Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 23(3): 367-73, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19179041

RESUMO

Ischemic wounds of the lower extremity can fail to heal despite successful revascularization. The foot can be divided into six anatomic regions (angiosomes) fed by distinct source arteries arising from the posterior tibial (three), anterior tibial (one), and peroneal (two) arteries. This study investigated whether bypass to the artery directly feeding the ischemic angiosome had an impact on wound healing and limb salvage. Retrospective analysis was performed for 52 nonhealing lower extremity wounds (48 patients) requiring tibial bypass over a 2-year period. Preoperative arteriograms were reviewed to determine arterial anatomy relative to each wound's specific angiosome and bypass anatomy. Patients were divided into two groups; direct revascularization (DR, bypass to the artery directly feeding the ischemic angiosome) or indirect revascularization (IR, bypass unrelated to the ischemic angiosome). Wound outcome was analyzed with regard to the endpoints of complete healing, amputation, or death unrelated to the wound. Time to healing was also noted for healed wounds. Based on preoperative arteriography, 51% (n = 27) of the wounds received DR to the ischemic angiosome, while 49% (n = 25) underwent IR. There were no statistically significant differences in the comorbidities of the two groups. Revascularization was via tibial bypass using the saphenous vein (n = 34, 65%) or polytetrafluoroethylene with a distal vein patch (n = 18, 35%). Bypasses were performed to the anterior tibial (n = 22, 42%), posterior tibial (n = 17, 33%), or peroneal (n = 13, 25%) arteries based on the surgeon's judgment. One bypass failed in the perioperative period and was excluded from the analysis. The remaining bypasses were patent at the time of wound analysis. Due to a 17% mortality rate during follow-up, 43 wounds were available for endpoint analysis. This analysis demonstrated that 77% of wounds (n = 33) progressed to complete healing and 23% of wounds (n = 10) failed to heal with resultant amputation. In the DR group, there was 91% healing with a 9% amputation rate. In the IR group, there was 62% healing with a 38% amputation rate (p = 0.03). In those wounds that did heal, total time to healing was not significantly different--DR 162.4 days versus IR 159.8 days (p = 0.95). Revascularization plays a crucial role in the treatment of ischemic lower extremity wounds. We believe that direct revascularization of the angiosome specific to the anatomy of the wound leads to a higher rate of healing and limb salvage. Although many factors must be considered in choosing the target artery for revascularization, consideration should be given to revascularization of the artery directly feeding the ischemic angiosome.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular , Pé/irrigação sanguínea , Isquemia/cirurgia , Salvamento de Membro/métodos , Veia Safena/transplante , Artérias da Tíbia/cirurgia , Amputação Cirúrgica , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/mortalidade , Seleção de Pacientes , Politetrafluoretileno , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artérias da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 118(7 Suppl): 188S-196S; discussion 197S-198S, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17099502

RESUMO

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the different variables that are inherent to breast augmentation. 2. Identify certain breast shape characteristics that make one approach more advantageous than others. 3. Take into account certain patient characteristics to develop a logical surgical plan for breast augmentation. SUMMARY: The optimal technique for breast augmentation has always been debated, and numerous variables fit the needs of the variously shaped patients in our population. The purpose of this article is to present the advantages and disadvantages of the various techniques available in breast augmentation so that, in conjunction with the patient's physical examination, a sound surgical plan can be developed for aesthetic augmentation of the breast.

3.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 114(5): 73E-81E, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15457008

RESUMO

The optimal technique for breast augmentation has always been debated, and numerous variables fit the needs of the variously shaped patients in our population. The purpose of this article is to present the advantages and disadvantages of the various techniques available in breast augmentation so that, in conjunction with the patient's physical examination, a sound surgical plan can be developed for aesthetic augmentation of the breast.


Assuntos
Implante Mamário/métodos , Adulto , Algoritmos , Mama/anatomia & histologia , Implantes de Mama/normas , Segurança de Equipamentos , Estética , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese , Géis de Silicone , Cloreto de Sódio , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA