Evaluating the perceived utility of an artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support system for depression treatment using a simulation center.

Aifred is a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that uses artificial intelligence to assist physicians in selecting treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) by providing probabilities of remission for different treatment options based on patient characteristics. We evaluated the utility of the CDSS as perceived by physicians participating in simulated clinical interactions. Twenty physicians who were either staff or residents in psychiatry or family medicine completed a study in which they had three 10-minute clinical interactions with standardized patients portraying mild, moderate, and severe episodes of MDD. During these scenarios, physicians were given access to the CDSS, which they could use in their treatment decisions. The perceived utility of the CDSS was assessed through self-report questionnaires, scenario observations, and interviews. 60% of physicians perceived the CDSS to be a useful tool in their treatment-selection process, with family physicians perceiving the greatest utility. Moreover, 50% of physicians would use the tool for all patients with depression, with an additional 35% noting that they would reserve the tool for more severe or treatment-resistant patients. Furthermore, clinicians found the tool to be useful in discussing treatment options with patients. The efficacy of this CDSS and its potential to improve treatment outcomes must be further evaluated in clinical trials.

Efficacy of Mycobacterium Phlei Cell Wall-Nucleic Acid Complex (MCNA) in BCG-Unresponsive Patients.

Background: We have previously reported the results of a prospective multi-institutional study on the efficacy of MCNA in patients who recurred after intravesical BCG treatment [1]. Since that publication, a new standardized definition for BCG-unresponsiveness has been established [2]. Objective: We re-analyzed the oncologic outcomes following intravesical MCNA in patients classified as BCG-unresponsive according to the new definition. Methods: For this analysis, we focused on the enrolled patients who satisfied the requirements for BCG Unresponsiveness: i.e. adequate BCG treatment (at least 5/6 induction and 2/3 maintenance instillations) and high grade tumor within 6 months of prior BCG. Treatment course included 6 weekly intravesical instillations of 8 mg MCNA followed by 3 weekly instillations at months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24. Followup assessments included cystoscopy, urine cytology and biopsy. Patients absent of high grade disease confirmed by central review of biopsy were deemed disease-free. Results: Of the 129 patients enrolled, 94 (68 CIS with/without papillary tumors, 26 papillary only tumors) fit the criteria for the new BCG Unresponsive definition. Overall, disease free survival (DFS) for all BCG unresponsive patients was 48.9% (95% CI 38.0-59.0%) at 6 months, 34.8% (95% CI 24.7-45%) at 1 year and 28.3% (15.7-34.3%) at 2 years post induction. In the group with papillary tumors, DFS measured at months 6, 12, and 24 were: 61.2% (38.2-77.8%), 61.2(38.2-77.8%), and 50.1% (27.5-69%). In the CIS-containing group, the corresponding DFS were: 44.8% (32.3-56.4%), 26.5% (16.3-37.9%), and 16.6% (8.6-26.9%), respectively. Conclusions: For patients who are BCG Unresponsive, MCNA has the potential to render 26.5% of patients with CIS and 61.2% of patients with papillary tumors disease-free for at least 1 year with an intact bladder. The higher efficacy noted in the true BCG-unresponsive cohort than was previously reported with all-comers emphasizes the importance of having clearly defined criteria for clinical trials investigating new intravesical therapies after BCG failure.