Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point PC6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications following surgery and anaesthesia. Antiemetic drugs are only partially effective in preventing PONV. An alternative approach is to stimulate the PC6 acupoint on the wrist. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004, updated in 2009 and now in 2015. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of PC6 acupoint stimulation with or without antiemetic drug versus sham or antiemetic drug for the prevention of PONV in people undergoing surgery. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library, Issue 12, 2014), MEDLINE (January 2008 to December 2014), EMBASE (January 2008 to December 2014), ISI Web of Science (January 2008 to December 2014), World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of articles to identify additional studies. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized trials of techniques that stimulated the PC6 acupoint compared with sham treatment or drug therapy, or combined PC6 acupoint and drug therapy compared to drug therapy, for the prevention of PONV. Interventions used in these trials included acupuncture, electro-acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation, transcutaneous nerve stimulation, laser stimulation, capsicum plaster, acu-stimulation device, and acupressure in people undergoing surgery. Primary outcomes were the incidences of nausea and vomiting after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the need for rescue antiemetic therapy and adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias domains for each trial. We used a random-effects model and reported risk ratio (RR) with associated 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We used trial sequential analyses to help provide information on when we had reached firm evidence in cumulative meta-analyses of the primary outcomes, based on a 30% risk ratio reduction in PONV. MAIN RESULTS: We included 59 trials involving 7667 participants. We rated two trials at low risk of bias in all domains (selection, attrition, reporting, blinding and other). We rated 25 trials at high risk in one or more risk-of-bias domains. Compared with sham treatment, PC6 acupoint stimulation significantly reduced the incidence of nausea (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.77; 40 trials, 4742 participants), vomiting (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.71; 45 trials, 5147 participants) and the need for rescue antiemetics (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.73; 39 trials, 4622 participants). As heterogeneity among trials was substantial and there were study limitations, we rated the quality of evidence as low. Using trial sequential analysis, the required information size and boundary for benefit were reached for both primary outcomes.PC6 acupoint stimulation was compared with six different types of antiemetic drugs (metoclopramide, cyclizine, prochlorperazine, droperidol. ondansetron and dexamethasone). There was no difference between PC6 acupoint stimulation and antiemetic drugs in the incidence of nausea (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.10; 14 trials, 1332 participants), vomiting (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.17; 19 trials, 1708 participants), or the need for rescue antiemetics (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.16; 9 trials, 895 participants). We rated the quality of evidence as moderate, due to the study limitations. Using trial sequential analyses, the futility boundary was crossed before the required information size was surpassed for both primary outcomes.Compared to antiemetic drugs, the combination of PC6 acupoint stimulation and antiemetic therapy reduced the incidence of vomiting (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.91; 9 trials, 687 participants) but not nausea (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.13; 8 trials, 642 participants). We rated the quality of evidence as very low, due to substantial heterogeneity among trials, study limitations and imprecision. Using trial sequential analysis, none of the boundaries for benefit, harm or futility were crossed for PONV. The need for rescue antiemetic was lower in the combination PC6 acupoint stimulation and antiemetic group than the antiemetic group (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.86; 5 trials, 419 participants).The side effects associated with PC6 acupoint stimulation were minor, transient and self-limiting (e.g. skin irritation, blistering, redness and pain) in 14 trials. Publication bias was not apparent in the contour-enhanced funnel plots. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is low-quality evidence supporting the use of PC6 acupoint stimulation over sham. Compared to the last update in 2009, no further sham comparison trials are needed. We found that there is moderate-quality evidence showing no difference between PC6 acupoint stimulation and antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV. Further PC6 acupoint stimulation versus antiemetic trials are futile in showing a significant difference, which is a new finding in this update. There is inconclusive evidence supporting the use of a combined strategy of PC6 acupoint stimulation and antiemetic drug over drug prophylaxis, and further high-quality trials are needed.

Introducing Final-Year Medical Students to Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Imaging: Teaching Transthoracic Echocardiography on a 2-Week Anesthesia Rotation.

PROBLEM: The availability of less expensive and smaller ultrasound machines has enabled the use of ultrasound in virtually all major medical/surgical disciplines. Some medical schools have incorporated point-of-care ultrasound training into their undergraduate curriculum, whereas many postgraduate programs have made ultrasound training a standard. The Chinese University of Hong Kong has charged its Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care to spearhead the introduction of ultrasound into the final-year medical curriculum by introducing handheld transthoracic echocardiography as part of perioperative assessment. INTERVENTION: All 133 final-year students completed a 2-week anesthesia rotation, which began with a half-day session consisting of a lecture and hands-on practice session during which they learned 9 basic transthoracic echocardiography views using 4 basic ultrasound probe positions. CONTEXT: Each student was required to perform a transthoracic echocardiography-examine under supervision of 1 patient/week for 2 weeks, and their results were compared against that of the supervisor's. Most patients were elective cardiac surgery patients. One long question on transthoracic echocardiography was included in their end-of-year surgery examination paper. Students provided feedback on their experience. OUTCOME: Most students learned the basic transthoracic echocardiography views fairly efficiently and had variable, though generally favorable, success rates in identifying obvious cardiac anomalies, including use of color Doppler. A few common mistakes were identified but were easily correctable. Logistics for mobilizing enough bedside supervision were challenging. Students reported positive feedback on the teaching initiative. LESSONS LEARNED: We were able to execute a successful short training course on transthoracic echocardiography during the final-year medical degree anesthesia rotation. Our initiative may set an example for other clinical departments to design similar courses pertinent to their specialties and syllabuses.

