RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in people from rural or remote Western Australia referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in Perth and their subsequent management; to estimate the cost savings were computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) offered in rural centres as a first line investigation for people with suspected CAD. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Adults with stable symptoms in rural and remote WA referred to Perth public tertiary hospitals for ICA evaluation during the 2019 calendar year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severity and management of CAD (medical management or revascularisation); health care costs by care model (standard care or a proposed alternative model with local CTCA assessment). RESULTS: The mean age of the 1017 people from rural and remote WA who underwent ICA in Perth was 62 years (standard deviation, 13 years); 680 were men (66.9%), 245 were Indigenous people (24.1%). Indications for referral were non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (438, 43.1%), chest pain with normal troponin level (394, 38.7%), and other (185, 18.2%). After ICA assessment, 619 people were medically managed (60.9%) and 398 underwent revascularisation (39.1%). None of the 365 patients (35.9%) without obstructed coronaries (< 50% stenosis) underwent revascularisation; nine patients with moderate CAD (50-69% stenosis; 7%) and 389 with severe CAD (≥ 70% stenosis or occluded vessel; 75.5%) underwent revascularisation. Were CTCA used locally to determine the need for referral, 527 referrals could have been averted (53%), the ICA:revascularisation ratio would have improved from 2.6 to 1.6, and 1757 metropolitan hospital bed-days (43% reduction) and $7.3 million in health care costs (36% reduction) would have been saved. CONCLUSION: Many rural and remote Western Australians transferred for ICA in Perth have non-obstructive CAD and are medically managed. Providing CTCA as a first line investigation in rural centres could avert half of these transfers and be a cost-effective strategy for risk stratification of people with suspected CAD.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Atenção à Saúde , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Austrália , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/economia , Constrição Patológica , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Austrália Ocidental , População Rural , Transferência de Pacientes/economia , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Povos Aborígenes Australianos e Ilhéus do Estreito de TorresRESUMO
PURPOSE: Non-adherence to heart failure (HF) medications is associated with poor outcomes. We used restricted cubic splines (RCS) to assess the continuous relationship between adherence to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) and ß-blockers and long-term outcomes in senior HF patients. METHODS: We identified a population-based cohort of 4234 patients, aged 65-84 years, 56% male, who were hospitalised for HF in Western Australia between 2003 and 2008 and survived to 1-year post-discharge (landmark date). Adherence was calculated using the proportion of days covered (PDC) in the first year post-discharge. RCS Cox proportional-hazards models were applied to determine the relationship between adherence and all-cause death and death/HF readmission at 1 and 3 years after the landmark date. RESULTS: RCS analysis showed a curvilinear adherence-outcome relationship for both RASI and ß-blockers which was linear above PDC 60%. For each 10% increase in RASI and ß-blocker adherence above this level, the adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year all-cause death fell by an average of 6.6% and 4.8% respectively (trend p < 0.05) and risk of all-cause death/HF readmission fell by 5.4% and 5.8% respectively (trend p < 0.005). Linear reductions in adjusted risk for these outcomes at PDC ≥ 60% were also seen at 3 years after landmark date (all trend p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: RCS analysis showed that for RASI and ß-blockers, there was no upper adherence level (threshold) above 60% where risk reduction did not continue to occur. Therefore, interventions should maximise adherence to these disease-modifying HF pharmacotherapies to improve long-term outcomes after hospitalised HF.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Alta do Paciente , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Assistência ao Convalescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitalização , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes are central for identifying myocardial infarction (MI) in administrative hospitalisation data, however validation of MI subtype codes is limited. We measured the sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10-AM (Australian Modification) codes for ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI). METHODS: A sample of MI admissions was obtained from a dataset containing all MI hospitalisations in Western Australia (WA) for 2003, 2008 and 2013. Clinical data were collected from hospital medical records (n=799 patients). Cases were classified by ICD-10-AM codes for STEMI, NSTEMI and unspecified MI, and compared to clinical classification from review of available electrocardiographs (ECGs) and cardiac biomarkers (n=660). Sensitivity and specificity for ICD-10-AM coding versus clinical classification was measured, stratified by calendar year of discharge. RESULTS: The majority of classifiable cases had MI recorded in the principal diagnosis field (STEMI n=293, 84.2%; NSTEMI n=202, 74.3%; unspecified MI n=20, 50.0%). Overall sensitivity of the ICD-10-AM STEMI code was 86.3% (95% CI 81.7-90.0%) and was higher when restricted to MI as a principal versus secondary diagnosis (88.8% vs 66.7%). Comparable values for NSTEMI were 66.7% (95% CI 61.5-71.6%), and 68.8% vs 61.4% respectively. Between 2003 and 2013, sensitivity for both MI subtypes increased: 80.2-89.5% for STEMI, and 51.2-73.8% for NSTEMI. Specificity was high for NSTEMI throughout (88.2% 95% CI 84.1-91.6%), although improving over time for STEMI (68.1-76.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10-AM codes for MI subtypes in hospitalisation data are generally high, particularly for principal diagnosis cases. However, the temporal improvement in sensitivity in coding of MI subtypes, particularly NSTEMI, may necessitate modification to trend studies using administrative hospitalisation data.
Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Austrália/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnósticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: There is no gold standard method to calculate medication adherence using administrative drug data. We compared three common methods and their ability to predict subsequent mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: Person-linked population-based datasets were used to identify 4234 patients (56% male, mean age of 76), who survived 1 year (landmark period) following hospitalization for HF in Western Australia from 2003 to 2008. Adherence was estimated by the medication possession ratio (MPR), MPR modified (MPRm), and proportion of days covered (PDC) in patients dispensed a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) and/or ß-blocker within the landmark period. Adjusted Cox regression models that fitted restricted cubic splines (RCS) assessed the relationship between medication adherence and 1-year all-cause death postlandmark period. RESULTS: In the landmark period, 87% and 68% of the HF cohort were dispensed RASI and ß-blockers, respectively. Mean adherence estimates for RASI and ß-blockers were 90% and 79% for MPR, 96% and 86% for MPRm, and 82% and 73% for PDC, respectively. In RCS models, MPRm was not associated with subsequent 1-year death in either the RASI or ß-blocker group, while MPR was independently associated with death in the RASI group only (P ≤ .01). However, PDC as a binary variable (PDC <80% or ≥80%) or continuous variable was independently associated with 1-year death in both RASI and ß-blocker groups (all P ≤ .02). CONCLUSION: Proportion of days covered calculated from administrative drug data provides a more conservative estimate of adherence than MPR or MPRm and was the most consistent predictor of subsequent mortality in an HF cohort using RCS analysis.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Adesão à Medicação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of different strategies for recruiting participants for a large Australian randomised controlled trial (RCT), the Australian Study for the Prevention through Immunisation of Cardiovascular Events (AUSPICE). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Men and women aged 55-60 years with at least two cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, overweight/obesity) were recruited for a multicentre placebo-controlled RCT assessing the effectiveness of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (23vPPV) for preventing cardiovascular events. METHODS: Invitations were mailed by the Australian Department of Human Services to people in the Medicare database aged 55-60 years; reminders were sent 2 weeks later. Invitees could respond in hard copy or electronically. Direct recruitment was supplemented by asking invitees to extend the invitation to friends and family (snowball sampling) and by Facebook advertising. MAIN OUTCOME: Proportions of invitees completing screening questionnaire and recruited for participation in the RCT. RESULTS: 21 526 of 154 992 invited people (14%) responded by completing the screening questionnaire, of whom 4725 people were eligible and recruited for the study. Despite the minimal study burden (one questionnaire, one clinic visit), the overall participation rate was 3%, or an estimated 10% of eligible persons. Only 16% of eventual participants had responded within 2 weeks of the initial invitation letter (early responders); early and late responders did not differ in their demographic or medical characteristics. Socio-economic disadvantage did not markedly influence response rates. Facebook advertising and snowball sampling did not increase recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Trial participation rates are low, and multiple concurrent methods are needed to maximise recruitment. Social media strategies may not be successful in older age groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12615000536561.
