Consuming viscous prey: a novel protein-secreting delivery system in neotropical snail-eating snakes.

BACKGROUND: Efficient venom delivery systems are known to occur only in varanoid lizards and advanced colubroidean snakes among squamate reptiles. Although components of these venomous systems might have been present in a common ancestor, the two lineages independently evolved strikingly different venom gland systems. In snakes, venom is produced exclusively by serous glands in the upper jaw. Within the colubroidean radiation, lower jaw seromucous infralabial glands are known only in two distinct lineages-the basal pareatids and the more advanced Neotropical dipsadines known as "goo-eating snakes". Goo-eaters are a highly diversified, ecologically specialized clade that feeds exclusively on invertebrates (e.g., gastropod molluscs and annelids). Their evolutionary success has been attributed to their peculiar feeding strategies, which remain surprisingly poorly understood. More specifically, it has long been thought that the more derived Dipsadini genera Dipsas and Sibynomorphus use glandular toxins secreted by their infralabial glands to extract snails from their shells. RESULTS: Here, we report the presence in the tribe Dipsadini of a novel lower jaw protein-secreting delivery system effected by a gland that is not functionally related to adjacent teeth, but rather opens loosely on the oral epithelium near the tip of the mandible, suggesting that its secretion is not injected into the prey as a form of envenomation but rather helps control the mucus and assists in the ingestion of their highly viscous preys. A similar protein-secreting system is also present in the goo-eating genus Geophis and may share the same adaptive purpose as that hypothesized for Dipsadini. Our phylogenetic hypothesis suggests that the acquisition of a seromucous infralabial gland represents a uniquely derived trait of the goo-eating clade that evolved independently twice within the group as a functionally complex protein-secreting delivery system. CONCLUSIONS: The acquisition by snail-eating snakes of such a complex protein-secreting system suggests that the secretion from the hypertrophied infralabial glands of goo-eating snakes may have a fundamental role in mucus control and prey transport rather than envenomation of prey. Evolution of a functional secretory system that combines a solution for mucus control and transport of viscous preys is here thought to underlie the successful radiation of goo-eating snakes.

Serological investigation and PCR in detection of pathogenic leptospires in snakes / Investigação sorológica e PCR na detecção de leptospiras patogênicas em serpentes

Detection of Leptospira by PCR had not yet been described in snakes. This study investigated, by microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and PCR, the presence of antibodies to Leptospira spp. and Leptospira spp., respectively, in venomous and non-venomous wildlife and captivity snakes. All snakes were divided into three groups to be compared: Group 1 (wildlife snakes - WS); Group 2 (snakes in intensive captivity - IC), and Group 3 (collective semi-extensive captivity -CC). Of the 147 snakes studied, 52 (35.4 percent) were positive for leptospirosis by MAT, 8 (15.4 percent) belonging to Group 1 (WS), 34 (65.4 percent) to Group 2 (IC) and 10 (19.2 percent) to Group 3 (CC). Jararaca (Bothrops jararaca) presented the highest average titer (66.7 percent, N=22/33) among the three group studied, and Hardjo prajtino was the most prevalent serovar (88.5 percent, N=46/52), with titers varying from 100 to 3200. Leptospira interrogans was revealed by PCR in kidney and liver of caiçaca (Bothrops moojeni) and jararaca-pintada (Bothrops pauloensis), showing 100 percent and 93 percent identity respectively. Future studies should be carried out for better understanding of the role of snakes as a reservoir of Leptospira in nature.(AU)

