Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 129(3): 319-326.e3, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35750292

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although viral infection is known to be associated with asthma exacerbations, prior research has not identified reliable predictors of acute symptom severity in virus-related asthma exacerbations (VRAEs). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of asthma control and viral infection on the severity of current illness and evaluate biomarkers related to acute symptoms during asthma exacerbations. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 120 children with physician-diagnosed asthma and current wheezing who presented to Arkansas Children's Hospital emergency department. The asthma control test (ACT) stratified controlled (ACT > 19) and uncontrolled (ACT ≤ 19) asthma, whereas pediatric respiratory symptom scores evaluated symptoms. Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained for viral analysis, and inflammatory mediators were evaluated by nasal filter paper and Luminex assays. RESULTS: There were 33 children with controlled asthma and 87 children with uncontrolled asthma. In those with uncontrolled asthma, 77% were infected with viruses during VRAE compared with 58% of those with controlled asthma. Uncontrolled subjects with VRAE had more acute symptoms compared with the controlled subjects with VRAE or uncontrolled subjects without a virus. The uncontrolled subjects with VRAE and allergy had the highest acute symptom scores (3.363 point pediatric respiratory symptom; P = .04). Children with asthma with higher symptom scores had more periostin (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Detection of respiratory viruses is frequent in those with uncontrolled asthma. Uncontrolled subjects with viruses have more acute symptoms during exacerbations, especially in those with allergy. Periostin was highest in subjects with the most acute symptoms, regardless of control status. Taken together, these data imply synergy between viral infection and allergy in subjects with uncontrolled asthma when considering acute asthma symptoms and nasal inflammation during an exacerbation of asthma.


Assuntos
Asma , Hipersensibilidade , Viroses , Asma/diagnóstico , Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/complicações , Sons Respiratórios , Viroses/complicações
2.
Xenobiotica ; 49(9): 1106-1115, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30328361

RESUMO

Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an association between acetaminophen (APAP) use and the development of asthma symptoms. However, few studies have examined relationships between APAP-induced signaling pathways associated with the development of asthma symptoms. We tested the hypothesis that acute APAP exposure causes airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) in human airways. Precision cut lung slice (PCLS) airways from humans and mice were used to determine the effects of APAP on airway bronchoconstriction and bronchodilation and to assess APAP metabolism in lungs. APAP did not promote AHR in normal or asthmatic human airways ex vivo. Rather, high concentrations mildly bronchodilated airways pre-constricted with carbachol (CCh), histamine (His), or immunoglobulin E (IgE) cross-linking. Further, the addition of APAP prior to bronchoconstrictors protected the airways from constriction. Similarly, in vivo treatment of mice with APAP (200 mg/kg IP) resulted in reduced bronchoconstrictor responses in PCLS airways ex vivo. Finally, in both mouse and human PCLS airways, exposure to APAP generated only low amounts of APAP-protein adducts, indicating minimal drug metabolic activity in the tissues. These findings indicate that acute exposure to APAP does not initiate AHR, that high-dose APAP is protective against bronchoconstriction, and that APAP is a mild bronchodilator.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen/farmacologia , Broncoconstrição/efeitos dos fármacos , Broncodilatadores/farmacologia , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Acetaminofen/efeitos adversos , Albuterol/farmacologia , Animais , Asma/fisiopatologia , Broncodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Carbacol/farmacologia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Pulmão/fisiologia , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Camundongos Endogâmicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Cultura de Órgãos , Estresse Oxidativo/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/induzido quimicamente
3.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0267322, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35476717

RESUMO

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the proportion of Arkansas residents who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus between May and December 2020 and to assess the determinants of infection. To estimate seroprevalence, a state-wide population-based random-digit dial sample of non-institutionalized adults in Arkansas was surveyed. Exposures were age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, occupation, contact with infected persons, comorbidities, height, and weight. The outcome was past COVID-19 infection measured by serum antibody test. We found a prevalence of 15.1% (95% CI: 11.1%, 20.2%) by December 2020. Seropositivity was significantly elevated among participants who were non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic (prevalence ratio [PRs]:1.4 [95% CI: 0.8, 2.4] and 2.3 [95% CI: 1.3, 4.0], respectively), worked in high-demand essential services (PR: 2.5 [95% CI: 1.5, 4.1]), did not have a college degree (PR: 1.6 [95% CI: 1.0, 2.4]), had an infected household or extra-household contact (PRs: 4.7 [95% CI: 2.1, 10.1] and 2.6 [95% CI: 1.2, 5.7], respectively), and were contacted in November or December (PR: 3.6 [95% CI: 1.9, 6.9]). Our results indicate that by December 2020, one out six persons in Arkansas had a past SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
4.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 11(6): 248-256, 2022 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35294550

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence studies largely focus on adults, but little is known about spread in children. We determined SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in children and adolescents from Arkansas over the first year of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We tested remnant serum samples from children ages 1-18 years who visited Arkansas hospitals or clinics for non-COVID-19-related reasons from April 2020 through April 2021 for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We used univariable and multivariable regression models to determine the association between seropositivity and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Among 2357 participants, seroprevalence rose from 7.9% in April/May 2020 (95% CI, 4.9-10.9) to 25.0% in April 2021 (95% CI, 21.5-28.5). Hispanic and black children had a higher association with antibody positivity than non-Hispanic and white children, respectively, in multiple sampling periods. CONCLUSIONS: By spring 2021, most children in Arkansas were not infected with SARS-CoV-2. With the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants, recognition of long-term effects of COVID-19, and the lack of an authorized pediatric SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the time, these results highlight the importance of including children in SARS-CoV-2 public health, clinical care, and research strategies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , Arkansas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(5): ofac154, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35493126

RESUMO

Background: The aim of this study was to estimate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rates in the small rural state of Arkansas, using SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence as an indicator of infection. Methods: We collected residual serum samples from adult outpatients seen at hospitals or clinics in Arkansas for non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related reasons. A total of 5804 samples were identified over 3 time periods: 15 August-5 September 2020 (time period 1), 12 September-24 October 2020 (time period 2), and 7 November-19 December 2020 (time period 3). Results: The age-, sex-, race-, and ethnicity-standardized SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence during each period, from 2.6% in time period 1 to 4.1% in time period 2 and 7.4% in time period 3. No statistically significant difference in seroprevalence was found based on age, sex, or residence (urban vs rural). However, we found higher seroprevalence rates in each time period for Hispanics (17.6%, 20.6%, and 23.4%, respectively) and non-Hispanic Blacks (4.8%, 5.4%, and 8.9%, respectively) relative to non-Hispanic Whites (1.1%, 2.6%, and 5.5%, respectively). Conclusions: Our data imply that the number of Arkansas residents infected with SARS-CoV-2 rose steadily from 2.6% in August to 7.4% in December 2020. There was no statistical difference in seroprevalence between rural and urban locales. Hispanics and Blacks had higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies than Whites, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 spread disproportionately in racial and ethnic minorities during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA