miR-655-3p inhibits cell migration and invasion by targeting pituitary tumor-transforming 1 in non-small cell lung cancer.

miR-655-3p functions as a tumor suppressor in tumor metastases; however, its role and mechanism in regulating cell migration and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear. Here, we found that miR-655-3p expression was markedly decreased in the NSCLC cell lines A549, NCI-H1650, PC14/b, NCI-H1299, and HPAEpiC compared to levels observed in normal human lung fibroblasts. miR-655-3p overexpression significantly inhibited migration and invasion of A549 and PC14/b cells, and pituitary tumor-transforming 1 (PTTG1) expression was up-regulated in the NSCLC cells. Luciferase reporter assays indicated that PTTG1 was a direct target of miR-655-3p. Additionally, PTTG1 overexpression alleviated the inhibitory effect of miR-655-3p on migration and invasion abilities in A549 and PC14/b cells. In conclusion, miR-655-3p inhibits NSCLC migration and invasion by targeting PTTG1, suggesting that miR-655-3p may serve as a therapeutic target to provide a new approach for the clinical treatment of NSCLC.

Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) Versus Crizotinib in ALK TKI-Naive Locally Advanced or Metastatic ALK-Positive NSCLC: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study (INSPIRE).

INTRODUCTION: Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) is a new-generation, potent ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has been found to have systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in ALK-positive NSCLC. We compared the efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib with crizotinib in patients with ALK TKI-naive, locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study, patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive iruplinalkib 180 mg once daily (7-d run-in at 60 mg once daily) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included PFS by investigator, objective response rate (ORR), time to response, duration of response, intracranial ORR and time to CNS progression by IRC and investigator, overall survival, and safety. An interim analysis was planned after approximately 70% (134 events) of all 192 expected PFS events assessed by IRC were observed. Efficacy was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the safety population, which included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. This study is registered with Center for Drug Evaluation of China National Medical Products Administration (CTR20191231) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04632758). RESULTS: From September 4, 2019, to December 2, 2020, a total of 292 patients were randomized and treated; 143 with iruplinalkib and 149 with crizotinib. At this interim analysis (145 events), the median follow-up time was 26.7 months (range: 3.7-37.7) in the iruplinalkib group and 25.9 months (range: 0.5-35.9) in the crizotinib group. The PFS assessed by IRC was significantly longer among patients in the iruplinalkib group (median PFS, 27.7 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.3-not estimable] versus 14.6 mo [95% CI: 11.1-16.5] in the crizotinib group; hazard ratio, 0.34 [98.02% CI: 0.23-0.52], p < 0.0001). The ORR assessed by IRC was 93.0% (95% CI: 87.5-96.6) in the iruplinalkib group and 89.3% (95% CI: 83.1-93.7) in the crizotinib group. The intracranial ORR was 90.9% (10 of 11, 95% CI: 58.7-99.8) in the iruplinalkib group and 60.0% (nine of 15, 95% CI: 32.3-83.7) in the crizotinib group for patients with measurable baseline CNS metastases. Incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 51.7% in the iruplinalkib group and 49.7% in the crizotinib group. CONCLUSIONS: Iruplinalkib was found to have significantly improved PFS and improved intracranial antitumor activity versus crizotinib. Iruplinalkib may be a new treatment option for patients with advanced ALK-positive and ALK TKI-naive NSCLC. FUNDING: This study was funded by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jinan, People's Republic of China, and partly supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2017ZX09304015).

A multi-center randomized phase II clinical study of bevacizumab plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment for Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF human monoclonal antibody suitable for chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study investigated the efficacy and safety of using bevacizumab plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as second-line chemotherapy option for patients with mCRC in China. Patients with mCRC, who had been previously treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, but not bevacizumab, were randomly assigned to two groups to receive bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI (FOLFIRI-B) or FOLFIRI alone. In FOLFIRI-B group, patients were given 10 mg/kg bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks. The primary endpoints were response rates and survival rates. Between June 2010 and May 2014, 65 patients were assigned to FOLFIRI-B group and 77 to FOLFIRI alone group. The median progression-free survivals were 8.5 months (95 % CI 5.8-10.5 months) for FOLFIRI-B and 5.1 months (95 % CI 2.7-9.8 months) for FOLFIRI alone; median overall survivals were 15.2 months (95 % CI 11.8-19.4 months) for FOLFIRI-B and 11.3 months (95 % CI 6.7-16.5 months) for FOLFIRI alone. Incidence rates of grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed and comparable between FOLFIRI-B and FOLFIRI alone groups. Chinese patients with mCRC treated with second-line chemotherapy of FOLFIRI-B had better survivals than those patients treated with FOLFIRI alone.