Stricter treat-to-target in RA does not result in less radiographic progression: a longitudinal analysis in RA BIODAM.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start (new) DMARD-therapy. METHODS: Patients with RA from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs because of active RA, and in whom treatment intensification according to the T2T principle was pursued, were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA-BIODAM cohort). The primary outcome was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde (SvdH) score, assessed every 6 months. Per 3-month interval DAS44-T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of two visits). The relation between T2T intensity and change in SvdH-score was modelled by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: In total, 511 patients were included [mean (s.d.) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female]. Mean 2-year SvdH progression was 2.2 (4.1) units (median: 1 unit). A stricter application of T2T in a 3-month interval did not reduce progression in the same 6-month interval [parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95% CI: -0.04, 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (-0.06; 0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits] nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval. CONCLUSIONS: In this daily practice cohort, following T2T principles more meticulously did not result in less radiographic progression than a somewhat more lenient attitude towards T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome.

Current favourable 10-year outcome of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: data from the ESPOIR cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To report the 10-year outcome of an inception cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the ESPOIR cohort, and predictors of outcome. METHODS: From 2003 to 2005, 813 patients were included if they had early arthritis (<6 months) with a high probability of RA and had never been prescribed DMARDs. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate predictors of outcome. RESULTS: In total, 521 (64.1%) RA patients were followed up for 10 years; 35 (4.3%) died, which appears to be similar to the French general population. Overall, 480 (92.1%) patients received a DMARD; 174 (33.4%) received at least one biologic DMARD, 13.6% within 2 years. At year 10, 273 (52.4%) patients were in DAS28 remission, 40.1% in sustained remission, 14.1% in drug-free remission, 39.7% in CDAI remission. Half of the patients achieved a health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) < 0.5. SF-36 physical component and pain were well controlled. Structural progression was weak, with a mean change from baseline in modified Sharp score of 11.0 (17.9). Only 34 (6.5%) patients required major joint surgery. A substantial number of patients showed new comorbidities over 10 years. Positivity for anti-citrullinated peptides antibodies (ACPA) was confirmed as a robust predictor of long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We report a very mild 10-year outcome of a large cohort of patients with early RA diagnosed in the early 2000s, which was much better than results for a previous cohort of patients who were recruited in 1993. This current favourable outcome may be related to more intensive care for real-life patients.

BENEFIT: real-world effectiveness of SB4 after transition from reference etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this non-interventional study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the etanercept biosimilar SB4 (BenepaliTM) following transition from reference etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Data were collected from clinical records of adult patients with stable RA or axSpA, in France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Key outcomes included the change from transition to 3 and 6 months in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) for RA or Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) for axSpA. RESULTS: In total, 358 patients with RA and 199 patients with axSpA were enrolled. The mean individual change in disease score from transition was -0.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.11, 0.08) at 3 months and 0.01 (95% CI -0.09, 0.11) at 6 months for DAS28, and -0.01 (95% CI -0.24, 0.21) at 3 months and -0.11 (95% CI -0.31, 0.10) at 6 months for BASDAI. In the RA cohort, 19 (5.3%) and 5 patients (1.4%) reported adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs), respectively. In the axSpA cohort, 12 (6.0%) and 2 patients (1.0%) reported adverse events and SAEs, respectively. One SAE of pneumonia (RA cohort) was considered to be related to SB4 administration. At 6 months post-transition, the SB4 retention rate was 90.8% (95% CI 87.2%, 93.4%) in the RA cohort and 92.4% (95% CI 87.5%, 95.4%) in the axSpA cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Transition from reference etanercept to SB4 is effective and safe in patients with stable RA and axSpA.

Is treat-to-target really working in rheumatoid arthritis? a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of patients treated in daily practice (RA BIODAM).

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice leads to more patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) meeting the remission target. METHODS: RA patients from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA BIODAM (BIOmarkers of joint DAMage) cohort). Per visit was decided whether a patient was treated according to a T2T-strategy with 44-joint disease activity score (DAS44) remission (DAS44 <1.6) as the target. Sustained T2T was defined as T2T followed in ≥2 consecutive visits. The main outcome was the achievement of DAS44 remission at the subsequent 3-month visit. Other outcomes were remission according to 28-joint disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean definitions. The association between T2T and remission was tested in generalised estimating equations models. RESULTS: In total 4356 visits of 571 patients (mean (SD) age: 56 (13) years, 78% female) were included. Appropriate application of T2T was found in 59% of the visits. T2T (vs no T2T) did not yield a higher likelihood of DAS44 remission 3 months later (OR (95% CI): 1.03 (0.92 to 1.16)), but sustained T2T resulted in an increased likelihood of achieving DAS44 remission (OR: 1.19 (1.03 to 1.39)). Similar results were seen with DAS28-ESR remission. For more stringent definitions (CDAI, SDAI and ACR/EULAR Boolean remission), T2T was consistently positively associated with remission (OR range: 1.16 to 1.29), and sustained T2T had a more pronounced effect on remission (OR range: 1.49 to 1.52). CONCLUSION: In daily clinical practice, the correct application of a T2T-strategy (especially sustained T2T) in patients with RA leads to higher rates of remission.

Biological DMARD efficacy in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on articular, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin and functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: There is no hierarchy in the use of biotherapies (bDMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and no published head-to-head comparative studies. Our purpose is to evaluate the respective efficacy of TNF inhibitors, IL12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), IL17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab) and CTLA4Ig (abatacept) on articular, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin and functional outcomes in PsA. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials assessing bDMARDs in PsA were selected through the MedLine, Cochrane and Embase databases. ACR20/50/70 and PASI75/90 response rates, enthesitis and dactylitis reduction rates and HAQ-DI mean reductions were collected. Pooled meta-analyses were performed to assess relative risks (RR) with their 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for each class of bDMARDs in comparison with placebo. RESULTS: 17 RCTs were analysed. Compared to placebo, all bDMARDs showed higher ACR20 response rates, with RRs ranging from 1.77 (1.31, 2.39) to 3.21 (2.52, 4.08), and a greater HAQ-DI mean reduction. TNF inhibitors, secukinumab and IL17 inhibitors showed higher ACR50/70 and PASI75/90 response rates. TNF inhibitors, secukinumab and IL17 inhibitors showed higher enthesitis resolution rates and only TNF inhibitors and IL17 inhibitors showed higher dactylitis resolution rates, with RRs ranging from 1.41 (1.02, 1.95) to 2.31 (1.60, 3.34) and from 2.07 (1.38, 3.12) to 2.65 (1.79, 3.94), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All bDMARDs showed higher ACR20 response rates and better HAQ-DI mean reduction compared to placebo. This meta-analysis highlights the variability of bDMARD efficacy on ACR50/70, PASI75/90 and enthesitis or dactylitis response rates. Head-to-head studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on potential efficacy-related differences between bDMARDs in PsA.

A single nucleotide polymorphism of IL6-receptor is associated with response to tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have changed care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, bDMARDs are costly, can lead to serious infections, and induce a sustained remission in only 30% of RA patients. In this study, we sought to determine if the clinical response to treatment with Tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 inhibitor, varied with genetic background. The efficacy of TCZ was assessed using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, measured after 3 months of treatment in two samples of French RA patients (TOCI and ROC studies). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 21 candidate genes were genotyped using KasPar method (LGC-genomics, UK) and then analyzed to determine their contribution to variation in the response to treatment. One hundred twenty-three patients in the TOCI group (79.8%) and 48 patients in the ROC group (80%) experienced good or moderate EULAR response. The clinical response to treatment was associated with SNP genotype in the gene IL6R, with patients with the homozygous AA-genotype for rs12083537 (IL6R) showing a significantly better response than homozygous or heterozygous patients with the G allele [TOCI: 87.5% of responders for AA genotype vs. 72.2% for AG or GG genotype (p = 0.018); ROC patients: 89.2% of responders for AA genotype vs. 65.2% for AG or GG genotype, p = 0.044]. A meta-analysis combining data from the two cohorts confirmed the lower response rate in patients carrying a copy of the G allele (OR (95% CI) = 0.35 (0.16-0.61), p = 0.001). No association was found with any of the other SNPs tested.

Prevalence of inflammatory posterior arch abnormalities on lumbar spine MRI in spondyloarthritis patients compared with low back pain patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted in order to compare the prevalence of inflammatory posterior arch abnormalities on lumbar spine MRI between axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients and low back pain (LBP) patients. METHODS: Patients-axSpA patients meeting the 2009 ASAS criteria and chronic LBP patients who had a lumbar spine MRI were selected. MRI-STIR and T1 sagittal images up to T8-T9 were reviewed by two experienced rheumatologists blinded to the diagnosis and clinical data to identify inflammatory posterior arch abnormalities. Analyses-The prevalence of inflammatory posterior arch abnormalities between axSpA and LBP patients was compared. Clinical data were compared in the axSpA group depending on whether or not inflammatory posterior arch abnormalities were present. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled in each group. The prevalence of all inflammatory posterior arch abnormalities was the same in the axSpA and LBP groups (58% in the SpA group versus 70% in the LBP group, p = 0.1). However, differences in terms of the prevalence of costotransverse joint arthritis, pedicle oedema above L3 and transverse and spinous process oedema were observed between the two groups (axSpA 27% versus LBP 6%, p = 0.0004). Patients with inflammatory posterior arch abnormalities in the axSpA group had a longer disease duration (11 versus 8 years, p = 0.02), higher CRP levels (median 11 versus 3 mg/l, p = 0.0002) and higher prevalence of radiographic sacroiliitis (84 versus 47%, p = 0.001) compared to patients without inflammatory posterior arch abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Costotransverse arthritis, pedicle oedema and transverse process oedema are more frequent in axSpA patients than LBP patients, on lumbar spine MRI depicting TH9-S1. KEY POINTS: • MRI pedicle oedema above L3, transverse process oedema, spinous process oedema or costotransverse arthritis is more frequently observed in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). • SpA patients with at least one MRI inflammatory lesion on the posterior arch had higher clinical activity scores and biological inflammation. • Facet joint arthritis was more common in patients with chronic low back pain.

Risk of losing remission, low disease activity or radiographic progression in case of bDMARD discontinuation or tapering in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic analysis of the literature and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of losing remission, low disease activity (LDA) or radiographic progression in the case of (1) discontinuing or (2) tapering doses of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with continuation of the initial treatment regimen in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with remission or LDA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature analysis was carried out through May 2017 on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and international congress databases, selecting controlled trials comparing bDMARDs discontinuation/tapering versus continuation in RA patients with remission or LDA. The meta-analysis assessed the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI of losing remission or LDA and the risk of radiographic progression after (1) discontinuing and (2) tapering doses of bDMARDs versus continuing the initial treatment. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comparing bDMARDs discontinuation versus continuation performed on nine trials showed an increased risk of losing remission (RR (95% CI)=1.97(1.43 to 2.73), P<0.0001) or LDA (RR (95% CI)=2.24(1.52 to 3.30), P<0.0001) and an increased risk of radiographic progression (RR (95% CI)=1.09(1.02 to 1.17), P=0.01) in case of bDMARD discontinuation. The meta-analysis comparing bDMARDs tapering versus continuation performed on 11 trials showed an increased risk of losing remission (RR (95% CI)=1.23(1.06 to 1.42), P=0.006) but no increased risk of losing LDA (RR (95% CI)=1.02 (0.85 to 1.23), P=0.81) nor any increased risk of radiographic progression (RR (95% CI)=1.09(0.94 to 1.26), P=0.26) in case of bDMARD tapering. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of bDMARDs leads to an increased risk of losing remission or LDA and radiographic progression, while tapering doses of bDMARDs does not increase the risk of relapse (LDA) or radiographic progression, even though there is an increased risk of losing remission.

