Feasibility of a Hospital-at-Home Program for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

The Hospital at Home (HaH) model has been positioned as an appropriate therapeutic strategy for selected patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This care model provides hospital-equivalent care, in terms of both quality and quantity, with medical and nursing staff that go to the patient's home. Here we describe our experience with a full HaH model for patients undergoing ASCT during the phase of aplasia. The patients met the eligibility criteria between January 1997 and December 2019 and were discharged from the hospital and admitted into the HaH-ASCT program on the same day they in which hematopoietic stem cells were infused. A total of 84 patients were included. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 16 to 74 years), and the median duration of participation in the HaH program was 17 days (range, 3 to 86 days). Only 10 of these patients (12%) required hospital readmission to the hematology department, 9 of them due to sepsis and 1 because of family care support claudication. Seventy-two patients (86%) experienced an episode of neutropenic fever during the HAH admission, with a median duration of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1 to 11 days); all were treated with empiric i.v. antimicrobial therapy. Most patients (88%) presented with mucositis (44% with grade 3-4). Parenteral nutrition was administered in 26% of patients for a median of 6 days (IQR, 1 to 12 days). Most patients (94%) required at least 1 blood product transfusion at home. There was no transplantation-related mortality during the HaH-ASCT program or in the patients who were readmitted. With careful selection of patients and a comprehensive and well- experienced multidisciplinary team (doctors, nurses, and auxiliary nurses) in the HaH department and in close collaboration with the hematology department, complete at-home management of ASCT recipients immediately after transplantation is possible. This allows patients undergoing an aggressive procedure such as ASCT to remain in their own familiar environment, providing a better quality of life with a program that has demonstrated to be effective and safe, with a low incidence of complications and no associated mortality.

Risk models for predicting in-hospital mortality from COVID-19 pneumonia in the elderly. / Modelos de riesgo para la predicción de mortalidad hospitalaria en ancianos con neumonía por COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the prognostic value of 3 severity scales: the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), the CURB-65 pneumonia severity score, and the Severity Community-Acquired Pneumonia (SCAP) score. To build a new predictive model for in-hospital mortality in patients over the age of 75 years admitted with pneumonia due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients older than 75 years admitted from the emergency department for COVID-19 pneumonia between March 12 and April 27, 2020. We recorded demographic (age, sex, living in a care facility or not), clinical (symptoms, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), and analytical (serum biochemistry, blood gases, blood count, and coagulation factors) variables. A risk model was constructed, and the ability of the 3 scales to predict all-cause in-hospital mortality was compared. RESULTS: We included 186 patients with a median age of 85 years (interquartile range, 80-89 years); 44.1% were men. Mortality was 47.3%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were as follows for each tool: PSI, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64-0.82); CURB-65 score, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79); and SCAP score, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.81). Risk factors included in the model were the presence or absence of symptoms (cough, dyspnea), the CCI, and analytical findings (aspartate aminotransferase, potassium, urea, and lactate dehydrogenase. The AUC for the model was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.88). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the predictive power of the PSI for mortality is moderate and perceptibly higher than the CURB-65 and SCAP scores. We propose a new predictive model for mortality that offers significantly better performance than any of the 3 scales compared. However, our model must undergo external validation.

OBJETIVO: Los objetivos son comparar la utilidad pronóstica de tres escalas de gravedad (Pneumonia Severity Index: PSI; CURB-65 scale; Severity Community Acquired Pneumonia Score: SCAP) y diseñar un nuevo modelo predictivo de mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes mayores de 75 años ingresados por neumonía por COVID-19. METODO: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes mayores de 75 años ingresados por neumonía por COVID-19 desde el servicio de urgencias entre el 12 de marzo y el 27 de abril de 2020. Se recogieron variables demográficas (edad, sexo, institucionalización), clínicas (síntomas, comorbilidades, índice de Charlson) y analíticas (bioquímica en suero, gasometría, hematimetría, hemostasia). Se derivó un modelo de riesgo y se compararon las escalas de gravedad PSI, CURB-65 y SCAP para predecir la mortalidad intrahospitalaria por cualquier causa. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 186 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 85 años (RIC 80-89), un 44,1% varones. La mortalidad fue del 47,3%. Las escalas PSI, CURB-65 y SCAP tuvieron un área bajo la curva (ABC) de 0,74 (IC 95% 0,64-0,82), 0,71 (IC 95% 0,62-0,79) y 0,72 (IC 95% 0,63-0,81), respectivamente. El modelo predictivo compuesto por la ausencia o presencia de síntomas (tos y disnea), comorbilidad (índice de Charlson) y datos analíticos (aspartato- aminotransferasa, potasio, urea y lactato-deshidrogenasa) tuvo un ABC de 0,81 (IC 95% 0,73-0,88). CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio muestra que la escala PSI tiene una capacidad predictiva de mortalidad moderada, notablemente mejor que las escalas CURB-65 y SCAP. Se propone un nuevo modelo predictivo de mortalidad que mejora significativamente el rendimiento de estas escalas, siendo necesario verificar su validez externa.

Modelos de riesgo para la predicción de mortalidad hospitalaria en ancianos con neumonía por COVID-19 / Mortality risk model for patients with suspected COVID-19 based on information available from an emergency dispatch center

Objetivo. Los objetivos son comparar la utilidad pronóstica de tres escalas de gravedad (Pneumonia Severity Index: PSI; CURB-65 scale; Severity Community Acquired Pneumonia Score: SCAP) y diseñar un nuevo modelo predictivo de mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes mayores de 75 años ingresados por neumonía por COVID-19. Método. Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes mayores de 75 años ingresados por neumonía por COVID-19 desde el servicio de urgencias entre el 12 de marzo y el 27 de abril de 2020. Se recogieron variables demográficas (edad, sexo, institucionalización), clínicas (síntomas, comorbilidades, índice de Charlson) y analíticas (bioquímica en suero, gasometría, hematimetría, hemostasia). Se derivó un modelo de riesgo y se compararon las escalas de gravedad PSI, CURB-65 y SCAP para predecir la mortalidad intrahospitalaria por cualquier causa. Resultados. Se incluyeron 186 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 85 años (RIC 80-89), un 44,1% varones. La mortalidad fue del 47,3%. Las escalas PSI, CURB-65 y SCAP tuvieron un área bajo la curva (ABC) de 0,74 (IC 95% 0,64-0,82), 0,71 (IC 95% 0,62-0,79) y 0,72 (IC 95% 0,63-0,81), respectivamente. El modelo predictivo compuesto por la ausencia o presencia de síntomas (tos y disnea), comorbilidad (índice de Charlson) y datos analíticos (aspartato-aminotransferasa, potasio, urea y lactato-deshidrogenasa) tuvo un ABC de 0,81 (IC 95% 0,73-0,88). Conclusión. Este estudio muestra que la escala PSI tiene una capacidad predictiva de mortalidad moderada, notablemente mejor que las escalas CURB-65 y SCAP. Se propone un nuevo modelo predictivo de mortalidad que mejora significativamente el rendimiento de estas escalas, siendo necesario verificar su validez externa. (AU)

Objectives: To compare the prognostic value of 3 severity scales: the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), the CURB-65 pneumonia severity score, and the Severity Community-Acquired Pneumonia (SCAP) score. To build a new predictive model for in-hospital mortality in patients over the age of 75 years admitted with pneumonia due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Material and methods: Retrospective study of patients older than 75 years admitted from the emergency department for COVID-19 pneumonia between March 12 and April 27, 2020. We recorded demographic (age, sex, living in a care facility or not), clinical (symptoms, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), and analytical (serum biochemistry, blood gases, blood count, and coagulation factors) variables. A risk model was constructed, and the ability of the 3 scales to predict all-cause in-hospital mortality was compared. Results: We included 186 patients with a median age of 85 years (interquartile range, 80-89 years); 44.1% were men. Mortality was 47.3%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were as follows for each tool: PSI, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64-0.82); CURB-65 score, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79); and SCAP score, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.81). Risk factors included in the model were the presence or absence of symptoms (cough, dyspnea), the CCI, and analytical findings (aspartate aminotransferase, potassium, urea, and lactate dehydrogenase. The AUC for the model was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.88). Conclusion: This study shows that the predictive power of the PSI for mortality is moderate and perceptibly higher than the CURB-65 and SCAP scores. We propose a new predictive model for mortality that offers significantly better performance than any of the 3 scales compared. However, our model must undergo external validation. (AU)