Acromial morphology is not associated with rotator cuff tearing or repair healing.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to determine whether acromial morphology (1) could be measured accurately on magnetic resonance images (MRIs) as compared to computed tomographs (CTs) as a gold standard, (2) could be measured reliably on MRIs, (3) differed between patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and those without evidence of RCTs or glenohumeral osteoarthritis, and (4) differed between patients with rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) that healed and those that did not. METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative study. We measured coronal, axial, and sagittal acromial tilt; acromial width, acromial anterior and posterior coverage, and glenoid version and inclination on MRI corrected into the plane of the glenoid. We determined accuracy by comparison with CT via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). To determine reliability, these same measurements were made on MRI by 2 observers and ICCs calculated. We compared these measurements between patients with a full-thickness RCT and patients aged >50 years without evidence of an RCT or glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We then compared these measurements between those patients with healed RCRs and those with a retorn rotator cuff on MRI. In this portion, we only included patients with both a preoperative MRI and a postoperative MRI at least 1 year from RCR. Only those patients without tendon defects on postoperative MRIs were considered to be healed. In these patients, we also radiographically measured the critical shoulder angle. RESULTS: In a validation cohort of 30 patients with MRI and CT, all ICCs were greater than 0.86. In these patients, the inter-rater ICCs of the MRI measurements were >0.53. In our RCT group of 110 patients, there was greater acromial width [mean difference (95% confidence interval) = 0.1 (0, 0.2) mm, P = .012] and significantly less sagittal acromial tilt [9° (5°-12°), P < .001] than in our comparison group of 107 patients. A total of 110 RCRs were included. Postoperative MRI scans were obtained at a mean follow-up of 24.2 ± 15.8 months, showing 84 patients (76%) had healed RCRs. Aside from acromial width, which was 0.2 mm different and thus did not have clinical significance, there was no association between healing and any of the measured morphologic characteristics. Patients with healed repairs had significantly smaller tears in terms of both width (P < .001) and retraction (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although the acromion is wider in RCTs, the difference of 0.1 mm likely has no clinical significance. The acromion is more steeply sloped from posteroinferior to anterosuperior in those with RCTs. These findings call into question subacromial impingement due to native acromial morphology as a cause of rotator cuff tearing. Acromial morphology, critical shoulder angle, and glenoid inclination were not associated with healing after RCR. This study does not support lateral acromioplasty.

Minimal clinically important differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale pain scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for different patient outcome scores have been reported for various shoulder diseases, including shoulder arthroplasty and the nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the MCID for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and a visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain, after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A total of 202 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were retrospectively reviewed. ASES, SST, and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. The MCID was then calculated via a 4-question anchor-based method. RESULTS: The MCID results for the ASES, SST, and VAS pain scores were 27.1, 4.3, and 2.4, respectively. Age at time of surgery, sex, anteroposterior tear size, and worker's compensation status were not associated with MCID values (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The MCID values determined in the current study are higher than those previously identified for the nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease using the same anchor questions. Use of these higher values should be considered when evaluating improvements of individual patients after rotator cuff repair, to determine comparative effectiveness of various rotator cuff repair techniques and to determine sample sizes for prospective comparative trials of rotator cuff repair methods.