Serious infusion-related reaction after rituximab, abatacept and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: prospective registry data.

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the incidence of serious infusion-related reactions (SIRRs) in RA treated by non-TNF-targeted biologics. Methods: We analysed data from three independent prospective registers, namely autoimmunity and rituximab, Orencia (abatacept) and RA (ORA) and Registry RoAcTEmra (tocilizumab), promoted by the French Society of Rheumatology and including patients with RA. SIRRs were defined by an occurrence during or within 24 h of an infusion and requiring discontinuation of treatment. Characteristics of patients with SIRRs were extracted from the electronic database. Results: Among the 4145 patients, SIRRs occurred in 100 patients: 56 patients with the rituximab cohort (2.8% or 0.7/100 patient-years), 15 with the abatacept cohort (1.5% or 0.6/100 patient-years) and 29 with tocilizumab (1.9% or 1/100 patient-years). No fatal SIRR occurred. A previous mild infusion reaction to non-TNF-targeted biologics was observed in a quarter of patients with SIRRs. After pooled multivariate analysis, positive anti-CCP was associated with a higher risk of SIRR (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.01, 6.17). Absence of concomitant treatment with a synthetic DMARD tended to be associated with a higher risk of SIRR (odds ratio = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.86). Conclusion: In daily practice, SIRRs are slightly more frequent than in clinical trials and rarely life threatening. In common practice, serological status (anti-CCP positivity) and absence of concomitant treatment with a synthetic DMARD increase the risk of SIRR.

Effectiveness of Exercise Programs in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of exercise programs on disease activity and function in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Medline via PubMed and Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: Reports of RCTs examining the effectiveness of exercise programs for AS published up to May 2017. DATA EXTRACTION: Outcomes were evolution of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) after the completion of exercise programs. Modalities of exercise were compared and the use of biologic therapy was reported. DATA SYNTHESIS: After screening 190 abstracts, we selected 26 reports for detailed evaluation and finally investigated 8 trials that assessed a home-based exercise program (2/8), swimming (1/8), Pilates training (1/8), or supervised exercises (4/8), for a total of 331 patients with AS. Four trials included patients receiving antitumor necrosis factor therapy. All trials except one showed a decrease in BASDAI and BASFI with exercise. The weighted mean difference was -0.90 (95% confidence interval, -1.52 to -0.27; I2=69%; P=.005) for the BASDAI and -0.72 (95% confidence interval, -1.03 to -0.40; I2=0%; P<.00001) for the BASFI in favor of exercise programs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small number of patients and the heterogeneity of exercise programs in the RCTs included in this meta-analysis, its results support the potential of exercise programs to improve disease activity and body function in AS.

Safety of surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by abatacept: data from the French Orencia in Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.

Objective: To investigate the frequency and risk factors of postoperative complications in RA patients treated with abatacept (ABA). Methods: The Orencia RA registry recruited 1012 patients receiving ABA for RA in routine care. Data from patients treated with ABA who underwent surgery were reviewed to describe the frequency of postoperative complications. Characteristics of patients and surgeries with and without complications were compared to identify factors associated with complications. Results: We identified 205 (20.3%) patients who underwent 263 surgeries, including 176 (66.9%) orthopaedic surgeries. Nineteen (7.2%) surgeries, in 19 patients (9.3%), entailed complications, including 7 delayed wound healing (2.7% of surgeries) and 6 surgical site infections (2.3% of surgeries). The median time between the last infusion of ABA and surgery was 5.9 weeks (range: 0.3-12.0 weeks), with no significant difference between patients with and without complications. The median corticosteroids daily dosage was higher in the group with complications [10.0 (6.25-15.0) vs 6.0 (5.0-10.0) mg/day, P = 0.042]. In multivariate analysis, only the duration of ABA treatment was significantly associated with postoperative complications [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.99) for each month of treatment], as were orthopaedic surgeries compared with other kinds of surgery [aOR = 4.45 (95% CI: 1.01, 20.2)]. Conclusion: In RA patients treated with ABA, the rate of surgical complications was low: 7.2% and higher in case of orthopaedic procedure and a more recent initiation of ABA. The median time between surgery and the last infusion of ABA was short and did not influence the rate of postoperative complications.

