RESUMO
The genomic comparison of two Klebsiella michiganensis clinical isolates recovered from the same patient, one resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam and intermediate to cefotaxime, the other resistant to ceftazidime but susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, revealed one mutation in the blaOXY-1-24 gene accounting for a L169M substitution in the Ω loop. Cloning experiment in Escherichia coli demonstrated the contribution of this mutation to the hydrolysis spectrum extension towards ceftazidime and cefepime, whereas the resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam was reduced. To the best of our knowledge, this study shows for the first time that ceftazidime resistance can occur in vivo from OXY-1 precursor by structural alteration.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of invasive infections in newborns. The prevention of GBS neonatal disease relies on the administration of an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to GBS-colonized women. In recent years, rapid intrapartum detection of GBS vaginal colonization using real-time nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) emerged as an alternative to antenatal culture screening methods. METHODS: We compared the performances of two loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) tests, the Ampliflash® GBS and the PlusLife® GBS tests, to standard culture for GBS detection in vaginal specimens from pregnant women. The study was conducted from April to July 2023 in a French hospital of the Paris area. RESULTS: A total of 303 samples were analyzed, including 85 culture-positive samples (28.1%). The Ampliflash® GBS test and the PlusLife® GBS tests gave a result for 100% and 96.3% tests, respectively. The performances of the tests were as follows: sensitivity 87.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.3-92.6) and 98.7% (95% CI 93.0-99.8), specificity 99.1% (95% CI 96.7-99.8), and 91.9% (95% CI 87.3-95.0), respectively. False negative results of the Ampliflash® GBS test correlated with low-density GBS cultures. Time-to-results correlated with GBS culture density only for the PlusLife® GBS test (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both techniques provide excellent analytical performances with high sensitivity and specificity together with a short turnaround time and results available in 10 to 35 min. Their potential to further reduce the burden of GBS neonatal disease compared with antenatal culture screening needs to be assessed in future clinical studies.