Vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity based on vestibular signals during walking.

Evoking muscle responses by electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) may help to understand the contribution of the vestibular system to postural control. Although paraspinal muscles play a role in postural stability, the vestibulo-muscular coupling of these muscles during walking has rarely been studied. This study aimed to investigate how vestibular signals affect paraspinal muscle activity at different vertebral levels during walking with preferred and narrow step width. Sixteen healthy participants were recruited. Participants walked on a treadmill for 8 min at 78 steps/min and 2.8 km/h, at two different step width, either with or without EVS. Bipolar electromyography was recorded bilaterally from the paraspinal muscles at eight vertebral levels from cervical to lumbar. Coherence, gain, and delay of EVS and EMG responses were determined. Significant EVS-EMG coupling (P < 0.01) was found at ipsilateral and/or contralateral heel strikes. This coupling was mirrored between left and right relative to the midline of the trunk and between the higher and lower vertebral levels, i.e. a peak occurred at ipsilateral heel strike at lower levels, whereas it occurred at contralateral heel strike at higher levels. EVS-EMG coupling only partially coincided with peak muscle activity. EVS-EMG coherence slightly, but not significantly, increased when walking with narrow steps. No significant differences were found in gain and phase between the vertebral levels or step width conditions. In summary, vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity based on vestibular signals might allow a fast, synchronized, and spatially co-ordinated response along the trunk during walking. KEY POINTS: Mediolateral stabilization of gait requires an estimate of the state of the body, which is affected by vestibular afference. During gait, the heavy trunk segment is controlled by phasic paraspinal muscle activity and in rodents the medial and lateral vestibulospinal tracts activate these muscles. To gain insight in vestibulospinal connections in humans and their role in gait, we recorded paraspinal surface EMG of cervical to lumbar paraspinal muscles, and characterized coherence, gain and delay between EMG and electrical vestibular stimulation, during slow walking. Vestibular stimulation caused phasic, vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity at delays of around 40 ms, which was mirrored between left, lower and right, upper vertebral levels. Our results indicate that vestibular afference causes fast, synchronized, and spatially co-ordinated responses of the paraspinal muscles along the trunk, that simultaneously contribute to stabilizing the centre of mass trajectory and to keeping the head upright.

Three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography to measure muscle volume of the lumbar multifidus: Reliability of processing technique and validity through comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.

There is a growing interest in muscle characteristics of the lumbar multifidus related to low back pain, but findings between studies are inconsistent. One of the issues explaining these conflicting findings might be the use of two-dimensional measures of cross-sectional area and thickness of the lumbar multifidus in most studies, which might be a suboptimal representation of the entire muscle volume. A three-dimensional volumetric assessment, combined with standardized imaging and processing measurement protocols, is highly recommended to quantify spinal muscle morphology. Three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography is a technique with large potential for daily clinical practice. It is achieved by combining conventional two-dimensional ultrasound with a motion-tracking system, recording the position and orientation of the ultrasound transducer during acquisition, resulting in a three-dimensional reconstruction. This study investigates intra- and interprocessor reliability for the quantification of muscle volume of the lumbar multifidus based on three-dimensional freehand ultrasound and its validity, in 31 patients with low back pain and 20 healthy subjects. Two processors manually segmented the lumbar multifidus on three-dimensional freehand ultrasound images using Stradwin software following a well-defined method. We assessed the concurrent validity of the measurement of multifidus muscle volume using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in 10 patients with low back pain. Processing reliability and agreement were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and calculation of the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change, while validity was defined based on correlation analysis. The processing of three-dimensional freehand ultrasound images to measure lumbar multifidus volume was reliable. Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients were found for intraprocessor reliability. For interprocessor reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were moderate to good, emphasizing the importance of processing guidelines and training. A single processor analysis is preferred in clinical studies or when small differences in muscle volume are expected. The correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional freehand ultrasound measurements of lumbar multifidus volume was moderate to good but with a systematically smaller multifidus volume measured on three-dimensional freehand ultrasound. These results provide opportunities for both researchers and clinicians to reliably assess muscle structure using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound in patients with low back pain and to monitor changes related to pathology or interventions. To allow implementation in both research and clinical settings, guidelines on three-dimensional freehand ultrasound processing and training were provided.

