Mitigating inequity: ethically prioritizing patients for CAR T-cell therapy.

Manufacturing capacity and institutional infrastructure to deliver chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-T) are pressured to keep pace with the growing number of approved products and expanding eligible patient population for this potentially life-saving therapy. Consequently, many cell therapy programs must make difficult decisions about which patient should get the next available treatment slot. This situation requires an ethical framework to ensure fair and equitable decision-making. In this perspective, we discuss the application of Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R), a priority-setting framework grounded in procedural justice, to the problem of limited CAR-T slots at our institution. We formed a multidisciplinary working group spanning several hematological malignancies. Through multiple rounds of partner engagement, we used A4R guiding principles to identify 4 main criteria to prioritize patients for CAR-T: medical benefit, safety/risk of complications, psychosocial factors, and medical urgency. Associated measures/tools and an implementation process were developed. We discuss further how ethical principles of fairness and equity demand a consistent approach within health systems that does not disadvantage medically underserved or underrepresented populations and supports overcoming barriers to care. In our commitment to transparency and collaboration, we make our tools available to others, ideally to be used to engage in their own A4R process, adapting the tools to their unique environments. Our hope is that our preliminary work will support the advancement of further study in this area globally, aiming for justice in resource allocation for all potential CAR-T candidates, wherever they may seek care.

Once weekly selinexor, carfilzomib and dexamethasone in carfilzomib non-refractory multiple myeloma patients.

BACKGROUND: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), including carfilzomib, potentiate the activity of selinexor, a novel, first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, in preclinical models of multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: The safety, efficacy, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor (80 or 100 mg) + carfilzomib (56 or 70 mg/m2) + dexamethasone (40 mg) (XKd) once weekly (QW) was evaluated in patients with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) not refractory to carfilzomib. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients, median prior therapies 4 (range, 1-8), were enrolled. MM was triple-class refractory in 38% of patients and 53% of patients had high-risk cytogenetics del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or gain 1q. Common treatment-related adverse events (all/Grade 3) were thrombocytopenia 72%/47% (G3 and G4), nausea 72%/6%, anaemia 53%/19% and fatigue 53%/9%, all expected and manageable with supportive care and dose modifications. MTD and RP2D were identified as selinexor 80 mg, carfilzomib 56 mg/m2, and dexamethasone 40 mg, all QW. The overall response rate was 78% including 14 (44%) ≥ very good partial responses. Median progression-free survival was 15 months. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly XKd is highly effective and well-tolerated. These data support further investigation of XKd in patients with MM.

D(T)PACE as salvage therapy for aggressive or refractory multiple myeloma.

Dexamethasone ± thalidomide with infusion of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide [D(T)PACE] is generally reserved as salvage therapy for aggressive multiple myeloma (MM) or plasma cell leukaemia (PCL) resistant to conventional therapies. The efficacy and durability of this potentially toxic regimen in this setting is unclear. We identified 75 patients who received D(T)PACE for relapsed/refractory MM at two tertiary care centres: Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto and Mayo Clinic Arizona. At time of D(T)PACE, 16 patients had PCL and three patients had leptomeningeal disease. Patients were heavily pretreated (median three prior regimens, range 1-12; prior autologous stem cell transplant [ASCT] 33%). Overall response rate was 49% (very-good partial response 16%, partial response 33%) with stable disease in an additional 36%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5·5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:4·3-9·8); overall survival (OS) 14·0 months (95% CI:8·7-19·3). Thirty-five patients proceeded to ASCT or clinical trial, with median PFS for this subset of 13·4 months (95% CI:7·7-20·1) and OS 20·5 months (95% CI:14·8-63·8). D(T)PACE is an effective salvage therapy for heavily pretreated MM patients. Although the overall response rate of 49% in this poor prognosis cohort is reasonable, the PFS is short, suggesting the best role for D(T)PACE is in bridging to definitive therapy, such as transplantation.

Central nervous system involvement with multiple myeloma: long term survival can be achieved with radiation, intrathecal chemotherapy, and immunomodulatory agents.

Involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) in multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare complication, with reported survival of <6 months. This report describes 37 MM patients with leptomeningeal and/or parenchymal brain involvement treated at our institution and identifies factors associated with long-term survival. From January 1999 to December 2010, 37 patients with CNS MM were evaluated at our institution. Clinical characteristics, treatment and survival were retrospectively collected. CNS disease was present at MM diagnosis in 24% and at relapse in 76%. Plasma cell leukemia (40%) and skull plasmacytomas (65%) were common, suggesting haematological and contiguous spread. Intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy was used in 81%, cranial and/or spinal irradiation in 78%, and various systemic therapies [immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) (51%), cisplatin-based (DPACE; cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) (27%), bortezomib (19%), alkylators (11%), dexamethasone alone (8%), auto-transplant (5%)]. Median survival from CNS disease was only 4·6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2·8-6·7]; however, nine patients had prolonged survival (median: 17·1 months, 95% CI: 13·2-67·4). In general, these long-term survivors were treated with radiotherapy, multi-dosing IT chemotherapy, and IMiD-containing therapy. CNS MM is a highly aggressive disease but in our experience, long-term survival can be achieved with the combination of multi-dosing IT chemotherapy, radiation and IMiD-based therapy.

Selinexor-Based Triplet Regimens in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (αCD38 mAbs) for newly diagnosed or early relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), especially in non-transplant eligible patients, may lead to more patients developing αCD38 mAb-refractory disease earlier in the treatment course with fewer treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the efficacy and safety of selinexor-based triplets (selinexor+dexamethasone [Sd] plus pomalidomide [SPd, n = 23], bortezomib [SVd, n = 16] or carfilzomib (SKd, n = 23]) in a subset of STOMP (NCT02343042) and BOSTON (NCT03110562) study patients treated previously with αCD38 mAbs. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (median 4 prior therapies, range 1 to 11, 90.3% refractory to αCD38 mAb) were included. Overall response rates (ORR) in the SPd, SVd and SKd cohorts were 52.2%, 56.3%, and 65.2%, respectively. Overall response rate was 47.4% among patients who had MM refractory to the third drug reintroduced in the Sd-based triplet. Median progression-free survival in the SPd, SVd, and SKd cohorts was 8.7, 6.7, and 15.0 months, respectively, and median overall survival was 9.6, 16.9, and 33.0 months, respectively. Median time to discontinuation in the SPd, SVd, and SKd cohorts was 4.4, 5.9, and 10.6 months, respectively. The most common hematological adverse events were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. Nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea were primarily grade 1/2. Adverse events were generally manageable with standard supportive care and dose modifications. CONCLUSION: Selinexor-based regimens may offer effective and well-tolerated therapy to patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM who had disease previously exposed or refractory to αCD38 mAb therapy and could help address the unmet clinical need in these high-risk patients.

A Canadian Perspective on the Treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a slowly progressing B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by monoclonal IgM gammopathy in the blood and infiltration of the bone marrow by clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells. As an incurable disease, the goals for therapy for WM are to relieve symptoms, slow disease progression, prevent organ damage, and maintain quality of life. However, given the rarity of WM, clinical trials comparing treatments for WM are limited and there is no definitive standard of care. The selection of first-line WM therapy is thus based on patient factors, disease characteristics, and drug access, with bendamustine-rituximab and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor therapy considered preferred treatments. Other treatments such as proteasome inhibitor- or purine analogue-based therapy, alternative chemoimmunotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplantation are generally reserved for the relapsed setting but may be used in rare circumstances in earlier lines of therapy. This paper summarizes the efficacy and safety of these WM therapies and discusses considerations for treatment from a Canadian perspective.

Selinexor-based regimens in patients with multiple myeloma after prior anti-B-cell maturation antigen treatment.

There is a lack of consensus on therapy sequencing in previously treated multiple myeloma, particularly after anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) therapy. Earlier reports on selinexor (X) regimens demonstrated considerable efficacy in early treatment, and after anti-BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy. Here, we present data from 11 heavily pretreated patients who predominantly received BCMA-antibody-drug conjugate therapy. We observe that X-containing regimens are potent and achieve durable responses with numerically higher overall response and clinical benefit rates, as well as median progression free survival compared to patients' prior anti-BCMA therapies, despite being used later in the treatment course. In an area of evolving unmet need, these data reaffirm the efficacy of X-based regimens following broader anti-BCMA therapy.

