Mechanical Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke Patients With Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score 0-5.

Background and Purpose- If anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with ASPECTS 0-5 (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) should be treated with mechanical thrombectomy remains unclear. Purpose of this study was to report on the outcome of patients with ASPECTS 0-5 treated with mechanical thrombectomy and to provide data regarding the effect of successful reperfusion on clinical outcomes and safety measures in these patients. Methods- Multicenter, pooled analysis of 7 institutional prospective registries: Bernese-European Registry for Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated Outside Current Guidelines With Neurothrombectomy Devices Using the SOLITAIRE FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy (Clinical Trial Registration-URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03496064). Primary outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-3 at day 90 (favorable outcome). Secondary outcomes included rates of day 90 modified Rankin Scale 0-2 (functional independence), day 90 mortality and occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of successful reperfusion with clinical outcomes. Outputs are displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) and 95% CI. Results- Two hundred thirty-seven of 2046 patients included in this registry presented with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and ASPECTS 0-5. In this subgroup, the overall rates of favorable outcome and mortality at day 90 were 40.1% and 40.9%. Achieving successful reperfusion was independently associated with favorable outcome (aOR, 5.534; 95% CI, 2.363-12.961), functional independence (aOR, 5.583; 95% CI, 1.964-15.873), reduced mortality (aOR, 0.180; 95% CI, 0.083-0.390), and lower rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR, 0.235; 95% CI, 0.062-0.887). The mortality-reducing effect remained in patients with ASPECTS 0-4 (aOR, 0.167; 95% CI, 0.056-0.499). Sensitivity analyses did not change the primary results. Conclusions- In patients presenting with ASPECTS 0-5, who were treated with mechanical thrombectomy, successful reperfusion was beneficial without increasing the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Although the results do not allow for general treatment recommendations, formal testing of mechanical thrombectomy versus best medical treatment in these patients in a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

[An Unusual Cause for a Bilateral Ptosis]. / Ungewöhnliche Ursache einer bilateralen Ptose.

An Unusual Cause for a Bilateral Ptosis Abstract. Immune-checkpoint-inhibitors are increasingly used in various malignancies. Autoimmune side effects such as colitis, hepatitis or skin reactions are well known, on the other hand neurological autoimmune complications such as myasthenic syndromes, myopathies or overlap syndromes with potentially life-threatening complications are less common and not well understood. A precise diagnosis has far reaching therapeutic consequences. Here we present the case of a patient under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, in which the diagnosis, due to the presence of overlap symptoms, is shown to be challenging. However, it was crucial to find the correct diagnosis in order to choose the proper therapy.

Predicting conversion to multiple sclerosis in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome: a retrospective study.

AIMS: To retrospectively analyse the Bernese radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) cohort with the goal of developing a prediction score for conversion to multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: A total of 31 patients with RIS were identified by screening medical records of neurological patients seen at the University Hospital of Bern between 2004 and 2017 for the diagnoses 'radiologically isolated syndrome' and 'RIS' adhering to 2009 Okuda recommendations. We analysed clinical, paraclinical and magnetic resonance imaging data during a maximum follow-up period of 3 years and identified significant predictors of conversion to MS. RESULTS: Data were available for 31 patients meeting 2009 Okuda RIS criteria. During the 3 years of follow up, 5/31 RIS patients converted to relapsing-remitting (RR) MS. In our univariate analysis, gadolinium (Gd) enhancement, brainstem and cerebellar hemisphere lesions, immune cell count and albumin concentration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) positivity in serum were identified as significant predictors of conversion to MS. Integrating these factors into our 'RIS-MS prediction score' enabled us to calculate a cut-off for prediction of conversion to MS within 3 years with high specificity [1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.00) and acceptable sensitivity (0.6, 95% CI 0.17-0.93)]. CONCLUSION: Our RIS-MS prediction score, if validated in an independent cohort, integrating radiological (Gd enhancement, brainstem and cerebellar hemisphere lesions) and paraclinical factors (ANA in serum, cell count and albumin in CSF) could be a useful prognostic tool for early recognition of RIS patients with a high risk of clinical progression to MS.