Rehabilitation to improve outcomes of lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies on disability, pain, pain-related fear, and return-to-work in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions or adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS: Six electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of rehabilitation (unimodal or multimodal). The estimated effect size was calculated for interventions with homogeneous content using a random-effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed by GRADE. RESULTS: In total, 18 RCTs, including 1402 unique patients, compared specific rehabilitation to other rehabilitation strategies or usual care. Most described indications were degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis. All rehabilitation interventions were delivered in the postoperative period, and six of them also included a preoperative component. Intervention dose and intensity varied between studies (ranging from one session to daily sessions for one month). Usual care consisted mostly of information and postoperative mobilization. At short term, low quality of evidence shows that exercise therapy was more effective for reducing disability and pain than usual care (standardized mean difference [95% CI]: -0.41 [-0.71; -0.10] and -0.36 [-0.65; -0.08], four and five studies, respectively). Multimodal rehabilitation consisted mostly of exercise therapy combined with cognitive behavioral training, and was more effective in reducing disability and pain-related fear than exercise therapy alone (-0.31 [-0.49; -0.13] and -0.64 [-1.11; -0.17], six and four studies, respectively). Effects disappeared beyond one year. Rehabilitation showed a positive tendency towards a higher return-to-work rate (pooled relative risk [95% CI]: 1.30 [0.99; 1.69], four studies). CONCLUSION: There is low-quality evidence showing that both exercise therapy and multimodal rehabilitation are effective for improving outcomes up to six months after lumbar fusion, with multimodal rehabilitation providing additional benefits over exercise alone in reducing disability and pain-related fear. Additional high-quality studies are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies in the long term and for work-related outcomes.

Postoperative bracing after lumbar surgery: a survey amongst spinal surgeons in Belgium.

PURPOSE: Bracing is frequently prescribed following lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions. However, previous studies failed to demonstrate the advantage of postoperative lumbar bracing in both short- and long-term outcome in terms of pain, quality of life and fusion rate. The purpose of this study was to assess the prescription patterns and rationale for postoperative bracing amongst spinal surgeons in Belgium. METHODS: A 16-item online survey was distributed by email to spinal surgeons affiliated to the Spine Society of Belgium (N = 252). RESULTS: A total of 105 surgeons (42%) completed the survey. The overall bracing frequency following lumbar surgery was 38%. A brace was more often prescribed following the fusion procedures (52%) than after the non-fusion procedures (21%) (p < 0.0001). The majority of surgeons (59%) considered bracing after at least one type of lumbar surgery. Orthopaedic surgeons (73%) reported a significantly higher rate of prescribing postoperative bracing compared to neurosurgeons (44%) (p = 0.003). Pain alleviation (67%) was the main goal for prescribing a postoperative brace. A total of 42% of the surgeons aimed to improve fusion rate by bracing after lumbar fusion procedures. A quasi-equal level of the scientific literature (29%), personal experience (35%) and teaching from peers (36%) was reported to contribute on the attitudes towards prescribing bracing. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative bracing was prescribed by Belgian spinal surgeons following more than one-third of lumbar procedures. This was underpinned by beliefs regarding pain alleviation and higher fusion rate. Interestingly, based on the scientific literature these beliefs have been demonstrated to be false. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Can Postural Instability in Individuals with Distal Radius Fractures Be Alleviated by Concurrent Cognitive Tasks?

