Effectiveness of vergence/accommodative therapy for accommodative dysfunction in children with convergence insufficiency.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy for improving accommodative amplitude and accommodative facility in children with symptomatic convergence insufficiency and accommodative dysfunction. METHODS: We report changes in accommodative function following therapy among participants in the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial - Attention and Reading Trial with decreased accommodative amplitude (115 participants in vergence/accommodative therapy; 65 in placebo therapy) or decreased accommodative facility (71 participants in vergence/accommodative therapy; 37 in placebo therapy) at baseline. The primary analysis compared mean change in amplitude and facility between the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups using analyses of variance models after 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks of treatment. The proportions of participants with normal amplitude and facility at each time point were calculated. The average rate of change in amplitude and facility from baseline to week 4, and from weeks 4 to 16, were determined in the vergence/accommodative therapy group. RESULTS: From baseline to 16 weeks, the mean improvement in amplitude was 8.6 dioptres (D) and 5.2 D in the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups, respectively (mean difference = 3.5 D, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5 to 5.5 D; p = 0.01). The mean improvement in facility was 13.5 cycles per minute (cpm) and 7.6 cpm in the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups, respectively (mean difference = 5.8 cpm, 95% CI: 3.8 to 7.9 cpm; p < 0.0001). Significantly greater proportions of participants treated with vergence/accommodative therapy achieved a normal amplitude (69% vs. 32%, difference = 37%, 95% CI: 22 to 51%; p < 0.0001) and facility (85% vs. 49%, difference = 36%, 95% CI: 18 to 55%; p < 0.0001) than those who received placebo therapy. In the vergence/accommodative therapy group, amplitude increased at an average rate of 1.5 D per week during the first 4 weeks (p < 0.0001), then slowed to 0.2 D per week (p = 0.002) from weeks 4 to 16. Similarly, facility increased at an average rate of 1.5 cpm per week during the first 4 weeks (p < 0.0001), then slowed to 0.6 cpm per week from weeks 4 to 16 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Office-based vergence/accommodative therapy is effective for improving accommodative function in children with symptomatic convergence insufficiency and coexisting accommodative dysfunction.

Near work symptoms and measures of accommodation in children.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Some children experience significant symptoms while doing near work, and accommodative deficits can be a contributory factor. However, studies investigating near work symptoms in children are sparse. BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between clinical and objective measures of accommodation and near point symptoms. METHODS: Twelve asymptomatic and 14 symptomatic children (mean age = 11.1 and 11.8 years, respectively) based on their Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey scores participated in the study. The clinical measures of accommodation were monocular amplitude of accommodation, monocular accommodative facility, and monocular estimation method. Objective measurements of the accommodative stimulus response function were recorded with a WAM-5500 autorefractor for two consecutive minutes at five viewing distances (0.33, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Dioptres [D]). Accommodative findings were compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney U-tests. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between symptoms and clinical and objective measures of accommodation. RESULTS: The mean CISS scores were 32.8 and 7.3 for the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, respectively (p = <0.001). The symptomatic group showed a reduced accommodative functions compared to the asymptomatic group (p = 0.002 for accommodative facility, p = 0.04 for accommodative amplitude, p = 0.029 and 0.01 for objective measures of accommodation at 4D and 5D viewing distance, respectively). Clinical tests of accommodative amplitude and facility (correlation coefficient = -0.407 and -0.54, respectively) showed the highest correlation with the CISS scores, compared to the objective measures of accommodation. CONCLUSION: Clinical tests of accommodation showed a greater association with symptoms than objective measures of accommodation in children aged 8-16 years. In children presenting with visual discomfort symptoms, measurement of accommodative amplitude and facility should be considered.

Validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in children aged 9 to 18 years.

PURPOSE: To assess the validity and reliability of the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) in children aged 9 to 18 years. The CISS is the primary outcome measure for a pilot study evaluating two different treatments for convergence insufficiency (CI). METHODS: Children with CI were given the CISS twice to assess reliability. CISS scores for the first administration were also compared with scores from children with normal binocular vision to assess the validity of the CISS. RESULTS: Forty-seven children with CI and 56 children with normal binocular vision participated in the study. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation and 95% limits of agreement for the children with CI. For children with CI, the intraclass correlation was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.613 to 0.873), and the 95% limits of agreement were -10.2 to +12.1. The mean (+/-SD) CISS score was 30.8 +/- 8.4 for the children with CI and 8.4 +/- 6.4 for the children with normal binocular vision. These means were significantly different (p < 0.0001). Good discrimination (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 88%) was obtained using a score of >/=16. CONCLUSIONS: Children with CI showed a significantly higher CISS symptom score than children with normal binocular vision. The results of the study indicate that the CISS is a valid and reliable instrument to use as an outcome measure for children aged 9 to 18 who are enrolled in clinical research concerning CI.

Validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in adults.

PURPOSE: To assess the validity and reliability of the revised Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) in adults aged 19-30 years. The CISS was developed to be the primary outcome measure for studies evaluating various treatments for convergence insufficiency (CI). METHODS: CISS mean scores from adults with symptomatic CI and adults with normal binocular vision (NBV) were compared to assess the survey's validity. Adults with symptomatic CI were given the CISS twice to evaluate reliability, which was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: Forty-six adults with CI and 46 adults with NBV participated in the study. The mean CISS score for the CI group was 37.3 (S.D. = 9.3) and 11.0 (S.D. = 8.2) for the NBV group. These mean values were significantly different (p < 0.0001). Good discrimination (sensitivity = 97.8%, specificity = 87%) was obtained using a score of 21 or higher. For the CI group the ICC was 0.885 (95% CI of 0.798, 0.936) and the 95% limits of agreement were -9.0 to 7.6. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with symptomatic CI had a significantly higher CISS score than adults with NBV. The results of the study demonstrate that the CISS is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used clinically or as an outcome measure for research studies of adults with CI.