RESUMO
Augmentative and Alternative Communication is an aided or unaided means of communication which supports existing communication abilities of an individual or replaces natural speech due to any speech and language disorder. The deficit could be developmental or acquired such as autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, learning difficulties, dysarthria, dyspraxia or due to any acquired neurological condition such as aphasia and other degenerative disorders. Furthermore, it may be due to surgical procedures such as laryngectomy. Alternate means of communication have also been successfully used with COVID-19 patients. These tools may include pictures, symbols, signs or voice output devices. Parents of children with special needs and medical professionals have been reluctant in implementing the approach due to certain misconceptions. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence for the use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication with a range of disorders in relation to in relation to Pakistan.
Assuntos
Auxiliares de Comunicação para Pessoas com Deficiência , Transtornos da Comunicação , Terapia da Linguagem , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/complicações , COVID-19/complicações , Criança , Comunicação , Transtornos da Comunicação/etiologia , Transtornos da Comunicação/reabilitação , Humanos , Terapia da Linguagem/instrumentação , Terapia da Linguagem/métodos , Paquistão , Fala , Fonoterapia/instrumentação , Fonoterapia/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of understanding and use of augmentative and alternative communication devices in Pakistani speech pathologists.. METHODS: The cross-sectional survey was conducted from January to June 2015 in six major cities of Pakistan: Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Lahore, Karachi, Quetta and Peshawar. It comprised speech and language pathologists who were asked to fill a questionnaire that consisted of10 questions. Data was analysed using SPSS17. Result: Overall calculated mean and standard error of mean from the respondents who agreed and strongly agreed regarding understanding, opinion-assessment and treatment about augmentative and alternative communication was153±36.373 and 12.124 respectively. RESULTS: Of the 132 subjects, 68(51.5%) were in the education group and 64(48.5%) in the control group. Postintervention, 11(16.2%) women in the education group and 37(57.8%)in the control group developed severe preeclampsia. Subsequently, 44(64.7%) in the education group had no preeclampsia. The corresponding number in the control group was 15(23.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Speech pathologists had understanding of assessing and working with individuals using augmentative and alternative communication.