Evaluation of a French Regional Telemedicine Network Dedicated to Neurological Emergencies: A 14-Year Study.

BACKGROUND: Equality in healthcare between urban and rural areas is problematic in France. Telemedicine networks are expected to improve equality in expertise assessment. We aimed to evaluate the use and impact of a regional rural French telemedicine network, dedicated to medical and surgical neurological emergencies, on interhospital patient transfers. METHODS: Eight community hospital emergency departments were remotely connected to the only university hospital in Franche-Comté, France. We prospectively obtained data from all patients consecutively admitted to emergency care departments in the region and who received medical or neurosurgical expertise by telemedicine from January 2002 to December 2015. The reasons for requesting expertise, number of requested neurological opinions, and interhospital patient transfers were analyzed. Economic savings were determined by estimating the cost of avoided transfers. RESULTS: A total of 23,710 patients had telemedicine consultations in the region. The network was used by every community hospital (independently of the existence of local neurological teams). These consultations were overwhelmingly for cases of stroke (30%) and head or spinal injuries (36%). Cerebral tumors represented 9% of teleconsultations. In 2015, 75% of patients admitted to the remote hospitals that did not have onsite neurological expertise nevertheless received neurovascular tele-expertise. The rate of thrombolyzed patients dramatically increased within 13 years regionally (9.9%) and 33.5% of thrombolyses were performed by telemedicine. The number of patients examined by telemedicine and admitted for head or spinal injuries also increased over the 13-year period (12% vs. 21%). Secondary interhospital transfers were halved for both pathologies. The estimated saving is ∼€3.5 million. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine networks facilitate acute-phase neurological assessment and prevent unnecessary secondary interhospital transfers.

Simulation-Based Teaching of Telemedicine for Future Users of Teleconsultation and Tele-Expertise: Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals worldwide are increasingly using telemedicine in their daily clinical practice. However, there is still a lack of dedicated education and training even though it is needed to improve the quality of the diverse range of telemedicine activities. Simulation-based training may be a useful tool in telemedicine education and training delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of simulation-based telemedicine training. METHODS: We assessed five telemedicine training sessions conducted in a simulation laboratory. The training was focused on video teleconsultations between a patient and a health care professional. The assessment included the participants' satisfaction and attitudes toward the training. RESULTS: We included 29 participants in total. Participant satisfaction was high (mean score 4.9 of 5), and those that took part stated the high applicability of the simulation-based training to their telemedicine practices (mean score 4.6 of 5). They also stated that they intended to use telemedicine in the future (mean score 4.5 of 5). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based training of telemedicine dedicated to video teleconsultation was feasible and showed high satisfaction from participants. However, it remains difficult to scale for a high number of health care professionals.

Does Intravenous Thrombolysis Influence the Time of Recanalization and Success of Mechanical Thrombectomy during the Acute Phase of Cerebral Infarction?

OBJECTIVES: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion. Recanalization time is a key factor in the treatment of AIS. It has previously been suggested that intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) may be associated with a shorter recanalization time. The aim of our study was to investigate whether IVT or other factors could be associated with shorter or longer MT procedure times. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a local cohort of patients treated by MT. We collected procedure time (puncture to recanalization and clot visualization to recanalization), demographic data, localization of the thrombus, antithrombotic treatment at arrival, IVT infusion, and stroke subtype at discharge according to the TOAST classification. We planned to analyze the full cohort and the successful revascularization subgroup. RESULTS: There was no difference in procedure times between patients who received IVT and those who did not. In the successful revascularization subgroup, patients presenting with cardioembolic stroke had a significantly shorter time between clot visualizations and revascularization than the other patients (41 vs. 56 min, p = 0.024), but this was not the case in the full cohort. Also in the successful revascularization subgroup, the revascularization time was 76 vs. 61 min (p = 0.075) in patients presenting with tandem occlusion vs. the others, but there was no difference between these groups in the full cohort. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in terms of procedure times in patients treated by IVT and MT vs. patients treated by MT alone either in the full cohort or in the successful revascularization subgroup. The data from the successful revascularization subgroup may be useful for studying revascularization times, provided that data from procedures that were stopped prematurely by the operator due to the length of time since symptom onset is removed.