for the use of future GMO product options both within and outside the area of hemophilia.