Decreased colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in a diverse urban population with increased colonoscopy screening.

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer screening has contributed to decreased incidence and mortality, disparities are present by race/ethnicity. The Citywide Colon Cancer Control Coalition (C5) and NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) promoted screening colonoscopy from 2003 on, and hypothesized future reductions in CRC incidence, mortality and racial/ethnic disparities. METHODS: We assessed annual percent change (APC) in NYC CRC incidence, stage and mortality rates through 2016 in a longitudinal cross-sectional study of NY State Cancer Registry, NYC Vital Statistics, and NYC Community Health Survey (CHS) data. Linear regression tested associations between CRC mortality rates and risk factors. RESULTS: Overall CRC incidence rates from 2000 decreased 2.8% yearly from 54.1 to 37.3/100,000 population in 2016, and mortality rates from 2003 decreased 2.9% yearly from 21.0 to 13.9 in 2016 at similar rates for all racial/ethnic groups. Local stage disease decreased overall with a transient increase from 2002 to 2007. In 2016, CRC incidence was higher among Blacks (42.5 per 100,000) than Whites (38.0), Latinos (31.7) and Asians (30.0). In 2016, Blacks had higher mortality rates (17.9), than Whites (15.2), Latinos (10.4) and Asians (8.8). In 2016, colonoscopy rates among Blacks were 72.2%, Latinos 71.1%, Whites 67.2%, and Asians, 60.9%. CRC mortality rates varied by neighborhood and were independently associated with Black race, CRC risk factors and access to care. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse urban population, a citywide campaign to increase screening colonoscopy was associated with decreased incidence and mortality among all ethnic/racial groups. Higher CRC burden among the Black population demonstrate more interventions are needed to improve equity.

Impact of a Citywide Benchmarking Intervention on Colonoscopy Quality Performance.

INTRODUCTION: There is marked variability in colonoscopy quality, limiting its effectiveness in colorectal cancer prevention. Multiple indicators have been established as markers for colonoscopy quality; however, there are conflicting data on the effects of quality reporting programs on endoscopist performance. In this study, we investigate the impact of a multicenter quarterly report card initiative on colonoscopy quality metric performance. METHODS: Data were collected from 194 endoscopists at 10 participating sites throughout New York City using a Qualified Clinical Data Registry from January 2013 to December 2014. Adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, bowel preparation quality and appropriate interval recommendations were tracked. Report cards were distributed to each site on a quarterly basis and technical assistance was provided as needed. Performance trends were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend and analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: 37,258 screening colonoscopies were performed during the study period. There was a positive performance trend for ADR over time from the first quarter of 2013 to the last quarter of 2014 (15.6-25.7%; p < 0.001). There were also increases in cecal intubation rates (78.2-92.6%; p < 0.001), bowel preparation adequacy rates (77.5-92.8%; p < 0.001), and adherence to appropriate screening intervals (28.0-55.0%; p < 0.001). There was no clinically significant change in mean withdrawal time. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a quarterly report card initiative resulted in statistically significant improvements in adenoma detection, cecal intubation, bowel preparation adequacy rates, and appropriate recommended screening intervals.

Disparities in mortality-to-incidence ratios by race/ethnicity for female breast cancer in New York City, 2002-2016.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in New York City (NYC) breast cancer incidence and mortality rates have previously been demonstrated. Disease stage at diagnosis and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) may present better measures of differences in screening and treatment access. Racial/ethnic trends in NYC MIR have not previously been assessed. METHODS: Mammogram rates were compared using the NYC Community Health Survey, 2002-2014. Breast cancer diagnosis, stage, and mortality were from the New York State Cancer Registry, 2000-2016. Primary outcomes were MIR, the ratio of age-adjusted mortality to incidence rates, and stage at diagnosis. Joinpoint regression analysis identified significant trends. RESULTS: Mammogram rates in 2002-2014 among Black and Latina women ages 40 and older (79.9% and 78.4%, respectively) were stable and higher than among White (73.6%) and Asian/Pacific-Islander women (70.4%) (P < .0001). There were 82 733 incident cases of breast cancer and 16 225 deaths in 2000-2016. White women had the highest incidence, however, rates among Black, Latina, and Asian/Pacific Islander women significantly increased. Black and Latina women presented with local disease (Stage I) less frequently (53.2%, 57.6%, respectively) than White (62.5%) and Asian/Pacific-Islander women (63.0%). Black women presented with distant disease (Stage IV) more frequently than all other groups (Black 8.7%, Latina 5.8%, White 6.0%, and Asian 4.2%). Black women had the highest breast cancer mortality rate and MIR (Black 0.25, Latina 0.18, White 0.17, and Asian women 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: More advanced disease at diagnosis coupled with a slower decrease in breast cancer mortality among Black and Latina women may partially explain persistent disparities in MIR especially prominent among Black women. Assessment of racial/ethnic differences in screening quality and access to high-quality treatment may help identify areas for targeted interventions to improve equity in breast cancer outcomes.

