Docking interactions determine substrate specificity of members of a widespread family of protein phosphatases.

How protein phosphatases achieve specificity for their substrates is a major outstanding question. PPM family serine/threonine phosphatases are widespread in bacteria and eukaryotes, where they dephosphorylate target proteins with a high degree of specificity. In bacteria, PPM phosphatases control diverse transcriptional responses by dephosphorylating anti-anti-sigma factors of the STAS domain family, exemplified by Bacillus subtilis phosphatases SpoIIE, which controls cell-fate during endospore formation, and RsbU, which initiates the general stress response. Using a combination of forward genetics, biochemical reconstitution, and AlphaFold2 structure prediction, we identified a conserved, tripartite substrate docking interface comprised of three variable loops on the surface of the PPM phosphatase domains of SpoIIE and RsbU that recognize the three-dimensional structure of the substrate protein. Nonconserved amino acids in these loops facilitate the accommodation of the cognate substrate and prevent dephosphorylation of the noncognate substrate. Together, single-amino acid substitutions in these three elements cause an over 500-fold change in specificity. Our data additionally suggest that substrate-docking interactions regulate phosphatase specificity through a conserved allosteric switch element that controls the catalytic efficiency of the phosphatase by positioning the metal cofactor and substrate. We hypothesize that this is a generalizable mechanistic model for PPM family phosphatase substrate specificity. Importantly, the substrate docking interface with the phosphatase is only partially overlapping with the much more extensive interface with the upstream kinase, suggesting the possibility that kinase and phosphatase specificity evolved independently.

A Central Region of NF-κB Essential Modulator Is Required for IKKß-Induced Conformational Change and for Signal Propagation.

NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) regulates NF-κB signaling by acting as a scaffold for the kinase IKKß to direct its activity toward the NF-κB inhibitor, IκBα. Here, we show that a highly conserved central region of NEMO termed the intervening domain (IVD, amino acids 112-195) plays a key role in NEMO function. We determined a structural model of full-length NEMO by small-angle X-ray scattering and show that full-length, wild-type NEMO becomes more compact upon binding of a peptide comprising the NEMO binding domain of IKKß (amino acids 701-745). Mutation of conserved IVD residues (9SG-NEMO) disrupts this conformational change in NEMO and abolishes the ability of NEMO to propagate NF-κB signaling in cells, although the affinity of 9SG-NEMO for IKKß compared to that of the wild type is unchanged. On the basis of these results, we propose a model in which the IVD is required for a conformational change in NEMO that is necessary for its ability to direct phosphorylation of IκBα by IKKß. Our findings suggest a molecular explanation for certain disease-associated mutations within the IVD and provide insight into the role of conformational change in signaling scaffold proteins.

A General Mechanism for the General Stress Response in Bacteria.

The General Stress Response promotes survival of bacteria in adverse conditions, but how sensor proteins transduce species-specific signals to initiate the response is not known. The serine/threonine phosphatase RsbU initiates the General Stress Response in B. subtilis upon binding a partner protein (RsbT) that is released from sequestration by environmental stresses. We report that RsbT activates RsbU by inducing otherwise flexible linkers of RsbU to form a short coiled-coil that dimerizes and activates the phosphatase domains. Importantly, we present evidence that related coiled-coil linkers and phosphatase dimers transduce signals from diverse sensor domains to control the General Stress Response and other signaling across bacterial phyla. These results additionally resolve the mystery of how shared sensory domains control serine/threonine phosphatases, diguanylate cyclases and histidine kinases, revealing a common coiled-coil linker transduction mechanism. We propose that this provides bacteria with a modularly exchangeable toolkit for the evolution of diverse signaling pathways.

Prolonged Cell Cycle Arrest in Response to DNA damage in Yeast Requires the Maintenance of DNA Damage Signaling and the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint.

Cells evoke the DNA damage checkpoint (DDC) to inhibit mitosis in the presence of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to allow more time for DNA repair. In budding yeast, a single irreparable DSB is sufficient to activate the DDC and induce cell cycle arrest prior to anaphase for about 12 to 15 hours, after which cells "adapt" to the damage by extinguishing the DDC and resuming the cell cycle. While activation of the DNA damage-dependent cell cycle arrest is well-understood, how it is maintained remains unclear. To address this, we conditionally depleted key DDC proteins after the DDC was fully activated and monitored changes in the maintenance of cell cycle arrest. Degradation of Ddc2ATRIP, Rad9, Rad24, or Rad53CHK2 results in premature resumption of the cell cycle, indicating that these DDC factors are required both to establish and to maintain the arrest. Dun1 is required for establishment, but not maintenance of arrest, whereas Chk1 is required for prolonged maintenance but not for initial establishment of the mitotic arrest. When the cells are challenged with 2 persistent DSBs, they remain permanently arrested. This permanent arrest is initially dependent on the continuous presence of Ddc2 and Rad53; however, after 15 hours both proteins become dispensable. Instead, the continued mitotic arrest is sustained by spindle-assembly checkpoint (SAC) proteins Mad1, Mad2, and Bub2 but not by Bub2's binding partner Bfa1. These data suggest that prolonged cell cycle arrest in response to 2 DSBs is achieved by a handoff from the DDC to specific components of the SAC. Furthermore, the establishment and maintenance of DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest requires overlapping but different sets of factors.