Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 78
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(10): 1611-1615, 2019 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31506700

RESUMO

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a common finding in many populations, including healthy women and persons with underlying urologic abnormalities. The 2005 guideline from the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended that ASB should be screened for and treated only in pregnant women or in an individual prior to undergoing invasive urologic procedures. Treatment was not recommended for healthy women; older women or men; or persons with diabetes, indwelling catheters, or spinal cord injury. The guideline did not address children and some adult populations, including patients with neutropenia, solid organ transplants, and nonurologic surgery. In the years since the publication of the guideline, further information relevant to ASB has become available. In addition, antimicrobial treatment of ASB has been recognized as an important contributor to inappropriate antimicrobial use, which promotes emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The current guideline updates the recommendations of the 2005 guideline, includes new recommendations for populations not previously addressed, and, where relevant, addresses the interpretation of nonlocalizing clinical symptoms in populations with a high prevalence of ASB.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Assintomáticas , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neutropenia/complicações , Gravidez , Prevalência , Transplantados , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(10): e83-e110, 2019 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895288

RESUMO

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a common finding in many populations, including healthy women and persons with underlying urologic abnormalities. The 2005 guideline from the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended that ASB should be screened for and treated only in pregnant women or in an individual prior to undergoing invasive urologic procedures. Treatment was not recommended for healthy women; older women or men; or persons with diabetes, indwelling catheters, or spinal cord injury. The guideline did not address children and some adult populations, including patients with neutropenia, solid organ transplants, and nonurologic surgery. In the years since the publication of the guideline, further information relevant to ASB has become available. In addition, antimicrobial treatment of ASB has been recognized as an important contributor to inappropriate antimicrobial use, which promotes emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The current guideline updates the recommendations of the 2005 guideline, includes new recommendations for populations not previously addressed, and, where relevant, addresses the interpretation of nonlocalizing clinical symptoms in populations with a high prevalence of ASB.


Assuntos
Infecções Assintomáticas , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neutropenia/complicações , Gravidez , Prevalência , Transplantados , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(6): 837-844, 2018 08 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635360

RESUMO

Background: The spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is a global concern, and much about transmission in healthcare systems remains unknown. To reduce hospital stays, nursing facilities (NFs) have increasingly assumed care of post-acute populations. We estimate the prevalence of MDRO colonization in NF patients on enrollment and discharge to community settings, risk factors for colonization, and rates of acquiring MDROs during the stay. Methods: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of newly admitted patients in 6 NFs in southeast Michigan using active microbial surveillance of multiple anatomic sites sampled at enrollment, days 14 and 30, and monthly thereafter for up to 6 months. Results: We enrolled 651 patients and collected 7526 samples over 1629 visits, with an average of 29 days of follow-up per participant. Nearly all participants were admitted for post-acute care (95%). More than half (56.8%) were colonized with MDROs at enrollment: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 16.1%; vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), 33.2%; and resistant gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB), 32.0%. Risk factors for colonization at enrollment included prolonged hospitalization (>14 days), functional disability, antibiotic use, or device use. Rates per 1000 patient-days of acquiring a new MDRO were MRSA, 3.4; VRE, 8.2; and R-GNB, 13.6. MDRO colonization at discharge was similar to that at enrollment (56.4%): MRSA, 18.4%; VRE, 30.3%; and R-GNB, 33.6%. Conclusions: Short-stay NF patients exhibit a high prevalence of MDROs near the time of admission, as well as at discharge, and may serve as a reservoir for spread in other healthcare settings. Future interventions to reduce MDROs should specifically target this population.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Docentes de Enfermagem , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/transmissão , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Michigan , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/efeitos dos fármacos
4.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 59(4): 2365-73, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25645855