Functional disconnectivity of the hippocampal network and neural correlates of memory impairment in treatment-resistant depression.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a disabling neuropsychiatric condition associated with cognitive impairment. Neuroimaging studies have consistently linked memory deficits with hippocampal atrophy in MDD patients. However, there has been a paucity of research examining how the hippocampus functionally contributes to memory impairments in MDD. The present study examined whether hippocampal networks distinguish treatment-resistant depression (TRD) patients from healthy controls (HCs), and whether these networks underlie declarative memory deficits in TRD. We hypothesized that functional connectivity (FC) of the posterior hippocampus would correlate preferentially with memory in patients, whereas FC pattern of the anterior and intermediate hippocampus would correlate with emotion-mediated regions and show a significant correlation with memory. METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans were acquired in 56 patients and 42 age- and sex-matched HCs. We parcellated the hippocampus into three subregions based on a sparse representation-based method recently developed by our group. FC networks of hippocampal subregions were compared between patients and HCs and correlated with clinical measures and cognitive performance. RESULTS: Decreased connectivity of the right intermediate hippocampus (RIH) with the limbic regions was a distinguishing feature between TRD and HCs. These functional abnormalities were present in the absence of structural volumetric differences. Furthermore, lower right amygdalar connectivity to the RIH related to a longer current depressive episode. Declarative memory deficits in TRD were significantly associated with left posterior and right intermediate hippocampal FC patterns. LIMITATIONS: Our patient samples were treatment-resistant, the conclusions from this study cannot be generalized to all MDD patients directly. Task-based imaging studies are needed to demonstrate hippocampal engagement in the memory deficits of patients. Finally, our findings are strongly in need of replication in independent validation samples. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate a transitional property of the intermediate hippocampal subregion between its anterior and posterior counterparts in TRD patients, and provide new insights into the neural network-level dysfunction of the hippocampus in TRD.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates Among New York City Adults Ages 20-54 years during 1976-2015.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are rising in younger Americans and mortality rates are increasing among younger white Americans. We used New York State Cancer Registry data to examine New York City CRC incidence and mortality trends among adults ages 20-54 years by race from 1976 to 2015. Annual percent change (APC) was considered statistically significant at P less than .05 using a two-sided test. CRC incidence increased among those ages 20-49 years, yet blacks had the largest APC of 2.2% (1993-2015; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4% to 3.1%) compared with 0.5% in whites (1976-2015; 95% CI = 0.2% to 0.7%). Among those aged 50-54 years, incidence increased among blacks by 0.8% annually (1976-2015; 95% CI = 0.4% to 1.1%), but not among whites. CRC mortality decreased among both age and race groups. These findings emphasize the value of local registry data to understand trends locally, the importance of timely screening, and the need for clinicians to consider CRC among all patients with compatible signs and symptoms.

A Comparison of Screening Tools for the Early Detection of Peripheral Neuropathy in Adults with and without Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Examine the effectiveness of the 128 Hz tuning fork, two monofilaments, and Norfolk Quality of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) questionnaire as tools for the early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in overweight, obese, and inactive (OOI) adults or those who have prediabetes (PD) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-four adults (mean age 58.4 years ± 12.1) were divided by glycemia (10 OOI normoglycemic, 13 PD, and 11 T2D). Sural nerves were tested bilaterally with the NC-stat DPNCheck to determine sural nerve amplitude potential (SNAP) and sural nerve conduction velocity (SNCV). All other testing results were compared to SNAP and SNCV. RESULTS: Total 1 g monofilament scores significantly correlated with SNAP values and yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity combinations of tested measures. Total QOL-DN scores negatively correlated with SNAP values, as did QOL-DN symptoms. QOL-DN activities of daily living correlated with the right SNAP, and the QOL-DN small fiber subscore correlated with SNCV. CONCLUSIONS: The 1 g monofilament and total QOL-DN are effective, low-cost tools for the early detection of DPN in OOI, PD, and T2D adults. The 128 Hz tuning fork and 10 g monofilament may assist DPN screening as a tandem, but not primary, early DPN detection screening tools.

