Flipping the Classroom in Residency Didactics Leads to Higher American Board of Surgery in-Training Examination Scores.

OBJECTIVE: Didactic education in General Surgery (GS) residency typically follows a nationally standardized curriculum; however, instructional format varies by institution. In recent years, GS residents at our institution expressed discontentment with weekly didactics and were not meeting their goals on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). We sought to develop improvements in our didactic curriculum to increase resident satisfaction and ABSITE scores of GS junior residents (Jrs). DESIGN: In a quality improvement project, we changed the weekly didactic curriculum format from hour-long lectures in the 2018 to 2019 academic year (AY) to a partially-flipped classroom in the 2019 to 2020 AY, involving a 30-minute faculty-led presentation followed by 30 minutes of resident-led practice questions. The outcomes measured were ABSITE scores taken in 2019 and 2020 and resident opinions via an anonymous survey. SETTING: This study was conducted at the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN). PARTICIPANTS: The cohort for this study included all GS Jrs in our GS residency program, including postgraduate year (PGY) 1 nondesignated preliminary, PGY1 to 3 categorical GS residents, and residents in their lab time. Senior residents attended a separate didactics session. RESULTS: After curriculum changes, the ABSITE percentile scores for GS Jrs rose from 52% ± 5% to 66% ± 4% (p = 0.03). No categorical GS Jr scored <30% in 2020, compared to 20% (6/30) of categorical General Surgery residents in 2019. All residents preferred the new format overall and reported greater engagement in and preparation for didactics. CONCLUSIONS: After changing didactic education from hour-long lectures in the 2018 to 2019 AY to a flipped classroom model in the 2019 to 2020 AY including 30 minutes of faculty-led lecture followed by 30 minutes of resident-led practice questions, ABSITE scores and resident satisfaction at the University of Minnesota General Surgery Program improved.

Developing Leaders in Surgical Residency: A Curriculum for Success.

OBJECTIVE: As surgical residents continue in their training, they are expected to not only take part in more complicated procedures, but to also serve as leaders in their respective care teams. While surgical skills are intensively taught in surgical residency programs, leadership is often learned informally, to the detriment of residents. Our curriculum was developed and implemented to provide foundational knowledge for surgical residents as they take on senior roles so that they may successfully act as leaders. This educational workshop was effective and efficient and can be applied at other residency programs that seek to improve the leadership skills of their residents. DESIGN: Implementation of a 3-day program focused on leadership, surgical skills, and career development to provide rising PGY-4 surgical residents with the abilities necessary for successful training. SETTING: This program was implemented at the University of Minnesota General Surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Rising PGY-4 general surgery residents. RESULTS: The program consisted of a 3-day workshop which all rising PGY-4 residents participating in before transitioning into their respective roles. The program was led by the general surgery faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Curricula focused on developing leadership skills in residents can be effectively applied in a time-efficient manner that can benefit the residents as they move into official leadership roles on the care team.

Outcomes of Interfacility VV-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Transfers: A Multicenter Study.

As the availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) expands, so has the need for interfacility transfer to ECMO centers. However, the impact of these transfers is unknown. We hypothesized that interfacility transfers would be associated with increased complications and mortality. This retrospective cohort study includes adult patients treated with venovenous (VV) ECMO at all four adult ECMO centers comprising our statewide registry. Complications, mortality, ECMO duration, length of stay, and disposition were compared based on cannulation at an ECMO center versus outside hospital and transferred by air versus ground after adjusting for baseline covariates/parameters. The study included 420 adult patients, 36% of whom were cannulated at an outside institution before transfer. Of these, 63% were transported by ground and the remainder by air. Risk adjusted logistic regression revealed similar odds of mortality between those cannulated at ECMO centers versus referring hospital and then transported (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-1.22). This study supports the practice of interfacility ECMO transfer.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of a restrictive blood product utilization protocol on blood product utilization and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed all adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients from January 2019 to December 2021. The restrictive protocol, implemented in March 2020, was defined as transfusion of blood products for a hemoglobin level less than 7, platelet levels less than 50, and/or fibrinogen levels less than 100. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mode of ECMO received: venoarterial ECMO, venovenous ECMO, and ECMO support following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). SETTING: M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center. PATIENTS: The study included 507 patients. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred fifty-one patients (29.9%) were placed on venoarterial ECMO, 70 (13.8%) on venovenous ECMO, and 286 (56.4%) on ECPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For patients on venoarterial ECMO (48 [71.6%] vs. 52 [63.4%]; p = 0.374), venovenous ECMO (23 [63.9%] vs. 15 [45.5%]; p = 0.195), and ECPR (54 [50.0%] vs. 69 [39.2%]; p = 0.097), there were no significant differences in survival on ECMO. The last recorded mean hemoglobin value was also significantly decreased for venoarterial ECMO (8.10 [7.80-8.50] vs. 7.50 [7.15-8.25]; p = 0.001) and ECPR (8.20 [7.90-8.60] vs. 7.55 [7.10-8.88]; p < 0.001) following implementation of the restrictive transfusion protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a restrictive transfusion protocol is noninferior to ECMO patient survival. Additional, prospective randomized trials are required for further investigation of the safety of a restrictive transfusion protocol.