BACKGROUND: Although impaired postural control may be a risk factor for distal radius fractures (wrist fractures), which often are caused by falls, little attention has been given thus far to the various performance and neurophysiologic aspects involved. Although studies suggest that external focus and cognitive tasks can improve postural control, it remains unclear whether these benefits are observed in individuals with a history of distal radius fracture and to what extent. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To compare patients with a history of distal radius fracture to age- and sex-matched controls in terms of postural stability while standing on stable and unstable support surfaces, using both postural sway and neurophysiological measures as endpoints; and (2) to determine whether internal- and external-focus strategies and cognitive tasks can improve postural stability in these patients. METHODS: Forty patients with distal radius fracture (33 females and seven males with a mean ± SD age of 56 ± 4 years) and 40 sex- and age-matched control participants participated in the study. We recruited patients with a history of fall-induced distal radius fractures occurring between 6 and 24 months before the start of our study. We excluded patients who had any of the following: fear of falling, taking any medication that may affect balance, neurologic disorders, dizziness, vestibular problems, Type II diabetes, musculoskeletal disorders or recent history of lower extremity fracture, any recent surgical interventions in the spine or lower limbs, and/or cognitive impairment. Of 120 patients who were being treated for distal radius fracture over the 18-month period, 91 (76%) agreed to participate and 40 eligible patients were finally enrolled. The control group included sex- and age-matched (within 2-year intervals) individuals who had never had a wrist fracture. This group was selected from attendants/relatives of the patients attending the neurology and physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient departments, as well as other volunteers with no history of balance problems or wrist fractures. To address our primary research question, we compared the postural control of individuals with a history of distal radius fracture with the control group while quietly standing on different support surfaces (rigid and foam surfaces) using both postural sway measures obtained by a force plate as well as neurophysiological measures (electromyography [EMG] activity of tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius). To address our secondary research question, we compared the postural sway measures and EMG activity of the ankle muscles between different experimental conditions (baseline, internal focus (mentally focusing on their feet without looking), external focus (mentally focusing on rectangular papers, placed on the force plate or foam, one under each foot), difficult cognitive task (recalling maximum backward digits plus one) and easy cognitive task (recalling half of the maximum backward digits). RESULTS: Patients with distal radius fractures presented with greater postural sway (postural instability) and enhanced ankle muscle activity compared with their control counterparts, but only while standing on a foam surface (mean velocity: 5.4 ± 0.8 versus 4.80 ± 0.5 [mean difference = 0.59, 95% CI of difference, 0.44-0.73; p < 0.001]; EMG root mean square of the tibialis anterior: 52.2 ± 9.4 versus 39.30 ± 6 [mean difference = 12.9, 95% CI of difference, 11.4-14.5; p < 0.001]). Furthermore, a decrease in postural sway was observed while standing on both rigid and foam surfaces during the external focus, easy cognitive, and difficult cognitive conditions compared with the baseline (for example, mean velocity in the baseline condition compared with external focus, easy cognitive task and difficult cognitive task was: 4.9 ± 1.1 vs 4.7 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.14, 95% CI of difference, 0.11-0.17; p < 0.001], 4.6 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.25, 95% CI of difference, 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001], and 4.5 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.34, 95% CI of difference, 0.29-0.40; p < 0.001] in the wrist fracture group). The same result was obtained for muscle activity while standing on foam (EMG root mean square of tibialis anterior in the baseline condition compared with external focus, easy cognitive task and difficult cognitive task: 58.8 ± 7.2 versus 52.3 ± 6.6 [mean difference = 6.5, 95% CI of difference, 5.5-7.6; p < 0.001], 48.8 ± 7.1 [mean difference = 10.1, 95% CI of difference, 9-11.1; p < 0.001], 42.2 ± 5.3 [mean difference = 16.7 95% CI of difference, 15.1-18.2; p < 0.001] in the wrist fracture group). CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that patients with a history of distal radius fractures have postural instability while standing on unstable support surfaces. This instability, which is associated with enhanced ankle muscle activity, conceivably signifying an inefficient cautious mode of postural control, is alleviated by external attention demands and concurrent cognitive tasks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study may serve as a basis for designing informed patient-specific balance rehabilitation programs and strategies to improve stability and minimize falls in patients with distal radius fractures. The integrative methodology presented in this work can be extended to postural control and balance assessment for various orthopaedic/neurological conditions.