A detecção de Leptospira pela técnica de PCR não havia sido descrita em serpentes. Este estudo investigou pelo teste de aglutinação microscópica (MAT) e PCR, a presença de anticorpos anti-Leptospira spp. e Leptospira spp., respectivamente, em serpentes peçonhentas e não peçonhentas de vida livre e de cativeiro. As serpentes foram divididas em três grupos para comparação: Grupo 1 (serpentes recém-chegadas da natureza - WS); Grupo 2 (serpentes em regime de cativeiro intensivo -IC) e Grupo 3 (serpentes em regime de cativeiro coletivo semi-extensivo - CC). Do total de 147 serpentes estudadas, 52 (35,4 por cento) foram positivas para leptospirose pelo MAT, as quais 8 (15,4 por cento) pertenciam ao Grupo 1 (WS), 34 (65,4 por cento) ao Grupo 2 (IC) e 10 (19,2 por cento) ao Grupo 3 (CC). Das espécies estudadas, a jararaca (Bothrops jararaca) apresentou maior soropositividade (66,7 por cento, N=22/33). O sorovar mais prevalente foi o Hardjo prajtino (88,5 por cento, N=46/52) e os títulos variaram de 100 a 3200. Leptospira interrogans foi revelada por PCR nos rins e no fígado de caiçaca (Bothrops moojeni) e de jararaca-pintada (Bothrops pauloensis), mostrando 100 por cento e 93 por cento de identidade, respectivamente. Futuros estudos devem ser realizados para melhor compreensão do papel das serpentes como reservatório de leptospiras na natureza.(AU)

Serological investigation and PCR in detection of pathogenic leptospires in snakes / Investigação sorológica e PCR na detecção de leptospiras patogênicas em serpentes

Detection of Leptospira by PCR had not yet been described in snakes. This study investigated, by microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and PCR, the presence of antibodies to Leptospira spp. and Leptospira spp., respectively, in venomous and non-venomous wildlife and captivity snakes. All snakes were divided into three groups to be compared: Group 1 (wildlife snakes - WS); Group 2 (snakes in intensive captivity - IC), and Group 3 (collective semi-extensive captivity -CC). Of the 147 snakes studied, 52 (35.4 percent) were positive for leptospirosis by MAT, 8 (15.4 percent) belonging to Group 1 (WS), 34 (65.4 percent) to Group 2 (IC) and 10 (19.2 percent) to Group 3 (CC). Jararaca (Bothrops jararaca) presented the highest average titer (66.7 percent, N=22/33) among the three group studied, and Hardjo prajtino was the most prevalent serovar (88.5 percent, N=46/52), with titers varying from 100 to 3200. Leptospira interrogans was revealed by PCR in kidney and liver of caiçaca (Bothrops moojeni) and jararaca-pintada (Bothrops pauloensis), showing 100 percent and 93 percent identity respectively. Future studies should be carried out for better understanding of the role of snakes as a reservoir of Leptospira in nature.

A detecção de Leptospira pela técnica de PCR não havia sido descrita em serpentes. Este estudo investigou pelo teste de aglutinação microscópica (MAT) e PCR, a presença de anticorpos anti-Leptospira spp. e Leptospira spp., respectivamente, em serpentes peçonhentas e não peçonhentas de vida livre e de cativeiro. As serpentes foram divididas em três grupos para comparação: Grupo 1 (serpentes recém-chegadas da natureza - WS); Grupo 2 (serpentes em regime de cativeiro intensivo -IC) e Grupo 3 (serpentes em regime de cativeiro coletivo semi-extensivo - CC). Do total de 147 serpentes estudadas, 52 (35,4 por cento) foram positivas para leptospirose pelo MAT, as quais 8 (15,4 por cento) pertenciam ao Grupo 1 (WS), 34 (65,4 por cento) ao Grupo 2 (IC) e 10 (19,2 por cento) ao Grupo 3 (CC). Das espécies estudadas, a jararaca (Bothrops jararaca) apresentou maior soropositividade (66,7 por cento, N=22/33). O sorovar mais prevalente foi o Hardjo prajtino (88,5 por cento, N=46/52) e os títulos variaram de 100 a 3200. Leptospira interrogans foi revelada por PCR nos rins e no fígado de caiçaca (Bothrops moojeni) e de jararaca-pintada (Bothrops pauloensis), mostrando 100 por cento e 93 por cento de identidade, respectivamente. Futuros estudos devem ser realizados para melhor compreensão do papel das serpentes como reservatório de leptospiras na natureza.

Comparison of wildlife and captivity rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus terrificus) microbiota / Comparação da microbiota de cascavéis (Crotalus durissus terrificus) de vida-livre e cativeiro

The study evaluated and compared the aerobic microbiota from the oral cavity, cloaca and venom of Crotalus durissus terrificus snakes, recently caught from the wild and kept under quarantine (WQ), individual captivity (IC) and collective captivity (CC). Antimicrobial drug effectiveness on isolated agents also was assayed. From group I, II and III were isolated, respectively, 29 (63.04 percent), 38 (90.48 percent) and 21 (42.86 percent) microorganisms from the cloaca; 15 (32.61 percent), 3 (7.14 percent) and 25 (51.02 percent) microorganisms from the oral cavity; and, 2 (4.35 percent), 1 (2.38 percent) and 3 (6.12 percent) microorganisms from venom. The most frequent bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris and Morganella morganii, with sensitivity to amikacin, gentamicin, norfloxacin, sulfazotrin and tobramycin. Snakes kept in semi-open captivity exhibited the fewest microorganisms in oral cavities, perhaps due to the environment in captivity, with different temperature gradients, running water, absence of daily handling, circulating air, possibility of moving around, daily cleaning, and sunlight access.(AU)

Este estudo avaliou e comparou a microflora aeróbica da cavidade oral, cloaca e veneno de serpentes Crotalus durissus terrificus recém-capturadas da natureza e mantidas sob quarentena (WQ), mantidas em cativeiro coletivo (CC) e em cativeiro individual (IC). A eficácia de drogas antimicrobianas de agentes isolados foi também avaliada. Foram isolados microorganismos dos grupos I, II e III respectivamente: 29 (63.04 por cento), 38 (90.48 por cento) e 21 (42.86 por cento) da cloaca; 15 (32.61 por cento), 3 (7.14 por cento) e 25 (51.02 por cento) da cavidade oral, e finalmente 2 (4.35 por cento), 1 (2.38 por cento) e 3 (6.12 por cento) do veneno. As bactérias mais frequentes foram Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris e Morganella morganii, com sensibilidade para amikacina, gentamicina, norfloxacina, sulfazotrina e tobramicina. Serpentes mantidas no cativeiro semi-aberto mostraram menor número de agentes infecciosos em cavidade oral, talvez devido ao ambiente de cativeiro com diferentes gradientes de temperatura, água corrente, ausência de manejo diário, ampla circulação de ar, possibilidade de movimentação pelos animais, limpeza diária e acesso ao Sol.(AU)

Comparison of wildlife and captivity rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus terrificus) microbiota / Comparação da microbiota de cascavéis (Crotalus durissus terrificus) de vida-livre e cativeiro

The study evaluated and compared the aerobic microbiota from the oral cavity, cloaca and venom of Crotalus durissus terrificus snakes, recently caught from the wild and kept under quarantine (WQ), individual captivity (IC) and collective captivity (CC). Antimicrobial drug effectiveness on isolated agents also was assayed. From group I, II and III were isolated, respectively, 29 (63.04 percent), 38 (90.48 percent) and 21 (42.86 percent) microorganisms from the cloaca; 15 (32.61 percent), 3 (7.14 percent) and 25 (51.02 percent) microorganisms from the oral cavity; and, 2 (4.35 percent), 1 (2.38 percent) and 3 (6.12 percent) microorganisms from venom. The most frequent bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris and Morganella morganii, with sensitivity to amikacin, gentamicin, norfloxacin, sulfazotrin and tobramycin. Snakes kept in semi-open captivity exhibited the fewest microorganisms in oral cavities, perhaps due to the environment in captivity, with different temperature gradients, running water, absence of daily handling, circulating air, possibility of moving around, daily cleaning, and sunlight access.

