Radiological changes in sagittal parameters after C1-C2 arthrodesis and their clinical correlation: is there a difference between traumatic and non-traumatic causes?

BACKGROUND: Compensatory changes in cervical sagittal alignment after C1-C2 arthrodesis have been reported in a few studies. No studies have explored the differences in these compensatory changes between traumatic and non-traumatic pathologies. Conflicting reports exist on the correlation between cervical sagittal parameters and neck pain or function. METHODOLOGY: Medical records of 81 consecutive patients [Jan 2010-Dec 2018] who underwent Harms arthrodesis were retrospectively reviewed. 53 patients were included in the final analysis. Radiological parameters [C0-C1, C1-C2, C2-C7 angles and T1 slope] and clinical parameters [VAS (Visual analogue scale) and NDI (Neck disability index)] were compared between the two groups, Group A (traumatic) and Group B (non-traumatic). RESULTS: The 53 patients [Group A (n = 24,) and Group B (n = 29)] had a mean age of 49.98 ± 21.82 years (42 males, 11 females). Mean follow up duration was 48.9 months. Δ C1-C2 angle is significantly correlated with ΔC2-C7 angle (Group A, p = 0.004; Group B, p = 0.015) but not with ΔC0-C1 angle (Group A, p = 0.315; Group B, p = 0.938). Though significant improvement in the clinical parameters (VAS/NDI) has been noted in both groups, Group A showed a greater improvement in VAS scores [Group A, (p < 0.001); Group B, (p < 0.023)]. CONCLUSIONS: The sub-axial sagittal profile was strongly correlated with the ΔC1-C2 angle in both groups. Group B showed greater changes in sagittal parameters after Harms fixation and Group A showed greater improvement in long-term functional outcomes. The final functional outcomes were not related to the initial or final radiological sagittal profile in both groups.

Reliability Validity and Responsiveness of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure 4th Version in a Multicultural Setup.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the fourth version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure for reliability and validity. DESIGN: Partly blinded comparison with the criterion standard Spinal Cord Independence Measure III, and between examiners and examinations. SETTING: A multicultural cohort from 19 spinal cord injury units in 11 countries. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 648 patients with spinal cord injury. INTERVENTION: Assessment with Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM IV) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) on admission to inpatient rehabilitation and before discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SCIM IV interrater reliability, internal consistency, correlation with and difference from SCIM III, and responsiveness. RESULTS: Total agreement between examiners was above 80% on most SCIM IV tasks. All Kappa coefficients were above 0.70 and statistically significant (P<.001). Pearson's coefficients of the correlation between the examiners were above 0.90, and intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.90. Cronbach's alpha was above 0.96 for the entire SCIM IV, above 0.66 for the subscales, and usually decreased when an item was eliminated. Reliability values were lower for the subscale of respiration and sphincter management, and on admission than at discharge. SCIM IV and SCIM III mean values were very close, and the coefficients of Pearson correlation between them were 0.91-0.96 (P<.001). The responsiveness of SCIM IV was not significantly different from that of SCIM III in most of the comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SCIM IV, which was adjusted to assess specific patient conditions or situations that SCIM III does not address, and which includes more accurate definitions of certain scoring criteria, are very good and quite similar to those of SCIM III. SCIM IV can be used for clinical and research trials, including international multi-center studies, and its group scores can be compared with those of SCIM III.

In-hospital mortality in people with complete acute traumatic spinal cord injury at a tertiary care center in India-a retrospective analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the causes and risk factors of mortality in people admitted with complete acute traumatic spinal cord injury (ATSCI). SETTING: The study was performed at the Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi. METHODS: Data between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively collected from case records of people with ATSCI. Risk factors for mortality were examined using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Mortality rate in ATSCI admissions (n = 758) during the study period was 10%. Median (IQR) age of study participants was 34 (21) years with a range of 14-85 years. Respiratory complications, septicemia, and cardiovascular causes were responsible for 42%, 28, and 18% of deaths. Mortality rate in people with paraplegia and tetraplegia was 3% and 22%, respectively. The proportion surviving at 6 weeks was significantly different across people with paraplegia and people with high and low tetraplegia (p < 0.001). Greater age (OR (multivariable models) = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.06), associated injuries (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.11-5.27), high tetraplegia (OR = 5.09, 95% CI = 2.21-11.72), low tetraplegia (OR = 4.84, 95% CI = 1.29-18.09), need for ventilator support (OR = 31.32, 95% CI = 14.92-65.35), septicemia (OR = 4.60, 95% CI = 1.05-20.07), respiratory complications (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.63-7.33), and cardiovascular causes (OR = 39.03, 95% CI = 8.29-183.89) were significant risk factors associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Respiratory complications, septicemia, and cardiovascular causes were the commonest causes of in-hospital mortality in people with complete ATSCI. Greater age, presence of associated injuries, tetraplegia, and ventilator support were risk factors significantly associated with mortality. To reduce morbidity and mortality in the acute phase, there is a need to focus on respiratory management and prevention of infections, especially in tetraplegics.

Development and validation of a simplified thoracolumbar spine fracture classification system.

STUDY DESIGN: Development and validation of fracture classification system. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a Simplified Classification System (SCS) for Thoraco-Lumbar (TL) fractures (SCS - TL fractures). SETTING: Tertiary Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, India METHODS: Based on the International Spinal Cord Society Spine Trauma Study Group (ISCoS STSG, n = 23) experts' clinical consensus conducted by the senior author and on his own experience, the Denis classification for TL fractures was modified to develop a SCS-TL fractures that could guide the management. After Face and Content validation, Construct validation was done in two stages. First stage analyzed if management of 30 cases of TL fractures, as suggested by the SCS - TL fractures and ISCoS STSG (n = 9) as well as other (n = 5) experts, matched. Second stage was a one year prospective study analyzing if the management suggested matched the management actually carried out by different spine surgeons (n = 10) working at a single institution. RESULTS: In the first stage there was 100% agreement for management (conservative or surgical) as proposed by experts and that suggested by the proposed classification for TL fractures whereas for surgical approach there was 88% agreement. In the second stage, there was 100% agreement for the management as well as surgical approach as carried out at our centre and that proposed by the SCS for TL fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed SCS-TL fractures helps in classifying and in decision making for management of TL fractures. The next phase of validation would involve multicentric reliability studies and prospective application of the SCS- TL fractures.

Is VCR necessary to correct very severe deformity? case report and review of literature.

Background: Management of severe scoliotic deformities is challenging. Deformity correction may need three column osteotomies that may be associated with significant morbidity. Staged procedure and use of Halo gravity traction is a useful strategy in such cases.Case Description: A thirty-year-old woman presented with complaint of progressive deformity over the back for the past few years. She was very frail as per the adult spine deformity frailty index (ASD-FI), and her BMI was less than 18. Her Cobb angle measured 180 degrees of main thoracic curve. Her pulmonary function was compromised and had dyspnea on exertion. Management options in these deformities are limited and fraught with risk of major complications. To correct these deformities, a 2-3 level vertebral column resection (VCR) is required using an all-posterior approach. This patient was treated by anterior release followed by halo-gravity traction (HGT) for two weeks, which was then followed by posterior release and correction. The Cobb angle was reduced from 180° to 55° at final follow up of 2 years.Conclusion: Anterior release and traction can help in obviating the vertebral column resection in these severe rigid U-shaped deformities.

Bull's eye sign - A diagnostic clinch in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Although typical imaging findings of COVID-19 pneumonia has been described it may be difficult at times to distinguish it from other viral pneumonias. In the following case series, we describe a typical sign i.e. Bull's-eye sign in COVID-19 pneumonia. As this sign is not associated with any known pulmonary disease, so its presence may help radiologists to differentiate COVID-19 pneumonia from its mimics.

