Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39172287

RESUMO

The genomic comparison of two Klebsiella michiganensis clinical isolates recovered from the same patient, one resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam and intermediate to cefotaxime, the other resistant to ceftazidime but susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, revealed one mutation in the blaOXY-1-24 gene accounting for a L169M substitution in the Ω loop. Cloning experiment in Escherichia coli demonstrated the contribution of this mutation to the hydrolysis spectrum extension towards ceftazidime and cefepime, whereas the resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam was reduced. To the best of our knowledge, this study shows for the first time that ceftazidime resistance can occur in vivo from OXY-1 precursor by structural alteration.

2.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 23(1): 37, 2024 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664821

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of invasive infections in newborns. The prevention of GBS neonatal disease relies on the administration of an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to GBS-colonized women. In recent years, rapid intrapartum detection of GBS vaginal colonization using real-time nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) emerged as an alternative to antenatal culture screening methods. METHODS: We compared the performances of two loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) tests, the Ampliflash® GBS and the PlusLife® GBS tests, to standard culture for GBS detection in vaginal specimens from pregnant women. The study was conducted from April to July 2023 in a French hospital of the Paris area. RESULTS: A total of 303 samples were analyzed, including 85 culture-positive samples (28.1%). The Ampliflash® GBS test and the PlusLife® GBS tests gave a result for 100% and 96.3% tests, respectively. The performances of the tests were as follows: sensitivity 87.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.3-92.6) and 98.7% (95% CI 93.0-99.8), specificity 99.1% (95% CI 96.7-99.8), and 91.9% (95% CI 87.3-95.0), respectively. False negative results of the Ampliflash® GBS test correlated with low-density GBS cultures. Time-to-results correlated with GBS culture density only for the PlusLife® GBS test (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both techniques provide excellent analytical performances with high sensitivity and specificity together with a short turnaround time and results available in 10 to 35 min. Their potential to further reduce the burden of GBS neonatal disease compared with antenatal culture screening needs to be assessed in future clinical studies.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus agalactiae , Vagina , Humanos , Feminino , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Streptococcus agalactiae/genética , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolamento & purificação , Gravidez , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Vagina/microbiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Recém-Nascido , Adulto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA