Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 97(5): 1610-5; discussion 1615-6, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24636706

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines a minimally invasive, left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) bypass with percutaneous intervention of non-LAD vessels for patients with multivessel coronary disease. The financial implications of HCR have not been compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) through sternotomy. METHODS: The contribution margin is a fiduciary calculation (best hospital payment estimate--total variable costs) used by hospitals to determine fiscal viability of services. From 2010 to 2011, 26 Medicare patients underwent HCR at a single United States institution and were compared with 28 randomly selected, contemporaneous Medicare patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB. All HCR patients underwent a robotic-assisted, sternal-sparing, off-pump, left internal mammary artery-LAD anastomosis plus percutaneous intervention to non-LAD vessels. A linear regression model was used to compare fiscal and utilization outcomes of HCR to OPCAB adjusted for hospital length of stay and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score. RESULTS: On regression analysis controlling for overall length of stay and Predicted Risk of Mortality score, the contribution margin (+$8,771, p<0.0001) was greater for HCR than for OPCAB. Despite higher total cost for HCR compared with OPCAB (+$7,026, p=0.001), the total variable cost (+$2,281, p=0.07) was not significantly different. Best payment estimates (+11,031, p<0.0001) and Medicare reimbursements (+$8,992, p=0.002) were higher for HCR than for OPCAB, and there was a reduction in blood transfusion (-1.5 units, p<0.0001), ventilator time (-10 hours, p=0.001), and postoperative length of stay (-1.2 days, p=0.002) for the HCR group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OPCAB, HCR results in a greater contribution margin for hospitals. This may result from higher reimbursement as well as improved resource utilization postoperatively, which may offset more expensive procedural costs associated with HCR.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Anastomose de Artéria Torácica Interna-Coronária/economia , Medicare/economia , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea/economia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Anastomose de Artéria Torácica Interna-Coronária/métodos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Revascularização Miocárdica/economia , Revascularização Miocárdica/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA