Ultra HD Liposuction: Enhancing Abdominal Etching Using Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Abdominis Fat Transfer (UGRAFT).

High-definition (HD) liposuction has allowed surgeons to sculpt the abdomen, enhancing abdominal etching. To create a more athletic abdomen, fat grafting has been used subcutaneously, and rectus abdominis fat grafting has been performed in patients undergoing lipoabdominoplasty. With the objective of increasing muscle volume to obtain a natural-looking abdomen in patients who are not suitable for abdominoplasty, we propose the use of ultrasound-guided rectus abdominis fat grafting (UGRAFT) in association with HD liposuction. PATIENTS: A prospective study with 10 consecutive patients undergoing UGRAFT was conducted. After HD liposuction, UGRAFT was performed from an incision in the umbilical region, using a blunt 2.5-mm cannula assisted by ultrasound. Fat injection was done closer to the anterior rectus sheath in the lower and middle muscle bellies. RESULTS: UGRAFT was performed in 10 patients. The mean age was 34.8 years (range, 24-51 years). The mean body mass index was 23.83 kg/m2 (range, 20.58-28.39 kg/m2). The mean volume of fat injected per "pack" was 34 cm3 (range, 20-40 cm3). UGRAFT added a mean time of 20 minutes (range, 15-30 minutes) to HD liposuction. Comparing the rectus abdominis muscle thickness pre-UGRAFT and post-UGRAFT, average muscle thickness increase was 5.1 mm (55.7% ± 37%), with P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: UGRAFT showed to be helpful for obtaining muscle expansion and a more natural abdominal contour, avoiding that unnatural appearance that HD liposuction may provide in patients who gain weight or have skin laxity.

"Brazilian Butt Lift" Performed by Board-Certified Brazilian Plastic Surgeons: Reports of an Expert Opinion Survey.

BACKGROUND: Gluteal fat augmentation has increased worldwide, and so have major complications. Brazilian plastic surgeons have been performing this procedure for more than 30 years, and more often every year. Therefore, the authors performed a study among board-certified plastic surgeons, members of the Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery, to evaluate their techniques; identify their preferences, complications, and outcomes with this procedure; and make some recommendations. METHODS: An anonymous Web-based survey consisting of 16 questions was sent to 5655 members in July of 2017. A supplementary survey was subsequently sent to obtain more information about major complications. RESULTS: A total of 853 responses were analyzed. The highest percentage of responses in the different categories were as follows: fat decantation for processing, injection with a 3-mm-diameter cannula, use of superior incisions, subcutaneous fat grafting only, and with a volume of 200 to 399 ml of fat per buttock. The majority of surgeons received training in this procedure during residency. The most common complications were contour irregularities. The estimated mortality rate was one in 20,117 cases, and the rate of nonfatal fat embolism was one in 9530. The risk of death was 16 times greater when fat was injected intramuscularly. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this survey, the authors recommend injecting fat only subcutaneously, by means of superior incisions, using cannulas 3 mm in diameter or more. They find that by following these recommendations, this procedure can be as safe as any other. More research to establish guidelines and increase its safety is necessary.

Subcutaneous-Only Gluteal Fat Grafting: A Prospective Study of the Long-Term Results with Ultrasound Analysis.

In recent years, gluteal fat augmentation has exhibited some of the most significant growth among all plastic surgery procedures. However, as the popularity of and media attention to gluteal fat augmentation continue to rise, reports of fatalities, largely attributed to fat embolism, have raised valid concerns. Many plastic surgeons inject fat in the intramuscular plane and claim better graft take in the muscles and the possibility of injecting more volume in the gluteal region. Because of the large caliber of vessels, subcutaneous fat augmentation has been a preference of many. However, the long-term outcome of fat injected into the subcutaneous layer has been questionable, and there is a lack of prospective quantitative studies of subcutaneous-only fat grafting. Therefore, the authors evaluated the long-term maintenance of gluteal adipose thickness when fat was injected only subcutaneously. Fifty consecutive female patients were evaluated in this prospective clinical study. All patients underwent gluteal fat augmentation in the subcutaneous plane only. Ultrasound analysis of the adipose tissue thickness of the gluteal region was performed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 12 months postoperatively. Immediate postoperative measurements revealed an average increase in gluteal subcutaneous layer thickness of 56.51 percent (range, 39.5 to 108.6 percent) (p < 0.0001). At 12 months postoperatively, the gluteal adipose tissue thickness decreased by an average of 18.16 percent (range, 6.8 to 24.8 percent) (p < 0.0001). Subcutaneous-only gluteal fat augmentation is shown to be as effective as previous studies reporting intramuscular fat injection with regard to long-term fat retention in the buttocks. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, IV.

Use of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss in Liposuction.

BACKGROUND: The use of tranexamic acid for blood loss prevention has gained popularity in many specialties, including plastic surgery. However, its use in liposuction has not been studied. The authors present a prospective, double-blind, nonrandomized study evaluating the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing perioperative blood loss during liposuction. METHODS: Twenty women undergoing liposuction were divided into two cohorts. Group 1 (n = 10) received a standard dose of 10 mg/kg of tranexamic acid intravenously in the preoperative and postoperative periods, whereas group 2 (n = 10) received a placebo. Patient hematocrit levels were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Blood volume in the infranatant of the lipoaspirate was also measured; t tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Age, body mass index, and volume of lipoaspirate were comparable between the two cohorts. The volume of blood loss for every liter of lipoaspirate was 56.2 percent less in the tranexamic group compared with the control group (p < 0.001). Hematocrit levels at day 7 postoperatively were 48 percent less in group 1 compared with group 2 (p = 0.001). Furthermore, a 1 percent drop in the hematocrit level was found after liposuction of 812 ± 432 ml in group 1 and 379 ± 204 ml in group 2. Thus, the use of tranexamic acid could allow for aspiration of 114 percent more fat, with comparable variation in hematocrit levels. CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid has been shown to be effective for minimizing perioperative blood loss in liposuction. Further large randomized controlled studies are required to corroborate this effect. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting.

BACKGROUND: The number of gluteal fat augmentation procedures has increased recently and so has the number of complications. Because of the increased risk of morbidity and mortality when fat is injected intramuscularly, not knowing where fat is injected is concerning. We sought to identify the planes in which fat is injected during the procedure. METHODS: We selected 15 consecutive female patients who desired gluteal fat augmentation. All patients had epidural anesthesia and the gluteal region was infiltrated with a vasoconstrictive solution. With the patient in prone position, an ultrasound probe placed on the buttocks was used to identify the fascial layers. While decanted fat was being injected with a blunt cannula, the images were projected wirelessly to a screen, so that the surgeon and assistant could follow the planes in which the cannula was being introduced and the fat injected. RESULTS: The mean volume of harvested fat was 3533 ml and the mean volume of fat injected per gluteal region was 528 ml. The evaluation of the depth and location of the cannula was performed in real time with the ultrasound, accurately and reliably identifying the planes of fat injection. All injections were subcutaneous. The downsides of this technique were the purchase cost of the ultrasound device, increased surgical time, the need for an assistant to follow the cannula and the probe constantly, and the learning curve. CONCLUSION: Real-time ultrasound-assisted gluteal fat grafting is reliable and may avoid injuring the deep vessels, further decreasing the risks of major complications.