Sensor-based postural feedback is more effective than conventional feedback to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Improving movement control can be an important treatment goal for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Although external feedback is essential when learning new movement skills, many aspects of feedback provision in patients with CLBP remain currently unexplored. New rehabilitation technologies, such as movement sensors, are able to provide reliable and accurate feedback. As such, they might be more effective than conventional feedback for improving movement control. The aims of this study were (1) to assess whether sensor-based feedback is more effective to improve lumbopelvic movement control compared to feedback from a mirror or no feedback in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and (2) to evaluate whether patients with CLBP are equally capable of improving lumbopelvic movement control compared to healthy persons. METHODS: Fifty-four healthy participants and 54 patients with chronic non-specific LBP were recruited. Both participant groups were randomised into three subgroups. During a single exercise session, subgroups practised a lumbopelvic movement control task while receiving a different type of feedback, i.e. feedback from movement sensors, from a mirror or no feedback (=control group). Kinematic measurements of the lumbar spine and hip were obtained at baseline, during and immediately after the intervention to evaluate the improvements in movement control on the practised task (assessment of performance) and on a transfer task (assessment of motor learning). RESULTS: Sensor-based feedback was more effective than feedback from a mirror (p < 0.0001) and no feedback (p < 0.0001) to improve lumbopelvic movement control performance (Sensor vs. Mirror estimated difference 9.9° (95% CI 6.1°-13.7°), Sensor vs. Control estimated difference 10.6° (95% CI 6.8°-14.3°)) and motor learning (Sensor vs. Mirror estimated difference 7.2° (95% CI 3.8°-10.6°), Sensor vs. Control estimated difference 6.9° (95% CI 3.5°-10.2°)). Patients with CLBP were equally capable of improving lumbopelvic movement control compared to healthy persons. CONCLUSIONS: Sensor-based feedback is an effective means to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with CLBP. Future research should focus on the long-term retention effects of sensor-based feedback. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02773160 , (retrospectively registered on May 16th, 2016).

Specific Contribution of the Transversus Abdominis for Postural Control Against Perturbation Caused by Kinesthetic Illusion.

Functional independence of the transversus abdominis (TrA) from other trunk muscles for postural control is still unclear. This study aimed to clarify the specific function of the TrA to control standing posture by vibratory stimulation of the triceps surae. Fifteen men participated in this study. Muscle activity of the TrA, internal oblique, lumbar multifidus, gluteus maximus, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior was measured using fine-wire and surface electrodes. Participants were asked to maintain a quiet standing posture with and without vibration of the triceps surae, which induced a kinesthetic illusion and the concomitant backward sway of the body. The muscle activity of each muscle for 10 s was extracted with and without vibration. The muscle activity levels were compared between the conditions by a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The activity of the TrA and rectus femoris was increased, whereas the internal oblique showed no change as a result of the induced kinesthetic illusion. In addition, the activity of the multifidus and biceps femoris was decreased. The TrA and rectus femoris could contribute to control the backward sway of the body. Furthermore, the TrA may have functional independence from the internal oblique during standing postural control. These results warrant further study in patients with low back pain.

Physiotherapist- and patient-reported barriers to guideline implementation of active physiotherapeutic management of low back pain: A theory-informed qualitative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Adoption of low back pain (LBP) guidelines in physiotherapeutic management is a well-documented problem. Thereby, an in-depth understanding of the barriers to implement an active approach for both patients and physiotherapists is needed. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with physiotherapists and patients with non-specific LBP. Interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. RESULTS: A total of 20 participants were interviewed, including ten physiotherapists and ten patients. Our findings reveal that patients and physiotherapists face each 23 barriers spanning 14 TDF domains. The TDF domain "social influences" revealed the most barriers, followed by "beliefs about consequences" and "environmental context" for patients and physiotherapists, respectively. Five barriers did overlap between both groups (lack of guideline awareness, incorrect exercise performance, interdisciplinary communication gaps, time constraints and challenges in patient compliance). CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to LBP guideline recommended physiotherapeutic practices span all 14 TDF domains. Consequently, future implementation interventions need to address multiple TDF domains for effective LBP guideline implementation.