Assessment of physician practices in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neuropsychiatric disorder, yet only 1 in 10 affected adults receives treatment. The study objective was to assess gaps in knowledge and describe current practice patterns of primary care physicians and psychiatrists in the United States in the management of adult patients with ADHD. METHOD: Primary care physicians and psychiatrists completed an Internet survey as a needs assessment of customary care related to management of adults with ADHD. Adult clinical case vignettes were followed by practice, confidence, and barrier questions. Survey data were collected from April 15, 2010, to August 22, 2010, and were deidentified and analyzed in aggregate to maintain confidentiality. χ(2) and t tests were used to compare responses of primary care physicians with those of psychiatrists. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1,924 physicians: 1,216 primary care physicians and 708 psychiatrists. Fewer primary care physicians than psychiatrists were "extremely confident" in diagnosis (8% vs 28%, respectively, P < .001) and treatment (8% vs 27%, respectively, P < .001). Limited experience with ADHD diagnosis was more of a barrier in primary care than in psychiatry (44% vs 19%, respectively, P < .001). Mean scores on 12 evidence-based questions were lower for primary care physicians than for psychiatrists (6.1 vs 6.8 correct, respectively, P < .001). Awareness of adult ADHD prevalence was lower among primary care physicians than among psychiatrists (32% vs 47% correct, respectively, P < .001). Fewer primary care physicians than psychiatrists recognized comorbid substance use disorder (76% vs 82%, respectively, P = .002), but more primary care physicians than psychiatrists recognized eating disorders (35% vs 21%, respectively, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The self-assessment survey results indicate physician practices in primary care and psychiatry differ and show areas in which further education will be useful to improve care for adults with ADHD.

Posttraumatic stress disorder screening practices: a 2010 internet assessment of customary care.

OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a signature injury of war among returning soldiers and US National Guard and Reserve members, with symptoms even more likely on rescreening. Studies that examine health care provider screening and referral practices outside the military for these patients are needed. The objective of this study was to assess health care provider PTSD practices and barriers to care. METHOD: A 25-item, anonymous Internet questionnaire was developed as an educational needs assessment survey based on the US Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense PTSD guideline and the companion, primary care-directed PTSD Screening and Referral for Health Care Providers of the National Center for PTSD. The assessment design included patient vignettes followed by multiple-choice questions and was distributed on the Internet to health care providers free of charge and without compensation. Of 1,338 participant health care providers, mainly from primary care and mental health specialties, 507 responded to the questions. Participant privacy was maintained for the self-assessment survey, and all responses were deidentified and analyzed in aggregate. Overall participant responses and subgroups of primary care and mental health questionnaire responses were scored against guidelines. Participant data responses to survey questions were collected from August 20, 2010, to October 3, 2010. RESULTS: Gaps in screening skills compared with guidelines were shown, as PTSD diagnosis questions were correctly answered by 51% of primary care and 56% of mental health providers. Real-world screening and referral differed from guidelines, as only 24% of primary care and 48% of mental health providers have a system in place to routinely screen for mental health in their patients who are returning service members. Only 25% of primary care providers had access to referral to mental health services, showing large gaps in care. Stigma associated with mental disorders was the practice barrier most frequently cited by health care providers. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified gaps in PTSD screening and linkage to care among health care providers. Further training efforts and resources are needed to screen patients and to reduce barriers to care.

Assessment of core competencies in childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder practice.

The study assessed competencies and practices of a large group of healthcare providers in childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and identified barriers to improving care. Methods were self-assessment using an Internet questionnaire with a standardized patient case; analysis compared with professional association recommendations; and measurement of provider self-efficacy levels. Of 2,103 participants who completed the assessment, 44% were only "somewhat confident" and 20% "not at all confident" in being up-to-date in diagnosis and management of ADHD. Based on American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology's Child and Adolescent Core Competencies and American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Practice Parameters, participants selected appropriate responses 60% of the time, 57% for items on diagnosis, and 62% for treatment. Providers under-used the family interview, and relied on ADHD rating scales for diagnosis. Lack of effective communication between provider, child, family, and teachers was the top barrier cited, yet participants rated involving the child and family as very important. In conclusion, education should include training on effective communication with the family to improve care for children with ADHD and dedication of further health education resources in the area of ADHD is needed.