Decision making in treatment after a first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation: A Delphi approach by the Neer Circle of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients who sustain a first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation (FTAGD) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to find consensus among experts using a validated iterative process in the treatment of patients after an FTAGD. METHODS: The Neer Circle is an organization of shoulder experts recognized for their service to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. Consensus among 72 identified experts from this group was sought with a series of surveys using the Delphi process. The first survey used open-ended questions designed to identify patient-related features that influence treatment decisions after an FTAGD. The second survey used a Likert scale to rank each feature's impact on treatment decisions. The third survey used highly impactful features to construct 162 clinical scenarios. For each scenario, experts recommended surgery or not and reported how strongly they made their recommendation. These data were analyzed to find clinical scenarios that had >90% consensus for recommending treatment. These data were also used in univariate and multivariate mixed-effects models to identify odds ratios (ORs) for different features and to assess how combining these features influenced the probability of surgery for specific populations. RESULTS: Of the 162 scenarios, 8 (5%) achieved >90% consensus for recommending surgery. All of these scenarios treated athletes with meaningful bone loss at the end of their season. In particular, for contact athletes aged > 14 years who were at the end of the season and had apprehension and meaningful bone loss, there was >90% consensus for recommending surgery after an FTAGD, with surgeons feeling very strongly about this recommendation. Of the scenarios, 22 (14%) reached >90% consensus for recommending nonoperative treatment. All of these scenarios lacked meaningful bone loss. In particular, surgeons felt very strongly about recommending nonoperative treatment after an FTAGD for non-athletes lacking apprehension without meaningful bone loss. The presence of meaningful bone loss (OR, 6.85; 95% confidence interval, 6.24-7.52) and apprehension (OR, 5.60; 95% confidence interval, 5.03-6.25) were the strongest predictors of surgery. When these 2 features were combined, profound effects increasing the probability of surgery for different populations (active-duty military, non-athletes, noncontact athletes, and contact athletes) were noted, particularly non-athletes. CONCLUSION: Consensus for recommending treatment of the FTAGD patient was not easily achieved. Certain combinations of patient-specific factors, such as the presence of meaningful bone loss and apprehension, increased the probability of surgery after an FTAGD in all populations. Over 90% of shoulder instability experts recommend surgery after an FTAGD for contact athletes aged > 14 years at the end of the season with both apprehension and meaningful bone loss. Over 90% of experts would not perform surgery after a first dislocation in patients who are not athletes and who lack apprehension without meaningful bone loss.

Management of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rates, and treatment response.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to (1) compare patient-reported outcome scores, (2) define failure and reoperation rates, and (3) quantify the magnitude of patient response across treatment strategies. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Scopus databases were searched for studies including physical therapy and operative treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. The criteria of the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies were used to assess study quality. Primary outcome measures were patient-reported outcome scores as well as failure, complication, and reoperation rates. To quantify patient response to treatment, we compared changes in the Constant-Murley score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score with previously reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. RESULTS: No level I or II studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were found. Physical therapy was associated with a 30% failure rate among the included patients, and another 30% went on to undergo surgery. Partial repair was associated with a 45% retear rate and 10% reoperation rate. Only graft interposition was associated with a weighted average change that exceeded the MCID for both the Constant-Murley score and ASES score. Latissimus tendon transfer techniques using humeral bone tunnel fixation were associated with a 77% failure rate. Superior capsular reconstruction with fascia lata autograft was associated with a weighted average change that exceeded the MCID for the ASES score. Reverse arthroplasty was associated with a 10% prosthesis failure rate and 8% reoperation rate. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality comparative studies to guide treatment recommendations. Compared with surgery, physical therapy is associated with less improvement in perceived functional outcomes and a higher clinical failure rate.

Editorial Commentary: All-Suture Anchor for Medial-Row Fixation in Rotator Cuff Repair-Ready for Prime Time?

We, orthopaedic surgeons, are always on the watch for suture anchor approaches that will enhance our potential for success with tendon-to-bone healing or at least make their use easier or more applicable in certain situations. It is always best to have some biomechanical testing to compare recently introduced suture anchors with established and more studied conventional anchors. Although this is a good start, unfortunately, secondary aspects of an anchor sometimes are only observed after use in a biological setting. An all-suture anchor certainly can be inserted with a smaller starting defect in the proximal humerus, which could help in different settings when trying to accomplish a rotator cuff repair. However, as in many biomechanical studies, we need to be cautious about how the findings apply to the actual clinical situation.

Revisiting the Anterior Glenoid: An Analysis of the Calcified Cartilage Layer, Capsulolabral Complex, and Glenoid Bone Density.

PURPOSE: In this cadaveric study, we aim to define the basic anatomy of the anterior glenoid with attention to the relationships of calcified cartilage, capsulolabral complex, and osseous morphology of the anterior glenoid. METHODS: Seventeen cadaveric glenoid specimens (14 male, 3 female, mean age 53.9 ± 10) were imaged with micro-computed tomography (CT) and embedded in poly-methyl-methacrylate. Specimens were included for final analysis only if the entire glenoid articular cartilage, labrum, capsule, and biceps insertion were pristine and without evidence of injury, degeneration, or damage during the preparation process. Group 1 members (n = 9) were axially sectioned through 3 to 9 o'clock and 4 to 8 o'clock; group 2 members (n = 8) were radially sectioned through 3, 4, 5, and 9 o'clock. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis quantified the percentage of bone within a 5 × 2.5 mm region at the glenoid rim. Micro-CT, SEM, and light microscopy evaluated the capsulolabral complex and calcified fibrocartilage. RESULTS: A 7 ± 2.1 mm region of calcified fibrocartilage at 4 o'clock was identified from the articular face to the medial glenoid neck supporting the overlying capsulolabral footprint and was >3× thicker at the articular attachment (316 ± 153 µm) versus the glenoid neck (92 ± 66 µm). At 3 to 9 o'clock and 4 to 8 o'clock 79.2% ± 5.4% and 75.2% ± 7.8% of the glenoid osseous width was covered with articular cartilage. The labrum accounted for 13.1% ± 3.4% of the glenoid width at 4 o'clock. SEM analysis demonstrated decreased glenoid bone density at 3, 4, and 5 o'clock (P ≤ .015) and no difference (P = .448) at 9 o'clock versus central subchondral bone. CONCLUSIONS: The capsulolabral footprint contributes significantly to the glenoid face, inserts directly adjacent to the articular cartilage, and extends medially along the glenoid neck. A layer of calcified fibrocartilage lies immediately beneath the capsulolabral footprint and is 3× thicker at the articular insertion compared with the glenoid neck. Lastly, there is a bone density gradient at the anterior-inferior rim versus the central subchondral bone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Arthroscopic Bankart repair has been reported to have a significant failure rate in many settings. It is felt that reproducing anatomy with the repair could help improve outcomes. Based on this study's findings, an arthroscopic Bankart technique that most closely reproduces native anatomy and potentially optimizes soft-tissue healing could be performed. This includes removal of 1 to 2 mm of articular cartilage from the glenoid face with anchor placement at this location to appropriately reposition the capsulolabral complex.

Biomechanical Comparison of Transosseous Knotless Rotator Cuff Repair Versus Transosseous Equivalent Repair: Half The Anchors With Equivalent Biomechanics?

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanics of a transosseous equivalent (TOE) repair using medial and lateral anchors with tape to a transosseous knotless (TOK) tape repair with only laterally placed intraosseous anchors. METHODS: One of 2 different repairs were performed on 8 paired specimens: (1) transosseous equivalent (TOE) tape repair or (2) transosseous knotless (TOK) tape repair. Specimens were mounted on a materials testing machine and loaded in uniaxial tension to measure cyclic construct gap formation, followed by failure testing. Paired t tests were used to compare gapping, ultimate stiffness, and failure loads. Fisher exact test was used to compare modes of failure (soft tissue failure vs construct failure). RESULTS: Peak cyclic gapping, failure stiffness, and ultimate failure loads did not differ between TOE and TOK repairs (P = .140 for gapping, P = .106 for stiffness, and P = .672 for peak failure loads). All TOK repairs failed via soft tissue failure medial to the medial suture line, with no construct failures. TOE repairs failed more often through construct failure (anchor migration or suture-bone interface cut through) than TOK repairs (P = .026). CONCLUSION: TOK repairs only failed through soft tissue whereas TOE repairs failed through both soft tissue and the repair construct. Despite 50% fewer suture anchors in the TOK repairs than the TOE repairs, cyclic gapping and ultimate stiffness and failure loads were not significantly different. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The transosseous knotless construct presented is a 2-anchor construct that is equivalent in biomechanical function to a traditional 4-anchor construct, reducing anchor load in the tuberosity.

The critical acromial point: the anatomic location of the lateral acromion in the critical shoulder angle.

BACKGROUND: Acromioplasty has been proposed as a means of altering elevated critical shoulder angles (CSAs). We aimed to localize the critical acromion point (CAP) responsible for the acromial contribution of the CSA and determine whether resection of the CAP can alter the CSA to a normal range. METHODS: The CAP and 3-dimensional (3D) CSAs were determined on 3D computed tomography reconstructions of 88 cadaveric shoulders and compared with corresponding CSAs on digitally reconstructed radiographs. The position of the CAP was fluoroscopically isolated in 20 of these specimens and the resulting fluoroscopic CSA compared with the corresponding 3D CAP and 3D CSA. We investigated the CSA before and after a virtual acromioplasty of 2.5 and 5 mm at the CAP in specimens with a CSA greater than 35°. RESULTS: The mean CAP was 21% ± 10% of the acromial anterior-posterior length from the anterolateral corner. There was no difference between the mean 3D CSA and the CSA on digitally reconstructed radiographs (32° vs 32°, P = .096). No difference between the mean fluoroscopic CSA and 3D CSA was found (31° vs 31°, P = .296). A 2.5-mm acromial resection failed to reduce the CSA to 35° or less in 7 of 13 shoulders, whereas a 5-mm resection reduced the CSA to 35° or less in 12 of 13. CONCLUSION: The CAP was localized to the anterolateral acromial edge and was easily identified fluoroscopically. A 5-mm acromial resection was effective in reducing the CSA to 35° or less. These data can guide surgeons in where and how to alter the CSA if future studies demonstrate a clinical benefit to surgically modifying this radiographic parameter.

Factors influencing direct clinical costs of outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.

BACKGROUND: Very limited information exists about factors affecting direct clinical costs of rotator cuff repair surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the direct cost of outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery using a unique value-driven outcomes tool and to identify patient- and treatment-related variables affecting cost. METHODS: Cost data were derived for arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed by 3 surgeons from March 2014 to June 2015 using the value-driven outcomes tool. Costs included overall total direct cost, which included facility utilization costs, medication costs, supply costs, and other ancillary costs. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to determine the effect of various patient-related and surgical-related factors on costs. RESULTS: There were 170 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed during the study period. Multivariate analysis showed significant correlations between higher total direct cost and the presence of a subscapularis repair being performed (P = .015) and total number of anchors used (P < .0001). Higher body mass index, severe systemic illness, 1 of the 3 surgeons, biceps tenodesis using an anchor, and total sum of anchors were correlated with higher facility utilization costs (P < .04). Severe systemic illness, addition of a subscapularis repair, 1 of the 3 surgeons, and additional subacromial decompression were correlated with higher pharmacy costs (P < .006). The addition of a subscapularis repair, total sum of anchors, and severe muscle changes to the supraspinatus were correlated with higher supply costs (P < .015). CONCLUSIONS: From a direct cost perspective, implementation of strategies to reduce overall costs should focus on reducing overall anchor quantity or price.

Should We Have a Better Definition of Pseudoparalysis in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears?

Pseudoparalysis has been previously described as the inability to elevate the arm over 90° in the setting of a rotator cuff tear. Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment for patients with a pseudoparalytic shoulder with a rotator cuff tear with options including rotator cuff repair and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Recent literature suggests that pseudoparalysis can reliably be corrected with a rotator cuff repair and is more cost effective than reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We believe that the arbitrary cutoff of 90° is too generous and leads to confusion. We believe that the definition of pseudoparalysis needs to be refined to clarify indications for treatment and not base a decision on a simple measurement without other factors considered. We suggest that pseudoparalysis as a description should include elevation limited to up to 45°. The patient should also be described as having a chronic and essentially atraumatic onset of symptoms and the rotator cuff tear is massive with at least grade II to III fatty infiltration. Only with increasing precision and describing the actual patient situation and limitations will we be more able to correctly compare treatment alternatives.

Convergent Validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System's Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test for the Knee and Shoulder Injury Sports Medicine Patient Population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the convergent validity, precision, and completion times for the Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test (PF-CAT) in a sports medicine patient population relative to standard measures of knee and shoulder function. METHODS: We reviewed all patient visits from April through September 2014 with either knee or shoulder complaints from a university-based sports medicine clinic, during which PF-CAT, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) outcome scores for shoulder patients and PF-CAT, SANE, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores for knee patients were obtained, with an initial visit or one follow-up visit included in the study. Spearman correlation was used to evaluate pairwise agreement among scores. The McNemar χ2 test was used to evaluate a difference in the number of times floor and ceiling values occurred. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare differences in completion times. RESULTS: In total, 415 shoulder and 450 knee clinical evaluations qualified for inclusion in the study. A high correlation was found between IKDC and PF-CAT scores (r = 0.75, P < .0001), and a moderately high correlation was found between PF-CAT and both SST (r = 0.68, P < .0001) and ASES (r = 0.63, P < .0001) scores. Maximum differences in the sum of floor-ceiling values versus the PF-CAT were 15% for the SST (P < .0001), 2.5% for the ASES (ceiling only, P = .0133), and 5.8% for the shoulder SANE (floor P = .0012, ceiling P = .0269). The PF-CAT had values of 0.4% for the shoulder and 0.6% for the knee. Zero percent of IKDC scores but 6.9% of knee SANE scores hit floor or ceiling values (floor P = .0019, ceiling P = .0007). The PF-CAT median completion time was lower at 55 seconds versus 268 seconds for the IKDC assessment (P < .0001), whereas shoulder patients' times were 61, 139, and 116 seconds for the PF-CAT, SST, and ASES evaluation, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The PF-CAT showed a high correlation with IKDC scores and a moderately high correlation with ASES and SST outcomes. The PF-CAT takes significantly less time to complete and exhibits improved or similar floor and ceiling effects in comparison to IKDC, SST, and ASES scores. The PF-CAT can be used in evaluating sports medicine knee and shoulder patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cross-sectional study.

Influence of Preoperative Musculotendinous Junction Position on Rotator Cuff Healing After Double-Row Repair.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the preoperative position of the musculotendinous junction (MTJ) on rotator cuff healing after double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A secondary purpose was to evaluate how tendon length and MTJ position change when the rotator cuff heals. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 42 patients undergoing arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair were reviewed. Patients undergoing repairs with other constructs or receiving augmented repairs (platelet-rich fibrin matrix) who had postoperative MRI scans were excluded. Preoperative MRI scans were evaluated for anteroposterior tear size, tendon retraction, tendon length, muscle quality, and MTJ position with respect to the glenoid in the coronal plane. The position of the MTJ was referenced off the glenoid face as either lateral or medial. Postoperative MRI scans were evaluated for healing, tendon length, and MTJ position. RESULTS: Of 42 tears, 36 (86%) healed, with 27 of 31 small to medium tears (87%) and 9 of 11 large to massive tears (82%) healing. Healing occurred in 94% of tears that had a preoperative MTJ lateral to the face of the glenoid but only 56% of tears that had a preoperative MTJ medial to the glenoid face (P = .0135). The measured tendon length increased an average of 14.4 mm in patients whose tears healed compared with shortening by 6.4 mm in patients with tears that did not heal (P < .001). The MTJ lateralized an average of 6.1 mm in patients whose tears healed compared with medializing 1.9 mm in patients whose tears did not heal (P = .026). The overall follow-up period of the study was from April 2005 to September 2014 (113 months). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative MTJ position is predictive of postoperative healing after double-row rotator cuff repair. The position of the MTJ with respect to the glenoid face is a reliable, identifiable marker on MRI scans that can be predictive of healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective review of case series; therapeutic study.

One-year Patient-reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Do Not Correlate With Mild to Moderate Psychological Distress.