Este estudo avaliou e comparou a microflora aeróbica da cavidade oral, cloaca e veneno de serpentes Crotalus durissus terrificus recém-capturadas da natureza e mantidas sob quarentena (WQ), mantidas em cativeiro coletivo (CC) e em cativeiro individual (IC). A eficácia de drogas antimicrobianas de agentes isolados foi também avaliada. Foram isolados microorganismos dos grupos I, II e III respectivamente: 29 (63.04 por cento), 38 (90.48 por cento) e 21 (42.86 por cento) da cloaca; 15 (32.61 por cento), 3 (7.14 por cento) e 25 (51.02 por cento) da cavidade oral, e finalmente 2 (4.35 por cento), 1 (2.38 por cento) e 3 (6.12 por cento) do veneno. As bactérias mais frequentes foram Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris e Morganella morganii, com sensibilidade para amikacina, gentamicina, norfloxacina, sulfazotrina e tobramicina. Serpentes mantidas no cativeiro semi-aberto mostraram menor número de agentes infecciosos em cavidade oral, talvez devido ao ambiente de cativeiro com diferentes gradientes de temperatura, água corrente, ausência de manejo diário, ampla circulação de ar, possibilidade de movimentação pelos animais, limpeza diária e acesso ao Sol.

Manejo de serpentes em cativeiro: manejo clínico-sanitário e avaliação da microbiologia / Management of captive snakes: clinical management and evalution of health-microbiota

O Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP) foi criado em 1989 por um grupo de pesquisadores da Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, com a finalidade de promover a pesquisa básica, aplicada e tecnológica das peçonhas ofídicas. Esse estudo teve como objetivo elaborar uma proposta para a implantação de um programa de manutenção em cativeiro mais eficiente, visando à sobrevida das serpentes e a independência de animais provenientes da natureza. Para tanto, foi necessária a construção de um sistema de cadastro de serpentes, a avaliação da infra estrutura e manejo utilizados, e a análise microbiológica de cada regime adotado. Foi observado que o Banco de Dados on line possibilita a organização dos dados e permite a rastreabilidade da peçonha. Ocativeiro intensivo apesar de proporcionar facilidade na vistoria dos animais necessita de modificações na infra estrutura e manejo. No cativeiro semi-extensivo, foi observado que as instalações facilitam o manejo dos animais, necessitando apenas de adequações nos aquecedores. No biotério de roedores são necessárias diversas mudanças estruturais, controle de temperatura, umidade, tratamento da ração, maravalha e água oferecida aos animais. Na análise microbiológica, não foi observada diferença na freqüência de bactérias entre as espécies, mas ocorreram diferenças entre os diferentes regimes de cativeiro utilizados, com destaque para o cativeiro intensivo. O isolamento de potencial patógenos nas amostras das serpentes estudadas apesar de não ser sinônimo de doença, foi considerado importante no processo de avaliação do tipo de manejo utilizado, considerando as numerosas condições estressantes proporcionadas pelo ambiente do cativeiro e o caráter oportunista desses agentes.(...)

The Center for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals (CEVAP) was founded in 1989 by a group of researchers from the Sao Paulo State University – UNESP, with the objective of promoting basic, applied, and technological research of snake venoms. The purpose of the present study was to develop a implementation program proposal for a more efficient captivity maintenance, aiming to extend the snakes’ life expectancy and the independence of animals brought from the wild. Therefore, it w as necessary to build a snake registry system, an infrastructure and handling procedures evaluation, as well as a microbiological profile evaluation of each captivity environment adopted. It was observed that an on line data bank allow s arrangement of the data as well as the traceability of the venom. Although intensive captivity enables easy check of the animal, it demands modifications in the infrastructure and handling. In semiextensive captivity it was observed that the facilities meet all the structure and safety requirements in addition to making the animals’ handling easier. In the rodents’ the biotery, several structural changes are needed besides temperature and humidity control, feed treatment, saw dust and water. In the microbiological analysis, it was observed a difference in the frequency of bacteria betw een the species, but also between the distinct captivity environments used, w ith special remark to the intensive captivity. Even though the presence of pathogens does not mean illness, the isolation of potential pathogens in the snakes’ samples analyzed was considered important in the evaluation process of the type of handling used, considering the numerous stressing conditions promoted by the captivity environment and the opportunistic character of these agents.(...)