Cauda equina syndrome: false-positive diagnosis of neurogenic bladder can be reduced by multichannel urodynamic study.

BACKGROUND: The present consensus suggests urgent surgical decompression if clinical features of cauda equina syndrome (CES) are supported by MRI evidence of pressure on cauda equina. However, clinical diagnosis has a high false-positive rate and MRI is a poor indicator. Though urodynamic studies (UDS) provide objective information about the lower urinary tract symptoms experienced by patients including neurogenic bladder, its role in the diagnosis of CES is not established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of an objective urological assessment protocol using uroflowmetry + USG-PVR as screening test and invasive UDS as confirmatory test in patients with suspected CES to rule out neurological impairment of the bladder function. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients who were referred to our institution with equivocal findings of cauda equina syndrome from January 2014 to December 2018 with positive MRI findings. An algorithm using multichannel UDS was followed in all the included patients. RESULTS: Out of 249 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 34 patients (13.65%) had normal uroflowmetry and USG-PVR findings; 211 patients underwent the invasive UDS. Only 141(57.6%) patients out of 245 patients had neurovesical involvement due to compression of cauda equina; 67 patients were treated conservatively using the objective protocol. Only one patient treated conservatively had to undergo emergency decompression for deterioration in symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Multichannel UDS provides an objective diagnostic tool to definitively establish the neurovesical involvement in CES. Utilising multichannel UDS as an adjunct to clinical findings avoids the probability of false-positive diagnosis of CES. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Reliability of Allen Ferguson classification versus subaxial injury classification and severity scale for subaxial cervical spine injuries: a psychometrics study.

STUDY DESIGN: A psychometrics study. OBJECTIVES: To determine intra and inter-observer reliability of Allen Ferguson system (AF) and sub-axial injury classification and severity scale (SLIC), two sub axial cervical spine injury (SACI) classification systems. SETTING: Online multi-national study METHODS: Clinico-radiological data of 34 random patients with traumatic SACI were distributed as power point presentations to 13 spine surgeons of the Spine Trauma Study Group of ISCoS from seven different institutions. They were advised to classify patients using AF and SLIC systems. A reference guide of the two systems had been mailed to them earlier. After 6 weeks, the same cases were re-presented to them in a different order for classification using both systems. Intra and inter-observer reliability scores were calculated and analysed with Fleiss Kappa coefficient (k value) for both the systems and Intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) for the SLIC. RESULTS: Allen Ferguson system displayed a uniformly moderate inter and intra-observer reliability. SLIC showed slight to fair inter-observer reliability and fair to substantial intra-observer reliability. AF mechanistic types showed better inter-observer reliability than the SLIC morphological types. Within SLIC, the total SLIC had the least inter-observer agreement and the SLIC neurology had the highest intra-observer agreement. CONCLUSION: This first external reliability study shows a better reliability for AF as compared to SLIC system. Among the SLIC variables, the DLC status and the total SLIC had least agreement. Low-reliability highlights the need for improving the existing classification systems or coming out with newer ones that consider limitations of the existing ones.

Reliability assessment of AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system and Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) for thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a multicentre study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicentre study was to determine whether the recently introduced AOSpine Classification and Injury Severity System has better interrater and intrarater reliability than the already existing Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) for thoracolumbar spine injuries. METHODS: Clinical and radiological data of 50 consecutive patients admitted at a single centre with a diagnosis of an acute traumatic thoracolumbar spine injury were distributed to eleven attending spine surgeons from six different institutions in the form of PowerPoint presentation, who classified them according to both classifications. After time span of 6 weeks, cases were randomly rearranged and sent again to same surgeons for re-classification. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability for each component of TLICS and new AOSpine classification were evaluated using Fleiss Kappa coefficient (k value) and Spearman rank order correlation. RESULTS: Moderate interrater and intrarater reliability was seen for grading fracture type and integrity of posterior ligamentous complex (Fracture type: k = 0.43 ± 0.01 and 0.59 ± 0.16, respectively, PLC: k = 0.47 ± 0.01 and 0.55 ± 0.15, respectively), and fair to moderate reliability (k = 0.29 ± 0.01 interobserver and 0.44+/0.10 intraobserver, respectively) for total score according to TLICS. Moderate interrater (k = 0.59 ± 0.01) and substantial intrarater reliability (k = 0.68 ± 0.13) was seen for grading fracture type regardless of subtype according to AOSpine classification. Near perfect interrater and intrarater agreement was seen concerning neurological status for both the classification systems. CONCLUSIONS: Recently proposed AOSpine classification has better reliability for identifying fracture morphology than the existing TLICS. Additional studies are clearly necessary concerning the application of these classification systems across multiple physicians at different level of training and trauma centers to evaluate not only their reliability and reproducibility, but also the other attributes, especially the clinical significance of a good classification system.