BACKGROUND: Patients with shoulder and rotator cuff pathology who exhibit greater levels of psychological distress report inferior preoperative self-assessments of pain and function. In several other areas of orthopaedics, higher levels of distress correlate with a higher likelihood of persistent pain and disability after recovery from surgery. To our knowledge, the relationship between psychological distress and outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has not been similarly investigated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are higher levels of preoperative psychological distress associated with differences in outcome scores (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? (2) Are higher levels of preoperative psychological distress associated with less improvement in outcome scores (VAS for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? (3) Does the prevalence of psychological distress in a population with full-thickness rotator cuff tears change when assessed preoperatively and 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? METHODS: Eighty-five patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were prospectively enrolled; 70 patients (82%) were assessed at 1-year followup. During the study period, the three participating surgeons performed 269 rotator cuff repairs; in large part, the low overall rate of enrollment was related to two surgeons enrolling only two patients total in the initial 14 months of the study. Psychological distress was quantified using the Distress Risk Assessment Method questionnaire, and patients completed self-assessments including the VAS for pain, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score preoperatively and 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Fifty of 85 patients (59%) had normal levels of distress, 26 of 85 (31%) had moderate levels of distress, and nine of 85 (11%) had severe levels of distress. Statistical models were used to assess the effect of psychological distress on patient self-assessment of shoulder pain and function at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: With the numbers available, distressed patients were not different from nondistressed patients in terms of postoperative VAS for pain (1.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.0-2.8] versus 1.0 [95% CI, 0.5-1.4], p = 0.10), Simple Shoulder Test (9 [95% CI, 8.1-10.4] versus 11 [95% CI, 10.0-11.0], p = 0.06), or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (80 [95% CI, 72-88] versus 88 [95% CI, 84-92], p = 0.08) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. With the numbers available, distressed patients also were not different from nondistressed patients in terms of the amount of improvement in scores between preoperative assessment and 1-year followup on the VAS for pain (3 [95% CI, 2.2-4.1] versus 2 [95% CI, 1.4-2.9], p = 0.10), Simple Shoulder Test (5.2 [95% CI, 3.7-6.6] versus 5.0 [95% CI, 4.2-5.8], p = 0.86), or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale (38 [95% CI, 29-47] versus 30 [95% CI, 25-36], p = 0.16). The prevalence of psychological distress in our patient population was lower at 1 year after surgery 14 of 70 (20%) versus 35 of 85 (41%) preoperatively (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Mild to moderate levels of distress did not diminish patient-reported outcomes to a clinically important degree in this small series of patients with rotator cuff tears. This contrasts with reports from other areas of orthopaedic surgery and may be related to a more self-limited course of symptoms in patients with rotator cuff disease or possibly to a beneficial effect of rotator cuff repair on sleep quality or other unrecognized determinants of psychosocial status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prognostic study.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation of humeral and glenosphere hardware configuration.

BACKGROUND: Various reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) implant options are available for the humeral and glenosphere components. This study used a cadaveric biomechanical shoulder simulator to evaluate how hardware configurations in 2 common rTSA systems affect (1) abduction/adduction range of motion (ROM), (2) rotational ROM, and (3) forces to elevate the arm. METHODS: Seven pairs of shoulders were tested on a biomechanical shoulder simulator before and after rTSA implantation. The Aequalis Reverse Shoulder (Tornier, Edina, MN, USA) and the Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis (RSP; DJO Surgical, Austin, TX, USA) were implanted in opposing shoulders. Aequalis implant options included humeral polymer insert thickness and eccentricity and glenosphere tilt. RSP implant options included glenosphere diameter and lateralization, humeral shell offset, and polymer insert depth. RESULTS: Both the RSP and Aequalis shifted the center of rotation inferior and medially compared with native shoulders (P < .001). Increased Aequalis insert thickness reduced adduction (P < .003) and internal/external (P < .028) passive ROM. The 10° inferiorly tilted glenosphere increased deltoid abduction forces (P < .032). In the RSP, smaller glenosphere diameter (P < .012), a semiconstrained humeral insert (P < .023), and a neutral humeral shell offset (P < .002) all decreased adduction deficit, whereas lateral glenosphere offset increased passive abduction ROM (P < .028). Increased humeral shell offset decreased passive internal/external rotation ROM (P < .050). DISCUSSION: Hardware configurations in rTSA have different effects on passive ROM and deltoid forces required for abduction. Identifying these changes may guide surgical decision making during rTSA placement.

