Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Continuous Outcomes for the use of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the statistical fragility of randomized controlled trials that assess the use of platelet rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and report a continuous primary outcome measure with statistical significance. METHODS: A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database was performed on July 26, 2023. All randomized controlled trials addressing the use of PRP for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were included that reported statistically significant primary continuous outcomes. The continuous fragility index (CFI) and continuous fragility quotient (CFQ) was calculated using approximative method as previously described using the mean and standard deviation of the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: There was a total of 34 eligible outcomes for analysis. The overall median CFI across all included studies was 5.7 (IQR, 4.8 - 9.9). The overall median CFQ across all included studies was 0.131 (IQR, 0.055 - 0.243). Loss to follow-up was greater than the CFI in only 3 of 34 eligible outcomes (8.8%). The most analyzed outcome was the WOMAC total score (n=9) with a median CFI of 6.6 and median CFQ of 0.250. The outcome with the highest median CFI was the WOMAC stiffness subscale at 93. Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated a non-statistically significant trend towards decreasing CFI (-0.497) and a statistically significant decrease in CFQ (-0.681, p = 0.03) with increasing grades of osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: The was an overall median CFI of 5.7 and CFQ of 0.131 for RCTs that report statistically significant continuous outcomes for the use of PRP for symptomatic knee OA. Although there are no current guidelines regarding statistical fragility of continuous outcomes, these results can be considered fragile given statistical significance may be reversed with only a few changes in patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2; systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Patellar Tendon Autograft Fixation at 0° Versus 30° Results in Improved Activity Scores and a Greater Proportion of Patients Achieving the Minimal Clinical Important Difference For Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to determine the effect of the knee flexion angle (KFA) during tibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixation on patient-reported outcomes, graft stability, extension loss, and reoperation after anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. METHODS: All 169 included patients (mean age 28.5 years, 65% male) were treated with anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft and were randomized to tibial fixation of the ACL graft at either 0° (n = 85) or 30° (n = 84). The primary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) 2 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the Marx Activity Scale (MAS), the rate of reoperation, and physical examination findings at 1 year, including KT-1000 and side-to-side differences in knee extension. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 82% (n = 139) for the primary outcome. Graft failure rate at 2 years was 1% (n = 2, 1 per group). ACL tibial graft fixation at 0° or 30° did not have a significant effect on KOOS scores at 2 years after ACLR. Patients whose graft was fixed at a knee flexion angle of 0° had greater scores on the MAS (mean 9.6 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5 to 10.6, versus 8.0, 95% CI 6.9 to 9.1; P = .04), and a greater proportion achieved the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for the KOOS pain subdomain (94% versus 81%; P = .04). There was no significant difference in knee extension loss, KT-1000 measurements, or reoperation between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In the setting of anatomic single-bundle ACLR using patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial portal femoral drilling, there was no difference in KOOS scores between patients fixed at 0° and 30°. Patient fixed in full extension did demonstrate higher activity scores at 2 years after surgery and a greater likelihood of achieving the MCID for KOOS pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective randomized trial.