Assuntos
Publicidade/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Mídias Sociais , Austrália , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/uso terapêutico , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome that is secondary to an abnormality of cardiac structure or function. These clinical practice guidelines focus on the diagnosis and management of HF with recommendations that have been graded on the strength of evidence and the likely absolute benefit versus harm. Additional considerations are presented as practice points. Main recommendations: Blood pressure and lipid lowering decrease the risk of developing HF. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors decrease the risk of HF hospitalisation in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. An echocardiogram is recommended if HF is suspected or newly diagnosed. If an echocardiogram cannot be arranged in a timely fashion, measurement of plasma B-type natriuretic peptides improves diagnostic accuracy. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ß-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve outcomes in patients with HF associated with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Additional treatment options in selected patients with persistent HF associated with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction include switching the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor; ivabradine; implantable cardioverter defibrillators; cardiac resynchronisation therapy; and atrial fibrillation ablation. Multidisciplinary HF disease management facilitates the implementation of evidence-based HF therapies. Clinicians should also consider models of care that optimise medication titration (eg, nurse-led titration). Changes in management as a result of the guideline: These guidelines have been designed to facilitate the systematic integration of recommendations into HF care. This should include ongoing audit and feedback systems integrated into work practices in order to improve the quality of care and outcomes of patients with HF.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Austrália , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , HumanosRESUMO
Please note that on p.929 in 5.2.2.7, paragraph 3, the dose of dabigatran should read as BD rather than daily. We regret any inconvenience that this may have caused.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The modern care of suspected and confirmed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is informed by an extensive and evolving evidence base. This clinical practice guideline focuses on key components of management associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with chest pain or ACS. These are presented as recommendations that have been graded on both the strength of evidence and the likely absolute benefit versus harm. Additional considerations influencing the delivery of specific therapies and management strategies are presented as practice points. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: This guideline provides advice on the standardised assessment and management of patients with suspected ACS, including the implementation of clinical assessment pathways and subsequent functional and anatomical testing. It provides guidance on the: diagnosis and risk stratification of ACS; provision of acute reperfusion therapy and immediate post-fibrinolysis care for patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; risk stratification informing the use of routine versus selective invasive management for patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS; administration of antithrombotic therapies in the acute setting and considerations affecting their long term use; and implementation of an individualised secondary prevention plan that includes both pharmacotherapies and cardiac rehabilitation. Changes in management as a result of the guideline: This guideline has been designed to facilitate the systematic integration of the recommendations into a standardised approach to ACS care, while also allowing for contextual adaptation of the recommendations in response to the individual's needs and preferences. The provision of ACS care should be subject to continuous monitoring, feedback and improvement of quality and patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/reabilitação , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Austrália , Cardiologia/normas , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nova Zelândia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Sociedades Médicas/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Variation in the provision of coronary angiography is associated with health care inefficiency and inequity. We explored geographic, socio-economic, health service and disease indicators associated with variation in angiography rates across Australia. METHODS: Australian census and National Health Survey data were used to determine socio-economic, health workforce and service indicators. Hospital separations and coronary deaths during 2011 were identified in the National Hospital Morbidity and Mortality databases. All 61 Medicare Locals responsible for primary care were included, and age- and sex-standardised rates of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) incidence, coronary angiography, revascularisation and mortality were tested for correlations, and adjusted by Bayesian regression. RESULTS: There were 3.7-fold and 2.3-fold differences between individual Medicare Locals in the lowest and highest ACS and coronary artery disease mortality rates respectively, whereas angiography rates varied 5.3-fold. ACS and death rates within Medicare Locals were correlated (partial correlation coefficient [CC], 0.52; P < 0.001). There was modest correlation between ACS and angiography rates (CC, 0.31; P = 0.018). The proportion of patients undergoing angiography who proceeded to revascularisation was inversely correlated with the total angiogram rate (CC, -0.71; P < 0.001). Socio-economic disadvantage and remoteness were correlated with disease burden, ACS incidence and mortality, but not with angiography rate. In the adjusted analysis, the strongest association with local angiography rates was with admissions to private hospitals (71 additional angiograms [95% CI, 47-93] for every 1000 admissions). CONCLUSION: Variation in rates of coronary angiography, not related to clinical need, occurs across Australia. A greater focus on clinical care standards and better distribution of health services will be required if these variations are to be attenuated.