RESUMO

Candida infective endocarditis is a rare disease with a high mortality rate. Our understanding of this infection is derived from case series, case reports, and small prospective cohorts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and use of different antifungal treatment regimens for Candida infective endocarditis. This prospective cohort study was based on 70 cases of Candida infective endocarditis from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis (ICE)-Prospective Cohort Study and ICE-Plus databases collected between 2000 and 2010. The majority of infections were acquired nosocomially (67%). Congestive heart failure (24%), prosthetic heart valve (46%), and previous infective endocarditis (26%) were common comorbidities. Overall mortality was high, with 36% mortality in the hospital and 59% at 1 year. On univariate analysis, older age, heart failure at baseline, persistent candidemia, nosocomial acquisition, heart failure as a complication, and intracardiac abscess were associated with higher mortality. Mortality was not affected by use of surgical therapy or choice of antifungal agent. A subgroup analysis was performed on 33 patients for whom specific antifungal therapy information was available. In this subgroup, 11 patients received amphotericin B-based therapy and 14 received echinocandin-based therapy. Despite a higher percentage of older patients and nosocomial infection in the echinocandin group, mortality rates were similar between the two groups. In conclusion, Candida infective endocarditis is associated with a high mortality rate that was not impacted by choice of antifungal therapy or by adjunctive surgical intervention. Additionally, echinocandin therapy was as effective as amphotericin B-based therapy in the small subgroup analysis.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Candidíase/microbiologia , Candidíase/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Equinocandinas/uso terapêutico , Endocardite/microbiologia , Endocardite/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
6.
JAMA ; 322(15): 1510-1511, 2019 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490531
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(7): e2324516, 2023 07 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37471087

RESUMO

Importance: While current evidence has demonstrated a surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundle consisting of preoperative Staphylococcus aureus screening, nasal and skin decolonization, and use of appropriate perioperative antibiotic based on screening results can decrease rates of SSI caused by S aureus, it is well known that interventions may need to be modified to address facility-level factors. Objective: To assess the association between implementation of an SSI prevention bundle allowing for facility discretion regarding specific component interventions and S aureus deep incisional or organ space SSI rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study was conducted among all patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiac valve replacement, or total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at 11 Veterans Administration hospitals. Implementation of the bundle was on a rolling basis with the earliest implementation occurring in April 2012 and the latest implementation occurring in July 2017. Data were collected from January 2007 to March 2018 and analyzed from October 2020 to June 2023. Interventions: Nasal screening for S aureus; nasal decolonization of S aureus carriers; chlorhexidine bathing; and appropriate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis according to S aureus carrier status. Facility discretion regarding how to implement the bundle components was allowed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was deep incisional or organ space SSI caused by S aureus. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equation (GEE) and interrupted time-series (ITS) models were used to compare SSI rates between preintervention and postintervention periods. Results: Among 6696 cardiac surgical procedures and 16 309 TJAs, 95 S aureus deep incisional or organ space SSIs were detected (25 after cardiac operations and 70 after TJAs). While the GEE model suggested a significant association between the intervention and decreased SSI rates after TJAs (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.98), there was not a significant association when an ITS model was used (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.32-2.39). No significant associations after cardiac operations were found. Conclusions and Relevance: Although this quality improvement study suggests an association between implementation of an SSI prevention bundle and decreased S aureus deep incisional or organ space SSI rates after TJAs, it was underpowered to see a significant difference when accounting for changes over time.


Assuntos
Infecções Estafilocócicas , Veteranos , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle
8.
Nurs Child Young People ; 34(4): 33-42, 2022 Jul 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35527710

RESUMO

This article, the 15th and last in a series on the biological basis of child health, focuses on the renal system, in particular the kidneys. It provides an overview of their role, function, anatomy and physiology, and embryological development. The renal system has a crucial role in homeostasis, so renal function impairment can have wide-ranging and potentially serious consequences for a child's overall health. The article describes some of the common renal conditions seen in children and how these are managed. It explains how to interpret the results of renal function tests and urine sampling conducted to assess renal function and to investigate acute and chronic disease.


Assuntos
Saúde da Criança , Rim , Criança , Humanos , Rim/fisiologia , Testes de Função Renal
9.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(3): 273-276, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34653528

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 vaccine breakthrough infections are expected, reporting on breakthrough infections requiring hospitalization remains limited. This observational case series report reviewed 10 individuals hospitalized with vaccine breakthrough infections to identify patient risk factors and serologic responses upon admission. METHODS: Electronic medical records of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1732 (Moderna) vaccinated patients admitted to Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System with newly diagnosed Coronavirus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID-19) between March 15, 2021 and April 15, 2021 were reviewed. Patient variables, COVID-19 lab testing including anti-S IgM, anti-N IgG antibodies, and hospital course were recorded. Based on lab testing, infections were defined as acute infection or resolving/resolved infection. RESULTS: Of the 10 patients admitted with breakthrough infections, all were >70 years of age with multiple comorbidities. Mean time between second vaccine dose and COVID-19 diagnosis was 49 days. In the 7 individuals with acute infection, none had observed serologic response to mRNA vaccination, 5 developed severe disease, and 1 died. Three individuals had anti-N IgG antibodies and a high polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold value, suggesting resolving/resolved infection. CONCLUSIONS: Given the variability of vaccine breakthrough infections requiring hospitalization, serologic testing may impart clarity on timing of infection and disease prognosis. Individuals at risk of diminished response to vaccines and severe COVID-19 may also benefit from selective serologic testing after vaccination to guide risk mitigation strategies in a post-pandemic environment.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Transmissíveis , Veteranos , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Teste para COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 113(1): 118-124, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33662308

