Daratumumab Use Prior to Kidney Transplant and T Cell-Mediated Rejection: A Case Report.

There is growing interest in daratumumab in the solid organ transplant realm owing to the potential immunomodulatory effects on CD38-expressing cells, primarily plasma cells, as they have a key role in antibody production. In particular there is interest in use of daratumumab for desensitization and potential treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. However, ongoing investigation with daratumumab has shown potential immunologic concerns in vitro, with a significant increase in populations of CD4-positive cytotoxic T cells and CD8-positive helper T cells in both peripheral blood and bone marrow that could lead to acute T cell-mediated rejection in the solid organ transplant patient. To date, there are no published reports of an association with daratumumab use and T cell-mediated rejection in vivo. In this case report we present what is to our knowledge the first documented case of an early severe T cell-mediated rejection in a low-immunologic-risk living-donor kidney transplant recipient who received daratumumab for multiple myeloma maintenance prior to transplant.

Bridging the gap: assessing CMV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients with previous solid organ transplants.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses a significant threat to solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and can lead to various complications and adverse outcomes. In an effort to prevent CMV infection, it is common to utilize prophylactic strategies, including antiviral medications such as valganciclovir, especially for high-risk patients. Risk factors for CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) include CMV mismatch between donor and recipient (i.e., donor positive, recipient negative), and intensity of immunosuppression, such as the use of T-cell depleting agents. However, little attention has been given to KTRs with a history of prior SOTs, despite their prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive regimens. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to investigate the incidence and implications of CMV DNAemia in KTRs with prior SOTs. The study included 97 KTRs with prior SOTs and 154 KTRs with no prior transplants as a control group. In the study group, the most common SOT before the current kidney transplantation (KT), was a previous KT. Patients in the KTR group with prior SOTs were more sensitized than those in the control group [calculated panel-reactive antibody > 30%: 49 (50.5%) vs. 30 (19.45%) patients, p = 0.001]. There was a 39.2% incidence of CMV DNAemia in the previous SOT group compared to 48.7% in the control group [non-significant (NS)]. Patients with prior SOTs demonstrated a shorter post-transplant time to CMV DNAemia [median time 1.6 months (interquartile range, IQR 0.7-5.8) in the KTRs with prior SOTs vs. 2.6 months (IQR 1.5-8.1) in the control group (p = 0.001)]. Although the study highlights the need for tailored prophylaxis strategies and vigilant monitoring in KTRs with prior SOTs, its limitations, such as its retrospective nature and single-center design, call for further multicenter research to establish comprehensive guidelines for managing CMV DNAemia in this unique patient population. Despite these limitations, this study underscores the importance of recognizing the heightened risk of CMV infection or reactivation in KTRs overall and the potential benefits of proactive intervention to mitigate associated morbidity and mortality.

Impact of Pharmacist Involvement in Early Identification and Enrollment in Patient Assistance Programs on CMV Outcomes in Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: No data exist evaluating the utilization of patient assistance programs (PAPs) on cytomegalovirus (CMV)-related outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early identification and enrollment in PAPs can prevent CMV-related events. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients at risk of CMV reactivation who received kidney and/or pancreas transplants. Two groups were evaluated with patients receiving oral valganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis through enrollment in PAPs or oral acyclovir with preemptive CMV monitoring. Primary outcomes include the incidence of CMV infection. Secondary outcomes include a cost benefit analysis, incidence of rejection, patient/graft survival, and time to CMV infection. RESULTS: There were 97 patients identified; valganciclovir through PAPs (n = 39) and preemptive CMV quantitative nucleic acid testing monitoring (n = 58). The incidence of CMV viremia was lower in the PAP group (12.8% vs 36.2%, respectively; P = .021). There were no significant differences in CMV syndrome/disease, acute rejection, graft loss, or death between the groups. The time to CMV infection was shorter in the preemptive group. Cost benefit analysis found that hiring a full time pharmacy employee for enrolling patients in PAPs was cost beneficial for the institution/health care system. CONCLUSION: Early identification and enrollment of patients in PAPs reduces the incidence of CMV viremia. Pharmacists play a crucial role in this process.