The effect of acute respiratory demand on postural control: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Postural control can be challenged by breathing. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the effect of an acute increase in respiratory demand on postural control compared to quiet breathing? METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Electronic databases were systematically searched until October 18, 2022 on studies reporting changes in center of pressure (CoP) motion related to an acute manipulation of respiratory demand compared to quiet breathing during upright standing in healthy participants and/or participants with a clinical condition. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies in healthy participants showed that voluntary (not metabolic-induced) hyperventilation or inspiratory resistive loading significantly increased CoP motion, while breath-holding decreased CoP motion, compared to quiet breathing (p< 0.05). Manipulating respiratory rate or breathing patterns did not reveal consistent results. Four studies showed that people with low back pain showed similar CoP responses to increasing respiratory demand (p> 0.05), except for breathing at different rates, whereas they showed greater CoP motion during quiet breathing. SIGNIFICANCE: The extent of postural disturbance depended on the breathing mode and how it was quantified (i.e., CoP coupled with breathing movement or overall CoP measures). Voluntary hyperventilation and inspiratory resistive loading increased postural sway. For voluntary hyperventilation, this could be explained by CoP motion being directly coupled to chest wall movements whereas metabolic-induced hyperventilation did not increase CoP motion or CoP coupling with breathing. Breath-holding decreased postural sway. Patients with low back pain show greater postural sways than pain-free individuals during quiet breathing, although they exhibit similar postural adaptations to respiratory-related challenges as controls.

Best practice rehabilitation pathway for the management of single and double-level lumbar fusion surgery: a modified Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence to guide the rehabilitation of patients following single or double-level lumbar fusion surgery (LFS). This is reflected in extensive variability in current rehabilitation regimes and subsequent low clinical success rates, which urges a call for a consensus rehabilitation pathway. AIM: To establish consensus on the optimal pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation of LFS. DESIGN: A modified Delphi Study. SETTING: Belgium and the Netherlands. POPULATION: A multidisciplinary panel of 31 experts in the field of LFS and rehabilitation participated. Nine patients validated the consensus pathway. METHODS: A three-round online Delphi questionnaire was followed by an in-person consensus meeting. In each round, experts could suggest new statements, and received group summary statistics and feedback for reconsidered statements. Consensus threshold was set at ≥75% agreement. The resulting rehabilitation pathway was validated by patients through an online questionnaire and subsequent in-person focus group. RESULTS: A total of 31 experts participated in the first online round, with 27 (87%) completing all online rounds, and 17 (55%) attending the in-person consensus meeting. Consensus was reached on 122 statements relating to pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation of LFS, and validated by patients. Key components of the rehabilitation pathway included prehabilitation, education, physiotherapy in every phase, early postoperative mobilization, and little movement restrictions. Patients emphasized the need for support during the return-to-work process. CONCLUSIONS: This process resulted in 122 expert-consensus statements on best practice rehabilitation for managing LFS, validated by patients. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The proposed rehabilitation pathway can serve as guidance to support clinicians, reduce practice variability, and subsequently improve clinical outcomes after LFS.

Ankle proprioception is not targeted by exercises on an unstable surface.

Laboratory study using a repeated measures design. The aim of this study was to determine if ankle proprioception is targeted in exercises on unstable surfaces. Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) has recurrence rates over 70%, which are believed to be due to a reduced accuracy of proprioceptive signals from the ankle. Proprioceptive exercises in rehabilitation of LAS mostly consist of balancing activities on an unstable surface. The methods include 100 healthy adults stood barefoot on a solid surface and a foam pad over a force plate, with occluded vision. Mechanical vibration was used to stimulate proprioceptive output of muscle spindles of triceps surae and lumbar paraspinal musculature. Each trial lasted for 60 s; vibration was applied from the 15th till the 30th second. Changes in mean velocity and mean position of the center of pressure (CoP) as a result of muscle vibration were calculated. Results show that on foam, the effect of triceps surae vibration on mean CoP velocity was significantly smaller than on a solid surface, while for paraspinal musculature vibration the effect was bigger on foam than on solid surface. Similar effects were seen for mean CoP displacement as outcome. Exercises on unstable surfaces appear not to target peripheral ankle proprioception. Exercises on an unstable surface may challenge the capacity of the central nervous system to shift the weighting of sources of proprioceptive signals on balance.