Outcome of patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and low NIHSS score.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and low NIHSS score is unknown, which was the aim to investigate in this study. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective single tertiary care centre 14-year cohort of patients with LVO in the anterior circulation and NIHSS score ≤ 5 on admission. Outcome was analysed according to primary intended therapy. RESULTS: Among 185 patients (median age 67.4 years), 52.4% received primary conservative therapy (including 26.8% secondary reperfusion in case of secondary neurological deterioration), 12.4% IV thrombolysis (IVT) only and 35.1% primary endovascular therapy (EVT). 95 (51.4%) patients experienced neurological deterioration until 3 months. Primary-IVT-only and primary-EVT compared to conservative-therapy patients had better 3 months' outcome (54.5% vs. 30.8%: adjustedOR 6.02; adjustedp = 0.004 for mRS 0-1 and 54.7% vs. 30.8%: adjustedOR 5.09; adjustedp = 0.002, respectively). Also mRS shift analysis favored primary-IVT-only and primary-EVT patients (adjustedOR 6.25; adjustedp = 0.001 and adjustedOR 3.14; adjustedp = 0.003). Outcome in primary-IVT-only vs. primary-EVT patients did not differ significantly. Patients who received secondary EVT because of neurological deterioration after primary-conservative-therapy had worse 3 months' outcome than primary-EVT patients (20.8% vs. 30.8%: adjustedOR 0.24; adjustedp = 0.047 for mRS 0-1 and adjustedOR 0.31; adjustedp = 0.019 in mRS shift analysis). Survival and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage did not differ amongst groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that primary IVT and/or EVT may be better than primary conservative therapy in patients with LVO in the anterior circulation and low NIHSS score. Furthermore, primary EVT was better than secondary EVT in case of neurological deterioration. There is an unmet need for RCTs to find the optimal therapy for this patient group.

Clinical effect of successful reperfusion in patients presenting with NIHSS < 8: data from the BEYOND-SWIFT registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: If patients presenting with large vessel occlusions (LVO) and mild symptoms should be treated with endvoascular treatment (EVT) remains unclear. Aims of this study were (1) assessing the safety and technical efficacy of EVT in patients with NIHSS < 8 as opposed to a comparison group of patients presenting with NIHSS ≥ 8 and (2) evaluation of the clinical effect of reperfusion in patients with NIHSS < 8. METHODS: Patients included into the retrospective multicenter BEYOND-SWIFT registry (NCT03496064) were analyzed. Clinical effect of achieving successful reperfusion (defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b/3) in patients presenting with NIHSS < 8 (N = 193) was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses (displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios, aOR and 95% confidence intervals, 95%-CI). Primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0-1) at day 90. Safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with NIHSS < 8 was compared to patients presenting with NIHSS ≥ 8 (N = 1423). RESULTS: Among patients with NIHSS < 8 (N = 193, 77/193, 39.9% receiving pre-interventional IV-tPA), successful reperfusion was significantly related to mRS 0-1 (aOR 3.217, 95%-CI 1.174-8.816) and reduced the chances of non-hemorrhagic neurological worsening (aOR 0.194, 95%-CI 0.050-0.756) after adjusting for prespecified confounders. In interaction analyses, the relative merits of achieving successful reperfusion were mostly comparable between patients presenting with NIHSS < 8 and NIHSS ≥ 8 as evidenced by non-significantly different aOR. Interventional safety and efficacy metrics were similar between patients with NIHSS < 8 and NIHSS ≥ 8. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving successful reperfusion is beneficial in patients with persisting LVO presenting with NIHSS < 8 and reduces the risk of non-hemorrhagic neurological worsening.

Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion: efficacy, outcomes, and futile recanalization in comparison with the anterior circulation.

BACKGROUND: Performing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is currently not evidence-based. OBJECTIVE: To compare patients' outcome, relative merits of achieving recanalization, and predictors of futile recanalization (FR) between BAO and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) MT. METHODS: In the multicenter BEYOND-SWIFT registry (NCT03496064), univariate and multivariate (displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios, aOR and 95% confidence intervals, 95%-CI) outcome comparisons between BAO (N=165) and ACLVO (N=1574) were performed. The primary outcome was favorable outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0-2). Secondary outcome included mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and FR. The relative merits of achieving successful recanalization between ACLVO and BAO were evaluated with interaction terms. RESULTS: MT in BAO was more often technically effective and equally safe in regards to mortality and sICH when compared to ACLVO. When adjusting for baseline differences, there was no significant difference between BAO vs ACLVO regarding rates of favorable outcome (aOR 0.986, 95%-CI 0.553 - 1.758). However, BAO were associated with increased rates of FR (aOR 2.146, 95%-CI 1.267 - 3.633). Predictors for FR were age, stroke severity, maneuver count and intracranial stenting. No significant heterogeneity on the relative merits of achieving successful recanalization on several outcome parameters were observed when comparing BAO and ACLVO. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, similar outcomes can be achieved in BAO and ACLVO patients treated with MT. Randomized controlled trials comparing patient selection and interventional strategies seem warranted to avoid FR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03496064.