Cannula malposition during antegrade cerebral perfusion for aortic surgery: role of cerebral oximetry.

PURPOSE: To describe the use of cerebral oximetry to detect a lack of right cerebral perfusion resulting from a malpositioned catheter used for antegrade cerebral perfusion during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). The simple corrective surgical adjustment that followed averted a potentially serious complication. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 57-yr-old male with a type-A aortic dissection undergoing DHCA required antegrade cerebral perfusion for cerebral protection. Catheters were placed accordingly in the left common carotid and brachiocephalic arteries. Whereas frontal cerebral oximetry immediately improved on the left, it did not improve on the right. It was immediately suspected that the tip of the brachiocephalic cannula had advanced into the right subclavian artery, thus depriving the right common carotid artery of blood flow. The problem resolved upon slight withdrawal of the cannula. CONCLUSION: Vigilance in anesthesia should not stop during DHCA or cardiopulmonary bypass. Cerebral oximetry may provide important information leading to actions that improve brain protection. Vigilances proved important in this case where the cannula tip used for antegrade cerebral perfusion was advanced too far into the right subclavian artery.

The costs and benefits of extending the role of the acute pain service on clinical outcomes after major elective surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute pain services have received widespread acceptance and formal support from institutions and organizations, but available evidence on their costs and benefits is scarce. Although there is good agreement on the provision of acute pain services after many major surgical procedures, there are other procedures for which the benefits are unclear. Data are required to justify any expansion of acute pain services. In this randomized, controlled clinical trial we compared the costs and effects of acute pain service care on clinical outcomes with conventional pain management on the ward. Patients included in the trial were considered by their anesthesiologist to have either arm be suitable for the procedure. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-three patients undergoing major elective surgery were randomized either to an anesthesiologist-led, nurse-based acute pain service group with patient-controlled analgesia or to a control group with IM or IV boluses of opioid analgesia. Both groups were treated with medications to treat opioid-related adverse effects and received the usual care from health professionals assigned to the ward. The main outcome measures were quality of recovery scores, pain intensity measures, global measure of treatment effectiveness, and overall pain treatment cost. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were drawn to detect a difference in the joint cost-effect relationship between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in quality of recovery score on postoperative day 1 between treatment and control groups (mean difference, 0; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.7 to 0.7; P = 0.94) or in the rate of improvement in quality of recovery score (mean difference, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.4 to 0.1; P = 0.34). The proportion of patients with 1 or more days of highly effective pain management was higher in the acute pain service group than in the control group (86% vs. 75%; P < 0.01). Costs were higher in the acute pain service group (mean difference, US$46; 95% CI, $44 to $48 per patient; P < 0.001). A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed that the acute pain service was more cost effective than was control for providing highly effective pain management if the decision maker was willing to pay more than US$546 per patient per 1 day with highly effective treatment. CONCLUSION: In extending the role of the acute pain service to a specific group of major surgical procedures, the acute pain service was likely to be cost effective.

Surgeons' attitudes and perception of an acute pain service.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitude and perception of surgeons about postoperative pain management, and an anaesthesiologist-based acute pain service. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING: Tertiary university teaching hospital, Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: All surgical staff members (specialists and trainees) of the Departments of Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Opinions on postoperative pain management, different pain management modalities, and services provided by the acute pain service. RESULTS: Of the 147 questionnaires, 104 (71%) were returned. The majority (97%) agreed that effective pain control improves patient recovery and 88% believed that anaesthetists should be involved in postoperative pain management. Overall, 85% of the respondents were satisfied with the acute pain service. However, about one third of them wanted to maintain an active role in postoperative pain management and only 54% thought that the acute pain service has a significant impact on patient outcomes. In addition, only 10% of surgeons agreed that patients receiving acute pain service intervention would be discharged earlier. The respondents also thought that, compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, epidural analgesia required more nursing care and was less cost-effective. Areas of the acute pain service warranting improvement included: education of surgeons on postoperative pain and its management (92%), communication (74%), and referral systems (80%). CONCLUSION: The majority of surgeons were satisfied with the acute pain service and agreed that anaesthetists should be involved in postoperative pain management. However, a proportion wanted to maintain an active role in postoperative pain management.

Renal dysfunction and CABG.