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico por imagem , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in care and inhospital course of patients with possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Australia and New Zealand based on whether a highly sensitive (hs) troponin assay was used at the hospital to which they presented. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: A snapshot study of consecutive patients presenting to hospitals in Australia and New Zealand from 14 to 27 May 2012 with possible ACS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of major adverse cardiac events (inhospital death, new or recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest or worsening heart failure); association between assay type and outcome (via propensity score matching and a generalised estimating equation [GEE]; averages of the predicted outcomes among patients who were treated with and without the availability of an hs assay (via inverse probability-weighting [IPW] with regression-adjusted estimators). RESULTS: 4371 patients with possible ACS were admitted to 283 hospitals. Over half of the hospitals (156 [55%]) reported using the hs assay and most patients (2624 [60%]) had hs tests (P = 0.004). Use of the hs assay was independent of hospital coronary revascularisation capability. Patients tested with the hs assay had more non-invasive investigations (exercise tests, stress echocardiography, stress nuclear scans, and computed tomography coronary angiography) than those tested with the sensitive assay. However, there were no differences between the groups in rates of angiography or revascularisation. All adjusted analyses showed a consistently lower rate of inhospital events, including recurrent heart failure in patients for whom the hs assay was used (GEE odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94; P = 0.014); IPW analysis showed a 2.3% absolute reduction in these events with the use of the hs assay (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Use of hs troponin testing of patients hospitalised with possible ACS was associated with an increased rate of non-invasive cardiac investigations and fewer inhospital adverse events.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Troponina/sangue , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Austrália , Nova Zelândia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the availability of a catheterisation laboratory and evidence-based care on the 18-month mortality rate in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Management and outcomes are described for patients enrolled in the 2012 Australian and New Zealand SNAPSHOT ACS audit. Patients were stratified according to their presentation to hospitals with or without cardiac catheterisation facilities. Data linkage ascertained patient vital status 18 months after admission. Descriptive and Cox proportional hazards analyses determined predictors of outcomes, and were used to estimate the numbers of deaths that could be averted by improved application of evidence-based care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality for ACS patients from admission to 18 months after admission. RESULTS: Definite ACS patients presenting to catheterisation-capable (CC) hospitals (n = 1326) were more likely to undergo coronary angiography than those presenting to non-CC hospitals (n = 1031) (61.5% v 50.8%; P = 0.0001), receive timely reperfusion (for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients: 45.2% v 19.2%; P < 0.001), and be referred for cardiac rehabilitation (57% v 53%; P = 0.05). All-cause mortality over 18 months was highest for STEMI (16.2%) and non-STEMI (16.3%) patients, and lowest for those presenting with unstable angina (6.8%) and non-cardiac chest pain (4.8%; P < 0.0001 for trend). After adjustment for patient propensity to present to a CC hospital and patient risk, presentation to a CC hospital was associated with 21% (95% CI, 2%-37%) lower mortality than presentation to a non-CC hospital. This mortality difference was attenuated after adjusting for delivery of evidence-based care. CONCLUSION: In Australia and New Zealand, the availability of a catheterisation laboratory appears to have a significant impact on long-term mortality in ACS patients, which is still substantial. This mortality may be reduced by improvements in evidence-based care in both CC and non-CC hospitals.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Institutos de Cardiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Angiografia Coronária , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Research on Australian cardiovascular disease secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation to guide practice needs updating to reflect current context of practice. It is timely therefore to review the core components that underpin effective services that deliver maximum benefits for participants. METHODS: The Australian Cardiovascular Health and Rehabilitation Association (ACRA) convened an inter-agency, multidisciplinary, nationally representative expert panel of Australia's leading cardiac rehabilitation clinicians, researchers and health advocates who reviewed the research evidence. RESULTS: Five core components for quality delivery and outcomes of services were identified and are recommended: 1) Equity and access to services, 2) Assessment and short-term monitoring, 3) Recovery and longer term maintenance, 4) Lifestyle/behavioural modification and medication adherence, and 5) Evaluation and quality improvement. CONCLUSIONS: ACRA seeks to provide guidance on the latest evidence in cardiovascular disease secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation. Clinicians should use these core components to guide effective service delivery and promote high quality evidence based care. Directors of hospitals and health services should use these core components to aid decision-making about the development and maintenance of these services.
Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Austrália/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to develop criteria to identify sudden cardiac death (SCD) and estimate population rates of SCD using administrative mortality and hospital morbidity records in Western Australia. METHODS: Four criteria were developed using place, death within 24 h, principal and secondary diagnoses, underlying and associated cause of death, and/or occurrence of a post mortem to identify SCD. Average crude, age-standardised and age-specific rates of SCD were estimated using population person-linked administrative data. RESULTS: In all, 9567 probable SCDs were identified between 1997 and 2010, with one-third aged ≥ 35 years having no prior admission for cardiovascular disease. SCD was more frequent in men (62.1%). The estimated average annual crude SCD rate for the period was 34.6 per 100 000 person-years with an average annual age-standardised rate of 37.8 per 100 000 person-years. Age-specific standardised rates were 1.1 per 100 000 person-years and 70.7 per 100 000 person-years in people aged 1-34 and ≥ 35 years, respectively. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) was recorded as the underlying cause of death in approximately 80% of patients aged ≥ 35 years, followed by valvular heart disease and heart failure. IHD was the most common cause of death in those aged 1-34 years, followed by unspecified cardiomyopathy and dysrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative morbidity and mortality data can be used to estimate rates of SCD and therefore provide a suitable methodology for monitoring SCD over time. The findings highlight the magnitude of SCD and its potential for public health prevention.
Assuntos
Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Austrália Ocidental/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Aboriginal Australians have a substantially higher frequency of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) events than their non-Aboriginal counterparts, together with a higher prevalence of comorbidities. The pattern of health service provision for IHD suggests inequitable delivery of important diagnostic procedures. Published data on disparities in IHD management among Aboriginal Australians are conflicting, and the role of comorbidities has not been adequately delineated. We compared the profiles of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal patients in the metropolitan area undergoing emergency IHD admissions at Western Australian metropolitan hospitals, and investigated the determinants of receiving coronary angiography. METHODS: Person-linked administrative hospital and mortality records were used to identify 28-day survivors of IHD emergency admission events (n =20,816) commencing at metropolitan hospitals in 2005-09. The outcome measure was receipt of angiography. The Aboriginal to non-Aboriginal risk ratio (RR) was estimated from a multivariable Poisson log-linear regression model with allowance for multiple IHD events in individuals. The subgroup of myocardial infarction (MI) events was modelled separately. RESULTS: Compared with their non-Aboriginal counterparts, Aboriginal IHD patients were younger and more likely to have comorbidities. In the age- and sex-adjusted model, Aboriginal patients were less likely than others to receive angiography (RRIHD 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.83; RRMI 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.87) but in the full multivariable model this disparity was accounted for by comorbidities as well as IHD category and MI subtype, and private health insurance (RRIHD 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.01; RRMI 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.01). When stratified by age groups, this disparity was not significant in the 25-54 year age group (RRMI 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.02) but was significant in the 55-84 year age group (RRMI 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The disproportionate under-management of older Aboriginal IHD patients is of particular concern. Regardless of age, the disparity between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians in receiving angiography for acute IHD in a metropolitan setting is mediated substantially by comorbidities. This constellation of health problems is a 'double-whammy' for Aboriginal people, predisposing them to IHD and also adversely impacting on their receipt of angiography. Further research should investigate how older age and comorbidities influence clinical decision making in this context.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isquemia Miocárdica/etnologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidade , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do PacíficoRESUMO
Despite guidelines advocating routine engagement with proven secondary prevention strategies, current uptake and access remain suboptimal. Australian registries of acute coronary syndrome have predominantly focused on inpatient care and have highlighted under-referral to cardiac rehabilitation, gaps in medication prescription and limited commencement of lifestyle change before discharge from hospital. Opportunities to improve equity, access and uptake of secondary prevention include better transition between acute and primary care, systematic delivery of prevention in primary care, workforce strengthening and embracing new technologies. Adopting a structured framework for delivery of secondary prevention in primary care will enhance continuity of care and improve coordination of services after acute coronary syndrome.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/prevenção & controle , Austrália , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Prevenção SecundáriaRESUMO