Reliability and agreement of lumbar multifidus volume and fat fraction quantification using magnetic resonance imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard to quantify size and structure of lumbar muscles. Three-dimensional volumetric measures are expected to be more closely related to muscle function than two-dimensional measures such as cross-sectional area. Reliability and agreement of a standardized method should be established to enable the use of MRI to assess lumbar muscle characteristics. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the intra- and inter-processor reliability for the quantification of (1) muscle volume and (2) fat fraction based on chemical shift MRI images using axial 3D-volume measurements of the lumbar multifidus in patients with low back pain. METHODS: Two processors manually segmented the lumbar multifidus on the MRI scans of 18 patients with low back pain using Mevislab software following a well-defined method. Fat fraction of the segmented volume was calculated. Reliability and agreement were determined using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman plots and calculation of the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). RESULTS: Excellent ICCs were found for both intra-processor and inter-processor analysis of lumbar multifidus volume measurement, with slightly better results for the intra-processor reliability. The SEMs for volume were lower than 4.1 cm³. Excellent reliability and agreement were also found for fat fraction measures, with ICCs of 0.985-0.998 and SEMs below 0.946%. CONCLUSION: The proposed method to quantify muscle volume and fat fraction of the lumbar multifidus on MRI was highly reliable, and can be used in further research on lumbar multifidus structure.

The Function Assessment Scale for Spinal Deformity: Validity and Reliability of a New Clinical Scale.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Function Assessment scale for Spinal Deformity (FASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal malalignment impacts daily functioning. Standard evaluation of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is based on static radiography and patient-reported scores, which fail to assess functional impairments. A clinical scale, quantifying function and balance of patients with ASD, could increase our insights on the impact of ASD on functioning. METHODS: To develop the FASD, 70 ASD patients and 20 controls were measured to identify the most discriminating items of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Trunk Control Measurement Scale. Discussions between experts on the clinical relevance of selected items led to further item reduction. The FASD's discriminative ability was established between 43 patients and 19 controls, as well as between three deformity subgroups. For its responsiveness to treatment, 10 patients were reevaluated 6 months postoperatively. Concurrent validity was assessed through correlation analysis with radiographic parameters (pelvic tilt; sagittal vertical axis [SVA]; pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]; coronal vertical axis) and patient-reported scores [Oswestry Disability Index]; Scoliosis Research Society outcome questionnaire; Falls Efficacy Scale-International). Test-retest and interrater reliability were tested on two groups of ten patients using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Patients with ASD, mainly with sagittal malalignment, scored worse compared to controls on FASD (P < 0.001) and its subscales. No significant improvement was observed 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.758). FASD correlated significantly to all patient-reported scores and to SVA and PI-LL. Reliability between sessions (ICC = 0.97) and raters (ICC = 0.93) was excellent. Subscales also showed good to excellent reliability, except FASD 1 on "spinal mobility and balance" between sessions (ICC = 0.71). CONCLUSION: FASD proved to be a valid and reliable clinical scale for evaluation of functional impairments in ASD. Objective information on function and balance might ultimately guide physiotherapeutic treatment toward improved functioning.Level of Evidence: 2.

Distinction of non-specific low back pain patients with proprioceptive disorders from healthy individuals by linear discriminant analysis.

The central nervous system (CNS) dynamically employs a sophisticated weighting strategy of sensory input, including vision, vestibular and proprioception signals, towards attaining optimal postural control during different conditions. Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) patients frequently demonstrate postural control deficiencies which are generally attributed to challenges in proprioceptive reweighting, where they often rely on an ankle strategy regardless of postural conditions. Such impairment could lead to potential loss of balance, increased risk of falling, and Low back pain recurrence. In this study, linear and non-linear indicators were extracted from center-of-pressure (COP) and trunk sagittal angle data based on 4 conditions of vibration positioning (vibration on the back, ankle, none or both), 2 surface conditions (foam or rigid), and 2 different groups (healthy and non-specific low back pain patients). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was performed on linear and non-linear indicators to identify the best sensory condition towards accurate distinction of non-specific low back pain patients from healthy controls. Two indicators: Phase Plane Portrait ML and Entropy ML with foam surface condition and both ankle and back vibration on, were able to completely differentiate the non-specific low back pain groups. The proposed methodology can help clinicians quantitatively assess the sensory status of non-specific low back pain patients at the initial phase of diagnosis and throughout treatment. Although the results demonstrated the potential effectiveness of our approach in Low back pain patient distinction, a larger and more diverse population is required for comprehensive validation.

Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting.