Renal dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting is common and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A number of strategies with potential renoprotective effects have been investigated, but no single one has been found to warrant routine use in CABG except fenoldopam in which the data to date appear promising. Other measures such as avoidance of nephrotoxic agents, including recent radiocontrast for coronary angiography, may reduce the incidence of renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery and should be implemented in routine care, whenever possible. The best renal protection strategy remains the same as for other organ protection and consists of optimizing haemodynamics, oxygenation, metabolic states and hydration.

Analgesic effect of electroacupuncture in postthoracotomy pain: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of electroacupuncture in postthoracotomy pain control is uncertain. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the role of electroacupuncture in the management of early postthoracotomy wound pain. METHODS: A total of 27 patients with operable non-small cell lung carcinoma who received thoracotomy were recruited and randomized to receive either electroacupuncture or sham acupuncture in addition to routine oral analgesics and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain control. All patients received acupuncture twice daily with visual analog pain score recorded for the first 7 postoperative days. Specific chest acupoints (LI 4, GB 34, GB 36, and TE 8) were targeted. Patient-controlled analgesia was used for the first 3 postoperative days in all patients, and the cumulative dosage used was recorded. RESULTS: Two patients were excluded after randomization because of complications unrelated to acupuncture. Interventions and data collection were completed for the remaining 25 patients (13 in the electroacupuncture group; 12 in the sham acupuncture group). There was a trend for lower visual analog scale pain scores in the electro-acupuncture group between postoperative days 2 and 6, although this did not reach statistical significance. The cumulative dose of patient-controlled analgesia morphine used on postoperative day 2 was significantly lower in the electroacupuncture group (7.5 +/- 5 mg versus 15.6 +/- 12 mg; p < 0.05). Such delay of onset of pain control may be related to the frequency of electroacupuncture used. CONCLUSIONS: Electroacupuncture may reduce narcotic analgesic usage in the early postoperative period. A prospective randomized controlled trial using different electroacupuncture frequency is warranted to verify this benefit.

Ropivacaine undergoes slower systemic absorption from the caudal epidural space in children than bupivacaine.

UNLABELLED: We compared the systemic absorption of ropivacaine and bupivacaine after caudal epidural administration in children. Twenty ASA physical status I or II children aged 1-7 yr undergoing elective hypospadias repair were randomized after the induction of general anesthesia to receive a single caudal epidural injection of 2 mg/kg of either ropivacaine 0.2% (R) or bupivacaine 0.2% (B) in a double-blinded fashion. Peripheral venous blood samples (1 mL) were obtained before and 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 120 min after the caudal injection. The total R and B concentration was measured in plasma by using high-performance liquid chromatography. All blocks were successful, and there were no complications. The peak plasma concentration (mean +/- SD) (R = 0.67 +/- 0.16 and B = 0.73 +/- 0.23 microg/mL) and the area under the plasma concentration curve (R = 61.9 +/- 20.6 and B = 62.7 +/- 18.2 microg x mL(-1) x min(-1)) were comparable between the two study groups. The median (range) time to attain peak plasma concentration was significantly slower in children who received ropivacaine (R = 65 [10-120] min and B = 20 [15-50] min, P < 0.05). We conclude that ropivacaine undergoes slower systemic absorption from the caudal epidural space in children than does bupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: We compared the systemic absorption of ropivacaine (0.2%) and bupivacaine (0.2%) after caudal epidural injection of 2 mg/kg in children aged 1-7 yr. Our results show that ropivacaine undergoes slower systemic absorption from the caudal epidural space in children than does bupivacaine.

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intravenously administered hyoscine N-butyl bromide in patients undergoing colonoscopy with patient-controlled sedation.

BACKGROUND: A prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted to investigate the effect of the antispasmodic hyoscine N-butyl bromide (Buscopan) during colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 120 patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to receive either 40 mg of hyoscine N-butyl bromide (n=60) or normal saline solution (n=60) intravenously as premedication. Colonoscopy was performed under patient-controlled sedation. Outcome measures included cecal intubation and total procedure time, demanded and administered doses of patient-controlled sedation, spasm score, pain score, endoscopist satisfaction score, patient willingness to repeat colonoscopy, and vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate) during colonoscopy. RESULTS: Mean cecal intubation time in the hyoscine N-butyl bromide group was significantly longer than the control group (12.20 vs. 9.74 minutes; p=0.04; but correction for multiple testing of data removed this significance). The use of hyoscine N-butyl bromide was associated with a significantly lower endoscopist mean satisfaction score (6.47 vs. 7.30; p=0.04; but correction for multiple testing of data removed this significance), higher demanded and administered mean doses of patient-controlled sedation (respectively, 34.80 and 7.25 vs. 24.20 and 5.87; p=0.045; p=0.04, respectively; but correction for multiple testing of data removed these findings of significance), fewer patients willing to repeat colonoscopy (60% vs. 83.9%; p=0.005), and more hemodynamic instability (p<0.001) when compared with the control group. No significant difference was found in the total procedure time, spasm score, or pain score. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with intravenously administered hyoscine N-butyl bromide impedes colonoscope insertion and causes greater patient discomfort, as well as hemodynamic instability.