RESUMO
Remdesivir was the first antiviral approved for treating COVID-19. We investigated its patterns of use, effectiveness and safety in clinical practice in Greece. This is a retrospective observational study of hospitalized adults who received remdesivir for COVID-19 in September 2020-February 2021. The main endpoints were the time to recovery (hospital discharge within 30 days from admission) and safety. The "early" (remdesivir initiation within 24 h since hospitalization) and "deferred" (remdesivir initiation later on) groups were compared. One thousand and four patients (60.6% male, mean age 61 years, 74.3% with severe disease, 70.9% with ≥1 comorbidities) were included, and 75.9% of them were on a 5-day regimen, and 86.8% were in the early group. Among those with a baseline mild/moderate disease, the median (95% CI) time to recovery was 8 (7-9) and 12 (11-14) days for the early and deferred groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The corresponding estimates for those with a severe disease were 10 (9-10) and 13 (11-15) days, respectively (p = 0.028). After remdesivir initiation, increased serum transaminases and an acute kidney injury were observed in 6.9% and 2.1%, respectively. Nine (0.9%) patients discontinued the treatment due to adverse events. The effectiveness of remdesivir was increased when it was taken within 24 h since admission regardless of the disease severity. Remdesivir's safety profile is similar to that described in clinical trials and other real-world cohorts.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 commonly present at healthcare facilities with moderate disease, i.e., pneumonia without a need for oxygen therapy. AIM: To identify clinical/laboratory characteristics of patients with moderate COVID-19, which could predict disease progression. METHODS: 384 adult patients presented with moderate COVID-19 and admitted to two hospitals were retrospectively evaluated. In a multivariate analysis gender, age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and National Early Weaning Score 2 were treated as co-variates. The development of hypoxemic respiratory failure, intubation rate and risk of death were considered as dependent variables. Estimated values are presented as odds-ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Most of the patients were male (63.28%) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 59 (16.04) years. Median (interquartile range) CCI was 2 (1-4). A total of 58.85% of the patients developed respiratory failure; 6.51% were intubated, and 8.85% died. The extent of pneumonia in chest X-ray (involvement of all four quartiles) [OR 3.96 (1.18-13.27), p = 0.026], respiratory rate [OR 1.17 (1.05-1.3), p = 0.004], SatO2 [OR 0.72 (0.58-0.88), p = 0.002], systolic blood pressure [OR 1.02 (1-1.04), p = 0.041] and lymphocyte count [OR 0.9993 (0.9986-0.9999), p = 0.026] at presentation were associated with the development of respiratory failure. The extent of pneumonia [OR 26.49 (1.81-387.18), p = 0.017] was associated with intubation risk. Age [OR 1.14 (1.03-1.26), p = 0.014] and the extent of pneumonia [OR 22.47 (1.59-316.97), p = 0.021] were associated with increased risk of death. CONCLUSION: Older age, the extent of pneumonia, tachypnea, lower SatO2, higher systolic blood pressure and lymphopenia are associated with dismal outcomes in patients presenting with moderate COVID-19.
RESUMO
RATIONALE: Changes in anti-SARS-CoV-2 defense immune subsets in patients treated with dexamethasone (DXM) for severe COVID-19 and their relation to disease outcomes are poorly understood. METHODS: Blood-lymphocyte subsets of 110 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were prospectively examined. A first sample was taken at enrollment and a second one 7-10 days later. Total B-, T-lymphocytes, CD4+, CD8+, T-regulatory (Treg), Natural-Killer (NK) and NK T-cells were counted using flow cytometry. RESULTS: At enrollment, patients with respiratory failure, characterized by DXM failure (intubation/death) or DXM success (hospital discharge) exhibited significantly fewer CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells and B-lymphocytes compared to the control group (no respiratory failure/no DXM). At the time of treatment completion, the DXM-failure group exhibited significantly fewer CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells, memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes, compared to the control and the DXM-success groups and fewer activated CD4+ T-lymphocytes, Tregs and NK cells compared to the control group. At the time of treatment completion, the number of all investigated lymphocyte subsets increased in the DXM-success group and was similar to those of the control group. NK cells significantly decreased over time in the DXM-failure group. CONCLUSION: The lymphocyte kinetics differ between DXM-treated and control COVID-19 patients and are associated with clinical outcomes.