Mineral and organic matrix composition at bone forming surfaces in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with either teriparatide or zoledronic acid.

The ability of bone to resist fracture is dependent on the composite nature of its mineral and organic matrix content. Teriparatide (TPTD) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) are approved anabolic and antiresorptive therapies, respectively, to reduce fracture risk in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. In the SHOTZ study, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were treated with TPTD (20 µg daily, subcutaneous) or ZOL (5 mg/year, intravenous infusion) for 24 months. Iliac crest biopsies were obtained at 6 months and again at 24 months from approximately one third of the original study cohort. To investigate the early effects of these two drugs on the quality of newly formed bone, we used vibrational spectroscopic techniques to analyze tetracycline-labelled transiliac biopsies obtained from participants at the 6-month time point. Raman spectra were acquired at forming trabecular and intra-cortical surfaces (identified by fluorescent double labels), to determine mineral, organic matrix, glycosaminoglycan, and tissue water content, as well as mineral maturity/crystallinity at three specific tissue ages (1-5, 15, and ≥25 days). Fourier transformed infrared microspectroscopy was used to determine pyridinoline/divalent collagen cross-link ratios. At 6 months, treatment with TPTD versus ZOL resulted in lower mineral and higher organic matrix content, increased tissue water content, and lower mineral/matrix, mineral maturity/crystallinity, glycosaminoglycan content, and pyridinoline/divalent enzymatic collagen cross-link ratio. Our results suggest that TPTD and ZOL have differential effects on material properties of newly formed bone at individual remodeling sites, highlighting their different mechanisms of action.

Outcomes in patients with aggressive or refractory disease from REVEL: A randomized phase III study of docetaxel with ramucirumab or placebo for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The REVEL study demonstrated improved efficacy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with ramucirumab plus docetaxel, independent of histology. This exploratory analysis characterized the treatment effect in REVEL patients who were refractory to prior first-line treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Refractory patients had a best response of progressive disease to first-line treatment. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL), and safety. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed for OS and PFS, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for response. QoL was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. Sensitivity analyses were performed on subgroups of the intent-to-treat population with limited time on first-line therapy. RESULTS: Of 1253 randomized patients in REVEL, 360 (29%) were refractory to first-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were largely balanced between treatment arms. In the control arm, median OS for refractory patients was 6.3 versus 10.3 months for patients not meeting this criterion, demonstrating the poor prognosis of refractory patients. Median OS (8.3 vs. 6.3 months; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68-1.08), median PFS (4.0 vs. 2.5 months; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88), and ORR (22.5% vs. 12.6%) were improved in refractory patients treated with ramucirumab compared to placebo, without new safety concerns or further deteriorating patient QoL. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of ramucirumab in refractory patients is similar to that in the intent-to-treat population. The benefit/risk profile for refractory patients suggests that ramucirumab plus docetaxel is an appropriate treatment option even in this difficult-to-treat population.