Is There a Disadvantage to Early Physical Therapy After Multiligament Surgery for Knee Dislocation? A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Multiligament knee injuries, though rare, can be profoundly disabling. Surgeons disagree about when to initiate rehabilitation after surgical reconstruction due to the conflicting priorities of postoperative stability and motion. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does early or late initiation of physical therapy after multiligament knee surgery result in fewer postoperative manipulations? (2) Does early versus late physical therapy compromise stability postoperatively? (3) Does early initiation of physical therapy result in improved patient-reported outcomes, as measured by the Multi-ligament Quality of Life (ML-QOL) score? METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, 36 adults undergoing multiligament repair or reconstruction were prospectively enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and randomized 1:1 to either early rehabilitation or late rehabilitation after surgery. Eligibility included those with an injury to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and at least one other ligament, as well as the ability to participate in early rehabilitation. Patients who were obtunded or unable to adhere to the protocols for other reasons were excluded. Early rehabilitation consisted of initiating a standardized physical therapy protocol on postoperative day 1 involving removal of the extension splint for quadriceps activation and ROM exercises. Late rehabilitation consisted of full-time immobilization in an extension splint for 3 weeks. Following this 3-week period, both groups engaged in the same standardized physical therapy protocol. All surgical reconstructions were performed at a single center by one of two fellowship-trained sports orthopaedic surgeons, and all involved allograft Achilles tendon PCL reconstruction. When possible, hamstring autograft was used for ACL and medial collateral ligament reconstructions, whereas lateral collateral ligament and posterolateral reconstruction was performed primarily with allograft. The primary outcome was the number of patients undergoing manipulation during the first 6 months. Additional outcomes added after trial registration were patient-reported quality of life scores (ML-QOL) at 1 year and an objective assessment of laxity through a physical examination and stress radiographs at 1 year. One patient from each group was not assessed for laxity or ROM at 1 year, and one patient from each group did not complete the ML-QOL questionnaires. No patient crossover was observed. RESULTS: With the numbers available, there was no difference in the use of knee manipulation during the first 6 months between the rehabilitation groups: 1 of 18 patients in the early group and 4 of 18 patients in the late group (p = 0.34). Similarly, there were no differences in knee ROM, stability, or patient-reported quality of life (ML-QOL) between the groups at 1 year. CONCLUSION: With the numbers available in this study, we were unable to demonstrate a difference between early and late knee rehabilitation with regard to knee stiffness, laxity, or patient-reported quality of life outcomes. The results of this small, randomized pilot study suggest a potential role for early rehabilitation after multiligament reconstruction for knee dislocation, which should be further explored in larger multi-institutional studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.

Editorial Commentary: Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: Doc, You Gotta Help Me!

Injections for the pain caused by knee osteoarthritis have been the focus of significant research for the last few decades. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can provide up to 12 months of pain relief in these patients, superior to both cortisone and hyaluronic acid. There is also some evidence for a synergistic effect when combining both PRP and hyaluronic acid. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has significantly greater levels of interleukin-1ra than PRP, as well as a small concentration of mesenchymal stromal cells. However, BMAC is yet unproven in its efficacy, and obtaining BMAC is not as simple as taking blood. Research into the use of expanded autologous and allogenic mesenchymal stem cells continues and shows future promise. For today, PRP remains the gold standard for the treatment of pain associated with knee osteoarthritis.

Editorial Commentary: Patients Who Achieve a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (Feel Better) Early After Hip Arthroscopy Have the Highest Rates of Long-Term Satisfaction.

Analyzing patient-reported outcomes using the lens of the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state allows surgeons to assess patient recovery at the individual level and make necessary changes to management if necessary. When patients with femoroacetabular impingement achieve MCID 6 months after arthroscopic treatment, they achieve patient acceptable symptomatic state 2 years postoperatively 88% of the time. The findings highlight the importance of the postoperative recovery trajectory and illustrate a quantitative way to study the progress of individual patients along their care journey.

A Comparison of Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft and Hamstring Tendon Autograft for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis.

OBJECTIVE: There is growing enthusiasm for the increased use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this analysis was to synthesize and quantitatively assess the available evidence comparing QT autograft with hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts, regarding functional outcomes, knee stability, anterior knee pain, and revision rates. DATA SOURCES: A search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for eligible studies up to May 2018 was conducted. Two reviewers selected studies based on inclusion criteria and assessed methodological quality. Outcomes analyzed were anterior knee pain, graft failure rates, knee stability, functional outcomes, and adverse events. Pooled analyses were performed for continuous and dichotomous variables where appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: Ten studies (1 randomized trial and 9 nonrandomized cohorts) met our inclusion criteria, which included 1398 patients. The analysis showed no statistical difference in anterior knee pain when comparing QT and HT autografts, but a significant difference between QT and BPTB autografts [odds ratio, 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.27); P < 0.001]. There were no differences between all 3 autografts in revision rates, knee stability, and patient-reported functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Quadriceps tendon autograft is a suitable graft alternative for primary ACLR, as it achieves good clinical outcomes with a low incidence of anterior knee pain. Given the limited quality of the included studies, there is a need for a well-designed multicenter randomized control trial comparing QT autograft with other primary ACL autografts to confirm our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV systematic review.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Meta-analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome treated with hip arthroscopy versus those treated with physical therapy alone. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 15, 2019. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared operative versus nonoperative treatment in the management of FAI for a minimum 6-month follow-up period were included. The primary outcome was the International Hip Outcome Tool 33. The CLEAR NPT (Checklist to Evaluate a Report of a Nonpharmacological Trial) was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of included studies. RESULTS: Three RCTs (Level I) were included with a total of 650 patients (323 randomized to surgery and 327 randomized to physical therapy), follow-rate of 90% (583 patients, 295 operative and 288 nonoperative), and average of 11.5 months' follow-up. Regarding participation, 222 of 350 patients (63%) in the FAIT (Femoroacetabular Impingement Trial) study, 348 of 648 (54%) in the FASHIoN (Full UK RCT of Arthroscopic Surgery for Hip Impingement Versus Best Conservative Care) study, and 80 of 104 (77%) in the study by Mansell et al. agreed to participate. The mean age was 35 years, and 51.5% of patients were male patients. All 3 RCTs represented high methodologic quality and a low risk of bias. The frequency-weighted mean follow-up period was 10 months. A meta-analysis of the 3 randomized trials showed that patients treated with operative management had improved preoperative-to-postoperative change scores on the International Hip Outcome Tool 33 compared with the nonoperative group (standardized mean difference, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-6.86; P < .05). One study reported on the achievement of clinically relevant outcomes at the individual level, with 51% of the operative group and 32% of the nonoperative group achieving the minimal clinically important difference and with 48% and 19%, respectively, achieving the patient acceptable symptomatic state for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that patients with FAI syndrome treated with hip arthroscopy have statistically superior hip-related outcomes in the short term compared with those treated with physical therapy alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, meta-analysis of Level I RCTs.