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infectious endocarditis is associated with substantial in-hospital mortality of 15%-20%. Effective management requires coordination between multiple medical and surgical subspecialties, which can often lead to disjointed care. Previous European studies have identified multidisciplinary endocarditis teams as a tool for reducing endocarditis mortality. METHODS: The multidisciplinary endocarditis team was formed in May 2018. The group developed an evidence-based algorithm for management of endocarditis that was used to provide recommendations for hospitalized patients over a 1-year period. Mortality outcomes were then retroactively assessed and compared to a historical control utilizing propensity matching. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and June 2019 the team provided guideline-based recommendations on 56 patients with Duke Criteria-definite endocarditis and at least 1 American Heart Association indication for surgery. The historical control included 68 patients with definite endocarditis and surgical indications admitted between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2015. In-hospital mortality decreased significantly from 29.4% in 2014-2015 to 7.1% in 2018-2019 (P < .0001). There was a non-significant increase in the rate of surgical intervention after implementation of the team (41.2% vs 55.4%; P = 0.12). Propensity score matching demonstrated similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multidisciplinary endocarditis team was associated with a significant 1-year decrease in all-cause in-hospital mortality for patients with definite endocarditis and surgical indications, in the presence of notable differences between the 2 studied cohorts. In conjunction with previous studies demonstrating their effectiveness, these data support the idea that widespread adoption of endocarditis teams in North America could improve outcomes for this patient population.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana/cirurgia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Endocardite Bacteriana/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 52(5): 654-61, 2011 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21292670

RESUMO

Infections in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are common and result in frequent hospital transfers, functional decline, and death. Colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) - including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB) - is also increasingly prevalent in SNFs. Antimicrobial resistance among common bacteria can adversely affect clinical outcomes and increase health care costs. Recognizing a need for action, legislators, policy-makers, and consumer groups are advocating for surveillance cultures to identify asymptomatic patients with MDROs, particularly MRSA in hospitals and SNFs. Implementing this policy for all SNF residents may be costly, impractical, and ineffective. Such a policy may result in a large increase in the number of SNF residents placed in isolation precautions with the potential for reduced attention by health care workers, isolation, and functional decline. Detection of colonization and subsequent attempts to eradicate selected MDROs can also lead to more strains with drug resistance. We propose an alternative strategy that uses a focused multicomponent bundle approach that targets residents at a higher risk of colonization and infection with MDROs, specifically those who have an indwelling device. If this strategy is effective, similar strategies can be studied and implemented for other high-risk groups.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(4): 392-398, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32962771

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibody was evaluated among employees of a Veterans Affairs healthcare system to assess potential risk factors for transmission and infection. METHODS: All employees were invited to participate in a questionnaire and serological survey to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 as part of a facility-wide quality improvement and infection prevention initiative regardless of clinical or nonclinical duties. The initiative was conducted from June 8 to July 8, 2020. RESULTS: Of the 2,900 employees, 51% participated in the study, revealing a positive SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence of 4.9% (72 of 1,476; 95% CI, 3.8%-6.1%). There were no statistically significant differences in the presence of antibody based on gender, age, frontline worker status, job title, performance of aerosol-generating procedures, or exposure to known patients with coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) within the hospital. Employees who reported exposure to a known COVID-19 case outside work had a significantly higher seroprevalence at 14.8% (23 of 155) compared to those who did not 3.7% (48 of 1,296; OR, 4.53; 95% CI, 2.67-7.68; P < .0001). Notably, 29% of seropositive employees reported no history of symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among employees was not significantly different among those who provided direct patient care and those who did not, suggesting that facility-wide infection control measures were effective. Employees who reported direct personal contact with COVID-19-positive persons outside work were more likely to have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Employee exposure to SARS-CoV-2 outside work may introduce infection into hospitals.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 50(5): 625-63, 2010 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20175247

