The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with a posterior guided system and suture-button fixation enables more precise bone block positioning in the axial plane versus anterior screws fixation.

PURPOSE: Adequate position of the bone block during arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is critical for an optimal functional outcome. However, this procedure is complex with a long learning curve. Our aim was to compare the bone block position between a dedicated glenoid posterior instrumentation and suture button fixation versus an anterior screw fixation, on a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. METHOD: Seventy-nine consecutive patients operated on for an anterior shoulder instability were included in this retrospective study. The same surgeon performed arthroscopically the Latarjet procedure either with an anterior drilling and screw fixation (Group A), or with a specific posterior glenoid guide pin, a posterior drilling, and a suture cortical button fixation (Group B). Evaluations were made by two independent observers. The position was evaluated by CT scan in the axial and sagittal planes. Learning curves with operative time, complications and clinical outcomes were assessed at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in Group A and 44 in Group B. In Group A, 27 bone blocks were flush (87.1%) and 38 in Group B (92.7%) (p < 0.01). In Group A, 72% of the bone block height was below the equator and 76%, in Group B (ns). The mean operating time was 123 ± 32.5 min in Group A and 95 ± 34.1 min in Group B (p < 0.0001). At the final follow-up, the mean aggregate Rowe score was respectively 94.6 ± 10.4 and 93.1 ± 9.8 points in Groups A and B. The mean aggregate Walch-Duplay score was respectively 94.2 ± 11.6 and 93.4 ± 10.6 points in Groups A and B. There were 11 complications (31.4%) in Group A and five complications (11.3%) in Group B (ns). CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with a posterior drilling guided system and suture-button fixation allows more precise positioning in the axial plane than with anterior drilling and screw fixation. This posterior-guided procedure could reduce intraoperative and short-term complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Prognostic factors of the synovial sarcoma of the extremities: imaging does matter.

OBJECTIVES: Synovial sarcomas (SS) of the extremities are rare soft tissue sarcomas that are more common in young adults. We deciphered the imaging phenotype of SS with the aim to determine if imaging could provide an incremental value to currently known prognostic factors (PF)-age and histological grade-to predict long-term overall survival (OS). METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included consecutive pediatric and adult patients with synovial sarcomas of the extremities from December 2002 to August 2020. Inclusion criteria were (i) a follow-up greater than 5 years and (ii) available pre-therapeutic MRI. A subset analysis included MRI and CT-scan. Clinical, pathological, and imaging variables were collected in all patients. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the association of these variables with OS using univariate and multivariate Cox regressions. RESULTS: Out of 428 patients screened for eligibility, 98 patients (mean age: 37.1 ± 15.2 years) were included (MRI: n = 98/98, CT scan: n = 34/98; 35%). The median OS was 75.25 months (IQR = 55.50-109.12) and thirty-six patients (n = 36/98;37%) died during follow-up. The recurrence rate was 12.2% (n =12/98). SS lesions were mostly grade 2 (57/98; 58%). On MRI, SS had a mean long-axis diameter of 67.5 ± 38.3 mm. On CT scan, 44% (15/34) were calcified. Grade (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.71; 95%CI = 1.30-5.66; p = 0.008), size of the lesions evaluated on MRI (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01-1.03; p < 0.001), and calcifications on CT scan (HR = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.02-0.50; p = 0.005) were independent PF of OS. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that imaging biomarkers can be used to predict long-term outcome in patients with SS. Strikingly, the presence of calcifications on CT scan is associated with favorable outcome and provides an incremental value over existing PF such as age, grade, and size. KEY POINTS: • Beyond its diagnostic value, MRI is a pre-operative prognostic tool in synovial sarcomas of the extremities since the size of the lesion is an important prognostic factor. • Calcifications on CT scans are independently and significantly associated with prolonged overall survival.

Systematic alignments yield balanced knees without additional releases in only 11% of knee arthroplasties: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: The literature suggests that "forgotten" knees are the most stable knees postoperatively. The main objective of our study was to determine whether a systematic alignment (mechanical, anatomical or kinematic) makes it possible to stabilise the operated joint in extension and in flexion. METHODS: This monocentric prospective cohort study was conducted between May 1st, 2021 and October 31st, 2021. A total of 132 consecutive patients undergoing primary navigated total knee arthroplasty were included, with a mean age of 72.4 years (7.9; 48.8-91.2 years), a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.6 kg/m2 (4.6; 17.6-41.6) and 71.2% (94/132) women. Mechanical, anatomical and kinematic knee alignments were simulated using Kick software for each patient. The primary outcome was the targeted rate of balanced knees for each type of alignment, based on a three-point score, aiming for a 3/3 score for each knee. Our secondary outcome was to characterise the specific implantation finally achieved by the surgeon. RESULTS: The targeted balance was reached in 10.6% (14/132), 10.6% (14/132) and 12.9% (17/132) of knees with mechanical, anatomical and kinematic alignment simulations, respectively. None of these simulations provided a superior number of balanced knees (p = 0.87). When simulating a patient-specific implantation, the highest score was reached in 89.1% (115/132) of cases. CONCLUSION: Systematic alignment simulations achieved knee balance in only 11% of cases. Patient-specific implantation, favouring knee balancing over alignment, allowed an 89% perfect score rate without having to perform any collateral release. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series. Level 4.

A new self-assessment tool following shoulder stabilization surgery, the auto-Walch and auto-Rowe questionnaires.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) are increasingly used for patient evaluation, as well as for scientific research. Few are used for practical purposes in the clinical setting, and few are reliable enough to allow proper feedback to physicians. Two of the most commonly used assessment tools in shoulder instability are the Walch-Duplay and the Rowe scores. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of self-administered versions of the Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores following shoulder stabilization procedure. METHODS: Between the months of May and December 2021, all patients who were followed in one of six institutions for shoulder instability were included. Patients were required to anonymously fill a self-administered version of Walch-Duplay and Rowe score. The classic scores were measured by the surgeon. Correlations between self-assessment and physician-assessment were then recorded. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were evaluated during the study period. Using the Spearman coefficient for correlation, a strong correlation (r > 0.5) was found between the results of the self-administered questionnaire and the surgeon-measured score. The difference between surgeon- and patient-administered questionnaires was non-significant. CONCLUSION: The self-administered version of the Walch-Duplay and Rowe questionnaires can reliably be used in the clinical setting for post-operative follow-up of patients undergoing shoulder stabilization procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Age Influence Upon Glenohumeral Remodeling After Shoulder Axial Rebalancing Surgery in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder rebalancing procedures have been proven to provide satisfactory functional improvements in patients with shoulder external rotation (ER) deficit due to brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). However, the influence of age at the time of surgery on osteoarticular remodeling remains uncertain. The purposes of this retrospective case series were (1) to assess the age impact on glenohumeral remodeling and (2) to determine an age limit after which significant changes can no longer be expected. METHODS: We reviewed preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging data of 49 children with BPBI who underwent a tendon transfer to reanimate active shoulder ER, with (n=41) or without (n=8) concomitant anterior shoulder release to restore passive shoulder ER, at a mean age of 72 ± 40 months (19;172). Mean radiographic follow-up was 35 ± 20 months (12;95). Univariate linear regressions were used to assess the influence of age at the time of surgery upon changes of glenoid version, glenoid shape, percentage of the humeral head anterior to the glenoid midline, and glenohumeral deformity. Beta coefficients with 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Improvements of glenoid version, glenoid shape, percentage of the humeral head anterior and glenohumeral deformity significantly decreased by 0.19 degrees [CI=(-0.31; -0.06), P =0.0046], 0.02 grade [CI=(-0.04; -0.01), P =0.002], 0.12% [CI=(-0.21; -0.04), P =0.0076], and 0.01 grade [CI=(-0.02; -0.01), P =0.0078] per additional month of age at the time of surgery, respectively. The threshold of 5 years was identified as the age at the time of surgery after which significant remodeling no longer occurred. No significant postoperative changes were observed in patients without glenohumeral dysplasia on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSION: In the setting of BPBI-related glenohumeral dysplasia, the younger the surgical axial rebalancing of the shoulder, the greater the glenohumeral remodeling seems to be. Such procedure seems to be safe in patients without significant joint deformity on preoperative imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic-Level IV.

Clinical evaluation of a resurfacing device implant for femoral osteochondral defects greater than 1 cm2 with a minimal follow-up of 4 years: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Osteochondral defects have a limited capacity to heal and can evolve to an early osteoarthritis. A surgical possibility is the replacement of the affected cartilaginous area with a resurfacing device BioPoly™ RS Partial Resurfacing Knee Implant. The aim of this study was to report the clinical and survival outcomes of the BioPoly™ after a minimum follow-up of 4 years. METHODS: This study included all patients who had a BioPoly™ for femoral osteochondral defects greater than 1 cm2 and at least ICRS grade 2. The main outcome was to observe the KOOS and the Tegner activity score were used to assess outcomes preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The secondary outcomes were the VAS for pain, the complications rate post-surgery and survival rate of BioPoly™ at the last FU. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with 44.4% (8/18) of women were included with a mean age of 46.6 years (11.4), a mean body mass index (BMI) of 21.5 (kg/m2) (2.3). The mean follow-up was 6.3 years (1.3). We found a significant difference comparing pre-operative KOOS score and at last follow-up [respectively, 66.56(14.37) vs 84.17(7.656), p < 0.01]. At last follow-up, the Tegner score was different [respectively, 3.05(1.3) vs 3.6(1.3), p < 0.01]. At 5 years, the survival rate was of 94.7%. CONCLUSIONS: BioPoly™ is a real alternative for femoral osteochondral defects greater than 1 cm2 and at least ICRS grade 2. It will be interesting to compare this implant to mosaicplasty technic and/or microfracture at 5 years postoperatively regarding clinical outcomes and survival rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III. Prospective cohort study.

Managing early complications in total hip arthroplasty: the safety of immediate revision.

PURPOSE: Immediate revision refers to a reoperation that involves resetting, draping, and exchanging the implant, after wound closure in total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of immediate revision after total hip arthroplasty on subsequent infection and complication rates. METHODS: A total of 14,076 primary total hip arthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020 were identified in our institutional database, of which 42 underwent immediate revision. Infection rates were determined 2 years after the index arthroplasty. The cause and type of revision, duration of primary and revision surgeries, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score, implant type, changes in implants, complications, and preoperative and intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis were all determined. RESULTS: No infections were observed within 2 years after the index arthroplasty. Leg length discrepancy (88%, n = 37) and dislocation (7.1%, n = 3) were the main causes of immediate revision. In most cases of discrepancy, the limb was clinically and radiologically longer before the immediate revision. The mean operative time was 48 ± 14 min for the primary procedure and 23.6 ± 9 min for the revision. The time between the first incision and last skin closure ranged from 1 to 3 h. None of the patients were extubated between the two procedures. Two patients had a National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score of 2, 13 had a score of 1, and 27 had a score of 0. CONCLUSION: Immediate revision is safe for correcting clinical and radiological abnormalities, and may not be associated with increased complication or infection rates. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; level of evidence, 3.

The ALR-RSI score is a valid and reproducible scale to assess psychological readiness before returning to sport after modified Broström-Gould procedure.

PURPOSE: Psychological readiness scores have been developed to optimize the return to play in many sports-related injuries. The purpose of this study was to statistically validate the ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport injury (ALR-RSI) scale after modified Broström-Gould (MBG) procedure. METHODS: A similar version of the ACL-RSI scale with 12 items was adapted to quantify the psychological readiness to RTS after MBG and to describe construct validity, discriminant validity, feasibility, reliability and internal consistency of the scale, according to the COSMIN methodology. The term "knee" was replaced by "ankle". The AOFAS and Karlsson scores were used as references patient-related outcome measurements (PROMs). RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included. The ALR-RSI score after MBG procedure was highly (r > 0.5) correlated to the AOFAS and Karlsson scores, with a Pearson coefficient r = 0.69 [0.54-0.80] and 0.72 [0.53-0.82], respectively. The mean ALR-RSI score was significantly greater in the subgroup of 55 patients who resumed sports activity compared to those that no longer practiced sport: 61.9 (43.8-79.6) vs 43.4 (25.0-55.6), (p = 0.01). The test-retest showed an "excellent" reproducibility with a ρ intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.93 [0.86-0.96]. The Cronbach's alpha statistic was 0.95, attesting an "excellent" internal consistency between the 12 ALR-RSI items. CONCLUSION: The ALR-RSI score is a valid and reproducible tool for the assessment of psychological readiness to RTS after an MBG procedure for the management of CLAI, in a young and active population. The ALR-RSI score may help to identify and counsel athletes on their ability to return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Use of a locking stem for reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a rare but reliable option.

INTRODUCTION: RSA is widely used in the treatment of complex trauma or degenerative changes of the shoulder. Strong primary fixation of the stem is necessary to prevent any loosening of the stem and subsequent revision. Presently, cement fixation or press-fit fixation are two options for humeral fixation, though each has its own limitations and risks. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternative option involving a distal screw interlocking system for fixation of the humeral stem from initial implantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients implanted with the Humelock Reversed® stem RSA that can be locked with distal humeral screws in cases of operative poor press fit or to modulate the lengthening of the arm via prosthetic humeral height. Seventy-two patients with a minimum two year follow-up were included, 13 for acute trauma, 42 for degenerative changes, and 17 for revision surgery. RESULTS: No difference was seen in radiological or clinical results for patients with or without interlocking screw primary stabilization. For non-trauma patients, the mean raw Constant score improved significantly from 31 (± 12) to 71 (± 12). For trauma patients, the mean raw Constant score for trauma (63.4) was significantly lower than for non-trauma cases (72.1) (p < 0.001). Analysis of the filling ratio demonstrated that interlocking screws were not used for lower filling ratios and that midterm fixation of the stem is not negatively impacted by distal interlocking screw fixation. DISCUSSION: Even if use of a distal interlocking screw fixation system is rare, it can be useful for patients with poor quality fixation of stemmed RSA. CONCLUSION: Use of an interlocking screw system to stabilize the stem in RSA provides good immediate and midterm stability of the implant allowing for clinical and radiological outcomes comparable to those obtained with press-fit fixation alone.

Ankle CT scan allows better management of posterior malleolus fractures than X-rays.

PURPOSE: Undiagnosed and undertreated posterior malleolus fractures lead to early ankle instability and arthritis. A preoperative CT scan could improve the management of those fractures. This study assessed the benefits of a systematic ankle CT scanner to diagnose and manage posterior malleolus fracture. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted. Sixty consecutive patients with bimalleolar fractures were operated and underwent a preoperative CT scan. The mean age was 50.0 years old (18.6 years old) with a mean body mass index of 20.3 (kg/m2) (11.4 kg/m2) and 71.7% (43/60) of women. The primary outcome was the rate of posterior malleolus fragment diagnosed on X-rays and on CT scan. Secondly, interobserver and interobserver's agreement were compared between conventional X-rays and CT scan. RESULTS: Thirty-five (58.3%) posterior fragment fractures were observed on X-rays and 53 (88.3%) on the preoperative CT scan (p < 0.01). The intraobserver reproducibility for X-rays was low (0.02 [- 0.23; 0.27]) and moderate for CT scan (0.45 [0.0; 0.84]). The interobserver reproducibility for X-rays was moderate (0.39 [0.15; 0.60]) and excellent for CT scan (0.78 [0.0; 1.0]). CONCLUSION: A wide proportion of bimalleolar fractures are associated with posterior malleolus fractures and undiagnosed with standard X-rays. We advocate a systematic preoperative CT scan in the management of bimalleolar fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2218999v0, date of registration: 11/08/2020 (retrospectively registered).

Comparative Efficacy of the Different Surgical Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic-Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several surgical approaches including midvastus, subvastus, mini-parapatellar, quadriceps-sparring (QS) and parapatellar are currently used to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since none of published study exhibited a simultaneous comparison of all of them, a network meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the most widely used knee surgical approaches regarding the improvement of functional outcomes and the range of motion (ROM). METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TKA approaches were searched in electronic databases, major orthopedics journals, and oral communications, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until May 1st, 2020. Two reviewers independently selected trials and extracted data. The primary outcomes were functional scores at 6 months post-surgeryevaluated by KSS and WOMAC, and the ROM. RESULTS: Sixty RCTs involving 5042 patients with 5107 TKA were included. No significant differences between different approaches were found for the KSS assessment or the WOMAC at 6 months. The mean of ROM at 6 months post-surgery were higher in the subvastus group than in all the others surgical approaches. The difference of ROM with subvastus approach was 7.3° (95% CI -14.1 to -0.1) with the midvastus approach, 11.1° (95% CI -18.7 to -2.8) with mini-parapatellar, 8.9° (95% CI -14.2 to -3.1) with standard parapatellar, and 9.2° (95% CI -16.1 to -1.8) with QS. CONCLUSION: No differences were found in functional outcomes over short or medium terms but subvastus seemed to increase the ROM at 6 months post-surgery. Until or unless future studies can demonstrate a long-term benefit, based on these results all studied surgical approaches to perform a TKA are equal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Network meta-analysis. Level 1.

Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several kinds of cutting guides, including patient-specific instrumentation, navigation, standard cutting guides, accelerometer-based navigation, and robotic guidance, are available to restore a planned alignment during TKA. No previous study has simultaneously compared all of these devices; a network meta-analysis is an especially appealing method because it allows comparisons across approaches that were not compared head-to-head in individual randomized controlled trials. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a network meta-analysis to determine whether novel approaches to achieving implant alignment, such as patient-specific instrumentation, navigation, accelerometer-based navigation, and robotic guidance, provide any advantage over standard cutting guides in terms of: (1) hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment outliers greater than ± 3°, (2) outcome scores (1989 - Knee Society Score and WOMAC score) measured 6 months after surgery, or (3) femoral and tibial implant malalignment (greater than ± 3°), taken separately, in the frontal and sagittal plane, as well as other secondary outcomes including validated outcome scores 1 and 2 years after surgery. METHODS: In our network meta-analysis, we included randomized controlled trials comparing the different cutting guides by using at least one of the previously specified criteria, without limitation on language or date of publication. We searched electronic databases, major orthopaedic journals, proceedings of major orthopaedic meetings, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until October 1, 2018. This led to the inclusion of 90 randomized controlled trials involving 9389 patients (mean age 68.8 years) with 10,336 TKAs. Two reviewers independently selected trials and extracted data. The primary outcomes were the proportion patients with malalignment of the HKA angle (defined as HKA > 3° from neutral) and the Knee Society Score and WOMAC scores at 6 months postoperatively. We combined direct and indirect comparisons using a Bayesian network meta-analysis framework to assess and compare the effect of different cutting guides on outcomes. Bayesian estimates are based on the posterior distribution of an endpoint and are called credible intervals. Usually the 95% credible interval, corresponding to a posterior probability of 0.95 that the endpoint lies in the interval, is computed. Unlike the frequentist approach, the Bayesian approach does not allow the calculation of the p value. RESULTS: The proportion of HKA outliers was lower with navigation than with patient-specific instrumentation (risk ratio 0.46 [95% credible interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.63]) and standard cutting guides (risk ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.37 to 0.53]); however, this corresponded to an actual difference of only 12% of patients for navigation versus 21% of patients for patient-specific instrumentation, and 12% of patients for navigation versus 25% for standard cutting guides. We found no differences for other comparisons between different cutting guides, including robotics and the accelerometer. We found no differences in the Knee Society Score or WOMAC score between the different cutting guides at 6 months. Regarding secondary outcomes, navigation reduced the risk of frontal and sagittal malalignments for femoral and tibial components compared with the standard cutting guides, but none of the other cutting guides showed superiority for the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Navigation resulted in approximately 10% fewer patients having HKA outliers of more than 3°, without any corresponding improvement in validated outcomes scores. It is unknown whether this incremental reduction in the proportion of patients who have alignment outside a window that itself has been called into question will justify the increased costs and surgical time associated with the approach. We believe that until or unless these new approaches either (1) convincingly demonstrate superior survivorship, or (2) convincingly demonstrate superior outcomes, surgeons and hospitals should not use these approaches since they add cost, have a learning curve (during which some patients may be harmed), and have the risks associated with uncertainty of novel surgical approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

The ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport after injury (ALR-RSI) is a valid and reproducible scale to quantify psychological readiness before returning to sport after ankle ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Chronic ankle instability is the main complication of ankle sprains and requires surgery if non-operative treatment fails. The goal of this study was to validate a tool to quantify psychological readiness to return to sport after ankle ligament reconstruction. METHODS: The form was designed like the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury scale and "Knee" was replaced by the term "ankle". The ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport after injury (ALR-RSI) scale was filled by patients who underwent ankle ligament reconstruction and were active in sports. The scale was then validated according to the international COSMIN methodology. The AOFAS and Karlsson scores were used as reference questionnaires. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (59 ankles) were included, 27 women. The ALR-RSI scale was strongly correlated with the Karlsson score (r = 0.79 [0.66-0.87]) and the AOFAS score (r = 0.8 [0.66-0.87]). A highly significant difference was found in the ALR-RSI between the subgroup of 50 patients who returned to playing sport and the seven who did not: 68.8 (56.5-86.5) vs 45.0 (31.3-55.8), respectively, p = 0.02. The internal consistency of the scale was high (α = 0.96). Reproducibility of the test-retest was excellent (ρ = 0.92; 95% CI [0.86-0.96]). CONCLUSION: The ALR-RSI is a valid, reproducible scale that identifies patients who are ready to return to the same sport after ankle ligament reconstruction. This scale may help to identify athletes who will find sport resumption difficult. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Were protective procedures against SARS-CoV-2 effective in an orthopaedic and trauma centre during the lockdown period? A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic started in December 2019 in Wuhan. The lockdown was declared on March 16, 2020 in France. Our centre had to adapt daily practices to continue to take care of bone and soft tissue tumours and emergencies. Through this study, we wanted to assess the various procedures implemented during the lockdown period between March 17 and May 10. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted in Cochin Hospital (Paris, France). Patients included were those who had surgery during the lockdown period. To take care of COVID-19 positive and negative patients, various procedures have been set up: reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for all hospitalized patients, a specific unit for COVID-positive patients, a specific surgical room, and use of protective personal equipment. To allow the effectiveness of the procedures implemented, we evaluated the number of complications attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and the number of patients who became COVID positive during hospitalization. RESULTS: During the lockdown period, there were 199 procedures of three types of procedures in our centre: 79 traumatology procedures (39.7%), 76 of bone and soft tissues tumours (38.2%), and 44 procedures related to infection (22.1%). We observed 13 complications (6.5%) during hospitalization, and only one patient became COVID-19 positive during the hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 epidemic has been a challenge for organization and adaptation to manage all COVID-19 positive and COVID negative. Through this study, we wanted to assess our procedures taken. They had been effective due to the low number of contamination and complications.

Is the position of dual-mobility cup in THA for femoral neck fractures optimal? A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have examined the relationship between the indication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the quality of its technical achievement. Implants mispositioning could happen more frequently while THA is performed on acute proximal femur fracture cases. The purpose of this study was to compare the frontal inclination (FTA) of double-mobility cups (DMC) in patients undergoing THA for hip osteoarthritis or fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients undergoing THA for hip fracture or hip osteoarthritis. The surgical protocol was identical in all patients and included a systematic DMC implantation. In the postoperative period, the FTA was measured on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and compared between groups. Malposition was defined for FTA values outside the 35°-55° range. RESULTS: The study included 97 patients: 33 men, mean age: 78.8 years, 45 fractures. The misalignment rate was 55% after THA for fracture versus 33% for hip osteoarthritis (p = 0.02). The mean FTA value was 39° for "fracture" and 43° for "hip osteoarthritis" groups (p = 0.052). The risk for hip dislocation, surgical revision for mechanical or infectious cause was identical in both groups. DISCUSSION: Misalignment was more frequent when THA was achieved for an acute proximal femur fracture. Several explanations can be proposed: lesser bone quality, incomplete removal of upper acetabular osteophytes which can lead to excessive horizontalization of the cup and surgical procedure performed by younger surgeons in "fracture group". These misalignments don't cause more mechanical complications in the first months after surgery.

