The future of research in female pelvic medicine.

Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) was recently recognized as a subspecialty by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). FPMRS treats female pelvic disorders (FPD) including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), lower urinary tract infections (UTI), pelvic pain, and female sexual dysfunction (FSD). These conditions affect large numbers of individuals, resulting in significant patient, societal, medical, and financial burdens. Given that treatments utilize both medical and surgical approaches, areas of research in FPD necessarily cover a gamut of topics, ranging from mechanistically driven basic science research to randomized controlled trials. While basic science research is slow to impact clinical care, transformational changes in a field occur through basic investigations. On the other hand, clinical research yields incremental changes to clinical care. Basic research intends to change understanding whereas clinical research intends to change practice. However, the best approach is to incorporate both basic and clinical research into a translational program which makes new discoveries and effects positive changes to clinical practice. This review examines current research in FPD, with focus on translational potential, and ponders the future of FPD research. With a goal of improving the care and outcomes in patients with FPD, a strategic collaboration of stakeholders (patients, advocacy groups, physicians, researchers, professional medical associations, legislators, governmental biomedical research agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device companies) is an absolute requirement in order to generate funding needed for FPD translational research.

Knowledge of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Obstetrics.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge and demographic factors associated with a lack of knowledge proficiency about urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among pregnant and postpartum women. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of women receiving antepartum and postpartum care at 9 Connecticut sites. Knowledge was assessed using the validated Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire. Lack of knowledge proficiency was defined as less than 80% and less than 50% correct responses on the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire UI and POP subscales. Logistic regression was used to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Surveys from 399 diverse pregnant and postpartum women were analyzed. Three quarters showed a lack of knowledge proficiency about UI and POP (74.2%, 70.6%). After adjustment, increased odds of lacking UI knowledge proficiency were associated with primiparity versus nulliparity (OR, 4.73; 95% CI, 2.24-9.98), Hispanic versus white race (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.18-6.01), and having a high school diploma/General Education Development/less (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.34-7.48) or some college (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.08-6.01) versus bachelor's degree; greater lack of POP knowledge proficiency was associated with having a high school diploma/General Education Development versus bachelor's degree (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.05-4.26) and never seeing a urologist/urogynecologist versus those who had (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12-0.77). Women working in a medical field versus those who did not demonstrated decreased odds of lacking UI and POP knowledge proficiency (ORs, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.13-0.52] and 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.70]). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant and postpartum women lack knowledge about UI and POP. Preconceptional counseling provides an opportunity for educational intervention.