Toxicity and survival outcomes of autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma patients with renal insufficiency: an institutional comparison between two eras.

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a feasible treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with renal insufficiency; however, these patients tend to experience higher rates of drug toxicity and transplant-related mortality (TRM) during ASCT. Recent adoption of bortezomib-based induction regimens and dose reduction of melphalan during conditioning may improve outcomes in this population. In this single center retrospective study, we compared the toxicity and survival outcomes of 96 MM patients with renal insufficiency undergoing ASCT between two eras: 1998-2007 and 2008-2016. The proportion of dialysis dependent patients was similar in both groups (49 and 45%). We found no TRM in those transplanted more recently as compared with 13% in the older era of ASCT. There were significantly more high grade (grades 3-4) toxicities in the older era of ASCT including high grade electrolyte abnormalities, mucositis, delirium, and bleeding. Patients transplanted more recently had significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) as well as deeper responses to ASCT (≥VGPR in 79% vs 39%). Progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged by 26 months in the more recent era compared with the older era. Overall, improvements in treatment regimens have resulted in reduced TRM and toxicities for patients with renal insufficiency undergoing ASCT.

An open-label, pharmacokinetic study of lenalidomide and dexamethasone therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) patients with various degrees of renal impairment - validation of official dosing guidelines.

Lenalidomide is a backbone agent in the treatment of multiple myeloma, but dose adjustment is required for those with renal impairment (RI). We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of lenalidomide and dexamethasone as frontline pre-transplant induction, with doses adjusted at start of each cycle based on creatinine clearance, as per the official dosing guidelines. After 4 cycles, PK studies showed that patients with moderate RI (30 ≤ CrCl < 60 mL/min) receiving 10 mg dosing may be under-dosed and those with severe RI (CrCl <30ml/min) appeared appropriately dosed initially, but sustained significant decreases in maximum serum concentration (Cmax) after repeated dosing, due to rapid clinical improvement and enhanced drug clearance. PK drug monitoring during cycle 1 may facilitate appropriate and timely dose adjustments. Adverse events rates did not vary based on severity of RI. No patient discontinued lenalidomide for toxicity. This supports the feasibility and safety of frontline lenalidomide in transplant-eligible patients with RI.

A phase 2 study of ofatumumab (Arzerra®) in combination with a pan-AKT inhibitor (afuresertib) in previously treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

AKT plays a centralized role in tumor proliferation and survival and is aberrantly activated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this phase 2 trial, 30 relapsed/refractory CLL patients were treated with combination afuresertib, a novel oral AKT inhibitor, and ofatumumab for 6 months, followed by afuresertib maintenance for 12 months. We aimed to achieve deeper and more durable responses, without requiring long-term continuous treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated but respiratory infections were common, with 18% severe requiring hospitalization. Hematologic toxicities were manageable (grade 3-4 neutropenia 39%). At a median follow-up of 13.4 months, overall responses were 50% (complete responses 3.6%). Median progression-free survival was 8.5 months and overall survival 34.8 months. Combination therapy with ofatumumab and afuresertib is active and well tolerated, but does not appear to lead to durable responses and may not provide additional benefit over single-agent ofatumumab in relapsed/refractory CLL. Novel agent combinations are currently undergoing intense investigation.

A phase 2 study of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Lenalidomide has anti-tumor activity in CLL but can be complicated by tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and tumor flare (TF). In our previous study using low-dose lenalidomide in treatment-naive CLL, TLS was averted but TF remained frequent and complete responses (CR) were rare, despite treatment to progression. The addition of dexamethasone may mitigate TF and enable lenalidomide dose escalation, achieving durable response without long-term use. In this phase 2 trial, 31 treatment-naive CLL patients received lenalidomide (target 25mg daily) plus dexamethasone for a finite 18 cycles. No patients developed TLS and TF was infrequent. Overall responses were 74.2% (CR 9.7%) and median progression-free survival 27 months. Cereblon-binding proteins IKZF1 and IKZF3 were largely downregulated, with associated increased IRF4 levels. We therefore report that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone can achieve durable responses in a subset of patients without continuing therapy until progression. Upregulation of IRF4 may contribute to anti-CLL activity of immunomodulatory agents. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01133743.

Current Review on High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New risk stratification systems and treatment strategies have been introduced in recent years. We aim to provide an overview of these recent changes and summarise these data in a concise article that would be useful for clinicians. RECENT FINDINGS: Apart from clinical stage, disease genetics are now recognised as important prognostic risk factors, and various new cytogenetic changes with negative prognostic impact have been identified. New technologies such as minimal residual disease detection are also playing an important role in prognostic assessment. Recent introduction of combination therapy with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs is showing promising results in high-risk patients and may partially abrogate the negative impact associated with some of the adverse risk factors. Recent advance has improved our understanding of high-risk multiple myeloma, and new therapeutic agents are now coming through the pipeline for this patient group with once dismal outcome.

Weekly cyclophosphamide and alternate-day prednisone: an effective, convenient, and well-tolerated oral treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of weekly oral cyclophosphamide in combination with alternate-day prednisone (CP) as salvage therapy for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients identified in our clinical database as having received CP as treatment for relapsed MM after ASCT at Princess Margaret Hospital between July 1998 and May 2004. The CP regimen consisted of oral cyclophosphamide at 500 mg once weekly and oral prednisone at 100 mg on alternate days. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients received the CP regimen, with a median of 2.0 prior therapies (range, 1.0-5.0) from time of diagnosis to initiation of CP. The median time from relapse after ASCT to start of CP therapy was 1.5 months (range, 0.0-23.5 months). Because of nonsecretory disease in 7 patients, only 59 patients were evaluable for response. The median duration of CP treatment was estimated at 5.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-7.8 months). With a median follow-up of 15.9 months (range, 1.4-67.2 months), 36 patients (61%) responded to treatment, 24 (41%) of whom had a partial response. The 1-year progression-free survival of all evaluable patients was estimated at 66% (95% CI, 54%-80%), with a median progression-free survival of 18.6 months (95% CI, 13.9-29.9 months). The median overall survival from time of initiation of CP was estimated at 28.6 months (95% CI, 22.1-not available months). CONCLUSION: Our data show that CP is an effective, well-tolerated, and convenient regimen as salvage therapy for MM after ASCT.

Results of a multicenter randomized phase II trial of thalidomide and prednisone maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplant.

We report a multicenter, randomized phase II trial conducted to assess the tolerability of combined thalidomide and prednisone maintenance in multiple myeloma. Eligibility required administration of melphalan (200 mg/m2) with blood stem cell support within 1 year of treatment onset and initiation of maintenance within 60 to 100 days after stem cell infusion. All patients received 50 mg of prednisone by mouth on alternate days and thalidomide at a starting dose of either 200 or 400 mg daily by mouth. The primary end point was the incidence of dropout or dose reduction due to treatment toxicity within 6 months. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. Median follow-up is 36.8 months. The primary end point was reached by 31% of patients on the 200 mg of thalidomide arm and 64% of patients on the 400 mg of thalidomide arm. Allowing for dose reduction, 76% of patients assigned to the 200 mg of thalidomide arm and 41% of patients assigned to the 400 mg of thalidomide arm remained on any maintenance therapy 18 months after registration. Eighty-eight percent of all patients dose-reduced thalidomide and 72% of all patients dose-reduced prednisone within 2 years of beginning maintenance. The median progression-free survival post-transplant is 32.3 months, or 42.2 months from diagnosis. Only the 200 mg of thalidomide arm of this trial met our definition of a tolerable maintenance therapy, defined as no dose reductions or discontinuation due to toxicity in at least 65% of patients for a minimum of 6 months, thus establishing a dosing schedule for phase III trials.

Lenalidomide alone and in combination for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Lenalidomide is a member of the immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and is currently approved for use in myelodysplastic syndromes and multiple myeloma. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), lenalidomide has anti-tumor activity which appears distinct, both mechanistically and clinically, from that observed in the approved indications. Furthermore, lenalidomide leads to toxicities, such as tumor flare reaction and tumor lysis, even at low dosing, that is not anticipated with lenalidomide therapy in other disorders. This review will discuss the current understanding of the mechanisms of action of lenalidomide in CLL, lessons of administration learned from clinical trials in CLL to date, and the potential role of lenalidomide in CLL for the future.