Development of a certification examination for orthopedic sports medicine fellows

Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a multifaceted examination to assess the competence of fellows following completion of a sports medicine fellowship. Methods: Orthopedic sports medicine fellows over 2 academic years were invited to participate in the study. Clinical skills were evaluated with objective structured clinical examinations, multiple-choice question examinations, an in-training evaluation report and a surgical logbook. Fellows' performance of 3 technical procedures was assessed both intraoperatively and on cadavers: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and arthroscopic shoulder Bankart repair. Technical procedural skills were assessed using previously validated task-specific checklists and the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) global rating scale. Results: Over 2 years, 12 fellows were assessed. The Cronbach α for the technical assessments was greater than 0.8, and the interrater reliability for the cadaveric assessments was greater than 0.78, indicating satisfactory reliability. When assessed in the operating room, all fellows were determined to have achieved a minimal level of competence in the 3 surgical procedures, with the exception of 1 fellow who was not able achieve competence in ACLR. When their performance on cadaveric specimens was assessed, 2 of 12 (17%) fellows were not able to demonstrate a minimal level of competence in ACLR, 2 of 10 (20%) were not able to demonstrate a minimal level of competence for RCR and 3 of 10 (30%) were not able to demonstrate a minimal level of competence for Bankart repair. Conclusion: There was a disparity between fellows' performance in the operating room and their performance in the high-fidelity cadaveric setting, suggesting that technical performance in the operating room may not be the most appropriate measure for assessment of fellows' competence.

Contexte: Le but de cette étude était de concevoir un examen à plusieurs volets pour évaluer la compétence des moniteurs cliniques à la fin de leur formation en médecine sportive. Méthodes: Après leur formation de 2 ans pour devenir orthopédistes en médecine sportive, les moniteurs cliniques ont été invités à participer à l'étude. Leurs habiletés cliniques ont été évaluées au moyen d'examens cliniques objectifs structurés, de questionnaires à choix multiple, d'un rapport d'évaluation en cours de formation et d'un journal de bord chirurgical. Leur habileté à réaliser 3 techniques chirurgicales différentes a été évaluée au bloc opératoire et sur des cadavres : reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur (RLCA), réparation arthroscopique de la coiffe des rotateurs (RACR) et intervention de Bankart sous endoscopie pour l'épaule. Les habiletés techniques ont été évaluées au moyen de listes de vérification spécifiques aux tâches validées et au moyen de l'outil d'évaluation globale ASSET (Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation). Résultats: Sur une période de 2 ans, 12 moniteurs ont été évalués. Le coefficient α de Cronbach pour les évaluations techniques a été supérieur à 0,8, et la fiabilité inter-examinateurs pour l'évaluation des interventions sur des cadavres a été supérieure à 0,78, soit une fiabilité jugée satisfaisante. Lors de l'évaluation au bloc opératoire, on a jugé que tous les moniteurs détenaient le niveau minimum de compétences pour exécuter les 3 techniques chirurgicales, à l'exception d'un seul qui n'a pas atteint le niveau de compétence pour la RLCA. À l'évaluation de leurs compétences pour les interventions sur des cadavres, 2 sur 12 (17 %) n'ont pas atteint le niveau minimum de compétence pour la RLCA, 2 sur 10 (20 %) pour la RACR et 3 sur 10 (30 %) pour l'intervention de Bankart. Conclusion: On a noté une disparité dans la compétence des moniteurs entre le bloc opératoire et le contexte cadavérique haute fidélité, ce qui donne à penser que le rendement technique au bloc opératoire pourrait ne pas être le moyen le plus approprié d'évaluer la compétence des moniteurs cliniques.