RESUMO

Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention, and management of persons with catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI), both symptomatic and asymptomatic, were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The evidence-based guidelines encompass diagnostic criteria, strategies to reduce the risk of CA-UTIs, strategies that have not been found to reduce the incidence of urinary infections, and management strategies for patients with catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria or symptomatic urinary tract infection. These guidelines are intended for use by physicians in all medical specialties who perform direct patient care, with an emphasis on the care of patients in hospitals and long-term care facilities.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/terapia , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Adulto , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle
14.
J Infect Dis ; 200(9): 1355-66, 2009 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19811099

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The significance of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) is unknown. Using a multinational collection of isolates from methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infective endocarditis (IE), we characterized patients with IE with and without hVISA, and we genotyped the infecting strains. METHODS: MRSA bloodstream isolates from 65 patients with definite IE from 8 countries underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 31 virulence genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and multilocus sequence typing. hVISA was defined using population analysis profiling. RESULTS: Nineteen (29.2%) of 65 MRSA IE isolates exhibited the hVISA phenotype by population analysis profiling. Isolates from Oceania and Europe were more likely to exhibit the hVISA phenotype than isolates from the United States (77.8% and 35.0% vs 13.9%; P < .001). The prevalence of hVISA was higher among isolates with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of 2 mg/L (P = .026). hVISA-infected patients were more likely to have persistent bacteremia (68.4% vs 37.0%; P = .029) and heart failure (47.4% vs 19.6%; P = .033). Mortality did not differ between hVISA- and non-hVISA-infected patients (42.1% vs 34.8%, P = .586). hVISA and non-hVISA isolates were genotypically similar. CONCLUSIONS: In these analyses, the hVISA phenotype occurred in more than one-quarter of MRSA IE isolates, was associated with certain IE complications, and varied in frequency by geographic region.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Vigilância da População , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Resistência a Vancomicina/genética , Idoso , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/genética , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Feminino , Genótipo , Saúde Global , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Filogenia , Prevalência , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Resistência a Vancomicina/efeitos dos fármacos
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 48(2): 149-71, 2009 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19072244

RESUMO

Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are at great risk for infection. Most residents are older and have multiple comorbidities that complicate recognition of infection; for example, typically defined fever is absent in more than one-half of LTCF residents with serious infection. Furthermore, LTCFs often do not have the on-site equipment or personnel to evaluate suspected infection in the fashion typically performed in acute care hospitals. In recognition of the differences between LTCFs and hospitals with regard to hosts and resources present, the Infectious Diseases Society of America first provided guidelines for evaluation of fever and infection in LTCF residents in 2000. The guideline presented here represents the second edition, updated by data generated over the intervening 8 years. It focuses on the typical elderly person institutionalized with multiple chronic comorbidities and functional disabilities (e.g., a nursing home resident). Specific topic reviews and recommendations are provided with regard to what resources are typically available to evaluate suspected infection, what symptoms and signs suggest infection in a resident of an LTCF, who should initially evaluate the resident with suspected infection, what clinical evaluation should be performed, how LTCF staff can effectively communicate about possible infection with clinicians, and what laboratory tests should be ordered. Finally, a general outline of how a suspected outbreak of a specific infectious disease should be investigated in an LTCF is provided.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Febre de Causa Desconhecida/etiologia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Estados Unidos
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(10): e1913823, 2019 10 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31642930

RESUMO

Importance: Although hand hygiene (HH) is considered the most effective strategy for preventing hospital-acquired infections, HH adherence rates remain poor. Objective: To examine whether the frequency of changing reminder signs affects HH adherence among health care workers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial in 9 US Department of Veterans Affairs acute care hospitals randomly assigned 58 inpatient units to 1 of 3 schedules for changing signs designed to promote HH adherence among health care workers: (1) no change; (2) weekly; and (3) monthly. Hand hygiene rates among health care workers were documented at entry and exit to patient rooms during the baseline period from October 1, 2014, to March 31, 2015, of normal signage and throughout the intervention period of June 8, 2015, to December 28, 2015. Data analyses were conducted in April 2018. Interventions: Hospital units were randomly assigned into 3 groups: (1) no sign changes throughout the intervention period, (2) signs changed weekly, and (3) signs changed monthly. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hand hygiene adherence as measured by covert observation. Interrupted time series analysis was used to examine changes in HH adherence from baseline through the intervention period by group. Results: Among 58 inpatient units, 19 units were assigned to the no change group, 19 units were assigned to the weekly change group, and 20 units were assigned to the monthly change group. During the baseline period, 9755 HH opportunities were observed at room entry and 10 095 HH opportunities were observed at room exit. During the intervention period, a total of 15 855 HH opportunities were observed at room entry, and 16 360 HH opportunities were observed at room exit. Overall HH adherence did not change from baseline compared with the intervention period at either room entry (4770 HH events [48.9%] vs 3057 HH events [50.1%]; P = .14) or exit (6439 HH events [63.8%] vs 4087 HH events [65.2%]; P = .06). In units that changed signs weekly, HH adherence declined from baseline at room entry (-1.9% [95% CI, -2.7% to -0.8%] per week; P < .001) and exit (-0.8% [95% CI, -1.5% to 0.1%] per week; P = .02). No significant changes in HH adherence were observed in other groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The frequency of changing reminder signs had no effect on HH rates overall. Units assigned to change signs most frequently demonstrated worsening adherence. Considering the abundance of signs in the acute care environment, the frequency of changing signs did not appear to provide a strong enough cue by itself to promote behavioral change. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02223455.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Higiene das Mãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Alerta , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
17.
Clin Infect Dis ; 46(9): 1368-73, 2008 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18419438