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional DMARDs in patients with RA at week 97 (SUMMACTA).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) tocilizumab (TCZ) versus intravenous (IV) TCZ, including switching formulations, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Patients (n=1262) were randomised 1:1 to receive TCZ-SC 162 mg weekly (qw)+placebo-IV every four weeks (q4w) or TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg q4w+placebo-SC qw in combination with DMARD(s). After a 24-week double-blind period, patients receiving TCZ-SC were re-randomised 11:1 to TCZ-SC (n=521) or TCZ-IV (TCZ-SC-IV, n=48), and patients receiving TCZ-IV were re-randomised 2:1 to TCZ-IV (n=372) or TCZ-SC (TCZ-IV-SC; n=186). Maintenance of clinical responses and safety through week 97 were assessed. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints remission and improvement from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index ≥0.3 were sustained through week 97 and comparable across arms. TCZ-SC had a comparable safety profile to TCZ-IV through week 97, except that injection site reactions (ISRs) were more common with TCZ-SC. Safety profiles in patients who switched were similar to those in patients who received continuous TCZ-SC or TCZ-IV treatment. The proportion of patients who developed anti-TCZ antibodies remained low across treatment arms. No association between anti-TCZ antibody development and clinical response or adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term efficacy and safety of TCZ-SC was maintained and comparable to that of TCZ-IV, except for ISRs. Profiles in patients who switched formulations were comparable to those in patients who received TCZ-IV or TCZ-SC. TCZ-SC provides additional treatment options for patients with RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01194414.

Autoantibodies to human citrullinated fibrinogen and their subfamilies to the α36-50Cit and ß60-74Cit fibrin peptides similarly predict radiographic damages: a prospective study in the French ESPOIR cohort of very early arthritides.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether subfamilies of the RA-specific autoantibodies to human citrullinated fibrinogen (AhFibA) differentially associate with the RA risk factors, HLA-DRB1 shared epitope containing alleles (SE alleles) and cigarette smoking, and thus help to predict the disease outcome. METHODS: AhFibA and their anti-α36-50Cit and anti-ß60-74Cit subfamilies were assayed by ELISA, at baseline, in the French ESPOIR (Etude et Suivi des Polyarthrites Indifférenciées Récentes) cohort composed of undifferentiated arthritides and RA patients of < 6 months' duration. Cigarette smoking, SE alleles' presence, DAS28, HAQ and modified Sharp-van der Heijde Score data were obtained at baseline, and after follow-up. RESULTS: After 3 years, 701 patients were classified as having RA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria. Among them, 349 (50%), 203 (29%) and 257 (37%) were AhFibA-, anti-α36-50Cit- and anti-ß60-74Cit-positive, respectively. The presence and titres of AhFibA and their subfamilies similarly associated with SE alleles, irrespective of their fine specificity, without significant effect of smoking. Neither their presence nor their titre was associated with DAS28 or HAQ. The presence of at least one subfamily was associated with a faster Sharp/van der Heijde score progression, albeit without correlation with the titre. CONCLUSION: AhFibA and their main subfamilies are similarly associated with SE alleles without additional effect of smoking. Whatever their fine specificity was, their presence (but not their titre) similarly constituted a marker of faster joint destruction.

Effectiveness and safety of abatacept in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the French Society of Rheumatology's ORA registry.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of age on the risk-benefit balance of abatacept in RA. METHODS: Data from the French orencia and RA registry, including a 2-year follow-up, were used to compare the effectiveness and safety of abatacept according to age. RESULTS: Among the 1017 patients, 103 were very elderly (⩾75 years), 215 elderly (65-74), 406 intermediate aged (50-64) and 293 very young (<50). At baseline, elderly and very elderly patients had longer disease duration, higher CRP levels and higher disease activity. These age groups showed a lower incidence of previous anti-TNF therapy and less common concomitant use of DMARDs, but a similar use of corticosteroid therapy. After adjusting for disease duration, RF/ACPA positivity, use of DMARDs or corticosteroids and previous anti-TNF treatment, the EULAR response (good or moderate) and the remission rate were not significantly different between the four age groups. At 6 months, the very elderly had a significantly lower likelihood of a good response than the very young (odds ratio = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.68). The decrease in DAS28-ESR over the 24-month follow-up period did not differ by age. Increasing age was associated with a higher rate of discontinuation for adverse events, especially severe infections (per 100 patient-years: 1.73 in very young, 4.65 in intermediates, 5.90 in elderly, 10.38 in very elderly; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of abatacept is not affected by age, but the increased rate of side effects, especially infections, in the elderly must be taken into account.

Performance of patient-reported outcomes in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity:the experience of the ESPOIR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity can be assessed by several outcome measures. The importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has recently been advocated. Our objective was to determine whether patient self-assessment can reflect RA disease activity. METHODS: Data from patients included in the early arthritis ESPOIR cohort and fulfilling 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for RA at month 12 were used. Data for several PROs (visual analogue scale for fatigue, pain, patient assessment of disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]; Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 [SF36]; Echelle de Mesure de l'Impact de la polyarthrite Rhumatoïde-court [EMIR-court] and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) were collected and their association with disease activity measured by Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-3 variables (DAS28-3v) was assessed. The association of PROs and disease activity was assessed by explained variance, Pearson correlation and performance of each PRO in differentiating low versus high disease activity states. RESULTS: We evaluated data for 677 patients. Whatever the disease activity, less impaired PROs was associated with the lowest disease activity. All PROs were moderately correlated with RA disease activity. The RAPID3 had the best association with DAS28-3v in determining RA disease activity state (r=0.45-0.55, explained variance 30-45%, sensitivity 69-100% and specificity 55-78%). Global PROs (RAPID3, EMIR-court) had the highest association with disease activity, followed by PROs assessing physical function. CONCLUSIONS: The association of PROs and RA disease activity (DAS28-3v) remains moderate. RAPID3, a global PRO, had the best association with disease activity as compared with other analysed PROs.

Glucocorticoid-sparing in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis and treated with tocilizumab: the SPARE-1 study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe steroid-sparing in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab (TCZ). METHODS: To evaluate the proportion of RA patients treated with more than 5 mg of prednisone (or equivalent)/day and starting TCZ who can receive less than 5 mg/day after 12 months without intensification of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), we conducted a non-interventional, multicentre, prospective study from 2011 to 2013. We included patients with moderate-to-severe RA, >18 years old, starting TCZ and receiving corticosteroids (GCs) at a dose greater than 5 mg/day of prednisone for at least 3 months. RESULTS: Amongst the 307 analysed patients (78% women, median RA duration: 8 years, mean DAS28-ESR: 5.1±1.3), 40% (95%CI=[35-46]) reached the targeted daily prednisone dose at M12, without conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD intensification. Predictive factors were RA duration of 5 years or less (OR=2.60, p=0.01), daily prednisone dose of 7.5 mg or less (OR=2.12, p=0.03), and low ESR value before the first TCZ infusion (OR=0.86, p=0.047). The proportion of patients with no more GCs increased up to 20% at M12. Disease activity improved over the 1-year period (DAS28-ESR LDA and remission in 41% and 33% of patients at M12, respectively). Amongst the 314 patients analysed for safety, at least one AE and at least one SAE were reported in 211 patients (67%) and in 48 patients (15%), respectively. No unexplained safety signal arose with TCZ. CONCLUSIONS: A biological DMARD as TCZ allows reducing both GCs dose and disease activity in RA patients. Nevertheless, corticosteroid spare in real life is probably lower.

