Suspension button constructs restore posterior knee laxity in solid tibial avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament.

PURPOSE: Dislocated tibial avulsions of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) require surgical intervention. Several arthroscopic strategies are options to fix the fragment and restore posterior laxity, including two types of suspension button devices: adjustable (self-locking) and rigid knotted systems. Our hypothesis was that a rigid knotted button construct has superior biomechanical properties regarding laxity restoration compared with an adjustable system. Both techniques were compared with standard screw fixation and the native PCL. METHODS: Sixty porcine knees were dissected. The constructs were tested for elongation, stiffness, yield force, load to failure force, and failure mode in a material testing machine. Group N (native, intact PCL) was used as a control group. In group DB (Dogbone™), TR (Tightrope™), and S (screw), a standardized block osteotomy with the osteotomized fragment attached to the PCL was set. The DB and TR groups simulated using a suspension button system with either a rigid knotted (DB) or adjustable system (TR). These groups were compared to a screw technique (S) simulating antegrade screw fixation from posterior. RESULTS: Comparing the different techniques (DB, TR, S), no significant elongation was detected; all techniques achieved a sufficient posterior laxity restoration. Significant elongation in the DB and TR group was detected compared with the native PCL (N). In contrast, screw fixation did not lead to significant elongation. The stiffness, yield load, and load to failure force did not differ significantly between the techniques. None of the techniques reached the same level of yield load and load to failure force as the intact state. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic suspension button techniques sufficiently restore the posterior laxity and gain a comparable construct strength as an open antegrade screw fixation.

Modified suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical comparison.

PURPOSE: Displaced tibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures require surgical fixation in order to provide an adequate bone healing and to avoid a loss of posterior stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a recently established modified suture bridge technique to a well-established transtibial pullout technique. It was hypothesized that the suture bridge technique shows lower elongation and higher load to failure force compared to a transtibial pullout fixation. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were biomechanically tested using an uniaxial hydrodynamic material testing system. A standardized bony avulsion fracture of the tibial PCL insertion was generated. Two different techniques were used for fixation: (A) suture bridge configuration and (B) transtibial pullout fixation. In 90° of flexion elongation, initial stiffness and failure load were determined. RESULTS: The suture-bridge technique resulted in a significant lower elongation (4.5 ± 2.1 mm) than transtibial pullout technique (12.4 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001). The initial stiffness at the beginning of cyclic loading was 46.9 ± 3.9 N/mm in group A und 40.8 ± 9.0 N/mm in group B (p = 0.194). Load to failure testing exhibited 286.8 ± 88.3 N in group A and 234.3 ± 96.8 N in group B (p = 0.377). CONCLUSION: The suture bridge technique provides a significant lower construct elongation during cyclic loading. But postoperative rehabilitation must respect the low construct strength of both techniques because both fixation techniques did not show a sufficient fixation strength to allow for a more aggressive rehabilitation.