Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the conventional surgical treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease. Recently, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has been developed to address some of the shortcomings associated with ACDF by preserving function of the motion segment. Controversy still surrounds regarding whether CDA is better. METHODS: We systematically searched six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Clinical, Ovid, BIOSIS and Cochrane registry of controlled clinical trials) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2014 in which CDA was compared with ACDF for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. Effective data were extracted after the assessment of methodological quality of the trials. Then, we performed the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen relevant RCTs with a total of 4061 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that CDA was superior to ACDF regarding better neurological success (P < 0.00001), greater motion preservation at the operated level (P < 0.00001), fewer secondary surgical procedures (P < 0.00001), and fewer rates of adverse events (P < 0.00001) but inferior to ACDF regarding operative times (P < 0.00001). No significant difference was identified between the two groups regarding blood loss (P = 0.87), lengths of hospital stay (P = 0.76), neck pain scores (P = 0.11) and arm pain scores (P = 0.78) reported on a visual analog scale. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis revealed that CDA demonstrated superiorities in better neurological success, greater motion preservation at the operated level, lower rate of adverse events and fewer secondary surgical procedures compared with ACDF. However, the benefits of blood loss, lengths of hospital stay, neck and arm pain functional recovery are still unable to be proved.

Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of artificial total disc replacement (TDR) with fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Spinal fusion is the conventional surgical treatment for lumbar DDD. Recently, TDR has been developed to avoid the negative effects of the fusion by preserving function of the motion segment. Controversy still surrounds regarding whether TDR is better. METHODS: We systematically searched six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Clinical, Ovid, BIOSIS and Cochrane registry of controlled clinical trials) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to March 2013 in which TDR was compared with the fusion for the treatment of lumbar DDD. Effective data were extracted after the assessment of methodological quality of the trials. Then, we performed the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven relevant RCTs with a total of 1,584 patients were included. TDR was more effective in ODI (MD -5.09; 95% CI [-7.33, -2.84]; P < 0.00001), VAS score (MD -5.31; 95% CI [-8.35, -2.28]; P = 0.0006), shorter duration of hospitalization (MD -0.82; 95% CI [-1.38, -0.26]; P = 0.004) and a greater proportion of willing to choose the same operation again (OR 2.32; 95% CI [1.69, 3.20]; P < 0.00001). There were no significant differences between the two treatment methods regarding operating time (MD -44.16; 95% CI [-94.84, 6.52]; P = 0.09), blood loss (MD -29.14; 95% CI [-173.22, 114.94]; P = 0.69), complications (OR 0.72; 95% CI [0.45, 1.14]; P = 0.16), reoperation rate (OR 0.83; 95% CI [0.39, 1.77]; P = 0.63) and the proportion of patients who returned to full-time/part-time work (OR 1.10; 95% CI [0.86, 1.41]; P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: TDR showed significant safety and efficacy comparable to lumbar fusion at 2 year follow-up. TDR demonstrated superiorities in improved physical function, reduced pain and shortened duration of hospitalization. The benefits of operating time, blood loss, motion preservation and the long-term complications are still unable to be proved.

A case of giant Ewing's sarcoma (EES)/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of the cervicothoracic junction in children with incomplete paralysis of both lower limbs: Case report and literature review.

Background: Extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma/primary neuroectodermal tumor (EES/PNET) is a rare, malignant, small round blue cell tumor, which usually involves the larynx, kidneys, and esophagus. The most common metastatic sites are lung and bone. The incidence of epidural EES/PNET was 0.9%, and a detailed search of the PubMed literature found only 7 case reports of epidural ESS/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in children. Case description: We report a case of epidural ESS/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in a child with chest and back pain as the first symptom, which worsened after half a year and developed incomplete paralysis of both lower extremities and urinary incontinence. She underwent emergency surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and died of lung metastases 8 months after surgery. Conclusion: Primary epidural tumors are mostly benign, such as spinal meningiomas and neuromas. Contrary to what has been previously thought, we report a case of malignant epidural EES/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction without bone destruction; The rarity of epidural EES/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in children has led to a lack of data, particularly on prognostic factors and recurrence patterns. Due to the difficulty of early diagnosis and high mortality, spine surgeons must explore and increase their awareness of this disease.

A comparison between "sandwich" and conventional methods of repairing spinal dura rupture.

OBJECTIVE: To study the therapeutic efficacy of the "sandwich" method (medical glue + gelatin sponge + medical glue) of spinal dural repair for preventing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks during treatment of subdural tumors. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with spinal subdural tumors treated between April 2007 and June 2011 were retrospectively investigated. The patients were divided into two groups: a conventional group (group A) and a "sandwich" group (group B). The group A patients included 16 males and 7 females with an average tumor course of 11 months (range, 2-34 months). Four of their 23 tumors were in the cervical spine, eight thoracic, and eleven lumbar. The group B patients included 19 males and 12 females with an average tumor course of 12 months (range, 3-36 months). Five of their 31 tumors were in the cervical spines, 10 thoracic, and 16 lumbar. In group A, the dural repairs were performed with interlocking sutures and a gelatin sponge covering the dura; whereas in group B, they were performed with interlocking sutures, painting of medical glue around the dural incision, covering this with a gelatin sponge, and finally covering of the gelatin sponge with medical glue. The total volume of drainage after operation, incidence of CSF leaks, healing of the incision, and recovery of clinical performance were recorded. RESULTS: Compared to group A patients, group B patients had a significantly smaller total volume of drainage (P < 0.05) on the day of surgery, and the first, second, and third postoperative days. The incidence of CSF leakage in group B was also significantly less than in group A (P < 0.05). Before discharge, three patients in group A developd hydrops, which was successfully treated by aspiration, continuous pressure from sandbags, and the prone position. During the first 3 months of follow-up, five patients developed deep hydrops under their incisions but required no treatment. There were no obvious abnormalities in group B. CONCLUSION: After removal of subdural spinal tumors by incising the dura mater, or in related spinal surgery, application of the "sandwich" complex to the damaged spinal dura reduces the volume of drainage postoperatively and reduces the incidence of CSF leakage.