Fluoroscopy-based percutaneous posterior screw placement in the lateral position using the tunnel view technique: technical note.

PURPOSE: Lumbar fusion using lateral single position surgery (LSPS) gained popularity during the last few years. While prone percutaneous pedicle screw placement is well described, placing percutaneous pedicle screws with the patient in the lateral position is considered the most complicated part of LSPS. In this article we describe the fluoroscopy navigated technique for lateral percutaneous screw placement using the tunnel view technique. METHODS: The radiologic background and principles of the tunnel view technique are described. In addition, the special positioning of the patient, the C-arm and the surgical technique is discussed in detail. RESULTS: This technique is used as the standard for percutaneous screw placement in the prone or lateral positions in our department since 2017. Since the introduction of this technique we have had 0% reoperation rate for symptomatic malpositioned pedicle screws. CONCLUSION: The tunnel view technique simplifies pedicle screw placement while allowing for permanent observation of pedicle walls and the superior joint surface during placement of the Jamshidi needle. It also allows for confirmation of intrapedicular position of the screw after its implantation. This technique is safe and feasible in our clinical experience.

Applied anatomy and surgical technique of the lateral single-position L5-S1 fusion.

The latest development in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure is its application in the lateral position to allow for simultaneous posterior percutaneous screw placement. The technical details of the lateral ALIF technique have not yet been described. To describe the surgical anatomy relevant to the lateral ALIF approach we performed a comprehensive anatomical study. In addition, the preoperative imaging, patient positioning, planning of the skin incision, positioning of the C-arm, surgical approach, and surgical technique are discussed in detail. The technique described led to the successful use of the lateral ALIF technique in our clinical cases. No lateral ALIF procedure needed to be aborted during these cases. Our present work gives detailed anatomical background and technical details for the lateral ALIF approach. This teaching article can provide readers with sufficient technical and anatomical knowledge to assist them in performing their first lateral ALIF procedure.

Introducing the craniocervical Y-ligament.

PURPOSE: We examined the accessory atlantoaxial ligaments and found them to be a part of a complex ligamentous structure, which we named craniocervical Y-ligament with respect to its shape. METHODS: The ligaments of the upper cervical spine were dissected in ten Thiel embalmed human cadavers. Origin and attachment of the Y-ligament were described and a detailed photo and video-documentation was carried out with the head in the neutral position, flexion, extension and rotation to study the ligament during these movements. RESULTS: The Y-ligaments were found to be paired and symmetric in all specimens. The shape of the ligament is similar to an Y, its lateral arm connecting the atlas to the axis, its medial arm connecting the occipital bone to the axis, fusing with the two main ligaments, the alar and transverse ligaments. The lateral arm of the Y-ligament was found to be analogous to the accessory atlantoaxial ligament. During cervical flexion, both arms of the Y-ligament became taut while extension made the Y-ligaments relaxed. During rotation both Y-ligaments became taut, moving in the opposite directions in the sagittal plane while following the gliding movements of the lateral masses of the atlas. CONCLUSIONS: The craniocervical Y-ligament is a complex ligamentous structure and has a constant anatomy. Because of its shape and special arrangement, it probably plays a role in limiting both atlantooccipital and atlantoaxial movements. Acknowledgement of this ligamentous structure will help understand upper cervical stability. The present study should serve as a basis for future biomechanical and radiological studies.

Applied anatomy of screw placement via the posterior arch of the atlas and anatomy-based refinements of the technique.

PURPOSE: To present a method of posterior arch and lateral mass screw (PALMS) insertion and to prove its feasibility. METHODS: Four formalin-fixed specimens and 40 macerated atlas vertebras were used to describe the relevant anatomy. The height of the posterior arch was measured on 42 consecutive patients using standard CT of the cervical spine. The operative technique and the special CT reconstructions used for preoperative planning are described. Eight patients underwent posterior fixation using this technique. RESULTS: We described the relevant anatomy and important anatomical landmarks of the posterior arch of the atlas. PALMS placement was modified according to these anatomical findings. Fifteen PALMSs were placed in eight patients using this technique without vascular or neural injury. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to place PALMS using the described technique. CT angiography is of crucial importance for preoperative planning using the described special reconstructions. The arch posterior to the lateral mass (APLM) is defined as the bone stock situated posterior to the lateral mass, respecting its convergence. The ideal entry point for a PALMS is on the APLM above the center of the converging lateral mass. A complete or incomplete ponticulus posticus and a retrotransverse foramen or groove can be used as an accessory landmark to refine the entry point.

Applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach to posterior C1-C2 fusion: an anatomical feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To describe the applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach used to reach the posterior aspect of the C1-C2 complex. Atlantoaxial fusion using a midline posterior approach and polyaxial screw and rod system is widely used. Although minimally invasive variations of this technique have been recently reported, the complex applied anatomy of these approaches has not been described. The C1-C2 complex represents an unique challenge because of its bony and vascular anatomy. In this study, the applied anatomy and feasibility of this technique are examined on cadavers. METHODS: The microsurgical anatomy of the upper cervical spine is examined on a formalin-fixed and on a fresh cadaver. The muscle-splitting approach is performed on 12 fresh cadavers using this technique. RESULTS: The minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach is described in detail. Relevant anatomy and bony landmarks that aid screw placement in C1 and C2 could be well visualized. Using this approach, we were able to reach the lateral mass of the atlas and the inferior articular process and pars interarticularis of the axis in all of the nine cadavers. We placed mini polyaxial screws in C1 lateral mass and C2 pars interarticularis in four cadavers according to the technique described by Harms and Melcher. CONCLUSIONS: Using this approach, it was possible to reach the posterior aspect of C1 and C2; the relevant anatomy needed to perform a C1-C2 fusion could be well visualized.

Anatomical changes in occipitalization: is there an increased risk during the standard posterior approach?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the anatomic changes in a case of occipitalization of the atlas. METHODS: Occipitalization of the atlas was found accidentally in a 64-year-old male cadaver. Anatomic dissection was carried out to examine the posterior aspect of the upper cervical region and craniocervical junction. The occipitalized atlas was then harvested and macerated to study the bony anomaly. RESULTS: In this case of occipitalization, fusion was observed at both lateral masses and at the left posterior hemiarch of the atlas. We found the following soft tissue changes: the rectus capitis posterior minor muscle was lacking on the left side and was atrophic on the right, the obliquus capitis superior muscle was present on both sides showing moderate atrophy and fatty changes. The posterior atlanto-axial membrane was thinner and asymmetric, had a free edge on the right side. Lateral to this edge the dura was lying free. We believe that these changes of the posterior atlanto-axial membrane together with the increased distance between the fused posterior arch of the atlas and the lamina of the axis could cause the observed "dura bulge" at this level. The vertebral artery was entering the skull through a canal on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: In our case, occipitalization considerably changed the anatomy of the upper cervical spine and craniocervical junction. Special care must be taken when using the posterior approach to avoid neurovascular injury in cases with occipitalization.

Single-Position Transpsoas Corpectomy and Posterior Instrumentation in the Thoracolumbar Spine for Different Clinical Scenarios.

BACKGROUND: The concept of single-position spine surgery has been gaining momentum because it has proven to reduce operative time, blood loss, and hospital length of stay with similar or better outcomes than traditional dual-position surgery. The latest development in single-position spine surgery techniques combines either open or posterior pedicle screw fixation with transpsoas corpectomy while in the lateral or prone positioning. OBJECTIVE: To provide, through a multicenter study, the results of our first patients treated by single-position corpectomy. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who underwent corpectomy and instrumentation in the lateral or prone position without repositioning between the anterior and posterior techniques. Data regarding demographics, diagnosis, neurological status, surgical details, complications, and radiographic parameters were collected. The minimum follow-up for inclusion was 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were finally included in our study (24 male patients and 10 female patients), with a mean age of 51.2 (SD ± 17.5) years. Three-quarter of cases (n = 27) presented with thoracolumbar fracture as main diagnosis, followed by spinal metastases and primary spinal infection. Lateral positioning was used in 27 cases, and prone positioning was used in 7 cases. The overall rate of complications was 14.7%. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter series of patients who underwent single-position corpectomy and fusion. This technique has shown to be safe and effective to treat a variety of spinal conditions with a relatively low rate of complications. More series are required to validate this technique as a possible standard approach when thoracolumbar corpectomies are indicated.

Evaluating a paradigm shift from anterior decompression and fusion to muscle-preserving selective laminectomy: a single-center study of degenerative cervical myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Muscle-preserving selective laminectomy (SL) is an alternative to conventional decompression surgery in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). It is less invasive, preserves the extensor musculature, and maintains the range of motion of the cervical spine. Therefore, the preferred treatment for DCM at the authors' institution has changed from anterior decompression and fusion (ADF), including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), toward SL. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes before and after this paradigm shift with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, reoperations, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This study was a retrospective register-based cohort study. All patients with DCM who underwent ADF or SL at the authors' institution from 2008 to 2019 were reviewed. Using ANCOVA, changes in PROMs from baseline to the 2-year follow-up were compared between the two groups, adjusting for clinicodemographic parameters, baseline PROMs, number of decompressed levels, and MRI measurements (C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA], and modified K-line interval [mK-line INT]). The PROMs, including the European Myelopathy Score (EMS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the EQ-5D, were collected from the national Swedish Spine Register. Complications, reoperations, and in-hospital treatment costs were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Ninety patients (mean age 60.7 years, 51 men [57%]) were included in the ADF group and 63 patients (mean age 68.8 years, 41 men [65%]) in the SL group. The ADF and SL groups had similar PROMs at baseline. The preoperative MR images showed similar C2-7 Cobb angles (10.7° [ADF] vs 14.1° [SL], p = 0.12) and mK-line INTs (4.08 vs 4.88 mm, p = 0.07), but different C2-7 SVA values (16.2 vs 19.3 mm, p = 0.04). The comparison of ANCOVA-adjusted mean changes in PROMs from baseline to the 2-year follow-up presented no significant differences between the groups (EMS, p = 0.901; NDI, p = 0.639; EQ-5D, p = 0.378; and EQ-5D health, p = 0.418). The overall complication rate was twice as high in the ADF group (22.2% vs 9.5%, p = 0.049), while the reoperation rate was comparable (16.7% vs 7.9%, p = 0.146). The average in-hospital treatment cost per patient was $6617 (USD) for SL, $7046 for ACDF, and $12,000 for ACCF. CONCLUSIONS: SL provides similar PROMs after 2 years, a significantly lower complication rate, and better cost-effectiveness compared with ADF.

Surgical treatment outcome on a national cohort of 176 patients with cervical manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affecting the cervical spine results in instability and deformity that can be divided into the subtypes C1-C2 horizontal (atlantoaxial instability), C0-C2 vertical (basilar invagination), subaxial, and combined instabilities. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical treatments and outcomes of RA-related deformity and instability in a population-based setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with RA in the national Swespine register from January 1, 2006, to March 20, 2019, were assessed. Baseline characteristics, surgical treatments, European Myelopathy Scale (EMS), Neck Disability Index, the Visual Analog Scale for neck and arm pain as well as pre- and postoperative imaging were analyzed. The follow-up time points were at 1-, 2-, and 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were included. There were 62 (35%) patients with C1-C2 horizontal instability, 48 (27%) with C0-C2 vertical instability, 19 (11%) patients with subaxial instability, 43 (24%) patients with combined instability, and 4 patients without instability served as controls. The EMS improved in the C1-C2 horizontal instability group after fusion surgery (Δ =2.6 p) but remained within baseline confidence intervals in the other groups. All patients regardless of instability improved in pain. The subaxial instability had the highest risk of death within 5 years after surgery (11/19, 58%). The most dangerous complications due to implant failure were seen in patients instrumented with laminar hooks. CONCLUSION: The neurological outcome after fusion surgery is poor and the death rate is high in patients with cervical RA-related instability and deformity.

Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed?

OBJECTIVE: The posterolateral extradural suboccipital approach can be used to reach the anterior epidural space and the retro-odontoid regions. The extent of necessary bone removal of the atlas vertebra (C1) has not yet been defined. We studied the changes in the size of the horizontal and vertical surgical windows using stepwise bone removal of C1. A representative case is shown. METHODS: The anatomical study was performed bilaterally on five Thiel-fixed human cadavers (mean age, 83.7 years). The surgical window (horizontal × vertical) required to access the retro-odontoid region via a posterolateral approach was measured for an intact C1 posterior arch, after a semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch, after resection of the unilateral hemiarch of C1, and finally after drilling approximately 3 mm from the medial aspect of the lateral mass of C1. RESULTS: The intact C1 resulted in a very narrow surgical window of 6.3 mm × 9.7 mm (horizontal × vertical). The vertical window increased to a 13 mm after the semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch and to 17.3 mm in the case of removal of the ipsilateral C1 posterior arch. The bone removal from the medial aspect of the C1 lateral mass resulted in a widening of the horizontal surgical window to 10.3 mm. The final size of the surgical window was 10.3 mm × 17.3 mm. The patient with severe kyphoscoliosis of the craniocervical spine was successfully operated on using odontoid and C1-2 facet osteotomies. CONCLUSION: If only the anterior epidural space or the base of the odontoid needs to be reached, the semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch allows for an adequate surgical window. The tip of the odontoid could only be reached if the ipsilateral posterior arch is resected.

Surgical anatomy of the cochlea for cochlear implantation.

The anatomy of the cochlea was investigated to obtain precise data for surgical cochlear implantation. The aim of this study has been to find the optimal site for cochleostomy, to determine the course of the basal turn and to define the relationship of the cochlea to the middle ear. Our study is the first to depict the cochlea in a classical coordinate system, to compare the anatomical situation to the surgical approaches, and, consequently, to offer firm anatomical basis for minimal invasive intervention. Thirty-five macerated temporal bones of otologically healthy individuals were used to study the surgical anatomy of the cochlea. The cochlea could be divided into three portions: promontorial, muscular and geniculo-tegmental, respectively. In the promontorial part, the basal turn has a characteristic turning around its own axis which is also indicated by the shifting with the bony spiral Lamina. In addition to the basal turn, a small part of the second and third turns of the cochlea can be also revealed behind the promontory. The most superficial part of the cochlea forming the promontory is positioned behind the Jacobson's canal providing an optimal approach for cochleostomy. The geniculo-tegmental portion of the cochlea is almost as large as the promontorial part tying immediately under the tegmen tympani. This area is accessible only from the top using a transtemporal supralabyrinthine approach. The promontorial and muscular portions can be investigated from two directions: through the facial recess and through the external acoustic meatus.