Long-Term Outcomes for Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 and Duodenopancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Liver metastasis from duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (DP-NENs) is a major cause of mortality in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients, yet much of their natural history is unknown. METHODS: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study analyzed all MEN1 patients with imageable functional (F) and nonfunctional (NF) DP-NENs (1990-2021) for liver metastasis-free survival (LMFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 138 patients, 85 (61.6%) had imageable DP-NENs (28 F, 57 NF), and the mean largest tumor size was 1.8 ± 1.4 cm. Multifocality was present in 32 patients (37.7%). Surgery was performed for 49 patients (57.7%). During an 11-year median follow-up period (IQR, 6-17 years), 23 (27.1%) of the patients had liver metastasis, and 19 (22.4%) patients died. Death was attributed to liver metastasis in 60% of cases. The patients with F-DP-NENs versus NF-DP-NENs more often had liver metastasis (46.4% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.002) but had similar 10-year LMFS (80.9 vs. 87.0%; p = 0.44) and OS (82.7 vs. 94.3%; p = 0.69). The patients with NF-DP-NENs had surgery when their tumors were larger (p < 0.001). Tumor size was not associated with liver metastasis (p = 0.89). The average growth rate was 0.04 cm/year (SE, 0.02 cm/year; p = 0.01) during active surveillance for NF-DP-NENs (n = 38). Liver metastasis developed in four patients with tumors smaller than 2 cm. The risk of liver metastasis was independent of surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.93; p = 0.72) and death (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.08-3.06; p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Although the observed outcomes in this study were better than historical data, small NF-DP-NENs still developed liver metastasis and liver metastasis remains a major cause of death. These results suggest that size as a sole criterion for surgery may be insufficient to predict tumor behavior.

Complications associated with loop ileostomy reversal delayed greater than twelve months.

Diverting loop ileostomy is performed after colectomy to allow for anastomotic healing, and prevention of pelvic sepsis when an anastomotic leak occurs. There is no consensus on the optimal timing of ileostomy closure, and there is limited data on complications associated with ileostomy closure greater than 12 months after creation. The aim of this study is to investigate outcomes of delayed loop ileostomy closure greater than 12 months after creation. Patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure between 2013 and 2023 at Carilion Medical Center, in Roanoke, VA were reviewed. Cohorts compared were defined as Control Group (closure < 4 months) and Delayed Group (closure > 12 months). Demographics and outcomes were compared. Statistical comparisons were performed using either Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson's Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Statistical modeling included binary logistic regression for 30-day readmissions and a generalized linear modeling for days till bowel function returns. Adjusted odds ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values were calculated. There were 135 patients in the Control Group and 19 patients in the Delayed Group. Demographics were similar between the groups except for a higher percentage of patients with diabetes, renal failure and history of cancer in Delayed Group (all p < 0.05). Operative time was longer for Delayed loop ileostomy closure (p < 0.05). Patients in the Delayed Group demonstrated a higher hospital readmission rate within 30 days (p < 0.05). Both groups had similar return of bowel function on post-operative day 2, similar length of stay, and similar rates of postoperative ileus (p = NS). Delayed loop ileostomy closure more than 12 months after creation does not delay return of bowel function but may lead to higher hospital readmission rates within 30 days.

Protective/reparative cytokines are suppressed at high injury severity in human trauma.

BACKGROUND: Trauma elicits a complex inflammatory response that, among multiple presenting factors, is greatly impacted by the magnitude of injury severity. Herein, we compared the changes in circulating levels of mediators with known proinflammatory roles to those with known protective/reparative actions as a function of injury severity in injured humans. METHODS: Clinical and biobank data were obtained from 472 (trauma database-1 (TD-1), University of Pittsburgh) and 89 (trauma database-2 (TD-2), Indiana University) trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and who survived to discharge. Injury severity was estimated based on the Injury Severity Score (ISS), and this was used as both a continuous variable and for the purpose of grouping patients into severity-based cohorts. Samples within the first 24 hours were obtained from all patients and then daily up to day 7 postinjury in TD-1. Sixteen cytokines were assayed using Luminex and were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (p<0.05). RESULTS: Patients with higher ISSs had longer ICU and hospital stays, days on mechanical ventilation and higher rates of nosocomial infection when compared with the mild and moderate groups. Time course analysis and correlations with ISS showed that 11 inflammatory mediators correlated positively with injury severity, consistent with previous reports. However, five mediators (interleukin (IL)-9, IL-21, IL-22, IL-23 and IL-17E/25) were suppressed in patients with high ISS and inversely correlated with ISS. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that severe injury is associated with a suppression of a subset of cytokines known to be involved in tissue protection and regeneration (IL-9, IL-22 and IL-17E/25) and lymphocyte differentiation (IL-21 and IL-23), which in turn correlates with adverse clinical outcomes. Thus, patterns of proinflammatory versus protective/reparative mediators diverge with increasing ISS.