A novel technique for reduction of unreducible lumbar fractures in ankylosing spondylitis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series study. PURPOSE OF STUDY: Fractures in ankylosed lumbar spine are difficult to reduce and it is like attempting to reduce the ends of a long bone fracture of an extremity. Simple compression from the posterior results in the anterior column opening in lumbar spine because of the inherent lordosis present there, which usually requires combined approach, if the gap is extensive. Purpose of our study is to describe a new technique for reduction of lumbar fracture not reducing through conventional technique in ankylosing spondylitis. There are no techniques described for reduction of these complex fractures in the literature to the best of our knowledge. METHODS: Four patients were operated by a new modified staged posterior approach. Two patients had AIS D neurology, one patient had AIS A neurology and one patient had normal neurology (AIS E). Patients were operated in a staged procedure in a single sitting, as single posterior procedure did not allow for complete reduction of lumbar fracture. The patients were first positioned prone and instrumentation was done. To close the anterior gap, patients were then positioned lateral and reduction and stabilization of fracture was done. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 50 years. Average time of surgery was 3 h 40 min. All four patients operated with this modified posterior approach had fusion 6 months after surgery. There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: We recommend this technique to be used in fractures in lumbar ankylosed spine as they have tendency to open anteriorly after trauma. It helps in closure of anterior column in a single surgery and obviates the need for anterior surgery in these patients.

Lumbar Transforaminal Injection of Steroids versus Platelet-Rich Plasma for Prolapse Lumbar Intervertebral Disc with Radiculopathy: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Pilot Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled pilot study. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of steroids with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administered by lumbar transforaminal injection (LTI) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine is one of the most common conditions managed by spine surgeons in routine practice. Once conservative management fails, LTI is diagnostic and often therapeutic. Steroids are the gold standard drug used for LTI but have limitations and side effects. METHODS: In this single-center double-blind randomized controlled pilot study, 46 patients were recruited and randomized by the lottery method. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain, modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI), and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) were assessed at 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of demographics, preprocedure VAS scores, mODI, and SF-12 scores (p=0.52). At the 1-week follow-up, the steroid group had significantly better improvement than the PRP group (p=0.0001). At the 3-week follow-up, both groups showed comparable outcomes; however, the PRP group had better symptom improvement. At 6 weeks and 6 months, the PRP group had better outcomes (VAS, p<0.0001; ODI, p=0.02; SF-12, p=0.002). Moreover, 17 and 16 patients in the steroid and PRP groups underwent repeat LTI with steroids or surgery because of pain recurrence during follow-up. At 1 year, no difference in outcomes was observed. CONCLUSIONS: PRP may be a useful alternative to steroids for LTI in lumbar radiculopathy. Although improvement was delayed and 1-year outcomes were comparable, the 6-week and 6-month outcomes were better with PRP than with LTI. Multiple PRP injections may be beneficial because of its autologous nature. However, further studies with a larger number of participants, longer follow-up, and repeat LTIs are warranted to draw definite conclusions.

An Assessment of the World's Contribution to Spine Trauma Care: A Bibliometric Analysis of Classifications and Surgical Management; An AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma Initiative.

STUDY DESIGN: Bibliometric analysis. OBJECTIVES: An analysis of the literature related to the assessment and management of spinal trauma was undertaken to allow the identification of top contributors, collaborations and research trends. METHODS: A search to identify original articles published in English between 2011 and 2020 was done using specific keywords in the Web of Science database. After screening, the top 300 most cited articles were analyzed using Biblioshiny R software. RESULTS: The highest number of contributions were from the Thomas Jefferson University, USA, University of Toronto and University of British Columbia, Canada. The top 3 most prolific authors were Vaccaro AR, Arabi B, and Oner FC. The USA and Canada were among the top contributing countries; Switzerland and Brazil had most multiple country co-authored articles. The most relevant journals were the European Spine Journal, Spine and Spine Journal. Three of the 5 most cited articles were about classification systems of fractures. The keyword analysis included clusters for different spinal regions, spinal cord injury, classification agreement and reliability studies, imaging related studies, surgical techniques and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified the most impactful authors and affiliations, and determined the journals where most impactful research is published in the field. Study also compared the productivity and collaborations across countries. The study highlighted the impact of development of new classification systems, and identified research trends including instrumentation, fixation and decompression techniques, epidemiology and recovery after spinal trauma.

Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction after SCI: A Comparison between India and Canada.

Background: The inclusion of people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) in research has allowed for an informed understanding of priorities of recovery of which bowel dysfunction and bladder dysfunction have been continuously identified. Research has also demonstrated the global disparities in SCI outcomes particularly when comparing high- and low-income countries. Currently, there is a lack of direct comparison between countries when assessing SCI outcomes. Objectives: This is an exploratory study to better understand bowel and bladder dysfunction amongst individuals with SCI in India and Canada. Methods: Data from 33 participants were analyzed. Participants completed an online questionnaire assessing demographic information and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score, Wexner score, Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS), and the Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL). Continuous data were compared using t tests. For not normally distributed data, the independent Mann-Whitney U test was used. Categorical variables were evaluated for association using Fisher's exact or chi-square test, depending on the sample size. Results: Independent Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated that the Canadian participants had poorer bowel function with higher total NBD scores (p = .007) and less frequent bowel movements (p = .036), and they were more likely to experience uneasiness, headaches, and perspiration during bowel movements (p < .001). NBSS results indicated a small but significantly higher proportion of the Indian participants were unsatisfied or unhappy with their bladder function (p = .049). The distribution of Wexner and I-QOL scores were the same across countries. Conclusion: Potential explanations for differences include lifestyle, management, financial resources, patient and caregiver education, and societal pressures, which are all heavily influenced by cultural, geographical, and economic circumstances.

AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification System: Internal Validation by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: Injury classifications are important tools to identify fracture patterns, guide treatment-decisions and aid to identify optimal treatment plans. The AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture (OF) classification system was developed, and the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of this new classification system. METHODS: 23 Members of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma participated in the validation process. Participants were asked to rate 33 cases according to the OF classification at 2 time points, 4 weeks apart (assessment 1 and 2). The kappa statistic (κ) was calculated to assess inter-observer reliability and intra-rater reproducibility. The gold master key for each case was determined by approval of at least 5 out of 7 members of the DGOU. RESULTS: A total of 1386 ratings (21 raters) were performed. The overall inter-rater agreement was moderate with a combined kappa statistic for the OF classification of 0.496 in assessment 1 and 0.482 in assessment 2. The combined percentage of correct ratings (compared to gold-standard) in assessment 1 was 71.4% and 67.4% in assessment 2. The average intra-rater reproducibility was substantial (κ = 0.74, median 0.76, range 0.55 to 1.00, SD 0.13) for the assessed fracture types. CONCLUSIONS: The assessed overall inter-rater reliability was moderate and substantial in some instances. The average intra-rater reproducibility is substantial. It seems that appropriate training of the classification system can enhance inter- and intra-rater reliability.