Reasons for malpractice claims after primary total hip arthroplasty in France: Insurance data from 240 claims from 2014 to 2017.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most frequent orthopedic surgery procedures, and orthopedic surgeons are among the most frequently accused of malpractice by their patients. Identifying the main reasons for malpractice claims after THA is a prior condition to reducing their frequency. The quality of the preoperative risk information given to the patient by the surgeon is crucial for these purposes. Data specific to THA are sparse in France, and we therefore conducted a retrospective study (1) to determine whether the outcome of medico-legal expert appraisal correlated with the quality and traceability of preoperative information, and (2) to identify the most frequent grounds for complaint after primary THA. HYPOTHESIS: The quality of patient information partly determines expert appraisal. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted based on data from the Branchet medical professional insurance agency for malpractice claims following THA over the period 2014-2017, with 240 complete files, for 125 women and 115 men. Data comprised: type of procedure, main grounds of complaint (complications), positive or negative expert appraisal, quality of preoperative patient information, amounts of compensation accorded and fees paid, and the practitioner's liability. We assessed correlations between information quality and liability. RESULTS: Surgical site infection and neurologic deficit were the two main grounds for malpractice claims. In the 240 files, cases for 106 operations (44.2%) were submitted to arbitration, 95 (39.6%) were brought to court, and 39 (16.2%) were settled out of court. The practitioner was held at least partly liable in 40 files (16.7%). Information to the patient was deemed imperfect or poor for 119 files (49.6%) and good in 121 (50.4%). Mean compensation was €30,940 (range, €0 to €198,100). In 27 of the 40 cases of liability (67.5%), the information to the patient was deemed imperfect or poor. Twenty-six of the 40 cases (65%) were settled out of court. In case of poor information, there was a significant risk for the practitioner to be held liable: 7.5 vs. 25% (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: The present study listed the main complications underlying malpractice claims after THA: infection, neurologic complications, and limb-length discrepancy. This should enable practitioners to improve patient information so as to reduce the rate of malpractice claims or at least decrease the practitioner's liability, as the study found a correlation between information quality and expert appraisal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Nonliving versus Living Animal Models for Microvascular Surgery Training: A Randomized Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Ethical and financial considerations have encouraged the use of nonliving models for simulation-based training in microsurgery, such as commercially available chicken thighs. The purpose of this study was to compare the nonliving chicken thigh model to the one currently considered as the standard-namely, the living rat model-in the setting of an initiation microsurgery course. METHODS: Applicants to the 3-day basic microsurgery course of the Paris School of Surgery were assigned randomly to either one group that received the regular training of the school (RT group), including four hands-on sessions using only living rat models, or one group that received a modified curriculum in which a nonliving chicken thigh model was used for the first hands-on session (CT group). During the following session, all trainees were evaluated on living rat models, using a global rating scale and two task-specific scales (knot-tying and anastomosis); rates of anastomosis patency, animal survival, and technique completion were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-three residents were enrolled. Global rating scale, knot-tying, and anastomosis task-specific scale scores were significantly higher in the CT group ( n = 51) than in the RT group, with mean differences of 2.6 points ( P = 0.0001), 1.3 points ( P < 0.0001), and 1.4 points ( P < 0.0001), respectively. Patency and survival rates were significantly higher in the CT group than in the RT group, with mean differences of 22% ( P = 0.0020) and 27% ( P < 0.0001), respectively; completion rates were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: Subject to the use of validated models, such as the chicken thigh, nonliving animal models are a suitable alternative to the living rat model in microsurgery initial training. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The use of validated non-living models, such as the chicken thigh, is a suitable alternative to the living rat model in microsurgery initial training.

Extra-articular hip resection with maintenance of pelvic continuity in malignant tumours of the proximal femur with articular invasion.

INTRODUCTION: Extra-articular hip resection may be necessary in cases of malignant tumour of the pelvic bone or of the proximal femur invading the hip joint. When the tumour is in the proximal femur, it is possible to resect the acetabulum en bloc by performing a periacetabular osteotomy, but this creates a discontinuity in the pelvic ring with difficult reconstruction and diminished function. Several techniques described recently seek to be as sparing as possible on the pelvic bone by preserving the posterior column or both columns in order to facilitate reconstruction and improve function. However, these still require complex reconstructions and can necessitate intra-pelvic dissection. TECHNIQUE: We describe here an extra-articular hip resection technique for tumours of the proximal femur invading the joint, with maintenance of pelvic continuity by preserving both columns and the quadrilateral plate of the acetabulum, without intra-pelvic dissection, that can be performed on patients in whom the medial wall of the acetabulum is thick enough. Our preliminary assessments have included studies on dry bone and imaging analyses. The technique was first tested on a single cadaver pelvis (encompassing 2 hips) and subsequently performed on a patient with a pathological fracture of the femoral neck due to osteosarcoma secondary to Paget's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Further clinical applications are essential to evaluate the overall effectiveness, safety and impact on patient functionality of this experimental technique.