The National Heart Foundation of Australia assembled an expert panel to provide guidance on policy and system changes to improve the quality of care for people with chronic heart failure (CHF). The recommendations have the potential to reduce emergency presentations, hospitalisations and premature death among patients with CHF. Best-practice management of CHF involves evidence-based, multidisciplinary, patient-centred care, which leads to better health outcomes. A CHF care model is required to achieve this. Although CHF management programs exist, ensuring access for everyone remains a challenge. This is particularly so for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, those from non-metropolitan areas and lower socioeconomic backgrounds, and culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Lack of data and inadequate identification of people with CHF prevents efficient patient monitoring, limiting information to improve or optimise care. This leads to ineffectiveness in measuring outcomes and evaluating the CHF care provided. Expanding current cardiac registries to include patients with CHF and developing mechanisms to promote data linkage across care transitions are essential. As the prevalence of CHF rises, the demand for multidisciplinary workforce support will increase. Workforce planning should provide access to services outside of large cities, one of the main challenges it is currently facing. To enhance community-based management of CHF, general practitioners should be empowered to lead care. Incentive arrangements should favour provision of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and rural areas, and culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Ongoing research is vital to improving systems of care for people with CHF. Future research activity needs to ensure the translation of valuable knowledge and high-quality evidence into practice.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Austrália , Benchmarking , Pesquisa Biomédica , Doença Crônica , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Planejamento em Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Assistência Centrada no PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aboriginal people have a disproportionately higher incidence rate of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) than non-Aboriginal people. The findings on Aboriginal disparity in receiving coronary artery procedures are inconclusive. We describe the profile and transfers of IHD patients admitted to rural hospitals as emergency admissions and investigate determinants of transfers and coronary angiography. METHODS: Person-linked hospital and mortality records were used to identify 28-day survivors of IHD events commencing at rural hospitals in Western Australia. Outcome measures were receipt of coronary angiography, transfer to a metropolitan hospital, and coronary angiography if transferred to a metropolitan hospital. RESULTS: Compared to non-Aboriginal patients, Aboriginal patients with IHD were more likely to be younger, have more co-morbidities, reside remotely, but less likely to have private insurance. After adjusting for demographic characteristics, Aboriginal people with MI were less likely to be transferred to a metropolitan hospital, and if transferred were less likely to receive coronary angiography. These disparities were not significant after adjusting for comorbidities and private insurance. In the full multivariate model age, comorbidities and private insurance were adversely associated with transfer to a metropolitan hospital and coronary angiography. CONCLUSION: Disparity in receiving coronary angiography following emergency admission for IHD to rural hospitals is mediated through the lower likelihood of being transferred to metropolitan hospitals where this procedure is performed. The likelihood of a transfer is increased if the patient has private insurance, however, rural Aboriginal people have a lower rate of private insurance than their non-Aboriginal counterparts. Health practitioners and policy makers can continue to claim that they treat Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people alike based upon clinical indications, as private insurance is acting as a filter to reduce rural residents accessing interventional cardiology. If health practitioners and policy makers are truly committed to reducing health disparities, they must reflect upon the broader systems in which disparity is perpetuated and work towards a systems improvement.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde do Indígena , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Miocárdica/etnologia , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Transferência de Pacientes , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitais Rurais , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Austrália Ocidental/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Disparities in the use of invasive coronary artery revascularisation procedures to manage acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been found in several developed economies. Factors such as socio-economic status, income and funding source may influence the use of invasive procedures and have also been associated with ongoing care. The objectives of this study were to determine whether outcomes for patients at one and five years after AMI treated with first-ever percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were the same for public and privately funded patients. METHODS: Retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked data to identify 30-day survivors of AMI treated with PCI in the index admission between 1995 and 2008 in Western Australian hospitals. The main outcome measures were admission for another PCI, re-AMI, and all-cause and cardiac mortality at one and five years. RESULTS: At one year, private patients were at greater adjusted risk for another PCI (HR 1.62 [1.36 - 1.94]; p < 0.001) than public patients, and more likely to have an additional revascularisation procedure from 90 days to 5 years (HR 1.33 [1.11 - 1.58]; p < 0.001). They were at less risk for all-cause death within five years (HR 0.69 [0.62-0.91]; p = 0.01) with a trend to reduced risk for cardiac death and re-AMI. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment as a private patient for AMI with first PCI is associated with an increased likelihood of additional coronary revascularisation procedure within 12 months and to five years, and a reduced risk for all-cause mortality to 5 years. While additional procedures were not associated with poorer outcomes, there was no clear relationship between better outcomes and additional procedures. Other lifestyle and health care factors may contribute to the significant reduction in all-cause mortality and the trends to reduced hazard for AMI and cardiac death among private patients.