RESUMO
PURPOSE: The efficacy of the 1-h bundle for emergency department (ED) patients with suspected sepsis, which includes lactate measurement, blood culture, broad-spectrum antibiotics administration, administration of 30 mL/kg crystalloid fluid for hypotension or lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, remains controversial. METHODS: We carried out a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial in 23 EDs in France and Spain. Adult patients with Sepsis-3 criteria or a quick sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 2 or a lactate > 2 mmol/L were eligible. The intervention was the implementation of the 1-h sepsis bundle. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality truncated at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included volume of fluid resuscitation at 24 h, acute heart failure at 24 h, SOFA score at 72 h, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, number of days on mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy, vasopressor free days, unnecessary antibiotic administration, and mortality at 28 days. 1148 patients were planned to be analysed; the study period ended after 873 patients were included. RESULTS: 872 patients (mean age 66, 42% female) were analyzed: 387 (44.4%) in the intervention group and 485 (55.6%) in the control group. Median SOFA score was 3 [1-5]. Median time to antibiotic administration was 40 min in the intervention group vs 113 min in the control group (difference - 73 [95% confidence interval (CI) - 93 to - 53]). There was a significantly higher rate, volume, and shorter time to fluid resuscitation within 3 h in the intervention group. There were 47 (12.1%) in-hospital deaths in the intervention group compared to 61 (12.6%) in the control group (difference in percentage - 0.4 [95% CI - 5.1 to 4.2], adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.48 to 1.39]). There were no differences between groups for other secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with suspected sepsis in the ED, the implementation of the 1-h sepsis bundle was not associated with significant difference in in-hospital mortality. However, this study may be underpowered to report a statistically significant difference between groups.
RESUMO
Objetivo: Existe una elevada tasa de infección oculta y diagnóstico tardío en el VIH. Los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) son un punto importante de atención sanitaria. El presente trabajo tiene el objetivo conocer el número de oportunidades perdidas para el diagnóstico de VIH que ocurren en los SUH. Método: Estudio multicéntrico de cohortes retrospectivo que incluyó a todos los pacientes diagnosticados de infección por el VIH en el año 2019 en 27 hospitales españoles de 7 comunidades autónomas diferentes. Se revisaron todos los episodios de consulta en los SUH en los 5años previos al diagnóstico para conocer el motivo de consulta y si este representaba una oportunidad perdida para el diagnóstico de VIH. Resultado: Se incluyeron 723 pacientes, y 352 de ellos (48,7%; IC95%: 45,1-52,3%) presentaron al menos una visita a un SUH durante los 5años anteriores al diagnóstico (mediana2; p25-p75: 1-4). Ciento dieciocho pacientes (16,3%; IC95%: 13,8-19,2%) presentaron oportunidad perdida de diagnóstico. Las principales consultas fueron consumo de drogas (145 [15%]), infecciones de transmisión sexual (91 [9,4%]) y solicitud de profilaxis de VIH postexposición (39 [4%]). Ciento cincuenta y cinco (42,9%) de los 352 tenían menos de 350CD4/mm3 cuando se estableció el diagnóstico de VIH. En los pacientes con visitas previas a urgencias, el tiempo medio hasta el diagnóstico desde esta visita fue de 580 (DE647) días. Conclusiones: El 16% de los pacientes diagnosticados de VIH perdieron la oportunidad de ser diagnosticados en los 5años previos al diagnóstico, lo que pone de manifiesto la necesidad de implementar medidas de cribado en los SUH diferentes a las actuales para mejorar estos resultados.(AU)
Objective: There is a high rate of occult infection and late diagnosis in HIV. Hospital emergency departments (ED) are an important point of health care. The present work aims to know the number of missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis occurring in the ED. Method: Retrospective multicenter cohort study that included all patients diagnosed with HIV infection in 2019 in 27 Spanish hospitals in 7 different autonomous communities. All ED consultation episodes in the 5years prior to diagnosis were reviewed to find out the reason for consultation and whether this represented a missed opportunity for HIV diagnosis. Result: Seven hundred twenty-three patients were included, and 352 (48.7%; 95%CI: 45.1%-52.3%) had at least one ED visit during the 5years prior to diagnosis (median2; p25-p75: 1-4). One hundred and eighteen patients (16.3%; 95%CI: 13.8%-19.2%) had a missed diagnostic opportunity. The main consultations were drug use (145 [15%]), sexually transmitted infections (91 [9.4%]) and request for post-exposure HIV prophylaxis (39 [4%]). One hundred and fifty-five (42.9%) of the 352 had less than 350CD4/mm3 when the HIV diagnosis was established. In patients with previous ED visits, the mean time to diagnosis from this visit was 580 (SD647) days. Conclusions: Sixteen percent of patients diagnosed with HIV missed the opportunity to be diagnosed in the 5years prior to diagnosis, highlighting the need to implement ED screening measures different from current ones to improve these outcomes.(AU)