Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Thorax ; 67(3): 278-80, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22156958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The British Thoracic Society (BTS) Standards of Care (SoC) Committee produced a standard of care for occupational asthma (OA) in 2008, based on a systematic evidence review performed in 2004 by the British Occupational Health Research Foundation (BOHRF). METHODS: BOHRF updated the evidence base from 2004-2009 in 2010. RESULTS: This article summarises the changes in evidence and is aimed at physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care, occupational health and public health and at employers, workers and their health, safety and other representatives. CONCLUSIONS: Various recommendations and evidence ratings have changed in the management of asthma that may have an occupational cause.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/terapia , Saúde Ocupacional/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Testes de Provocação Brônquica/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 46(5): 467-72, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15167395

RESUMO

Monocyte cell surface CD14 increases following both in vitro challenge with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and exposure to organic dusts. We investigated 9 volunteers, mean age 39 years (range, 29-53 years). Each inhaled increasing concentrations of lipopolysaccharide (0.5 microg, 5.0 microg, and 20 microg). Monocyte cell surface CD14 (expressed as mean linear fluorescence) was measured before and after using flow cytometry. Upregulation of CD14 (up to 6 hours after LPS exposure) did not differ significantly between LPS (mean, 35.8; standard deviation [SD]; 54.3), n = 7 after 20 l g LPS) in comparison to placebo (39.3 [49.0]; n = 7). Maximum mean (SD) percentage CD14 upregulation up to 6 hours after challenge differed, but not significantly between those experiencing a clinically significant event (58.4 [49.2]) in comparison to those who did not (13.8, [43.2]; P = 0.27). Two individuals with a marked clinical response developed marked CD14 upregulation after exposure to LPS.


Assuntos
Leucócitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Receptores de Lipopolissacarídeos/análise , Adulto , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Leucócitos Mononucleares/imunologia , Receptores de Lipopolissacarídeos/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Regulação para Cima
3.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 57(1): 30-5, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17200128

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Health & Safety Executive estimate that between 1500-3000 UK workers develop asthma through potentially avoidable workplace exposures each year. AIMS: To assess the perception of health, safety and the work environment by workers with symptoms suggestive of occupational asthma. METHODS: A total of 97 workers referred to hospital specialists with symptoms suggestive of occupational asthma were studied in order to investigate their attitudes to the workplace, safety and health. A qualitative study design using semi-structured telephone interviews at 2 months and 12 months following enrolment was used at 6 national UK centres with a special interest in occupational asthma. RESULTS: Many workers in the study felt let down by the workplace and management and perceived that a lack of health and safety measures had contributed to the development of their asthma symptoms. Many workers felt that their employers were 'uncaring' and were pursuing or considering medico-legal cases against them. CONCLUSIONS: Workers' perception of risk influences their behaviour in the workplace, and their own health beliefs potentially create barriers to changing this. It is essential to consider workers' perceptions when developing strategies to effect change within the workplace.


Assuntos
Asma/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Doenças Profissionais/psicologia , Adulto , Asma/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Saúde Ocupacional , Reino Unido , Local de Trabalho/psicologia
4.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther ; 18(3): 177-80, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15707851

RESUMO

Although many different methods of measuring cough reflex sensitivity have been published, few are simple enough to use outside of a hospital or laboratory environment. The aim of this study was to develop a simple, quick, and portable cough challenge, assess its reproducibility, and compare its results with those measured by an existing established hospital protocol. Twenty-five volunteers performed cough challenges based on an established hospital dosimeter protocol, and, on a separate occasion, by a protocol inhaling citric acid from DeVilbiss 40 hand-held nebulisers (citric acid concentrations of 10-3000 mM). Reproducibility of the hand-held cough challenge was assessed in 11 volunteers. Cough thresholds were consistently higher by the hand-held method than by the hospital dosimeter method. The geometric mean citric acid concentrations causing two coughs (threshold D2) were 3.14 and 2.77 log mM, respectively (p<0.001). The geometric mean (95% CI) difference between the tests was 0.51 log mM (0.18-0.83) of the average of the two values. Cough D2 thresholds attained by the two techniques did, however, show significant correlation (r=0.95, p<0.0001). The coefficient of repeatability for the hand-held method was 0.40 log mM. Administering citric acid from DeVilbiss 40 hand-held nebulisers offers a rapid, portable, and reproducible cough challenge in healthy volunteers. The results correlate well with an existing Mefar dosimeter challenge, but give two to three times greater cough thresholds.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/farmacologia , Ácido Cítrico/farmacologia , Tosse/induzido quimicamente , Reflexo/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA