Patient-reported intestinal toxicity from whole pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy: First quantification of bowel dose-volume effects.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intestinal toxicity is commonly experienced during whole-pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy (WPRT) for prostate cancer. The aim of the current study was to assess bowel dose-volume relationships for acute patient-reported intestinal symptoms of patients treated with WPRT for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Complete data of 206 patients were available; the median dose to pelvic nodes was 51.8Gy (range 50.4-54.4, 1.7-2Gy/fr). Intestinal symptoms were assessed as changes in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire scores relative to the Bowel Domain (IBDQ-B) between baseline and radiotherapy mid-point/end. The 25th percentiles of the most severe worsening from baseline (ΔIBDQ-B) were set as end-points. The impact of bowel loops and sigmoid colon dose-volume/surface parameters as well as selected clinical parameters were investigated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Analyses were focused on the four questions showing a median ΔIBDQ-B>0. No dose volume/surface parameters were predictive, other than ΔIBDQ5≥3 (loose stools): when grouping patients according to bowel DVHs (high risk: V20>470cc, V30>245cc, V42>110cc; low risk: all the remaining patients), a two-variable model including high-risk DVH-shape (OR: 9.3) and age (protective, OR: 0.94) was assessed. The model showed good calibration (slope: 1.003, R2=0.92) and was found to be robust after bootstrap-based internal validation. CONCLUSIONS: Constraining the bowel loops may reduce the risk of loose stools. The risk is higher for younger patients.

First application of a pixel-wise analysis on bladder dose-surface maps in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To develop a method for investigating local dose effects on the bladder after prostate cancer radiotherapy based on dose-surface maps (DSMs). BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DSMs of patients included in a prospective study (DUE01) were generated by virtually cutting bladder contours at the points intersecting the sagittal plane passing through its center-of-mass: maps were laterally normalized and aligned at the posterior inferior point. The average DSMs of patients with/without toxicity, the DSMs of differences and t statistic were used to select regions better discriminating patients with toxicity. A total of 72 patients with no/mild urinary symptoms before radiotherapy and who were treated with moderate hypo-fractionation (2.5-2.65Gy/fr, 70-74Gy) were considered, and the endpoint was an International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)⩾15 at the end of therapy (IPSSend⩾15, n=25/72). RESULTS: The DSMs of patients with/without toxicity were significantly different (p<0.05). The percentage of bladder circumference receiving >50-70Gy at 5-7mm from the base was associated with an IPSSend⩾15 (odds ratios: 1.03-1.07). Different patterns were recognized for specific symptoms. With frequency/urgency, a quasi-threshold effect on the absolute posterior dose at 5-12mm from the base (2Gy equivalent doses=80-82Gy, α/ß=3-5Gy) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Local-dose effects for acute symptoms were detected in a group of patients treated within a moderately hypo-fractionated protocol. The results for frequency/urgency were consistent with a threshold effect on the trigone.

Multi-variable models of large International Prostate Symptom Score worsening at the end of therapy in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Prospectively assessing clinical/dosimetry factors affecting the acute worsening of urinary functionality after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIAL/METHODS: DUE01 population was considered, including patients treated with conventional or moderate hypo-fractionation (2.2-2.7 Gy/fr). Relevant clinical factors were collected, urinary symptoms were self-reported through the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) before and at the end of radiotherapy; while absolute weekly dose-surface histograms (DSHw) were chosen as dosimetry descriptors. An IPSS increase of at least 10 and 15 points (ΔIPSS ⩾ 10 and ΔIPSS ⩾ 15) were chosen as endpoints. Patients with baseline IPSS>20 were excluded. Relevant factors were chosen through a bootstrap-based in silico methodology. RESULTS: Complete information was available for 380 patients: 77/380 (20%) and 28/380 (7%) with ΔIPSS ⩾ 10 and ΔIPSS ⩾ 15, respectively. Neoadjuvant hormone was protective (OR=0.49 and 0.69). DSHw at 8.5 Gy/week and 12 Gy/week were risk factors, with additional risk for patients who use cardiovascular drugs and anti-hypercholesterolemia drugs. In the hypo-fractionated subgroup (n=209) the role of cardiovascular drugs (OR=2.16) for ΔIPSS ⩾ 10 and anti-hypercholesterolemia drugs (OR=2.80) for ΔIPSS⩾15, together with DSHw (10 Gy/week and 12.5 Gy/week, respectively), was confirmed. CONCLUSION: Current study shows a dose-surface/volume effect for acute large worsening of urinary functionality; several clinical variables largely impact the risk and especially all the factors related with vascular diseases.

Multi-variable models predicting specific patient-reported acute urinary symptoms after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Results of a cohort study.

PURPOSE: A prospective trial started in 2010, aiming at developing models for urinary toxicity and erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. This analysis is finalised at highlighting correlations between clinical/dosimetric factors and acute urinary specific symptoms, as measured by single questions of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). MATERIALS/METHODS: IPSS was prospectively collected before and at the end of radiotherapy; absolute weekly bladder dose-surface histograms (DSHw) were chosen as dosimetric descriptors. Relevant clinical factors were prospectively gathered. Backward feature selection was used to identify variables to be included in logistic models for moderate-severe (scores⩾4) urinary symptoms. RESULTS: Complete data of 262 patients (120 conventional fractionation, 142 hypofractionation) were available. Smoking was a strong predictor for feeling of incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency and straining; neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and use of antihypertensive drugs were risk factors for intermittency and weak stream, respectively. The baseline score was a major predictor for all symptoms with the exception of intermittency. DSHw were correlated to increased risk of frequency, intermittency, urgency and nocturia. Most models showed moderate-high discrimination (AUC≈0.60-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking and other clinical and dosimetric factors predict for specific moderate-severe acute urinary symptoms; baseline condition heavily modulated the risk in most endpoints.

Relationships between bladder dose-volume/surface histograms and acute urinary toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DUE01 is an observational study aimed at developing predictive models of genito-urinary toxicity of patients treated for prostate cancer with conventional (1.8-2Gy/fr, CONV) or moderate hypo-fractionation (2.35-2.7Gy/fr, HYPO). The current analysis focused on the relationship between bladder DVH/DSH and the risk of International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)⩾15/20 at the end of radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Planning and relevant clinical parameters were prospectively collected, including DVH/DSH, LQ-corrected (DVHc/DSHc) and weekly (DVHw/DSHw) histograms. Best parameters were selected by the differences between patients with/without IPSS⩾15/20 at the end of radiotherapy. Logistic uni- and backward multi-variable (MVA) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Data of 247 patients were available (CONV: 116, HYPO: 131). Absolute DVHw/DSHw and DVHc/DSHc predicted the risk of IPSS⩾15 at the end of radiotherapy (n=77/247); an MVA model including baseline IPSS, anti-hypertensive, T stage, the absolute surface receiving ⩾8.5Gy/week and ⩾12.5Gy/week was developed (AUC=0.78, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83). Similar AUC values were found if replacing DSHw with DVHw/DVHc/DSHc parameters. The impact of dose-volume/surface parameters remained when excluding patients with baseline IPSS⩾15 and in HYPO. IPSS⩾20 at the end of radiotherapy (n=27/247) was mainly correlated to baseline IPSS and T stage. CONCLUSIONS: Although the baseline IPSS was the main predictor, constraining v8.5w<56cc and v12.5w<5cc may significantly reduce acute GU toxicity.

Impact of the radiotherapy technique on the correlation between dose-volume histograms of the bladder wall defined on MRI imaging and dose-volume/surface histograms in prostate cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the 'true' absolute and relative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the bladder wall, dose-wall histogram (DWH) defined on MRI imaging and other surrogates of bladder dosimetry in prostate cancer patients, planned both with 3D-conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. For 17 prostate cancer patients, previously treated with radical intent, CT and MRI scans were acquired and matched. The contours of bladder walls were drawn by using MRI images. External bladder surfaces were then used to generate artificial bladder walls by performing automatic contractions of 5, 7 and 10 mm. For each patient a 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and an IMRT treatment plan was generated with a prescription dose of 77.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fr) and DVH of the whole bladder of the artificial walls (DVH-5/10) and dose-surface histograms (DSHs) were calculated and compared against the DWH in absolute and relative value, for both treatment planning techniques. A specific software (VODCA v. 4.4.0, MSS Inc.) was used for calculating the dose-volume/surface histogram. Correlation was quantified for selected dose-volume/surface parameters by the Spearman correlation coefficient. The agreement between %DWH and DVH5, DVH7 and DVH10 was found to be very good (maximum average deviations below 2%, SD < 5%): DVH5 showed the best agreement. The correlation was slightly better for absolute (R = 0.80-0.94) compared to relative (R = 0.66-0.92) histograms. The DSH was also found to be highly correlated with the DWH, although slightly higher deviations were generally found. The DVH was not a good surrogate of the DWH (R < 0.7 for most of parameters). When comparing the two treatment techniques, more pronounced differences between relative histograms were seen for IMRT with respect to 3DCRT (p < 0.0001).

Correlation between surrogates of bladder dosimetry and dose-volume histograms of the bladder wall defined on MRI in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

The correlation between bladder dose-wall-histogram (DWH) and dose-volume-histogram (DVH), dose-surface-histogram (DSH), and DVH-5/10 was investigated in a group of 28 patients; bladder walls were drawn on T2-MRI. DVH showed the poorest correlation with DWH; DSH or DVH-5/10 should be preferred in planning; absolute DVH may be used for radical patients, although less robust.

Contouring variability of the penile bulb on CT images: quantitative assessment using a generalized concordance index.

PURPOSE: Within a multicenter study (DUE-01) focused on the search of predictors of erectile dysfunction and urinary toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer, a dummy run exercise on penile bulb (PB) contouring on computed tomography (CT) images was carried out. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess interobserver contouring variability by the application of the generalized DICE index. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen physicians from different Institutes drew the PB on CT images of 10 patients. The spread of DICE values was used to objectively select those observers who significantly disagreed with the others. The analyses were performed with a dedicated module in the VODCA software package. RESULTS: DICE values were found to significantly change among observers and patients. The mean DICE value was 0.67, ranging between 0.43 and 0.80. The statistics of DICE coefficients identified 4 of 15 observers who systematically showed a value below the average (p value range, 0.013 - 0.059): Mean DICE values were 0.62 for the 4 "bad" observers compared to 0.69 of the 11 "good" observers. For all bad observers, the main cause of the disagreement was identified. Average DICE values were significantly worse from the average in 2 of 10 patients (0.60 vs. 0.70, p < 0.05) because of the limited visibility of the PB. Excluding the bad observers and the "bad" patients," the mean DICE value increased from 0.67 to 0.70; interobserver variability, expressed in terms of standard deviation of DICE spread, was also reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained values of DICE around 0.7 shows an acceptable agreement, considered the small dimension of the PB. Additional strategies to improve this agreement are under consideration and include an additional tutorial of the so-called bad observers with a recontouring procedure, or the recontouring by a single observer of the PB for all patients included in the DUE-01 study.