Psychological distress negatively affects self-assessment of shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: In many areas of orthopaedics, patients with greater levels of psychological distress report inferior self-assessments of pain and function. This effect can lead to lower-than-expected baseline scores on common patient-reported outcome scales, even those not traditionally considered to have a psychological component. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study attempts to answer the following questions: (1) Are higher levels of psychological distress associated with clinically important differences in baseline scores on the VAS for pain, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? (2) Does psychological distress remain a negative predictor of baseline shoulder scores when other clinical variables are controlled? METHODS: Eighty-five patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were prospectively enrolled. Psychological distress was quantified using the Distress Risk Assessment Method questionnaire. Patients completed baseline self-assessments including the VAS for pain, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, tear size, and tear retraction were recorded for each patient. Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression models were used to assess the effect of psychological distress on patient self-assessment of shoulder pain and function. RESULTS: Distressed patients reported higher baseline VAS scores (6.7 [95% CI, 4.4-9.0] versus 2.9 [95% CI, 2.3-3.6], p = 0.001) and lower baseline Simple Shoulder Test (3.7 [95% CI, 2.9-4.5] versus 5.7 [95% CI 5.0-6.4], p = 0.001) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (39 [95% CI, 34-45] versus 58 [95% CI, 53-63], p < 0.001). Distress remained associated with higher VAS scores (p = 0.001) and lower Simple Shoulder Test (p < 0.001) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (p < 0.001) when age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking status, tear size, and tear retraction were controlled. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of psychological distress are associated with inferior baseline patient self-assessment of shoulder pain and function using the VAS, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Longitudinal followup is warranted to clarify the relationship between distress and self-perceived disability and the effect of distress on postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An analysis of technical aspects of the arthroscopic Bankart procedure as performed in the United States.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the intersurgeon variation in technical aspects of performing an arthroscopic Bankart repair. METHODS: A unique approach with experienced equipment representatives from 3 different arthroscopic companies was used. Experienced representatives were identified by DePuy Mitek, Smith & Nephew, and Arthrex and filled out questionnaires on how their surgeons performed arthroscopic Bankart procedures. This was performed in a blinded fashion with no knowledge of the identities of the specific surgeons or representatives by us. A video on different aspects of the procedure was observed by each representative before filling out the questionnaire to help standardize responses. Data were collected using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Data were analyzed as an infrequent observation with 0% to 30% of representatives reporting the observation; sometimes, 31% to 70% reporting the observation; and often, greater than 70% of representatives reporting. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of representatives had 6 or more years of arthroscopic experience. Forty-three percent of representatives reported that their surgeons use 3 portals for the procedure often. Forty-four percent reported that viewing was performed exclusively from the posterior portal while the surgeon was performing the repair. Seventy-three percent reported that the Hill-Sachs lesion was observed often, and 61% reported that the posterior labrum was evaluated often before the repair. Only 25% of representatives reported that the Bankart lesion was extensively released and mobilized often. Thirty-three percent reported 3 anchors as being used often. Seventy-five percent reported biocomposite anchors as being used often. Single-loaded anchors were reported as being used often by 47%. Eighty-one percent reported that sutures were placed in a simple fashion. Eighty-three percent reported the use of any posterior sutures or anchors for additional plication as infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in performance of the arthroscopic Bankart repair in the United States. Areas of concern include completeness of the diagnostic examination, the adequacy of capsulolabral mobilization, variation in the use of accessory portals, and inconsistent use of additional capsular or labral plication or fixation.

Biomechanical comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems in soft tissue-constrained shoulders.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have examined the biomechanics of isolated variables in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. This study directly compared the composite performance of two reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems; each system was designed around either a medialized or a lateralized glenohumeral center of rotation. METHODS: Seven pairs of shoulders were tested on a biomechanical simulator. Center of rotation, position of the humerus, passive and active range of motion, and force to abduct the arm were quantified. Native arms were tested, implanted with a Tornier Aequalis or DJO Surgical Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis (RSP), and then retested. Differences from the native state were then documented. RESULTS: Both systems shifted the center of rotation medially and inferiorly relative to native. Medial shifts were greater in the Aequalis implant (P < .037). All humeri shifted inferior compared with native but moved medially with the Aequalis (P < .001). Peak passive abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation did not differ between systems (P > .05). Both reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems exhibited adduction deficits, but the RSP implant deficit was smaller (P = .046 between implants). Both systems reduced forces to abduct the arm compared with native, although the Aequalis required more force to initiate motion from the resting position (P = .022). CONCLUSION: Given the differences in system designs and configurations, outcome variables were generally comparable. The RSP implant allowed slightly more adduction, had a more lateralized humeral position, and required less force to initiate elevation. These factors may play roles in limiting scapular notching, improving active external rotation by normalizing the residual rotator cuff length, and limiting excessive stress on the deltoid.