Breastfeeding Following Spinal Cord Injury: Consumer Guide for Mothers.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that infants be breastfed exclusively for the first 6 months of age. However, there are few resources available on the effects a spinal cord injury (SCI) can have for breastfeeding mothers. It is difficult to find information to address the unique challenges women with SCI experience when planning or trying to breastfeed. Our international team, including women with SCI, health care providers, and SCI researchers, aims to address the information gap through the creation of this consumer guide. The purpose of this consumer guide is to share the most common issues women with SCI experience during breastfeeding and provide information, practical suggestions, recommendations, and key resources in lay language. General information about breastfeeding is available on the internet, in books, or from friends and health care providers. We do not intend to repeat nor replace general breastfeeding information or medical advice. Breastfeeding for mothers with SCI is complex and requires a team of health care providers with complementary expertise. Such a team may include family physician, obstetrician, physiatrist, neurologist, occupational and physical therapist, lactation consultant, midwife, and psychologist. We hope this consumer guide can serve as a quick reference guide for mothers with SCI planning of trying to breastfeed. This guide will also be helpful to health care providers as an educational tool.

Motherhood after Spinal Cord Injury: Breastfeeding, Autonomic Dysreflexia, and Psychosocial Health: Clinical Practice Guidelines.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that children be breastfed exclusively for the first 6 months of age. This recommendation may prove challenging for women with spinal cord injury (SCI) who face unique challenges and barriers to breastfeeding due to the impact of SCI on mobility and physiology. Tailored provision of care from health care professionals (HCPs) is important in helping women navigate these potential barriers. Yet, HCPs often lack the confidence and SCI-specific knowledge to meet the needs of mothers with SCI. An international panel of clinicians, researchers, consultants, and women with lived experience was formed to create an accessible resource that can address this gap. A comprehensive survey on breastfeeding complications, challenges, resources, and quality of life of mothers with SCI was conducted, along with an environmental scan to evaluate existing postpartum guidelines and assess their relevance and usability as recommendations for breastfeeding after SCI. Building on this work, this article provides evidence-based recommendations for HCPs, including but not limited to general practitioners, obstetricians, pediatricians, physiatrists, lactation consultants, nurses, midwives, occupational therapists, and physiotherapists who work with prospective and current mothers with SCI.

Streamlining the Journey of Research Into Clinical Practice: Making Your Patients and Practice Flourish Optimizing Management and Minimizing Risk of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures - Perspectives of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection Group Key Opinion Leaders.

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review with clinical recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To highlight important studies about osteoporotic spinal fractures (OF) that may be integrated into clinical practice based on the assessment of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection group key opinion leaders. METHODS: 4 important studies about OF that may affect current clinical practice of spinal surgeons were selected and reviewed with the aim of providing clinical recommendations to streamline the journey of research into clinical practice. Recommendations were graded as strong or conditional following the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: 4 studies were selected. Article 1: a validation of the Osteoporotic Fracture (OF)-score to treat OF fractures. Conditional recommendation to incorporate the OF score in the management of fractures to improve clinical results. Article 2: a randomized multicenter study comparing romosozumab/alendronate vs alendronate to decrease the incidence of new vertebral fractures. Strong recommendation that the group receiving romosozumab/alendronate had a decreased risk of new OF when compared with the alendronate only group only. Article 3: a systematic literature review of spinal orthoses in the management of. Conditional recommendation to prescribe a spinal orthosis to decrease pain and improve quality of life. Article 4: post-traumatic deformity after OF. A conditional recommendation that middle column injury and pre-injury use of steroids may lead to high risk of post-traumatic deformity after OF. CONCLUSIONS: Management of patients with OF is still complex and challenging. This review provides some recommendations that may help surgeons to better manage these patients and improve their clinical practice.

Understanding Decision Making as It Influences Treatment in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurological Deficit: Conceptual Framework and Methodology.

STUDY DESIGN: This paper presents a description of a conceptual framework and methodology that is applicable to the manuscripts that comprise this focus issue. OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to present a conceptual framework which is relied upon to better understand the processes through which surgeons make therapeutic decisions around how to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures (TL) fractures. METHODS: We will describe the methodology used in the AO Spine TL A3/4 Study prospective observational study and how the radiographs collected for this study were utilized to study the relationships between various variables that factor into surgeon decision making. RESULTS: With 22 expert spine trauma surgeons analyzing the acute CT scans of 183 patients with TL fractures we were able to perform pairwise analyses, look at reliability and correlations between responses and develop frequency tables, and regression models to assess the relationships and interactions between variables. We also used machine learning to develop decision trees. CONCLUSIONS: This paper outlines the overall methodological elements that are common to the subsequent papers in this focus issue.

Using Equipoise to Determine the Radiographic Characteristics Leading to Agreement on Best Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficits.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess radiographic characteristics associated with agreement and disagreement in treatment recommendation in thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures. METHODS: A panel of 22 AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts reviewed 183 cases and were asked to: (1) classify the fracture; (2) assess degree of certainty of PLC disruption; (3) assess degree of comminution; and (4) make a treatment recommendation. Equipoise threshold used was 77% (77:23 distribution of uncertainty or 17 vs 5 experts). Two groups were created: consensus vs equipoise. RESULTS: Of the 183 cases reviewed, the experts reached full consensus in only 8 cases (4.4%). Eighty-one cases (44.3%) were included in the agreement group and 102 cases (55.7%) in the equipoise group. A3/A4 fractures were more common in the equipoise group (92.0% vs 83.7%, P < .001). The agreement group had higher degree of certainty of PLC disruption [35.8% (SD 34.2) vs 27.6 (SD 27.3), P < .001] and more common use of the M1 modifier (44.3% vs 38.3%, P < .001). Overall, the degree of comminution was slightly higher in the equipoise group [47.8 (SD 20.5) vs 45.7 (SD 23.4), P < .001]. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement group had a higher degree of certainty of PLC injury and more common use of M1 modifier (more type B fractures). The equipoise group had more A3/A4 type fractures. Future studies are required to identify the role of comminution in decision making as degree of comminution was slightly higher in the equipoise group.

Predictive Algorithm for Surgery Recommendation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurological Deficits.

STUDY DESIGN: Predictive algorithm via decision tree. OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) remain an emerging field and have not previously been used to guide therapeutic decision making in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Building such models may reduce the variability in treatment recommendations. The goal of this study was to build a mathematical prediction rule based upon radiographic variables to guide treatment decisions. METHODS: Twenty-two surgeons from the AO Knowledge Forum Trauma reviewed 183 cases from the Spine TL A3/A4 prospective study (classification, degree of certainty of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, use of M1 modifier, degree of comminution, treatment recommendation). Reviewers' regions were classified as Europe, North/South America and Asia. Classification and regression trees were used to create models that would predict the treatment recommendation based upon radiographic variables. We applied the decision tree model which accounts for the possibility of non-normal distributions of data. Cross-validation technique as used to validate the multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The accuracy of the model was excellent at 82.4%. Variables included in the algorithm were certainty of PLC injury (%), degree of comminution (%), the use of M1 modifier and geographical regions. The algorithm showed that if a patient has a certainty of PLC injury over 57.5%, then there is a 97.0% chance of receiving surgery. If certainty of PLC injury was low and comminution was above 37.5%, a patient had 74.2% chance of receiving surgery in Europe and Asia vs 22.7% chance in North/South America. Throughout the algorithm, the use of the M1 modifier increased the probability of receiving surgery by 21.4% on average. CONCLUSION: This study presents a predictive analytic algorithm to guide decision-making in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits. PLC injury assessment over 57.5% was highly predictive of receiving surgery (97.0%). A high degree of comminution resulted in a higher chance of receiving surgery in Europe or Asia vs North/South America. Future studies could include clinical and other variables to enhance predictive ability or use machine learning for outcomes prediction in thoracolumbar burst fractures.