[From comprehensive geriatric assessment to an integrated multidimensional assessment system : interRAI tools and their applications]. / De l'évaluation gériatrique standardisée à un système intégré d'évaluation multidimensionnelle : les outils interRAI et leurs applications.

The multidimensional assessment carried out with interRAI tools constitutes an operationalization of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and is adapted to the specificities of each place of care. From a single assessment, the interRAI approach makes it possible to conduct a multidimensional assessment of functional autonomy and to produce a series of indicators (health, areas of intervention, quality of care and consumption of resources). It helps to identify clinical needs to be the subject of a personalized care plan and the strengths and weaknesses of health organizations to modify the professional practices. Compared to standardized geriatric assessment, interRAI tools consider the person's expectations and resources, offer a universal common language, produce a multidimensional synthesis and facilitate the construction of an integrated information system. The basis for their development is scientificity based on evidence.

Thirty-day hospital readmission predictors in older patients receiving hospital-at-home: a 3-year retrospective study in France.

OBJECTIVE: This study described older patients receiving hospitalisation-at-home (HaH) services and identified factors associated with 30-day hospital readmission. DESIGN: 3-year retrospective study in 2017-2019 in France. PARTICIPANTS: 75 108 patients aged 75 years and older who were discharged from hospital medical wards (internal medicine and geriatric units) and admitted to HaH. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: 30-day hospital readmission. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 83.4 years (SD 5.7), 52.3% were male and 88.4% lived in a private household. Patients were primarily discharged from the internal medicine unit (85.3%). The top four areas of care in the HaH were palliative care, complex dressing, intravenous therapy and complex nursing care. Overall, 23.5% of patients died during their HaH stay and 27.8% were readmitted to the hospital at 30 days. In the multivariate model, male (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.23), supportive cancer HaH care (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.11) and very high intensity care during the previous in-person hospitalisation (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.57) increased the risk of hospital readmission at 30 days. Older age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.98), living in a nursing home (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.54), postsurgery HaH care (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.58) and having been previously hospitalised in a geriatric unit (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.85) decreased the risk of hospital readmission at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: HaH provides complex care to very old patients, which is associated with high mortality. Several factors are associated with rehospitalisation within 30 days that could be avoided with better integration of different services with higher geriatric skills. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CNIL:2228861.

The Implementation of Integrated Health Information Systems - Research Studies from 7 Countries Involving the InterRAI Assessment System.

Introduction: In the past years, governments from several countries have shown interest in implementing integrated health information systems. The interRAI Suite of instruments fits this concept, as it is a set of standardised, evidence-based assessments, which have been validated for different care settings. The system allows the electronic transfer of information across care settings, enabling integration of care and providing support for care planning and quality monitoring. The main purpose of this research is to describe the recent implementation process of the interRAI instruments in seven countries: Belgium, Switzerland, France, Ireland, Iceland, Finland and New Zealand. Methods: The study applied a case study methodology with the focus on the implementation strategies in each country. Principal investigators gathered relevant information from multiple sources and summarised it according to specific aspects of the implementation process, comparing them across countries. The main implementation aspects are described, as well as the main advantages and barriers perceived by the users. Results: The seven case studies showed that adequate staffing, appropriate information technology, availability of hardware, professional collaboration and continuous training are perceived as important factors which can contribute to the implementation of the interRAI instruments. In addition, the use of electronic standardised assessment instruments such as the interRAI Suite provided evidence to improve decision-making and quality of care, enabling resource planning and benchmarking. Conclusion: In practice, the implementation of health information systems is a process that requires a cultural shift of policymakers and professional caregivers at all levels of health policy and service delivery. Information about the implementation process of the interRAI Suite in different countries can help investigators and policymakers to better plan this implementation. This research sheds light on the advantages and pitfalls of the implementation of the interRAI Suite of instruments and proposes approaches to overcome difficulties.

Implementation of a Standardized Comprehensive Assessment Tool in France: A Case Using the InterRAI Instruments.

BACKGROUND: The improvement of quality of care requires a standardized and comprehensive assessment tool but implementation is challenging. PURPOSE: We have reported on the development of the interRAI instruments in France from the onset to the mandatory use at the national level. We also have identified in the literature and in practices, incentives and barriers for the implementation of this integrated clinical information system in long term care. RESULTS: Three periods in the interRAI instruments development were identified over the last twenty years. The first one was a research approach about improving quality of long term care. The second one was an experimental clinical use into an integrated care model with case management. The third one was a call for tenders issued by a French national agency, and the choice to use the interRAI-HC (Home Care) for all case managers. The main incentives and barriers that were identified include the national context, the target population, the providers involved and the impact on their practice, the interRAI instrument characteristics, training and leadership. CONCLUSION: This historical overview of the development of interRAI instruments in France gives health care organizations pertinent information to guide the implementation of a standardized and comprehensive assessment tool.