Influence of preoperative musculotendinous junction position on rotator cuff healing using single-row technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of rotator cuff musculotendinous junction (MTJ) retraction with healing after rotator cuff repair and with preoperative sagittal tear size. METHODS: We reviewed preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of 51 patients undergoing arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair between March 1, 2005, and February 20, 2010. Preoperative MRI studies were evaluated for anteroposterior tear size, tendon retraction, tendon length, muscle quality, and MTJ position with respect to the glenoid. The position of the MTJ was referenced off the glenoid face as either lateral or medial. Postoperative MRI studies obtained at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively (mean, 25 ± 13.9 months) were evaluated for healing, tendon length, and MTJ position. RESULTS: We found that 39 of 51 tears (76%) healed, with 26 of 30 small/medium tears (87%) and 13 of 21 large/massive tears (62%) healing. Greater tendon retraction, worse preoperative muscle quality, and a more medialized MTJ were all associated with worse tendon healing (P < .05). Of tears that had a preoperative MTJ lateral to the face of the glenoid, 93% healed, whereas only 55% of tears that had a preoperative MTJ medial to the face of the glenoid healed (P < .05). Healed repairs that had limited tendon lengthening (<1 cm) and limited MTJ position change (<1 cm) from preoperative were found to be smaller, had less preoperative tendon retraction, had less preoperative MTJ medialization, and had less preoperative rotator cuff fatty infiltration (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MTJ medialization, tendon retraction, and muscle quality are all predictive of tendon healing postoperatively when using a single-row rotator cuff repair technique. The position of the MTJ with respect to the glenoid face can be predictive of healing, with over 90% healing if lateral and 50% if medial to the face. Lengthening of the tendon accounts for a significant percentage of the musculotendinous unit lengthening that occurs in healed tears as opposed to muscle elongation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Diaphragm function after interscalene brachial plexus block: a double-blind, randomized comparison of 0.25% and 0.125% bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) provides excellent analgesia after rotator cuff surgery but is associated with diaphragm dysfunction. In this study, ISBPB with 20 mL of 0.125% or 0.25% bupivacaine were compared to assess the effect on diaphragm function, oxygen saturation, pain control, opioid requirements, and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 30 adults undergoing outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled to receive ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus catheter placement with 20 mL of 0.125% (n = 15) or 0.25% bupivacaine (n = 15). Diaphragm function and oxygen saturation were assessed before ISBPB placement and on discharge from the postanesthesia care unit. Postoperative pain scores, opioid requirements, and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: Diaphragm function and oxygen saturation were superior in the low concentration group. Absent or paradoxic motion of the diaphragm was present in 78% of the 0.25% group compared with 21% of patients in the 0.125% group (P = .008). Oxygen saturation decreased 4.3% in the 0.25% group compared with a decrease of 2.6% in the 0.125% group (P = .04). Pain scores averaged 1 of 10 in the 0.25% group and 0 of 10 in the 0.125% group (P = .02). Opioid requirements and patient satisfaction were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized, double-blind comparison of ISBPB performed with 20 mL of 0.125% or 0.25% bupivacaine, diaphragm function and oxygen saturation were superior in patients treated with more dilute bupivacaine. Furthermore, there were no clinically significant differences in pain scores, and no statistically significant differences in opioid requirements and patient satisfaction.

Blood transfusion associated with shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported high rates of transfusion in shoulder arthroplasty. This study was conducted to evaluate the rate of transfusion at our institution, to confirm reported risk factors for transfusion, and to look for changes over time.We hypothesized that transfusion rates associated with shoulder arthroplasty at our institution are lower than those recently reported and that the incidence of transfusion is higher in individuals with low preoperative hemoglobin, with revision arthroplasty, and in older individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 366 shoulder arthroplasties (323 patients) was performed. This included total shoulder arthroplasties, hemiarthroplasties, revision arthroplasties, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the association of clinical variables with transfusion. Early (1996-2005) and late (2006-2009) groups were compared to evaluate changes in demographics and transfusion rates over time. RESULTS: The overall transfusion rate was 7.4% (27 of 339). Predictors of transfusion were higher intraoperative blood loss, low preoperative hemoglobin level, and humeral cement fixation. Procedure type was not predictive of transfusion. There was no difference in transfusion rates between the early and late groups, but the late group had an increased use of general anesthesia combined with a regional block, increased intraoperative blood loss, and increased use of sequential compression devices for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Lower preoperative hemoglobin, higher intraoperative blood loss, and humeral cement fixation were predictors of transfusion, but not female sex, increasing age, type of procedure, or comorbidities.