Tuberculous pleuritis: clinical presentations and diagnostic challenges.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) is one of the most common types of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. We highlight the latest epidemiology of TBP, the heterogeneity of its presentation and the performance of different diagnostic strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: There are differential trends in the incidences of TBP worldwide. Its incidence increased in China but decreased in the United States in the past decade. The presentation of TBP is heterogeneous regarding clinical symptoms, radiological findings and pleural fluid analysis results. Conventional microbiological tests have low sensitivities to diagnose TBP. Recent research focused on various diagnostic tools with better yield. The sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) in pleural fluid, including the latest generation of PCR and sequencing-based techniques for detecting tuberculosis, remains suboptimal. Various pleural fluid biomarkers have been explored, but there is a lack of consensus on their clinical utility and cutoff levels. SUMMARY: The heterogeneity of clinical presentation poses obstacles to diagnosing TBP. Further development of diagnostic tools, including more robust NAAT and biomarkers with additional validation, is needed before incorporation into routine clinical practice.

Comparison of the 12-month impact of COVID-19 and SARS on physiological capacity and health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the differences in medium to long-term recovery on spirometry, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between COVID-19 and SARS. METHODS: We performed a 12-month prospective study on COVID-19 survivors. The changes in dynamic lung volumes at spirometry (%predicted FEV1, %predicted FVC), 6MWD and HRQoL at 1-3, 6 to 12 months were compared against a historical cohort of SARS survivors using the same study protocol. The residual radiological changes in HRCT in COVID-19 survivors were correlated with their functional capacity. RESULTS: 108 COVID-19 survivors of various disease severity (asymptomatic 2.9%, mild 33.3%, moderate 47.2%, severe 8.3%, critical 8.3%) were recruited. When compared with 97 SARS survivors, 108 COVID-19 survivors were older (48.1 ± 16.4 vs. 36.1 ± 9.5 years, p < 0.001) and required less additional support during hospitalization; with lower dynamic lung volumes, shorter 6MWD and better physical component score. Both groups of survivors had comparable changes in these parameters at subsequent follow-ups. Both COVID-19 and SARS survivors had similar mental component score (MCS) at 6 and 12 months. COVID-19 survivors initially experienced less (between-group difference, -3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.5 to -0.7, p = 0.012) and then more improvement (between-group difference 2.9, 95%, CI 0.8 to 5.1, p = 0.007) than SARS survivors in the MCS at 1-3 to 6 months and 6 to 12 months respectively. Forty (44.0%) out of 91 COVID-19 survivors had residual abnormalities on HRCT at 12 months, with a negative correlation between the severity scores of parenchymal changes and 6MWD (r=-0.239, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 survivors demonstrated a similar recovery speed in dynamic lung volumes and exercise capacity, but different paces of psychological recovery as SARS survivors in the convalescent phase. The severity of parenchymal changes in HRCT is negatively correlated with the 6MWD of COVID-19 survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This prospective study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 2 November 2020 (Identifier: NCT04611243).