Aiming for SDAI remission versus low disease activity at 1†year after inclusion in ESPOIR cohort is associated with better 3-year structural outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Using data for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the ESPOIR cohort, we aimed to evaluate the impact of remission versus low disease activity (LDA) by the Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at 1 year on 3-year structural damage assessed by the modified Sharp-van der Heijde total score (mTSS) and functional impairment assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). METHODS: We included 625 patients from the ESPOIR cohort who fulfilled the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for RA at baseline and had an SDAI score at 1 year. mTSS and HAQ-DI scores were compared at 3 years for patients with SDAI remission or LDA status at 1 year. A linear mixed model was used to assess the independent effect of SDAI status at 1 year on mTSS and HAQ-DI at 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 625 patients included (mean (SD) age 48.5 (12.1) years; 491 (78.6%) were women), 121 (19.4%) were in SDAI remission and 223 (35.7%) in LDA at 1 year. The mean (SD) mTSS and HAQ-DI score at 3 years was 9.6 (9.2) and 0.23 (0.42), respectively, for patients in remission at 1 year and 15.8 (16.1) and 0.43 (0.52), respectively, for patients with LDA (both p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed an association of remission rather than LDA status at 1 year and reduced mTSS score (p=0.005) but not HAQ-DI score (p=0.4) at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Aiming for SDAI remission rather than LDA at 1 year leads to better radiographic outcomes at 3 years in early RA patients.

Identification of secreted phosphoprotein 1 gene as a new rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility gene.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of the SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138 polymorphisms, previously reported as autoimmune risk variants, in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) genetic background according to anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) status of RA individuals. METHODS: We analysed a total of 11,715 RA cases and 26,493 controls from nine independent cohorts; all individuals were genotyped or had imputed genotypes for SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138. The effect of the SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138 risk-allele combination on osteopontin (OPN) expression in macrophages and OPN serum levels was investigated. RESULTS: We provide evidence for a distinct contribution of SPP1 to RA susceptibility according to ACPA status: the combination of ≥3 SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138 common alleles was associated mainly with ACPA negativity (p=1.29×10(-5), ORACPA-negative 1.257 (1.135 to 1.394)) and less with ACPA positivity (p=0.0148, ORACPA-positive 1.072 (1.014 to 1.134)). The ORs between these subgroups (ie, ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative) significantly differed (p=7.33×10(-3)). Expression quantitative trait locus analysis revealed an association of the SPP1 risk-allele combination with decreased SPP1 expression in peripheral macrophages from 599 individuals. To corroborate these findings, we found an association of the SPP1 risk-allele combination and low serum level of secreted OPN (p=0.0157), as well as serum level of secreted OPN correlated positively with ACPA production (p=0.005; r=0.483). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a significant contribution of the combination of SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138 frequent alleles to risk of RA, the magnitude of the association being greater in patients negative for ACPAs.

Prevalence of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis among psoriasis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Skin psoriasis precedes the onset of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 84% of patients with psoriasis. Dermatologists have an important role to screen psoriasis patients for PsA. The efficiency of PsA screening remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the point prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis using a systematic search of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase database searches yielded 394 studies for review. No study aimed to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis. We assumed that the prevalence of newly diagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis at the time they seek medical care could be a sound estimate of this value. Seven epidemiological studies and 5 studies on PsA screening questionnaires allowed us to clearly identify patients with newly diagnosed PsA and were selected for review. RESULTS: The prevalence of undiagnosed PsA was 15.5% when all studies were considered and 10.1% when only epidemiological studies were considered. LIMITATIONS: Data were obtained from studies not designed to address the question at hand. Heterogeneity was high (I(2) = 96.86%), and therefore a random effects model was used. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis adds to the recommendation that dermatologists need to screen all patients with psoriasis for PsA.