Single-agent lenalidomide in the treatment of previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

PURPOSE: Lenalidomide is an oral immunomodulatory drug with multiple effects on the immune system and tumor cell microenvironment leading to inhibition of malignant cell growth. Based on encouraging reports of lenalidomide in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we investigated the first-line use of single-agent lenalidomide in CLL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a starting dose of lenalidomide 10 mg/d for 21 days of a 28-day cycle and weekly 5-mg dose escalations to a target of 25 mg, we encountered severe toxicities (tumor lysis, fatal sepsis) in the first two patients enrolled. The study was halted and the protocol amended to a more conservative regimen: starting dose of lenalidomide 2.5 mg with monthly escalations to a target dose of 10 mg, and extended tumor lysis prophylaxis and monitoring. Gene expression profiles from patient samples before and after 7 days of lenalidomide were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled on the amended protocol. No further tumor lysis events were reported. Tumor flare was common (88%) but mild. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in 72% of patients, with only five episodes of febrile neutropenia. The overall response rate was 56% (no complete responses). Although rapid peripheral lymphocyte reductions were observed, rebound lymphocytoses during the week off-therapy were common. Lenalidomide-induced molecular changes enriched for cytoskeletal and immune-related genes were identified. CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide is clinically active as first-line CLL therapy and is well-tolerated if a conservative approach with slow dose escalation is used. A lenalidomide-induced molecular signature provides insights into its immunomodulatory mechanisms of action in CLL.

Bortezomib is active in patients with untreated or relapsed Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: a phase II study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent bortezomib in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Symptomatic WM patients, untreated or previously treated, received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously days 1, 4, 8, and 11 on a 21-day cycle until two cycles past complete response (CR), stable disease (SD) attained, progression (PD), or unacceptable toxicity. Responses were based on both paraprotein levels and bidimensional disease measurements. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. A median of six cycles (range, two to 39) of bortezomib were administered. Twenty-one patients had a decrease in immunoglobulin M (IgM) of at least 25%, with 12 patients (44%) reaching at least 50% IgM reduction. Using both IgM and bidimensional criteria, responses included seven partial responses (PRs; 26%), 19 SDs (70%), and one PD (4%). Total response rate was 26%. IgM reductions were prompt, with nodal responses lagging. Hemoglobin levels increased by at least 10 g/L in 18 patients (66%). Most nonhematologic toxicities were grade 1 to 2, but 20 patients (74%) developed new or worsening peripheral neuropathy (five patients with grade 3, no grade 4), a common cause for dose reduction. Onset of neuropathy was within two to four cycles and reversible in the majority. Hematologic toxicities included grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in eight patients (29.6%) and neutropenia in five (19%). Toxicity led to treatment discontinuation in 12 patients (44%), most commonly because of neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib has efficacy in WM, but neurotoxicity can be dose limiting. The slower response in nodal disease may require prolonged therapy, perhaps with a less intensive dosing schedule to avoid early discontinuation because of toxicity. Future studies of bortezomib in combination with other agents are warranted.

The t(4;14) is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant.

The frequency and prognostic relevance of translocations t(11;14) and t(4;14), the most common translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene in multiple myeloma (MM), were investigated in 128 patients treated with intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant. Myeloma cells were identified by cytoplasmic light chain immunofluorescence combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (cIg-FISH) for detection of translocations t(11;14) and t(4;14). Overall, t(11;14) was detected in 16 of 125 (12.8%) and t(4;14) in 15 of 120 (12.5%) patients. Progression-free and overall survivals were similar for patients with or without t(11;14). However, patients with t(4;14) had significantly shorter progression-free (median 9.9 months vs. 25.8 months; P = 0.0003) and overall survivals (median 18.3 months vs. 48.1 months; P < 0.0001) than patients without t(4;14). The t(4;14) was associated with IgA and t(11;14) with light chain MM. There was no association between the t(11;14) or t(4;14) and other biological parameters including age, gender, haemoglobin, beta-2 microglobulin, C-reactive protein, calcium, creatinine, albumin, or the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells. Multivariate analysis identified t(4;14) as the only adverse prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival. Our results indicate that the t(4;14) detected by cIg-FISH is associated with a poor prognosis in MM patients receiving intensive chemotherapy and autotransplant.