Autologous Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Blood-Derived Products for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the available clinical data regarding the use of autologous IL-1 receptor antagonist blood products (AILBPs) and their validity as an alternative intra-articular (IA) therapy for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and noncomparative studies that evaluated the clinical efficacy of AILBPs (i.e., autologous protein solution and autologous conditioned serum) for knee OA were included. The primary outcome measure was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. The secondary outcomes measured were the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale score, Short Form 36 (SF-36) score, radiographic scores, and adverse events, which were qualitatively analyzed. RESULTS: We included 8 studies, comprising 3 RCTs (Level II) and 5 noncomparative studies (Level IV), with a total of 592 patients (mean age, 56.4 years; 49.7% male patients). The RCTs represented high methodologic quality, whereas the noncomparative studies represented moderate to good quality. With AILBPs, 2 of 4 studies (50%) showed improvements in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptom and sport subscales, 5 of 7 studies (71%) achieved improvements in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and 4 of 5 studies (80%) attained improvements in the visual analog scale pain score from baseline to final follow-up. Most adverse events associated with AILBPs were mild to moderate in severity and were primarily localized to the injection site. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence substantiates that AILBPs are a safe and tolerable IA injection therapy that may improve pain parameters and functionality for mild to moderate knee OA patients and may be an effective adjunct for those unresponsive to traditional IA therapies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II through IV studies.

Bone marrow stimulation decreases retear rates after primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the optimization of biomechanical and patient factors in the setting of rotator cuff repair (RCR), postoperative retear rates remain high in many series reported in the literature. Preclinical studies have suggested bone marrow stimulation (BMS) at the rotator cuff footprint may reduce the rate of retear after RCR. The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical evidence investigating the effect of arthroscopic RCR, with and without BMS, on rotator cuff healing and functional outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through December 2017. Two reviewers selected studies based on the inclusion criteria and assessed methodologic quality. Pooled analyses were performed for continuous and binomial variables where appropriate. RESULTS: Four studies (365 patients), including 2 Level I randomized controlled trials and 2 Level III retrospective comparative cohort studies were included. There was no statistical difference in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale score, or the Constant score between the BMS and conventional repair groups. The pooled retear rates were 18.4% (28 of 152) and 31.8% (56 of 176) for patients treated with and without BMS, respectively. The pooled analysis of rotator cuff retear rates from the 4 studies (328 patients) showed a statistically significant difference favoring BMS over conventional repair (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.73; P = .002; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: BMS reduces the retear rate after RCR but shows no difference in functional outcomes compared with conventional repair. This study provides evidence for the use of BMS as a potential cost-effective biological approach toward improving rotator cuff healing.

Imaging of the Postoperative Condition of Posterolateral Corner Injuries.

Posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee are often sustained in combination with anterior or posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A variety of surgical techniques including acute repair, nonanatomical reconstructions, and anatomical reconstructions have been used to treat grade III PLC injuries. Scant literature is available on postoperative imaging of the PLC. This article reviews the more commonly used surgical techniques and the postoperative imaging assessment of the PLC of the knee.

Does Platelet-Rich Plasma Lead to Earlier Return to Sport When Compared With Conservative Treatment in Acute Muscle Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the time to return to sport and reinjury rate after platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection versus control therapy (i.e., physiotherapy or placebo injection) in patients with acute grade I or II muscle strains. METHODS: All eligible studies comparing PRP against a control in the treatment of acute (≤7 days) grade I or II muscle strains were identified. The primary outcome was time to return to play. The secondary outcome was the rate of reinjury at a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. Subgroup analysis was performed to examine the efficacy of PRP in hamstring muscle strains alone. The checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacologic trial (CLEAR-NPT) was used to assess the quality of studies. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials including a total of 268 patients with grade I and II acute muscle injuries were eligible for review. The pooled results revealed a significantly earlier return to sport for the PRP group when compared with the control group (mean difference, -5.57 days [95% confidence interval, -9.57 to -1.58]; P = .006). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in time to return to sport when comparing PRP and control therapy in grade I and II hamstring muscle strains alone (P = .19). No significant difference was noted in the rate of reinjury between the 2 groups (P = .50) at a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from the current literature, although limited, suggests that the use of PRP may result in an earlier return to sport among patients with acute grade I or II muscle strains without significantly increasing the risk of reinjury at 6 months of follow-up. However, no difference in time to return to sport was revealed when specifically evaluating those with a grade I or II hamstring muscle strain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, meta-analysis of level I and II studies.

Reliability and Validity of the Arthroscopic International Cartilage Repair Society Classification System: Correlation With Histological Assessment of Depth.

PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver reliability of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system of chondral lesions in cadavers, to determine the intraobserver reliability of the ICRS grading system comparing arthroscopy and video assessment, and to compare the arthroscopic ICRS grading system with histological grading of lesion depth. METHODS: Eighteen lesions in 5 cadaveric knee specimens were arthroscopically graded by 7 fellowship-trained arthroscopic surgeons using the ICRS classification system. The arthroscopic video of each lesion was sent to the surgeons 6 weeks later for repeat grading and determination of intraobserver reliability. Lesions were biopsied, and the depth of the cartilage lesion was assessed. Reliability was calculated using intraclass correlations. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.89) for the arthroscopic grading, and the intraobserver reliability with the video grading was 0.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.9). A high correlation was seen between the arthroscopic grading of depth and the histological grading of depth (0.91); on average, surgeons graded lesions using arthroscopy a mean of 0.37 (range, 0-0.86) deeper than the histological grade. CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic ICRS classification system has good interobserver and intraobserver reliability. A high correlation with histological assessment of depth provides evidence of validity for this classification system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As cartilage lesions are treated on the basis of the arthroscopic ICRS classification, it is important to ascertain the reliability and validity of this method.

Performance Assessment of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Labral Repair in a Dry Shoulder Simulator.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of dry models to assess performance of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and labral repair (LR). METHODS: Residents, fellows, and sports medicine staff performed an arthroscopic RCR and LR on a dry model. Any prior RCR and LR experience was noted. Staff surgeons assessed participants by use of task-specific checklists, the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET), and a final overall global rating. All procedures were video recorded and were scored by a fellow blinded to the year of training of each participant. RESULTS: A total of 51 participants and 46 participants performed arthroscopic RCR and LR, respectively, on dry models. The internal consistency or reliability (Cronbach α) using the total ASSET score for the RCR and LR was high (>0.9). One-way analysis of variance for the total ASSET score showed a difference between participants based on year of training (P < .001) for both procedures. The inter-rater reliability for the ASSET score was excellent (>0.9) for both procedures. A good correlation was seen between the ASSET score and the year of training, as well as the previous number of sports rotations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show evidence of construct validity when using dry models to assess performance of arthroscopic RCR and LR by residents. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study support the use of arthroscopic simulation in the training of residents and fellows learning arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

The True Recurrence Rate and Factors Predicting Recurrent Instability After Nonsurgical Management of Traumatic Primary Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To (1) define the cumulative recurrence rate after primary anterior shoulder dislocation in Level I and II comparative studies and (2) to pool risk ratios for common risk factors to provide a clinically practical hierarchy of modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for recurrence. METHODS: Level I and II prognostic studies were identified using the electronic databases CINAHL, Embase, and MEDLINE from inception to December 2014. Included studies (n = 15) had recurrent dislocation as the main outcome, and a minimum 2-year follow-up. The cumulative odds ratio of prognostic factors was calculated where appropriate. Bias was assessed in each study using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. RESULTS: The reported rate of recurrence ranged from 19% to 88% (pooled overall = 21%; pooled Level I only = 47%). The pooled time to recurrence was 10.8 months (standard deviation 0.42). Male sex (n = 6 studies) conferred a 2.68 (1.66-4.31; P < .001) and patient age <20 years (n = 4 studies) conferred a 12.76 (5.77-28.2; P < .001; vs >20 years) increased odds of recurrence. An associated greater tuberosity fracture (n = 7 studies) decreased the odds of recurrence by 3.8 times (2.94-5.00; P < .001). The quality of evidence was moderate for age, low for sex, and very low for all other prognostic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled rate of recurrence after primary anterior shoulder instability was found to be 21% among moderate- to high-quality prognostic studies. Male sex and younger age predicted a significantly higher risk of recurrent instability (approaching 80%), whereas concurrent fracture of the greater tuberosity significantly decreased the risk of subsequent recurrent dislocation. However, considering the quality of available evidence for these predictors, there remains a clear need for further high-quality prospective studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, systematic review of Level I and II prognostic studies.

Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the hip arthroscopy literature to date has shown outcomes consistent with published patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) estimates. METHODS: All clinical investigations of hip arthroscopy using modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and/or Hip Outcome Score (HOS) outcomes with at least 1 year of follow-up were reviewed. Ninety-one studies (9,746 hips) were included for review. Eighty-one studies (9,317 hips) contained only primary hip arthroscopies and were the primary focus of this review. The remaining studies (429 hips) did not exclude patients with prior surgical history and were thus considered separately. Mean mHHS, HOS-ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and HOS-SS (Sports-Specific) scores were compared with previously published PASS and MCID values. RESULTS: After 31 ± 20 months, 5.8% of study populations required revision arthroscopy and 5.5% total hip arthroplasty. A total of 88%, 25%, and 30% of study populations met PASS for mHHS, HOS-ADL, and HOS-SS, respectively, and 97%, 90%, and 93% met MCID. On bivariate analysis, increasing age was associated with significantly worse postoperative mHHS (P < .01, R(2) = 0.14), HOS-SS (P = .05, R(2) = 0.12), and rates of reoperation (P = .02, R(2) = 0.08). Increasing body mass index was associated with significantly worse HOS-ADL (P = .02, R(2) = 0.35) and HOS-SS (P = .03, R(2) = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis of 81 studies of primary hip arthroscopy, we have found that more than 90% of study populations meet MCID standards for the most commonly used patient-reported outcomes measures in hip arthroscopy literature, mHHS and HOS. Eighty-eight percent meet PASS standards for the mHHS, but PASS standards are far more difficult to achieve for HOS-ADL (25%) and HOS-SS (30%) subscales. Differences in psychometric properties of the mHHS and HOS likely account for the discrepancies in PASS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Use of an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill After a Sports Medicine Rotation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical skill (OSATS), using dry models, would be a valid method of assessing residents' ability to perform sports medicine procedures after training in a competency-based model. METHODS: Over 18 months, 27 residents (19 junior [postgraduate year (PGY) 1-3] and 8 senior [PGY 4-5]) sat the OSATS after their rotation, in addition to 14 sports medicine staff and fellows. Each resident was provided a list of 10 procedures in which they were expected to show competence. At the end of the rotation, each resident undertook an OSATS composed of 6 stations sampled from the 10 procedures using dry models-faculty used the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET), task-specific checklists, as well as an overall 5-point global rating scale (GRS) to score each resident. Each procedure was videotaped for blinded review. RESULTS: The overall reliability of the OSATS (0.9) and the inter-rater reliability (0.9) were both high. A significant difference by year in training was seen for the overall GRS, the total ASSET score, and the total checklist score, as well as for each technical procedure (P < .001). Further analysis revealed a significant difference in the total ASSET score between junior (mean 18.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8 to 19.9) and senior residents (24.2, 95% CI 22.7 to 25.6), senior residents and fellows (30.1, 95% CI 28.2 to 31.9), as well as between fellows and faculty (37, 95% CI 36.1 to 27.8) (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that an OSATS using dry models shows evidence of validity when used to assess performance of technical procedures after a sports medicine rotation. However, junior residents were not able to perform as well as senior residents, suggesting that overall surgical experience is as important as intensive teaching. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As postgraduate medical training shifts to a competency-based model, methods of assessing performance of technical procedures become necessary.

Microfracture for chondral defects: assessment of the variability of surgical technique in cadavers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the variability of the microfracture technique when performed by experienced knee arthroscopy surgeons. METHOD: Four surgeons were each asked to perform microfracture on six preformed cartilage defects in fresh human cadaveric knees. Surgeons were instructed on penetration depth, inter-hole distance, and to place the holes perpendicular to the subchondral surface. Micro-computed tomography was used to calculate depth error, inter-hole distance error, and deviation of penetration angles from the perpendicular. RESULTS: All surgeons misjudged depth and inter-hole distance, tending to make microfracture holes too deep (depth error 1.1 mm ± 1.9) and too close together (inter-hole distance error: -0.8 mm ± 0.4). Fifty-one per cent of holes were angled more than 10° from the perpendicular (range 2.6°-19.8°). Both depth and distance errors were significantly lower in the trochlear groove than on the femoral condyle (p < 0.05). Surface shearing was associated with both penetration depth >4 mm and angles >20°. Inter-hole infraction occurred in holes closer than 2.5 mm to each other. CONCLUSION: Even experienced knee arthroscopy surgeons demonstrate inconsistency in surgical technique when performing microfracture. While further research will be required to demonstrate that these variations in surgical technique are associated with poorer clinical outcomes after microfracture, surgeons should attempt to minimizing such variations in order to prevent surface shearing and inter-hole infraction.

How to set the bar in competency-based medical education: standard setting after an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

BACKGROUND: The goal of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Competency-based Medical Education (CBME) is to establish a minimal level of competence. The purpose of this study was to 1) to determine the credibility and acceptability of the modified Angoff method of standard setting in the setting of CBME, using the Borderline Group (BG) method and the Borderline Regression (BLR) method as a reference standard; 2) to determine if it is feasible to set different standards for junior and senior residents, and 3) to determine the desired characteristics of the judges applying the modified Angoff method. METHODS: The results of a previous OSCE study (21 junior residents, 18 senior residents, and six fellows) were used. Three groups of judges performed the modified Angoff method for both junior and senior residents: 1) sports medicine surgeons, 2) non-sports medicine orthopedic surgeons, and 3) sports fellows. Judges defined a borderline resident as a resident performing at a level between competent and a novice at each station. For each checklist item, the judges answered yes or no for "will the borderline/advanced beginner examinee respond correctly to this item?" The pass mark was calculated by averaging the scores. This pass mark was compared to that created using both the BG and the BLR methods. RESULTS: A paired t-test showed that all examiner groups expected senior residents to get significantly higher percentage of checklist items correct compared to junior residents (all stations p < 0.001). There were no significant differences due to judge type. For senior residents, there were no significant differences between the cut scores determined by the modified Angoff method and the BG/BLR method. For junior residents, the cut scores determined by the modified Angoff method were lower than the cut scores determined by the BG/BLR Method (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the modified Angoff method is an acceptable method of setting different pass marks for senior and junior residents. The use of this method enables both senior and junior residents to sit the same OSCE, preferable in the regular assessment environment of CBME.

The Addition of Platelet-Rich Plasma to Scaffolds Used for Cartilage Repair: A Review of Human and Animal Studies.

PURPOSE: To review the available literature on studies focusing on platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-enhanced scaffolds for cartilage lesion repair in animals and to analyze the clinical outcomes of similar biologically augmented cartilage regeneration techniques in humans. METHODS: We conducted a literature search and subsequent review investigating the potential of PRP to enhance articular cartilage repair using scaffolds or bioengineered implants. RESULTS: Of the 14 animal model studies reviewed, 10 reported positive effects with PRP whereas only 2 showed negative overall effects. The remaining 2 studies reported no significant differences, or neutral results, with the use of PRP. With the addition of PRP, the gross appearance and histologic analysis of repair cartilage were improved or no difference was seen compared with control (11 of 12 studies that looked at this). Human studies of the knee or talar dome showed improvements in clinical assessment scores as soon as 6 months after surgery. There was great variability in the method of PRP preparation, choice of scaffold, and cell source between studies. CONCLUSIONS: PRP-augmented scaffolds have been shown to be beneficial in the articular cartilage repair process in animals and humans based on macroscopic, histologic, and biochemical analysis and based on clinical outcome scores, respectively. Comparison between studies is difficult because there is great variability in PRP preparation and administration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.