Optimal postural control is an essential capacity in daily life and can be highly variable. The purpose of this study was to investigate if young people have the ability to choose the optimal postural control strategy according to the postural condition and to investigate if non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) influences the variability in proprioceptive postural control strategies. Young individuals with NSLBP (n = 106) and healthy controls (n = 50) were tested on a force plate in different postural conditions (i.e., sitting, stable support standing and unstable support standing). The role of proprioception in postural control was directly examined by means of muscle vibration on triceps surae and lumbar multifidus muscles. Root mean square and mean displacements of the center of pressure were recorded during the different trials. To appraise the proprioceptive postural control strategy, the relative proprioceptive weighting (RPW, ratio of ankle muscles proprioceptive inputs vs. back muscles proprioceptive inputs) was calculated. Postural robustness was significantly less in individuals with NSLBP during the more complex postural conditions (p < 0.05). Significantly higher RPW values were observed in the NSLBP group in all postural conditions (p < 0.05), suggesting less ability to rely on back muscle proprioceptive inputs for postural control. Therefore, healthy controls seem to have the ability to choose a more optimal postural control strategy according to the postural condition. In contrast, young people with NSLBP showed a reduced capacity to switch to a more multi-segmental postural control strategy during complex postural conditions, which leads to decreased postural robustness.

The effect of acute back muscle fatigue on postural control strategy in people with and without recurrent low back pain.

Back muscle fatigue decreases the postural stability during quiet standing, but it is not known whether this fatigue-induced postural instability is due to an altered proprioceptive postural control strategy. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate if acute back muscle fatigue may be a mechanism to induce or sustain a suboptimal proprioceptive postural control strategy in people with and without recurrent low back pain (LBP). Postural sway was evaluated on a force platform in 16 healthy subjects and 16 individuals with recurrent LBP during a control (Condition 1) and a back muscle fatigue condition (Condition 2). Back muscle fatigue was induced by performing a modified Biering-Sørensen test. Ankle and back muscle vibration, a potent stimulus for muscle spindles, was used to differentiate proprioceptive postural control strategies during standing on a stable and unstable support surface, where the latter was achieved by placing a foam pad under the feet. Ankle signals were predominantly used for postural control in all subjects although, in each condition, their influence was greater in people with LBP compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.001). The latter group adapted their postural control strategy when standing on an unstable surface so that input from back muscles increased (p < 0.001). However, such adaptation was not observed when the back muscles were fatigued. Furthermore, people with LBP continued to rely strongly on ankle proprioception regardless of the testing conditions. In conclusion, these findings suggest that impaired back muscle function, as a result of acute muscle fatigue or pain, may lead to an inability to adapt postural control strategies to the prevailing conditions.

Linear and Non-linear Dynamic Methods Toward Investigating Proprioception Impairment in Non-specific Low Back Pain Patients.

Central nervous system (CNS) uses vision, vestibular, and somatosensory information to maintain body stability. Research has shown that there is more lumbar proprioception error among low back pain (LBP) individuals as compared to healthy people. In this study, two groups of 20 healthy people and 20 non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) participants took part in this investigation. This investigation focused on somatosensory sensors and in order to alter proprioception, a vibrator (frequency of 70 Hz, amplitude of 0.5 mm) was placed on the soleus muscle area of each leg and two vibrators were placed bilaterally across the lower back muscles. Individuals, whose vision was occluded, were placed on two surfaces (foam and rigid) on force plate, and trunk angles were recorded simultaneously. Tests were performed in eight separate trials; the independent variables were vibration (four levels) and surface (two levels) for within subjects and two groups (healthy and LBP) for between subjects (4 × 2 × 2). MANOVA and multi-factor ANOVA tests were done. Linear parameters for center of pressure (COP) [deviation of amplitude, deviation of velocity, phase plane portrait (PPP), and overall mean velocity] and non-linear parameters for COP and trunk angle [recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) and Lyapunov exponents] were chosen as dependent variables. Results indicated that NSLBP individuals relied more on ankle proprioception for postural stability. Similarly, RQA parameters for the COP on both sides and for the trunk sagittal angle indicated more repeated patterns of movement among the LBP cohort. Analysis of short and long Lyapunov exponents showed that people with LBP caused no use of all joints in their bodies (non-flexible), are less stable than healthy subjects.

Factors Associated With the Ultrasound Characteristics of the Lumbar Multifidus: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The first aim of this review was to investigate the association between age, sex, height, weight, physical activity level, posture, lumbar level and body side, and structural characteristics (cross-sectional area [CSA], thickness, linear dimensions, and echo intensity) of the lumbar multifidus (LM) measured by ultrasound. Second, differences between healthy individuals and patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) were investigated. TYPE: Systematic review. LITERATURE SURVEY: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched until September 2018. METHODOLOGY: Studies were included if (a) full text was available in English, Dutch, or French; (b) participants were older than 18 years of age and were asymptomatic or had nonspecific CLBP; and (c) the relation between structural characteristics of the LM, measured by ultrasound, and at least one of the above-mentioned factors was described, and/or a comparison between a CLBP and control group was made. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Quality of studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Downs and Black checklist. SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven studies were included. Thickness and CSA of the LM do not correlate with age. Males have a larger LM size than females. Thickness and CSA of left and right LM are highly correlated in healthy subjects. More significant side-to-side differences are present in subjects with CLBP than in those without. Muscle size increases from proximal to caudal lumbar levels. The presence of CLBP is associated with muscle size and function. CONCLUSIONS: The association between the factors age, sex, height, weight, physical activity level, posture, lumbar level, body side, and presence of CLBP, and the ultrasound characteristics of the LM is discussed. These factors should be taken into account in future research on structural muscle characteristics, or when correlating with functional behavior or investigating the effect of a targeted intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Changes in the Organization of the Secondary Somatosensory Cortex While Processing Lumbar Proprioception and the Relationship With Sensorimotor Control in Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) rely more on the ankle compared with the lower back proprioception while standing, perform sit-to-stand-to-sit (STSTS) movements slower, and exhibit perceptual impairments at the lower back. However, no studies investigated whether these sensorimotor impairments relate to a reorganization of the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (S1 and S2) and primary motor cortex (M1) during proprioceptive processing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Proprioceptive stimuli were applied at the lower back and ankle muscles during functional magnetic resonance imaging in 15 patients with NSLBP and 13 controls. The location of the activation peaks during the processing of proprioception within S1, S2, and M1 were determined and compared between groups. Proprioceptive use during postural control was evaluated, the duration to perform 5 STSTS movements was recorded, and participants completed the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ) to assess back-specific body perception. RESULTS: The activation peak during the processing of lower back proprioception in the right S2 was shifted laterally in the NSLBP group compared with the healthy group (P=0.007). Moreover, patients with NSLSP performed STSTS movements slower (P=0.018), and reported more perceptual impairments at the lower back (P<0.001). Finally, a significant correlation between a more lateral location of the activation peak during back proprioceptive processing and a more disturbed body perception was found across the total group (ρ=0.42, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients with NSLBP show a reorganization of the higher-order processing of lower back proprioception, which could negatively affect spinal control and body perception.

Differences in brain processing of proprioception related to postural control in patients with recurrent non-specific low back pain and healthy controls.

Patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) show an impaired postural control during standing and a slower performance of sit-to-stand-to-sit (STSTS) movements. Research suggests that these impairments could be due to an altered use of ankle compared to back proprioception. However, the neural correlates of these postural control impairments in NSLBP remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated brain activity during ankle and back proprioceptive processing by applying local muscle vibration during functional magnetic resonance imaging in 20 patients with NSLBP and 20 controls. Correlations between brain activity during proprioceptive processing and (Airaksinen et al., 2006) proprioceptive use during postural control, evaluated by using muscle vibration tasks during standing, and (Altmann et al., 2007) STSTS performance were examined across and between groups. Moreover, fear of movement was assessed. Results revealed that the NSLBP group performed worse on the STSTS task, and reported more fear compared to healthy controls. Unexpectedly, no group differences in proprioceptive use during postural control were found. However, the relationship between brain activity during proprioceptive processing and behavioral indices of proprioceptive use differed significantly between NSLBP and healthy control groups. Activity in the right amygdala during ankle proprioceptive processing correlated with an impaired proprioceptive use in the patients with NSLBP, but not in healthy controls. Moreover, while activity in the left superior parietal lobule, a sensory processing region, during back proprioceptive processing correlated with a better use of proprioception in the NSLBP group, it was associated with a less optimal use of proprioception in the control group. These findings suggest that functional brain changes during proprioceptive processing in patients with NSLBP may contribute to their postural control impairments.