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize the clinical and molecular epidemiologic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus colonization (especially extranasal colonization) and to determine the extent to which community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has emerged in community nursing homes. METHODS: The study enrolled a total of 213 residents, with or without an indwelling device, from 14 nursing homes in southeastern Michigan. Samples were obtained from the nares, oropharynx, groin, perianal area, wounds, and enteral feeding tube site. Standard microbiologic methods were used to identify methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and MRSA. Molecular epidemiologic methods included pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PCR detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin, and SCCmec and agr typing. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one residents (62%) were colonized with S. aureus (MRSA colonization in 86). S. aureus colonization occurred in 80 (76%) of 105 residents with indwelling devices and in 51 (47%) of 108 residents without indwelling devices (P<.001). Of the 86 residents who were colonized with MRSA, nares culture results were positive for only 56 (65%). Residents with devices in place were more likely to be colonized at multiple sites. Eleven different strains of MRSA were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Seventy-three residents (85%) were colonized with hospital-associated SCCmec II strains, and 8 (9%) were colonized with community-associated SCCmec IV strains, 2 of which carried Panton-Valentine leukocidin. CONCLUSIONS: Extranasal colonization with MRSA is common among nursing home residents-particularly among residents with an indwelling device. We documented the emergence of community-associated SCCmec IV MRSA strains in the community nursing home setting in southeastern Michigan.


Assuntos
Casas de Saúde , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Humanos , Resistência a Meticilina , Michigan/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
18.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(9): 3087-90, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18650347

RESUMO

Identification of viridans group streptococci (VGS) to the species level is difficult because VGS exchange genetic material. We performed multilocus DNA target sequencing to assess phylogenetic concordance of VGS for a well-defined clinical syndrome. The hierarchy of sequence data was often discordant, underscoring the importance of establishing biological relevance for finer phylogenetic distinctions.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Estreptococos Viridans/genética , Humanos , Filogenia , Análise de Sequência de DNA
19.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(5): 1780-4, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18367572

RESUMO

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) are important causes of infective endocarditis (IE), but their microbiological profiles are poorly described. We performed DNA target sequencing and susceptibility testing for 91 patients with definite CNS IE who were identified from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Microbiology, a large, multicenter, multinational consortium. A hierarchy of gene sequences demonstrated great genetic diversity within CNS from patients with definite endocarditis that represented diverse geographic regions. In particular, rpoB sequence data demonstrated unique genetic signatures with the potential to serve as an important tool for global surveillance.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Polimorfismo Genético , Staphylococcus/classificação , Staphylococcus/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Coagulase/biossíntese , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Ribossômico/genética , RNA Polimerases Dirigidas por DNA/genética , Genótipo , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fator Tu de Elongação de Peptídeos/genética , Filogenia , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Homologia de Sequência , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus/genética
20.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(4): 789-803, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29667186

RESUMO

The diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of infectious diseases in older adults in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), particularly nursing facilities, remains a challenge for all health providers who care for this population. This review provides updated information on the currently most important challenges of infectious diseases in LTCFs. With the increasing prescribing of antibiotics in older adults, particularly in LTCFs, the topic of antibiotic stewardship is presented in this review. Following this discussion, salient points on clinical relevance, clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, therapy, and prevention are discussed for skin and soft tissue infections, infectious diarrhea (Clostridium difficile and norovirus infections), bacterial pneumonia, and urinary tract infection, as well as some of the newer approaches to preventive interventions in the LTCF setting.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrição Inadequada , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Idoso , Infecções por Caliciviridae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Caliciviridae/terapia , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/efeitos adversos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA